Dual trigger of final oocyte maturation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles

Effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate dose in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation on pregnancy outcomes in poor ovarian response patients with different body mass index levels

Background

For the poor ovarian response (POR) population, the relationship between medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) dose in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and clinical outcome is still unclear. This study aims to explore the effect of MPA dose in PPOS on clinical outcomes in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients with different body mass index (BMI) levels, hoping to provide clinical doctors with better options for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) programs.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 253 oocyte retrieval cycles of POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients who underwent PPOS protocol in IVF/ICSI treatment at the Reproductive Medical Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from March 2019 to April 2022. The effects of different MPA doses (8 mg/d or 10 mg/d) on pregnancy outcomes were compared in normal BMI (18.5-24 kg/m2) and high BMI (≥24 kg/m2) patients, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors affecting pregnancy outcomes.

Results

For normal BMI patients, the 8-mg/d MPA group had a higher embryo implantation rate (33.78% vs. 18.97%, P = 0.012). For high BMI patients, the 10-mg/d MPA group had a higher HCG positive rate (55.00% vs. 25.00%, P = 0.028), clinical pregnancy rate (50.00% vs. 20.00%, P = 0.025), and cumulative pregnancy rate (37.74% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.023) compared with the 8-mg/d MPA group. There was no significant difference in cumulative live birth rate between the 8-mg/d and 10-mg/d MPA groups in patients with normal or high BMI. The results of multivariate logistic regression showed a significant correlation between MPA dose and cumulative pregnancy in the high BMI population (OR = 0.199, 95% CI: 0.046~0.861, P = 0.031).

Conclusions

For POR patients with high BMI, 10 mg/d of MPA in the PPOS protocol had a higher cumulative pregnancy rate than 8 mg/d of MPA, but it had no significant effect on the cumulative live birth rate.

Cycle outcomes of dual trigger (GnRH agonist+hCG) versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger alone in POSEDION group 3-4 poor-responders and normo-responders: A prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, dual trigger was proposed in an attempt to improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes in poor and normo-responder patients (PR and NR, respectively). The study's aim was to compare cycle outcomes of dual trigger versus human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger in NRs and POSEIDON group 3/4 (PG 3/4) PRs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial included PG 3/4 PRs and NRs undergoing IVF using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. PRs and NRs were divided into two subgroups: (1) study groups in both arms received dual trigger and (2) control groups received only HCG.

RESULTS

Two-hundred twenty-five women participated in the study. The mean patient age was significantly higher in the dual trigger group versus the HCG trigger group in PG 3/4 PRs. The number of retrieved oocytes and MII oocytes and the number of patients with good quality embryos were comparable between groups and live birth rates (LBR) per embryo transfer (ET) were significantly higher in the HCG group versus the dual trigger group in PG3/4 PRs (39.2% versus 19.2%; p = 0.026). NR dual trigger and HCG trigger groups were comparable in terms of patient age and LBR per ET did not significantly differ between these groups. The number of patients with good quality embryos was significantly higher in the dual trigger group versus the HCG group in NRs CONCLUSION: Dual trigger does not seem to add additional benefits in terms of live birth rates in PG3/4 PRs and NRs. Nonetheless, considering the age difference and lack of homogenity in the number and day of embryos transferred in PG 3/4 PRs, major conclusion that can be drawn from the study is that dual trigger is not systematically useful even in poor responders since the number of mature oocytes is comparable between groups. Larger scale studies are required for additional potential implications.

Triggering of ovulation for GnRH-antagonist cycles in normal and low ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review andmeta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated whether dual triggering [a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] of final oocyte maturation can improve the number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate in low or normal responders undergoing in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

