History of endometriosis may adversely affect the outcome in menopausal recipients of sibling oocytes

Ethanol sclerotherapy of endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI improves progressive pregnancy and live birth rate

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the impact of ethanol sclerotherapy of endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI on pregnancy rates?

DESIGN

We reviewed women with endometrioma(s) larger than 25 mm having IVF/ICSI cycles. All patients with a history of ovarian cystectomy were excluded. Two groups were compared: patients who had transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy of their endometrioma(s) before ovarian stimulation and patients whose endometrioma(s) were left in situ (untreated) at the time of IVF/ICSI (control group). Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors by inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary endpoint was progressive pregnancy rates per IVF/ICSI cycle including fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Secondary endpoints were live birth rates, the number of mature oocytes retrieved, pregnancy loss. Endometriomas recurrence rates after sclerotherapy and procedural complications were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 96 cycles (67 patients) were included: 46 cycles (34 patients) in the ethanol sclerotherapy group and 50 cycles (33 patients) in the control group. After propensity score weighting, the pregnancy and live-birth rates were significantly higher in the ethanol sclerotherapy group compared to the control group (weighted OR, 2.9 ; 95 CI, 1.4 - 6.6 and weighted OR 2.4 ; 95 CI, 1.1 - 5.4 respectively), with a lower rate of pregnancy loss (weighted OR 0.3 ; 95 CI, 0.1 - 0.9). Ovarian response was similar in the two groups. The recurrence rate of endometrioma at 6 months after sclerotherapy was 20 %.

CONCLUSION

Sclerotherapy of endometrioma before ovarian stimulation may increase pregnancy rate, with a low rate of recurrence and a minimal risk of complication.

Long noncoding RNA BMPR1B-AS1 stability regulated by IGF2BP2 affects the decidualization in endometriosis patients through the SMAD1/5/9 pathway

Endometriosis (EMs)-related infertility commonly has decreased endometrial receptivity and normal decidualization is the basis for establishing and maintaining endometrial receptivity. However, the potential molecular regulatory mechanisms of impaired endometrial decidualization in patients with EMs have not been fully clarified. We confirmed the existence of reduced endometrial receptivity in patients with EMs by scanning electron microscopy and quantitative real-time PCR. Here we identified an lncRNA, named BMPR1B-AS1, which is significantly downregulated in eutopic endometrium in EMs patients and plays an essential role in decidual formation. Furthermore, RNA pull-down, mass spectrometry, RNA immunoprecipitation, and rescue analyses revealed that BMPR1B-AS1 positively regulates decidual formation through interaction with the RNA-binding protein insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2). Downregulation of IGF2BP2 led to a decreased stability of BMPR1B-AS1 and inhibition of activation of the SMAD1/5/9 pathway, an inhibitory effect which diminished decidualization in human endometrial stromal cells (hESCs) decidualization. In conclusion, our identified a novel regulatory mechanism in which the IGF2BP2-BMPR1B-AS1-SMAD1/5/9 axis plays a key role in the regulation of decidualization, providing insights into the potential link between abnormal decidualization and infertility in patients with EMs, which will be of clinical significance for the management and treatment of infertility in patients with EMs.

What is the impact of endometriosis and the AFS stage on cumulative pregnancy rates in IVF programs?

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is commonly observed in infertile women and can be staged with regard to severity [e.g. according to the American Fertility Society (AFS) classification]. This condition can cause infertility through impaired oocyte quality, fertilization disorders, tubal lesions, adhesions, deep infiltration, and adenomyosis. Although women with endometriosis often turn to in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs, the literature data on IVF outcomes are sometimes contradictory (i.e. the same as in other etiologies of infertility, or worse). The objective of the present study was to assess and compare pregnancy rates in women with and without endometriosis and according to the endometriosis stage.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in IVF and the cumulative pregnancy rates after frozen/thawed embryo transfers, in women without endometriosis (group A) or with endometriosis (group B). We further compared groups in which endometriosis was staged according to the revised AFS classification: stage 1/2 (group C), stage 3/4 (group D, without endometrioma), and endometrioma alone (group E).

RESULTS

We documented 430 cycles in group A and 460 in group B (including 56 in group C, 88 in group D and 316 in group E). After fresh or frozen/thawed embryo transfers, the differences in ongoing pregnancy rates between groups A and B were not significant. However the cumulative rates per couple were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in group D.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend IVF for women with endometriosis because the pregnancy rates are similar to those observed for women with other types of infertility. This approach is in line with the international guidelines issued by assisted reproductive technology societies. These results again raise the question of whether surgical resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (stage 3/4) should be recommended before admission to an IVF program. Trial registration This study was approved by an institutional review board (CPP Ouest VI, Brest, France): reference: B2020CE.43.

Live Birth After Oocyte Donation In Vitro Fertilization Cycles in Women With Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Although multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the infertility related to endometriosis, there are no conclusive data on the association of endometriosis with endometrial receptivity. The oocyte donation model in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles can clarify this issue.

Objective

To explore the association of a history of endometriosis with ART outcomes in recipients of oocyte donation.

Data Sources

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases were searched from inception until August 31, 2023, using combinations of relevant keywords. Moreover, we retrieved data from the databases of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in the US and the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the United Kingdom.

