Withdrawal of GnRH agonist decreases oestradiol and VEGF concentrations in high responders

Interpretable artificial intelligence-assisted embryo selection improved single-blastocyst transfer outcomes: a prospective cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model for embryo selection in a prospective clinical trial?

DESIGN

This single-centre prospective cohort study was carried out from October 2021 to March 2022. A total of 330 eligible patients were assigned to their preferred groups, with 250 patients undergoing a fresh single-blastocyst transfer cycle after the exclusion criteria had been applied. For the AI-assisted group (AAG), embryologists selected the embryos for transfer based on the ranking recommendations provided by an interpretable AI system, while with the manual group, embryologists used the Gardner grading system to make their decisions.

RESULTS

The implantation rate was significantly higher in the AAG than the manual group (80.87% versus 68.15%, P = 0.022). No significant difference was found in terms of monozygotic twin rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between the groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in terms of neonatal outcomes, including gestational weeks, premature birth rate, birth height, birthweight, sex ratio at birth and newborn malformation rate. The consensus rate between the AI and retrospective analysis by the embryologists was significantly higher for good-quality embryos (i.e. grade 4BB or higher) versus poor-quality embryos (i.e. less than 4BB) (84.71% versus 25%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These prospective trial results suggest that the proposed AI system could effectively help embryologists to improve the implantation rate with single-blastocyst transfer compared with traditional manual evaluation methods.

Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration to decrease the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GNRH agonist cycles triggered with human chorionic gonadotropin

PURPOSE

In Gonadotropin releasing hormone(GnRH) agonist IVF, after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin(HCG) triggering, there is a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS). Few methods exist to prevent OHSS in these cases. Therefore, we investigated the use of a GnRH antagonist to decrease the risk of OHSS, due to its ability to decrease VEGF production and function.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study of 171-IVF patients at risk for developing OHSS after a GnRH agonist cycle with HCG trigger was performed from 2011 to 2019. The patient population consisted of women with an unexpected exuberant response to stimulation based on ovarian reserve testing and were triggered with hCG. Women were converted to a freeze-all cycle and received either cabergoline 0.5 mg orally alone for 7 days from the collection(Group 1, n = 123) or received cabergoline 0.5 mg orally and ganirelix, 250 mcg SC for 7-10 days(Group 2, n = 48).

RESULTS

Group 1 had more cases of moderate and severe OHSS than group 2-(25% vs. 10% p = 0.03, and 52% vs. 25% p = 0.001 respectively). Group 1 reported more abdominal discomfort and bloating than group 2(91% vs. 65% p < 0.001) and the presence of free fluid was more frequent in group 1 than group 2(74% vs. 35% p < 0.001). Hemoconcentration and electrolyte disturbances were less severe in group 2 than in group 1 (p < 0.001 all cases).

CONCLUSION

In patients at high risk for developing OHSS after hCG trigger in a GnRH agonist cycle, the addition of GnRH antagonists in the luteal phase may reduce the risk of developing moderate and severe OHSS. The GnRH antagonist likely leads to more rapid luteolysis and down regulation of VEGF production and receptor response, thereby decreasing the hallmark increased vascular permeability.

Comparison of the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes between single cleavage-stage embryo transfer and single blastocyst transfer by time-lapse selection of embryos

To compare the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes following single cleavage-stage embryo transfer (SCT) and single blastocyst transfer (SBT) using time-lapse imaging (TLI), a total of 2066 normally fertilized and cleaved embryos from 233 patients were divided into Day 3 SCT group (n = 171) and Day 5 SBT group (n = 62) according to patient's willingness. Embryo selection criteria were based on embryo cleavage patterns, timing parameters, and blastocyst quality. The pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of each group were evaluated. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to pregnancy outcomes including the implantation rate, early abortion rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate, and obstetric outcomes including preterm birth rate, gestational week, birth height, birth weight and fetal malformation rate between SCT group and SBT group. SBT group had significantly higher monozygotic twinning (MZT) rates than SCT group (6.98% vs. 0, p < .05). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend of higher proportion of male-to-female sex ratio at birth in SBT group than SCT group (1.38 vs. 1.05). Based on the combination of cleavage patterns and timing parameters, SCT may be an alternative to SBT because it can provide similar pregnancy and obstetric outcomes and meanwhile lower monozygotic twinning rates.