Studies up to October 2022 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risks (RR), and continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature [metaphase II (MII)] oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate; other IVF outcomes were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies were identified, and 898 patients were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the number of oocytes retrieved [WMD = 1.38 (95% CI 0.47-2.28), I2 = 66%, p = 0.003, low evidence], number of MII oocytes [WMD = 0.7 (95% CI 0.35-1.05), I2 = 42%, p < 0.0001, moderate evidence], number of embryos [WMD = 0.68 (95% CI 0.07-1.3), I2 = 67%, p = 0.03, low evidence] and number of good-quality embryos [WMD = 1.14 (95% CI 0.35-1.93), I2 = 0%, p = 0.005, moderate evidence] in the dual trigger group were significantly higher than in the hCG trigger group. The results of the ovarian response subgroup analysis showed significant differences in all of these outcomes in normal responders, and no differences in any of the outcomes in low responders, except for the number of MII oocytes. In low responders, clinical pregnancy rates may be improved in the dual trigger group [RR = 2.2 (95% CI 1.05-4.61), I2 = 28%, p = 0.04, low evidence].

CONCLUSION

Dual triggering by GnRH agonist and hCG improved oocyte maturity and embryo grading for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Dual triggering for final oocyte maturation may improve clinical pregnancy rates in low responders.

In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes With a Dual Trigger in Normoresponders in Antagonist Cycles

Objectives To evaluate whether the dual trigger of ovulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and the standard dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (dual trigger) is better than hCG alone in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients who responded well to ovarian stimulation. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2021, 5593 antagonist cycles of patients were reviewed. This study included women who had an antral follicle count of 5 or more and exhibited a normoresponse to ovarian stimulation using the GnRH antagonist protocol, as determined by the follicular output rate (FORT). The primary outcome indicators consisted of the quantities of retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes. The secondary outcome markers included live birth rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and continued pregnancy rates. Results A total of 1244 normoresponder women who met the inclusion criteria were identified from the scanned files and subsequently enrolled in the GnRH antagonist protocol. A total of 383 cycles were observed in the group that was given the standard hCG trigger while 861 cycles were observed in the group that was given the dual trigger. The number of mature oocytes and top-quality embryos was significantly higher in the dual trigger group. The maturation rate in the hCG group was 74.8% while it was 76.9% in the dual trigger group (p=0.018). The dual trigger group exhibited an ongoing pregnancy rate of 37.6%, whereas the hCG group had a rate of 30.1% (p = 0.02). The dual trigger group exhibited a slightly higher live birth rate (34.3% vs 29.2%, p = 0.11), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Dual trigger of ovulation was superior to hCG alone in terms of the number of mature oocytes yielded, top quality of embryos, maturation rates, and ongoing pregnancy in IVF cycles of normoresponders having ovarian stimulation on the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Comparison of dual-trigger and human chorionic gonadotropin-only trigger among polycystic ovary syndrome couples who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: A retrospective cohort study

The dual-trigger regime, consisting of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), has been shown to offer advantage over the HCG-only trigger regime. However, little is known about the influence of dual-trigger or HCG-only trigger regime on the reproductive outcome of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) couples undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and intrauterine insemination (IUI). A total of 404 cycles of COS and IUI treatments from couples with PCOS were enrolled, and divided, according to the regime of trigger, into dual-trigger group (n = 109, 0.1-0.2 mg gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist plus 6000 IU HCG) and HCG-only group (n = 295, 10,000 IU HCG or 250 μg recombinant HCG). Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable (all P > .05). In dual-trigger group, live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate and β -HCG positive rate were all higher as compared to the HCG-only group (20.18% vs 18.98%, 25.69% vs 23.39% and 28.44% vs 25.08% respectively), despite the differences failed to achieve statistical significances (all P > .05). Moreover, early miscarriage rate and multiple pregnancy rate of the dual-trigger group were lower than those of the HCG-only group (17.86% vs 18.84% and 3.57% vs 7.25% respectively), although no statistical significances were found (all P > .05). Additionally, logistic regression analysis revealed that age contributed significantly to the live birth of couples with PCOS ( P = .043, OR = 0.900). Dual-trigger regime for oocyte maturation seems to associate with beneficial improvements in reproductive outcomes of PCOS couples undergoing COS and IUI. Instead of HCG-only trigger, dual-trigger regime might be an alternative option in COS and IUI cycles for couples with PCOS.

Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus trigger with hCG alone in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching

Background

Despite a large number of studies on the selection of trigger drugs, it remains unclear whether the dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, compared to the trigger with hCG alone, can improve the reproductive outcome of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the laboratory and clinical outcomes of dual trigger versus single trigger.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 520 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between July 2014 and September 2020 at the Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI treatment with fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH antagonist protocol. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding variables and binary logistic regression analysis to determine the correlations between trigger methods and pregnancy outcomes. After propensity score matching, 57 cycles from each group were evaluated and compared for laboratory or clinical outcomes in this retrospective cohort study.

Results

There was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos available, top-quality embryos, or the rate of normal fertilization between the dual-trigger and single-trigger protocols, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were also similar between the two groups, while the miscarriage rate (37.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.045) was higher in the dual-trigger than the single-trigger group. Subsequent binary logistic regression analysis showed that age was a remarkably significant independent predictor of both clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.84–0.97, p = 0.006) and live birth rate (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82–0.97, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Therefore, dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation might increase miscarriage rate, but in terms of the laboratory and other pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate or live birth rate, there was no evidence to show that dual trigger was superior to an hCG-trigger alone for patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.

Dual Trigger with hCG Plus GnRHa for Final Oocyte Maturation in PGT-A Cycles Results in Similar Euploidy Rates when Compared to hCG-Only Trigger

Factors that may have an effect on euploidy rate of blastocysts have been investigated thoroughly in the literature. We aimed to assess whether dual trigger alters the ploidy chance of a blastocyst in preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a total of 385 PGT-A cycles at a single tertiary center for various indications. Final oocyte maturation was triggered using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or the combination of hCG and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) (dual trigger). Participants were divided based on triggering method and all demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were compared. Final oocyte maturation was triggered in 143 cycles with hCG (37.1%), and in 242 cycles with dual trigger (62.9%). The duration of stimulation was shorter in the dual trigger arm compared to the hCG trigger group (10.0 ± 1.6 vs. 9.4 ± 1.4 days, p ≤ .001). Euploidy rates per blastocyst tested were 23.4% and 26.1% respectively for hCG and dual trigger groups without significance. Similar rates of euploidy were noted, even after age stratification. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding positive pregnancy result and ongoing pregnancy rates (p = .779 vs. p = .188). Although dual triggering, compared to hCG triggering, does not provide an additional superiority on blastocyst euploidy rate, further studies in women with different infertility etiology are needed to specifically evaluate the impact of triggering method on ploidy rates.

Effect of dual trigger on reproductive outcome in low responders: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Poor ovarian responders (PORs) pose a great challenge for fertility clinics worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine whether 'dual trigger' consisting of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is beneficial or not regarding implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and live birth rate for POR.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale or version 2 (NOS) of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (ROB2) independently by two authors. Furthermore, RevMan version 5.4 was used to analyze the extracted data and to create an inverse-weighted summary-odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

A total of 1390 studies were screened. Seven studies containing a total of 2474 POR were included. The pooled meta-analysis revealed a 1.62-fold increase in clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.62 [1.00, 2.62], p = .05) and a 2.65-fold increase in live birth rate (OR = 2.65 [1.66, 4.24], p < .0001) in the dual trigger group compared to hCG trigger. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding implantation rate (OR = 1.14 [0.93, 1.39], p = .21).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of this study indicates that dual trigger as finale oocyte maturation is advantageous compared to hCG trigger among POR. However, large-scale, high-quality, randomized controlled trials (RCT) are required to confirm this conclusion and fully address the magnitude of this effect.

Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin improves the outcome of intrauterine insemination

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dual trigger, which is a combination of gonadotropin-releasing agonist (GnRH-a) and recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the final oocyte maturation, in the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2016 to October 2018 and involved 639 IUI cycles at the Halim Fertility Center, Indonesia. Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed during IUI cycles. The ovulation triggers were divided into two groups: group I received a combination of GnRH-a and recombinant hCG as a dual trigger, and group II received only recombinant hCG as a single trigger. The baseline characteristics, cycle parameters, and IUI outcomes of both groups were compared.

Results

Our study included a total of 639 IUI cycles, 334 were in the dual trigger group and 305 in the single trigger group. The clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the dual trigger group than in the single trigger group (P<0.001). Based on the multivariate analysis, the dual trigger increased the clinical pregnancy rate by 2.524 times than that by the single trigger.