Study Selection

Observational studies were included if they investigated the impact of endometriosis on ART outcomes with donor oocytes.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Publicly available data related to ART from various sources were gathered, and a retrospective aggregate and nonaggregate analysis using registries of in vitro fertilization cycles with oocyte or embryo donation was conducted.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) following oocyte donor cycles. The effect measures of comparisons between groups are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% CI.

Results

This study analyzed 7212 oocyte donation cycles from 4 studies for the meta-analysis, along with 162 082 cycles from 2 registries (137 182 from SART and 24 900 from HFEA). No significant differences between the groups were observed in the meta-analysis of published data after adjusting for confounding factors (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.19-1.57). A statistically significant lower LBR was identified in women with endometriosis when analyzing the aggregate data from SART and HFEA databases (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found a modest decrease in LBR among women with a history of endometriosis, although only results from the pooled analysis of registry data and not those from the meta-analysis reached statistical significance. These findings suggest that a marginal impairment of uterine receptivity may contribute to infertility mechanisms in women affected by endometriosis.

Is endometrial receptivity affected in women with endometriosis? Results from a matched pair case-control study of assisted reproductive technology treatments

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is endometriosis detrimental to embryo implantation?

DESIGN

A retrospective matched case-control study of women with a surgical or ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis at Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano between 2015 and 2021. Women with endometriosis who underwent a 'freeze-all' cycle during an IVF treatment were eligible to be included. They were matched to patients without the disease, who also underwent cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles, in a 1:1 ratio by age (±1 year), and number (=) and quality (±1 top versus low) of cryopreserved blastocysts. All women underwent single frozen embryo transfer, and assisted reproductive technology outcomes suggested by the Core Outcome Measure for Infertility Trials initiative were evaluated. The main outcome was the cumulative live birth rate per cycle.

RESULTS

One hundred and one women with endometriosis and 101 matched unaffected women were included. Cumulative live birth rate per cycle did not vary between women with and without endometriosis (50% versus 58%, respectively; P = 0.32). On the basis of the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the predicted success rates over four embryos transferred were also similar (74% versus 82%, respectively; P = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

In women with moderate or severe endometriosis, these retrospective results seem to indicate no or a limited effect of the disease on endometrial receptivity.

Endometriosis patients benefit from high serum progesterone in hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the optimal serum progesterone cut-off level in patients with endometriosis undergoing hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) with intensive progesterone luteal phase support?

DESIGN

A cohort study, including 262 HRT-FET cycles in 179 patients all diagnosed with endometriosis either by laparoscopy or by ultrasound in patients with visible endometriomas. Pre-treatment consisted of 42 days of oral contraceptive pills and 5 days' wash-out, followed by 6 mg oral oestrogen daily. Exogenous progesterone supplementation with vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg/12h commenced when the endometrium was 7 mm or thicker. From the fourth day of vaginal progesterone supplementation, patients also received intramuscular progesterone 50 mg daily. Blastocyst transfer was scheduled for the sixth day of progesterone supplementation.

RESULTS

The overall positive HCG, live birth (LBR) and total pregnancy loss rates were 60%, 39% and 34%, respectively. The optimal progesterone cut-off level was 118 nmol/l (37.1 ng/ml) defined as the maximum of the Youden index. The unadjusted LBR was significantly higher in patients with progesterone measuring 118 nmol/l or above compared with patients with progesterone measuring less than 118 nmol/l (51% [44/86] versus 34% [59/176], P = 0.01), whereas the adjusted odds ratio for a live birth was 2.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.7) after adjusting for age, body mass index, blastocyst score, blastocyst age, quality and number of blastocysts transferred.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum progesterone levels above 118 nmol/l (37.1ng/ml) resulted in significantly higher LBR compared with lower serum progesterone levels, suggesting that a threshold for optimal serum progesterone exists.

Endometrial stromal PRMT5 plays a crucial role in decidualization by regulating NF-κB signaling in endometriosis

Decidualization is a prerequisite for successful embryo implantation, in which elongated fibroblast-like endometrial stromal cells differentiate into more rounded decidual cells. Accumulating evidence has stressed the important role of the defective eutopic endometrium in infertility in endometriosis patients. However, the role of arginine methylation in the process of physiological decidualization and pathological decidualization defects is not clear. Here, we observed that the expression level of PRMT5, the main type II PRMT, was decreased in the endometrium of endometriosis patients, predominantly in stromal cells. Compared with the undecidualized state, PRMT5 was increased in the stromal cells of normal secretory endometrium in humans and in the decidua of normal pregnant mice or mice with artificially induced decidualization. The inhibition of PRMT5 resulted in a significant decrease in uterine weight and decidualization-related regulator expression, including FOXO1, HOXA10 and WNT4, in mice and IGFBP1 and prolactin levels in human endometrial stromal cells. Transcriptome analysis showed that decreased PRMT5 activity led to NF-κB signaling activation by inducing p65 translocation to the nucleus, which was also observed in endometriosis patients. Finally, overexpression of PRMT5 rescued the defective expression of IGFBP1 and prolactin in primary endometrial stromal cells from endometriosis patients. Our results indicate that promotion of PRMT5 may provide novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of decidualization defects in infertile women, such as those with endometriosis.