Evaluation of preimplantation genetic testing based on next-generation sequencing for balanced reciprocal translocation carriers

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq) identify normal/balanced embryos in balanced reciprocal translocation carriers and what are their reproductive outcomes?

DESIGN

One hundred couples with balanced reciprocal translocation who underwent a total of 134 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles between January 2015 and October 2017 were evaluated. Trophectoderm cells of blastocysts were biopsied for CNV-Seq-based NGS. All the balanced/normal blastocysts were vitrified and cryopreserved. Single balanced/normal blastocysts were warmed and transferred in the subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle.

RESULTS

During the study period, 400 blastocysts were analysed by NGS-PGT, of which 109 (27.25%) were balanced and euploid. A total of 52 blastocysts were transferred in the FET cycle. Clinical pregnancy was confirmed in 34 women (65.38%), with a miscarriage rate of 2.94%; 26 healthy term babies were born, including 24 singletons and one set of twins, while eight couples had ongoing pregnancies. Amniocentesis revealed a fetal chromosome status that was consistent with the NGS-PGT results. Female carriers had a significantly higher blastocyst rate than did the male carriers (37.01% versus 31.27%, P = 0.04). The transferable blastocyst rate was higher in couples treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist than in those treated with GnRH agonist (38.20% versus 24.37%, P = 0.01). However, neither carrier sex nor ovarian stimulation protocol influenced the clinical pregnancy rate.

CONCLUSIONS

CNV-Seq-based NGS is an efficient and reliable PGT method for balanced reciprocal translocation.

Association between the number of oocytes retrieved and cumulative live birth rate in women aged 35-40 years undergoing long GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles

PURPOSE

To study the association between the numbers of oocytes retrieved and the cumulative live birth rates (LBR) in women aged 35-40 years undergoing long GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles.

METHODS

A total of 931 women aged 35-40 years who underwent their first cycle of IVF/ICSI treatment between January 2010 and December 2013 at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were identified and reviewed. The main endpoint of this study was the cumulative LBR after one complete oocyte retrieval, which included fresh and all subsequent frozen-thaw embryo transfer cycles. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for live birth were estimated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, all the women were divided into four groups based on the number of oocytes retrieved: 0-4, 5-9, 10-14 or ≥15 oocytes group. Variables were then compared among groups.

RESULTS

We found that 634 out of the 931 patients (68.1%) achieved at least one live birth. The number of oocytes retrieved was an independent predictive factor for live birth, with OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.15-1.26) when adjusted for age (years), duration of infertility and Gn (gonadotrophin) doses. The cumulative LBR in the four different oocyte groups was 35.6, 68.8, 83.4 and 89.2%, respectively. When the 1-4 oocytes group was issued as a reference, the ORs for cumulative LBR gradually increased to 3.66, 6.74 and 11.77 in other three oocytes groups, respectively. The moderate-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate was dramatically increased in the ≥15 oocytes group (6.9%) when compared to that in the 10-14 oocytes group (0.8%), while the cumulative LBR only increased 5.8% (from 83.4 to 89.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal number of oocytes retrieved in women aged 35-40 years is 10-14 oocytes, which achieves a high cumulative LBR while maintaining an acceptable low OHSS rate.

GnRH antagonist administered twice the day before hCG trigger combined with a step-down protocol may prevent OHSS in IVF/ICSI antagonist cycles at risk for OHSS without affecting the reproductive outcomes: a prospective randomized control trial

PURPOSE

The purpose this study is to investigate whether a double antagonist dose (0.25 mg/12 h) administered the day before hCG trigger is effective in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in GnRH antagonist IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles at risk for OHSS.

METHODS

This is a prospective randomized control study, conducted from November 2012 to January 2016. A total of 194 patients undergoing a IVF/ICSI GnRH antagonist cycle that were at risk of OHSS and chose to proceed with embryo transfer and avoid cycle cancellation or embryo cryopreservation were allocated into two groups. The inclusion criteria consisted of a rapid rise of oestradiol ≥ 3500 pg/ml combined with ≥ 18 follicles > 11 mm in diameter without any mature follicle > 16 mm, in any day of stimulation. Overall, 97 patients (intervention group A) received a double dose of GnRH antagonist (0.25 mg/12 h) the day before hCG while 97 patients (control group B) did not. Recombinant FSH administration was tapered to 100 IU/24 h the day of the allocation in both groups.