Implantation Failure in Endometriosis Patients: Etiopathogenesis

Embryo implantation requires adequate dialogue between a good quality embryo and a receptive endometrium. This implantation is still considered as the black box of reproductive medicine. Endometriosis is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease, concerning about 10% of women of reproductive age and is one of the major causes of female infertility. The mechanisms involved in endometriosis-related infertility, an event not yet completely understood, are multifactorial and include anatomical changes, reduction in ovarian reserve, endocrine abnormalities, genetic profile, immunity markers, inflammatory mediators, or altered endometrial receptivity. In this article, we will focus on the impact of endometriosis on embryo quality and on endometrial receptivity. Results: Poor oocyte and embryo quality seem to promote a lower pregnancy rate, more than the endometrium itself in women with endometriosis. Other studies report the contrary. In addition, hormonal imbalance observed in the endometrium could also alter the embryo implantation. Conclusions: Controversial results in the literature add difficulties to the understanding of the mechanisms that lead to embryo implantation disorders. Furthermore, either oocyte/embryo impairment, altered endometrium, or both may cause impaired implantation. New prospective, randomized, and controlled studies are necessary to determine the origin of the defects that make conception more difficult in the case of endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Endometriosis and oocyte quality: an analysis of 13 614 donor oocyte recipient and autologous IVF cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Does endometriosis affect live birth following donor oocyte recipient versus autologous IVF?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There was no significant difference in the live birth rate (LBR) in women with endometriosis undergoing donor oocyte recipient cycles versus autologous IVF cycles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

For infertile women with endometriosis, IVF is often considered as a treatment option. Lower implantation and pregnancy rates have been observed following IVF in women with endometriosis. It has been debated whether the lower pregnancy rate is due to the effect on oocyte quality or the endometrium, thus affecting implantation. To delineate whether endometriosis affects oocyte quality or the endometrium, we planned a study, using a donor oocyte recipient model, where the recipients were women diagnosed with endometriosis and compared their outcomes with women who underwent autologous IVF, who had also been diagnosed with endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) anonymized data from 1996 to 2016 were analyzed. This comprised of a total of 758 donor oocyte recipients, where the recipients were women diagnosed with endometriosis, and 12 856 autologous IVF cycles where the women were diagnosed with endometriosis as the sole cause of infertility.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data on all women with endometriosis undergoing donor oocyte recipient and autologous IVF cycles were analyzed to compare live birth outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed adjusting for number of previous IVF cycles, previous live birth, period of treatment, day of embryo transfer, number of embryos transferred and fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycle.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There was no significant difference in the LBR in women with endometriosis undergoing donor oocyte recipient fresh embryo transfer cycles compared to women undergoing autologous IVF fresh embryo transfer cycles (31.6% vs 31.0%; odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 99.5% CI 0.79–1.35). After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in LBR in women with endometriosis undergoing donor oocyte recipient fresh embryo transfer cycles versus autologous fresh embryo transfer cycles (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.05, 99.5% CI 0.79–1.41).

There was no significant difference in the LBR in women with endometriosis undergoing donor oocyte recipient frozen embryo transfer cycles compared to women undergoing autologous frozen embryo transfer cycles (19.6% vs 24.0%; OR 0.77, 99.5% CI 0.47–1.25). After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in the LBR in women undergoing donor oocyte recipient frozen embryo transfer cycles compared with autologous frozen embryo transfer cycles (aOR 0.85, 99.5% CI 0.51–1.41).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Although the analysis was adjusted for potential confounders, there was no information on the extent and classification of endometriosis as well as oocyte number. Furthermore, adenomyosis is thought to co-exist in women with endometriosis and may have independent pathophysiological mechanisms affecting fertility, for which there was no information.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The study shows no difference in LBR between donor oocyte recipient cycles in which all recipients had endometriosis compared to autologous IVF cycles in women with endometriosis. Therefore, this study finding suggests that there may be a minimal or no effect of oocyte quality on IVF outcomes in women with endometriosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding was obtained. M.S.K. is an associate editor with Human Reproduction Open. He was not involved in the editorial or peer review process for the manuscript.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Assessment of TET1 gene expression, DNA methylation and H3K27me3 level of its promoter region in eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis and infertility

Endometriosis is the cause of infertility. The eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis showed an aberrant expression pattern of multitude genes. The role of TET1 protein in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and related infertility is not sufficiently known. Further, knowledge on TET1 transcriptional control still remains incomplete. The aim of the study was assessment of TET1 gene expression, DNA methylation and H3K27me3 level of its promoter region in eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis and infertility. The study included 44 infertile patients with endometriosis (IWE) and 77 infertile (IW) and fertile (FW) patients without endometriosis. The research material was eutopic endometrium. The TET1 mRNA level was analyzed by qPCR. Western blot was used to evaluate the level of TET1 protein. The level of DNA methylation and H3K27me3 level of TET1 gene's promoter region were assessed using HRM and ChIP qPCR, respectively. The level of TET1 expression (TET1 mRNA; TET1 protein level) was lower in IWE during the implantation window (p < 0.001; p = 0.0329). The level of TET1 DNA methylation was higher in the secretory endometrium in mild and advanced IWE (p < 0.004; p < 0.008). H3K27me3 level did not differ between the study groups. The diminished expression of TET1 gene during the secretory phase, may account for the aberrant process of embryonic implantation in infertile endometriosis patients. DNA hypermethylation of TET1 gene is a potential relevant regulator of its expression. H3K27me3 occupancy does not affect the expression of TET1 gene in our study group.