RESULTS

Incidence of early-onset moderate/severe OHSS was significantly lower in intervention group A compared to control group B (0 vs 12.37%, P < 0.001). Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle (50.52 vs 42.27%, P = 0.249) was not significantly different between the two groups. Oestradiol (3263.471 ± 1271.53 vs 5233 ± 1425.17, P < 0.001), progesterone (0.93 ± 0.12 vs 1.29 ± 0.14, P < 0.001) and luteinizing hormone (1.42 ± 0.31 vs 1.91 ± 0.33, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in group A the day of the hCG triggering.

CONCLUSION

The administration of a rescue double GnRH antagonist dose the day before hCG trigger may represent a safe alternative preventive strategy for early OHSS without affecting the reproductive outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN02750360.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are commonly used in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles to prevent a luteinising hormone surge during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) prior to planned oocyte retrieval, thus optimising the chances of live birth.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of the different GnRHa protocols as adjuncts to COH in women undergoing ART cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to April 2015: the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and registries of ongoing trials. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two protocols of GnRHa used in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in subfertile women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted the data. The primary outcome measure was number of live births or ongoing pregnancies per woman/couple randomised. Secondary outcome measures were number of clinical pregnancies, number of oocytes retrieved, dose of gonadotrophins used, adverse effects (pregnancy losses, ovarian hyperstimulation, cycle cancellation, and premature luteinising hormone (LH) surges), and cost and acceptability of the regimens. We combined data to calculate odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables and mean differences (MD) for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I² statistic. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for the main comparisons using 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 37 RCTs (3872 women), one ongoing trial, and one trial awaiting classification. These trials made nine different comparisons between protocols. Twenty of the RCTs compared long protocols and short protocols. Only 19/37 RCTs reported live birth or ongoing pregnancy.There was no conclusive evidence of a difference between a long protocol and a short protocol in live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.81; 12 RCTs, n = 976 women, I² = 15%, low quality evidence). Our findings suggest that in a population in which 14% of women achieve live birth or ongoing pregnancy using a short protocol, between 13% and 23% will achieve live birth or ongoing pregnancy using a long protocol. There was evidence of an increase in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.92; 20 RCTs, n = 1643 women, I² = 27%, moderate quality evidence) associated with the use of a long protocol.There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in terms of live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates when the following GnRHa protocols were compared: long versus ultrashort protocol (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 4.36; one RCT, n = 150 women, low quality evidence), long luteal versus long follicular phase protocol (OR 1.89, 95% CI 0.87 to 4.10; one RCT, n = 223 women, low quality evidence), when GnRHa was stopped versus when it was continued (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.33; three RCTs, n = 290 women, I² = 0%, low quality evidence), when the dose of GnRHa was reduced versus when the same dose was continued (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.52; four RCTs, n = 407 women, I² = 0%, low quality evidence), when GnRHa was discontinued versus continued after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration in the long protocol (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.64; one RCT, n = 181 women, low quality evidence), and when administration of GnRHa lasted for two versus three weeks before stimulation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.68; one RCT, n = 85 women, low quality evidence). Our primary outcomes were not reported for any other comparisons.Regarding adverse events, there were insufficient data to enable us to reach any conclusions except about the cycle cancellation rate. There was no conclusive evidence of a difference in cycle cancellation rate (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.55; 11 RCTs, n = 1026 women, I² = 42%, low quality evidence) when a long protocol was compared with a short protocol. This suggests that in a population in which 9% of women would have their cycles cancelled using a short protocol, between 5.5% and 14% will have cancelled cycles when using a long protocol.The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to low. The main limitations in the evidence were failure to report live birth or ongoing pregnancy, poor reporting of methods in the primary studies, and imprecise findings due to lack of data. Only 10 of the 37 included studies were conducted within the last 10 years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When long GnRHa protocols and short GnRHa protocols were compared, we found no conclusive evidence of a difference in live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates, but there was moderate quality evidence of higher clinical pregnancy rates in the long protocol group. None of the other analyses showed any evidence of a difference in birth or pregnancy outcomes between the protocols compared. There was insufficient evidence to make any conclusions regarding adverse effects.