BCL6, a key oncogene, in the placenta, pre-eclampsia and endometriosis

BACKGROUND

The key oncogene B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6) drives malignant progression by promoting proliferation, overriding DNA damage checkpoints and blocking cell terminal differentiation. However, its functions in the placenta and the endometrium remain to be defined.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

Recent studies provide evidence that BCL6 may play various roles in the human placenta and the endometrium. Deregulated BCL6 might be related to the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia (PE) as well as endometriosis. In this narrative review, we aimed to summarize the current knowledge regarding the pathophysiological role of BCL6 in these two reproductive organs, discuss related molecular mechanisms, and underline associated research perspectives.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed for human, animal and cellular studies published until October 2021 in the following areas: BCL6 in the placenta, in PE and in endometriosis, in combination with its functions in proliferation, fusion, migration, invasion, differentiation, stem/progenitor cell maintenance and lineage commitment.

OUTCOMES

The data demonstrate that BCL6 is important in cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, migration and invasion of trophoblastic cells. BCL6 may have critical roles in stem/progenitor cell survival and differentiation in the placenta and the endometrium. BCL6 is aberrantly upregulated in pre-eclamptic placentas and endometriotic lesions through various mechanisms, including changes in gene transcription and mRNA translation as well as post-transcriptional/translational modifications. Importantly, increased endometrial BCL6 is considered to be a non-invasive diagnostic marker for endometriosis and a predictor for poor outcomes of IVF. These data highlight that BCL6 is crucial for placental development and endometrium homeostasis, and its upregulation is associated with the pathogenesis of PE, endometriosis and infertility.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The lesson learned from studies of the key oncogene BCL6 reinforces the notion that numerous signaling pathways and regulators are shared by tumors and reproductive organs. Their alteration may promote the progression of malignancies as well as the development of gestational and reproductive disorders.

The mid-secretory endometrial transcriptomic landscape in endometriosis: a meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Do women with endometriosis have a different endometrial gene expression profile at the time of embryo implantation than women without endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The endometrial gene expression profile of women with endometriosis differs from that of women without endometriosis at the mid-secretory phase, although the differences are small.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

About 50% of women with endometriosis suffer infertility. Several molecular studies have suggested impaired endometrial receptivity in women with endometriosis, while others have detected no dysregulation of endometrial receptivity. Nevertheless, the previous endometrial transcriptome studies comparing women with and without endometriosis have been performed in small sample size with limited statistical power. We set out to systematically search and compile data of endometrial gene expression signatures at the receptive phase in women with endometriosis versus control women. Based on the obtained data, we conducted a meta-analysis of differentially expressed genes in order to raise the power of the analysis for identifying the molecular profiles of receptive phase endometria in endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic literature search was conducted up to February 2022 following PRISMA criteria and included PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science databases. For the systematic search, the term ‘endometriosis’ was paired with the terms ‘transcriptomics’, ‘transcriptome’, ‘gene expression’, ‘RNA-seq’, ‘sequencing’ and ‘array’, by using the Boolean operator ‘AND’ to connect them. Articles written in English were screened and interrogated for data extraction.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed on the selected studies to extract the differentially expressed genes described at the mid-secretory phase in women with endometriosis versus women without endometriosis in natural cycles, using the robust rank aggregation method. In total, transcriptome data of 125 women (78 patients and 47 controls) were meta-analysed, with a special focus on endometrial receptivity-specific genes based on commercial endometrial receptivity tests.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 8 studies were eligible for the quantitative meta-analysis, gathering transcriptome data from the mid-secretory phase endometria of 125 women. A total of 7779 differentially expressed transcripts between the study groups were retrieved (3496 up-regulated and 4283 down-regulated) and were meta-analysed. After stringent multiple correction, there was no differential expression of any single molecule in the endometrium of women with endometriosis versus controls, while enrichment analysis detected that the pathways of chemotaxis and locomotion are dysregulated in endometriosis. Further analysis of endometrial receptivity-specific genes highlighted dysregulation of C4BPA, MAOA and PAEP and enrichment of immune and defence pathways in women with endometriosis.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Most of the studies included into the meta-analysis were relatively small and had different study designs, which might have contributed to a bias.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The current meta-analysis supports the hypothesis that endometrial receptivity is altered in women with endometriosis, although the changes are small. The molecules and pathways identified could serve as future biomarkers and therapeutical targets in detecting and treating endometriosis-associated infertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The authors declare no competing interests. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport [grant FPU15/01193] and the Margarita Salas program for the Requalification of the Spanish University system [grant UJAR01MS]; Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO) and European Regional Development Fund (FEDER): grants RYC-2016-21199 and ENDORE SAF2017-87526-R; Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía (B-CTS-500-UGR18; A-CTS-614-UGR20); the Junta de Andalucía [BIO-302; and PAIDI P20_00158]; the University of Jaén [PAIUJA-EI_CTS02_2017]; the University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigación 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence; Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES), and by the Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Conocimiento, Investigación y Universidades and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ref. SOMM17/6107/UGR; the Estonian Research Council (grant PRG1076); Horizon 2020 innovation (ERIN, grant no. EU952516) of the European Commission and Enterprise Estonia (grant EU48695).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42020122054).

Epigenetic Factors in Eutopic Endometrium in Women with Endometriosis and Infertility

Eutopic endometrium in patients with endometriosis is characterized by aberrant expression of essential genes during the implantation window. It predisposes to disturbance of endometrial receptivity. The pathomechanism of implantation failures in women with endometriosis remains unclear. This paper aims to summarize the knowledge on epigenetic mechanisms in eutopic endometrium in the group of patients with both endometriosis and infertility. The impaired DNA methylation patterns of gene promoter regions in eutopic tissue was established. The global profile of histone acetylation and methylation and the analysis of selected histone modifications showed significant differences in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Aberrant expression of the proposed candidate genes may promote an unfavorable embryonic implantation environment of the endometrium due to an immunological dysfunction, inflammatory reaction, and apoptotic response in women with endometriosis. The role of the newly discovered proteins regulating gene expression, i.e., TET proteins, in endometrial pathology is not yet completely known. The cells of the eutopic endometrium in women with endometriosis contain a stable, impaired methylation pattern and a histone code. Medication targeting critical genes responsible for the aberrant gene expression pattern in eutopic endometrium may help treat infertility in women with endometriosis.

Down-regulation of HLA-DRs and HLA-DPs reflects the deficiency of antigen-presenting cells in endometrium from infertile women with and without ovarian endometriosis

This study aimed to explore common molecular changes in the infertile endometrium from women with and without endometriosis (EM). By analyzing the dataset GSE120103 from Gene Expression Omnibus, a total of 3252 shared differentially expressed genes were identified between ovarian EM in infertile vs. fertile endometrium and EM-free infertile vs. fertile endometrium. In addition, the gene annotation and pathway analysis of the shared differentially expressed genes with the same expression trend indicated that the pathway 'MHC class II antigen presentation' and five candidate genes: HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB3, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1 were both down-regulated in infertile endometrium with or without EM. Logistic regression showed that HLA-DRA might be an independent predictor of the infertile status of the endometrium. Single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) showed that some classic antigen-presenting cells: macrophages type 1, macrophages type 2, and mature dendritic cells were significantly down-regulated in infertile endometrium with or without EM, whose enrichment correlated positively with the expression of candidate HLA molecules. Hence, the down-regulation of HLA-DRs and HLA-DPs reflecting the deficiency of antigen-presenting cells in endometrium might serve as a common biomarker for diagnosing endometrium-associated infertility in women with and without endometriosis.

Analysis of IVF/ICSI Outcomes in Endometriosis Patients With Recurrent Implantation Failure: Influence on Cumulative Live Birth Rate

OBJECTIVE

To study the influence of endometriosis activity on the pregnancy outcomes of patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in in-vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles. The pregnancy outcomes were compared between RIF patients with endometriosis who received treatment at different occasions to explore the appropriate treatment plan for these patients and to optimize the pregnancy-support strategies.

DESIGN

Ambispective cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 330 patients with endometriosis were enrolled from 2008 to 2018 and included 1043 IVF/ICSI cycles. All patients were diagnosed with RIF after IVF/ICSI. Patients were assigned to three subtypes according to different control states of endometriosis, including the untreated, early-treatment, and late-treatment groups. The clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and cumulative live birth rate of endometriosis patients with RIF were the main outcomes; additionally, the fertilization rate, available embryonic rate, and high-quality embryonic rate were also compared.

RESULTS

The early-treatment and late-treatment groups showed higher cumulative live birth rate than the untreated group (early-treated 43.6% vs. late-treated 46.3% vs. untreated 27.7%, P<0.001), though patients in the two treatment groups had higher rates of adenomyosis and ovarian surgery. The two treatment group showed a better laboratory result than the untreated and especially, the early-treatment group. The untreated group (46.24%) had a lower IVF fertilization rate than the treated group (early-treated [64.40%] and late-treated [60.27%] (P<0.001). In addition, the rates of available embryos and high-quality embryos in the early-treated group were much higher those that in the untreated group (90.30% vs. 85.20%, 76.50% vs. 64.47%). Kaplan-Meier curve showed that patients in the untreated group needed a mean of 23.126 months to achieve one live birth; whereas those in the treated group needed a comparatively shorter duration (early-treated: 18.479 ± 0.882 months and late-treated: 14.183 ± 1.102 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis has a negative influence on IVF/ICSI outcome. The control of endometriosis activity can result in a higher cumulative live birth rate in patients. It is necessary for endometriosis patients to receive medical treatment to achieve a better prognosis especially for those with RIF.

Endometriosis Lowers the Cumulative Live Birth Rates in IVF by Decreasing the Number of Embryos but Not Their Quality

Endometriosis and infertility are closely linked, but the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization (IVF) parameters, especially on embryo quality and IVF outcomes. A total of 1124 cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection were retrospectively evaluated, including 155 cycles with endometriosis and 969 cycles without endometriosis. Women with endometriosis had significantly lower ovarian reserve markers (AMH and AFC), regardless of previous ovarian surgery. Despite receiving significantly higher doses of exogenous gonadotropins, they had significantly fewer oocytes, mature oocytes, embryos, and top-quality embryos than women in the control group. Multivariate analysis did not reveal any association between endometriosis and the proportion of top-quality embryo (OR = 0.87; 95% CI [0.66-1.12]; p = 0.3). The implantation rate and the live birth rate per cycle were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.05), but the cumulative live births rate was significantly lower in in the endometriosis group (32.1% versus 50.7%, p = 0.001), as a consequence of the lower number of frozen embryos. In conclusion, endometriosis lowers the cumulative live birth rates by decreasing the number of embryos available to transfer, but not their quality.

Challenges in uncovering non-invasive biomarkers of endometriosis

Endometriosis affects up to 10% of women of childbearing age, causing symptoms that can include chronic pelvic pain and reduced fertility. The symptoms are not specific to the disease and can be confused with other gynecological conditions or normal menstruation. Currently, the disease can be only definitively diagnosed by laparoscopy, as no clinically accepted biomarker exists. Biomarker discovery can either follow a hypothesis-driven approach selecting targets to be tested based on current knowledge of the disease, or take an unbiased high-throughput screening “omics” approach, such as transcriptomics or proteomics, to identify markers that are unique or elevated in accessible bodily fluids of patients with the disease. Numerous studies have been conducted using these approaches to try and identify endometriosis biomarkers, but variabilities in study design, cohort selection, and analysis, together with the fact that most studies were small-scale, have made independent validation of biomarker candidates difficult. Therefore, efforts are underway to standardize cohort selection, patient data, and sample collection to allow better cross-study comparisons. Large scale multi-center studies using this standardized approach are necessary to validate existing endometriosis biomarker candidates and uncover potential new markers. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease, it is likely that a panel of biomarkers will be necessary to diagnose and categorize endometriosis.

Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss and unexplained infertility: twins in disguise

STUDY QUESTION

Is B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6 (BCL6) endometrial expression, a surrogate biomarker of endometriosis, elevated in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (uRPL) and unexplained infertility (UI) compared to fertile subjects?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Endometrial BCL6 expression is elevated to a similar degree in women with uRPL and UI compared to fertile controls.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis has been linked to the genesis of endometrial progesterone resistance and to specific nuclear proteins, including endometrial BCL6. BCL6 overexpression (immune histologic score > 1.4) has been strongly associated with poor reproductive outcomes in IVF cycles in women with UI. Our previous data have demonstrated an accuracy of 94% for diagnosing endometriosis, and BCL6 protein is elevated in the decidua of women with uRPL.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

In this case-control study, at a tertiary university teaching hospital, 110 samples (control n = 28; uRPL n = 29; UI n = 53) from pathological archives were analyzed. Timed endometrial biopsies were obtained between 2 January 2002 and 31 December 2016.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHOD

LH-timed endometrial biopsies were obtained from women with UI, uRPL (two or more consecutive losses) and normal fertile subjects during the mid-secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. Endometrial BCL6 protein levels were compared in women with UI and uRPL and fertile controls using western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry (HSCORE).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The mean age of the uRPL group was significantly higher than the others [mean (SD)] control = 32.7 (2.6); uRPL = 35.8 (3.7); UI = 32.7 (4.4); P = 0.002, ANOVA]. Seventy-nine percent of women in both subfertile groups (uRPL and UI, 65 out of 82) displayed elevated BCL6 protein levels. From these, a subset of cases with abnormal BCL6 went to laparoscopy and endometriosis was found in 9 out of 11 cases of uRPL and in 20 out of 21 cases of UI. Median BCL6 HSCORE for controls versus uRPL and UI was significantly different [median (interquartile); control = 0.3 (0.02 to 0.5); uRPL = 3 (1.9 to 3.6); UI = 2.9 (1.6 to 3.1); P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis]. A significant trend in the association between the degree of infertility (fertile, uRPL and UI) and the HSCORE level (negative, medium and high) was found (P < 0.001; x 2 for trend). Western blot of representative samples from each group demonstrated similar findings based on protein levels in the whole endometrium. After running ANCOVA analysis for age difference, the BCL6 difference among groups was still significant (P-value < 0.0001).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

We studied subjects with two consecutive pregnancy losses rather than the definition adopted in Europe of three losses. The findings may lack external validity in other clinical settings (e.g. low prevalence of endometriosis).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Based on the data presented here, we postulate that the degree of BCL6 expression may represent a continuum of progesterone resistance and response to inflammation that occurs in women with endometriosis, yielding different degrees of infertility, from uRPL to UI.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study was supported by NICHD/NIH R01 HD067721 (SLY and BAL), by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior: Grant 99999.003035/2015-08 (BAL) and by CAPES/PROAP (RFS). Two authors (BAL, SLY) have licensed intellectual property for the detection of endometriosis. Dr Bruce Lessey is an unpaid scientific Advisor for CiceroDx. The other authors report no conflict of interest.

Clinical Management of Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common and challenging condition of reproductive-aged women that carries a high individual and societal cost. The many molecular dissimilarities between endometriosis lesions and eutopic endometrium create difficulties in the development of new drug therapies and treatments. Surgery remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis, but it must be weighed against the risks of surgical morbidity and potential decreases in ovarian reserve, especially in the case of endometriomas. Safe and effective surgical techniques are discussed within this article for various presentations of endometriosis. Medical therapy is suppressive rather than curative, and regimens that are long-term and affordable with minimal side effects are recommended. Recurrences are common and often rapid when medical therapy is discontinued. Endometriosis in the setting of infertility is reviewed and appropriate management is discussed, including when and whether surgery is warranted in this at-risk population. In patients with chronic pain, central sensitization and myofascial pain are integral components of a multidisciplinary approach. Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, the risk is low and currently no preventive screening is recommended. Hormone therapy for symptomatic women with postsurgical menopause should not be delayed as a result of concerns for malignancy or recurrence of endometriosis.

Medical or surgical treatment before embryo transfer improves outcomes in women with abnormal endometrial BCL6 expression

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of medical or surgical treatment prior to embryo transfer in women with elevated endometrial BCL6 expression and suspected endometriosis in a prospective, cohort study design at a university-associated infertility clinic.

METHODS

All subjects had at least 1 year of unexplained infertility (UI) and each prospectively underwent endometrial biopsy and immunostaining for the oncogene BCL6, prior to embryo transfer during an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle. To be included, subjects had to have an abnormal BCL6 result, defined by elevated HSCORE ≥ 1.4. Women that were pre-treated with laparoscopy or medical suppression with GnRH agonist (depot leuprolide acetate; Lupron®, Abbvie, Inc., Chicago, IL) for 2 months were compared to a group that went untreated (controls). Endpoints included implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR), and as well as cycle characteristics. Miscarriage rate were also compared between treatment and control group.

RESULTS

Women in each group had similar characteristics. Those treated by medical suppression and those undergoing laparoscopy for endometriosis had a significantly higher LBR, (5/10; 50%; 95%CI 23.7 to 76.3%) and (11/21; 52.4%; 95%CI 32.4 to 71.7), respectively, compared to controls (4/54; 7.4%; 95%CI 2.9 to 17.6). An absolute benefit of 44.2% (16/31; 95%CI 24.6 to 61.2) and a number need to treat of 3 for those that received treatment (medical suppression and laparoscopy), compared to no treatment. Miscarriages were significantly more common in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with suspected endometriosis and aberrant endometrial BCL6 expression have worse reproductive outcomes following embryo transfer, including a high miscarriage rate, poor IR, and low LBR and CPR compared to cycles pre-treated with medical and surgical management.

Chronic Niche Inflammation in Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: Current Understanding and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent inflammatory disease that affects up to 10% of women of reproductive age and accounts for up to 50% of female infertility cases. It has been highly associated with poorer outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART), including decreased oocyte retrieval, lower implantation, and pregnancy rates. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis-associated infertility is crucial for improving infertility treatment outcomes. Current theories regarding how endometriosis reduces fertility include anatomical distortion, ovulatory dysfunction, and niche inflammation-associated peritoneal or implantation defects. This review will survey the latest evidence on the role of inflammatory niche in the peritoneal cavity, ovaries, and uterus of endometriosis patients. Nonhormone treatment strategies that target these inflammation processes are also included. Furthermore, mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies are highlighted for potential endometriosis treatment because of their immunomodulatory effects and tropism toward inflamed lesion foci. Potential applications of stem cell therapy in treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility in particular for safety and efficacy are discussed.

Progesterone Resistance in Endometriosis: an Acquired Property?

Endometriosis is the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus and is characterized by progesterone resistance and changes in global and progesterone target gene expression. However, the mechanism behind this and whether it is innate, acquired, or present in both the eutopic and ectopic tissue in not always clear. We find large-scale gene expression studies in eutopic tissue, indicative of progesterone resistance, are often contradictory, potentially due to the dynamic nature of this tissue, whereas suppressed progesterone receptor expression is supported in ectopic but not eutopic tissue. This suggests more studies are required in eutopic tissue particularly, and that potentially the suppressed progesterone receptor (PR) expression is a consequence of the pathogenic process and exposure to the peritoneal environment.

Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common inflammatory disease characterized by the presence of tissue outside the uterus that resembles endometrium, mainly on pelvic organs and tissues. It affects ~5-10% of women in their reproductive years - translating to 176 million women worldwide - and is associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Diagnosis is reliably established only through surgical visualization with histological verification, although ovarian endometrioma and deep nodular forms of disease can be detected through ultrasonography and MRI. Retrograde menstruation is regarded as an important origin of the endometrial deposits, but other factors are involved, including a favourable endocrine and metabolic environment, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and altered immunity and inflammatory responses in genetically susceptible women. Current treatments are dictated by the primary indication (infertility or pelvic pain) and are limited to surgery and hormonal treatments and analgesics with many adverse effects that rarely provide long-term relief. Endometriosis substantially affects the quality of life of women and their families and imposes costs on society similar to those of other chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Future research must focus on understanding the pathogenesis, identifying disease subtypes, developing non-invasive diagnostic methods and targeting non-hormonal treatments that are acceptable to women who wish to conceive.

Uterine natural killer cell progenitor populations predict successful implantation in women with endometriosis-associated infertility

PROBLEM

Uterine natural killer (uNK) cells play a critical role early in gestation. As we previously identified altered uNK cell development in endometriosis-associated infertility, we herein sought to characterize natural killer (NK) cell profiles in endometriosis that may predict embryo implantation.

METHOD OF STUDY

Study participants had a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis-associated infertility. Endometrial tissue and peripheral blood were obtained from 58 women. Thirty-three patients underwent artificial reproductive technology (IVF, ICSI, or IUI) within a mean of 9.5 months of surgery. NK and hematopoietic progenitor cells from endometrium and blood were analyzed by flow cytometry. Successful implantation was defined as a positive pregnancy test.

RESULTS

In successful implantation, populations of endometrial CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells were higher (3.97% vs 0.69%; P < .0004), and coexpression of NK cell marker CD56 was increased (81.1% vs 60.9%; P < .034) compared with patients who had failed implantation. In contrast, levels of blood NK progenitors were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that uterine NK progenitor cell populations are markedly different in patients with endometriosis who proceed to successful or failed embryo implantation and may define a novel predictor of implantation success. Our findings also highlight the fundamental differences inherent in NK cell repertoires between blood and uterine compartments.

Endometrial BCL6 testing for the prediction of in vitro fertilization outcomes: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate endometrial BCL6 expression as a prognostic biomarker for IVF outcome in women with unexplained infertility (UI) before ET.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-associated infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Women with UI for >1 year.

INTERVENTION(S)

We studied women with UI who underwent testing for endometrial BCL6, in an LH-timed midluteal phase biopsy and completed an IVF cycle and ET.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) and live birth rate per transfer was compared for women positive or negative for BCL6 expression. An abnormal BCL6 result was defined by an histologic score (>1.4).

RESULT(S)

Women with normal and abnormal BCL6 and those who conceived or not had similar characteristics. Women with low levels of BCL6 expression had a significantly higher clinical PR (11/17; 64.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 41.3-82.6) compared with women with abnormal (high) BCL6 expression (9/52; 17.3%; 95% CI 9.3-30.8). These results yield a relative risk of 0.267 (95% CI 0.13-0.53; P=.0004) for those with normal BCL6 expression, an absolute benefit of 47.4% (95% CI 22.5-72.0). Live birth rate was also significantly higher in women with low BCL6 expression (10/17; 58.8%; 95% CI 36.0-78.4) compared with women with abnormal BCL6 expression (6/52; 11.5%; 95% CI 5.4-23.0). The relative risk was 0.19 (95% CI 0.08-0.45; P=.0002), yielding an absolute benefit of 47.3% (95% CI 21.8-67.8).

CONCLUSION(S)

Aberrant BCL6 expression (histologic score, >1.4) was strongly associated with poor reproductive outcomes in IVF cycles in women with UI.

[IVF and endometriosis, oocyte donation and fertility preservation]

Endometriosis is a common condition, causing pain and infertility. In infertile woman with superficial peritoneal endometriosis and patent tubes, laparoscopy is recommended, followed by ovarian stimulation alone or in combination with intrauterine inseminations. In case of ovarian or deep endometriosis, the indications of surgery and assisted reproductive technologies remain to be defined precisely. In vitro fertilization is generally proposed after the failure of up to three inseminations, directly for ovarian or deep endometriosis, or in case of an associated factor of infertility, mainly male. Before ovarian stimulation in view to in vitro fertilization, a pretreatment by GnRH agonist for 2 to 6 months or combined contraceptive for 6 to 8 weeks would improve the pregnancy rate. Egg donation is effective in patients with advanced ovarian failure or lack of ovarian response to stimulation. Fertility preservation, especially by oocytes vitrified, must be proposed preventively to women with endometriosis at risk of ovarian failure, without close wish to be pregnant.

Endometrial receptivity in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis: it is affected, and let me show you why

The endometrium maintains complex controls on proliferation and apoptosis as part of repetitive menstrual cycles that prepare the endometrium for the window of implantation and pregnancy. The reliance on inflammatory mechanisms for both implantation and menstruation creates the opportunity in the setting of endometriosis for establishment of chronic inflammation that is disruptive to endometrial receptivity, causing both infertility and abnormal bleeding. Clinically, there can be little doubt that the endometrium of women with endometriosis is less receptive to embryo implantation, and strong evidence exists to suggest that endometrial changes are associated with decreased cycle fecundity as a result of this disease. Here we provide unifying concepts regarding those changes and how they are coordinated to promote progesterone resistance and estrogen dominance through aberrant cell signaling pathways and reduced expression of key homeostatic proteins in eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis.

In vitro fertilization for endometriosis-associated infertility

Endometriosis is an enigmatic disease affecting 10-15% of reproductive aged women and is encountered in 25-35% of women suffering from infertility. IVF is an effective tool to overcome endometriosis-associated infertility when expectant management or surgery fails. Direct IVF should be envisioned if the female age is greater than 38 year and infertility is long lasting. Likewise, semen characteristics or tubal status that is incompatible with natural conception mandates going straight to IVF. IVF, not only bypasses the distortion of pelvic anatomy associated with advanced stage endometriosis, but also removes gametes from a hostile peritoneal environment. In this article, we address the impact, if any, of endometriosis and endometriomason IVF outcome, whether surgical treatment of early-stage disease, endometriomas or deep infiltrating endometriosis would enhance pregnancy rates in IVF, which protocol to employ for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF and finally the impact, if any, of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF on progression of endometriosis.