Conclusion

Our data showed that the dual trigger combination of GnRH-a and recombinant hCG significantly improves the outcome of intrauterine insemination.

Clinical efficacy of dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin and a gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist for women undergoing fertility preservation

Purpose

To determine the optimal maturation method to increase the yield of mature oocytes, especially for cancer patients with fewer chances of fertility preservation (FP) before gonadotoxic therapy.

Methods

A total of 373 cycles in 293 patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for FP using a gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol were enrolled. The control group (n = 225) received 250 µg of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) while the study group (n = 148) received 250 µg of rhCG and 0.2 mg of triptorelin for triggering. Subgroup analyses were performed for stimulation cycles with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels <1.1 ng/ml, n = 86), with endometrioma (n = 104), or with breast cancer and endometrial cancer using 5 mg of letrozole during the COS cycles (n = 84).

Results

There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics or the number of total and mature oocytes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses for women with endometrioma or DOR showed similar results. However, the dual trigger group had a significantly higher number of mature oocytes than the rhCG trigger group in breast and endometrial cancer patients using letrozole during the COS cycles (6.9 ± 6.0 vs. 4.6 ± 3.6, p = 0.034). The maturation rate was higher in the dual trigger group, although the difference was not statistically significant (59.3 ± 26.7 vs. 50.0 ± 28.0, p = 0.124).

Conclusions

Dual triggering can be an efficient maturation method to maximize the yield of mature oocytes in breast or endometrial cancer patients using letrozole‐combined GnRH antagonist protocol for FP.

Use of Triggers on in vitro Fertilization and Evaluation of Risk Factors for Sub-Optimal Maturation Rate

OBJECTIVE

 To compare the oocyte maturation rate in the treatment of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in terms of the use of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), agonist gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and dual trigger and to evaluate the associated risk factors for sub-optimal maturation rates.

METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study with 856 women who underwent IVF. They performed oocyte retrieval and were classified into 3 groups (1 - hCG, 2 - GnRH agonist, 3 - dual trigger). The primary outcome was maturation rate per trigger, and the secondary outcomes were the pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval and the correlations between low maturation rate as well as the clinical and treatment characteristics of women.

RESULTS

 The maturation rate was 77% in group 1; 76% in group 2, and 83% in group 3 (p = 0.003). Group 2 showed women with better ovarian reserve, greater number of oocytes collected, and more mature oocytes and embryos compared with the other groups (p < 0.001). The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was no different between the groups (p = 0.755). Low ovarian reserve and low doses of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) administered during the stimulus were associated with a higher chance of null maturation rate.

CONCLUSION

 The oocyte maturation rates and IVF results were similar in all groups. Low ovarian reserve is associated with the worst treatment results.

Prediction, assessment, and management of suboptimal GnRH agonist trigger: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to identify baseline patient demographic and controlled ovarian stimulation characteristics associated with a suboptimal response to GnRHa triggering, and available options for prevention and management of suboptimal response.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched for keywords related to GnRHa triggering, and peer-reviewed articles from January 2000 to September 2021 included.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included in the review. A suboptimal response to GnRHa triggering was more likely following long-term or recent oral contraceptive use and with a low or high body mass index. Low basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol serum levels were correlated with suboptimal oocyte yield, as was a low serum LH level on the day of triggering. A prolonged stimulation period and increased gonadotropin requirements were correlated with suboptimal response to triggering. Post-trigger LH < 15 IU/L best correlated with an increased risk for empty follicle syndrome and a lower oocyte retrieval rate. Retriggering with hCG may be considered in patients with suboptimal response according to post-trigger LH, as in cases of failed aspiration.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment assessment of patient characteristics, with pre- and post-triggering assessment of clinical and endocrine cycle characteristics, may identify cases at risk for suboptimal response to GnRHa triggering and optimize its utilization.

Dual trigger with the combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and standard dose of human chorionic gonadotropin improves in vitro fertilisation outcomes in poor ovarian responders

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the dual trigger with the combination of GnRH agonist and standard dose of recombinant hCG on IVF outcomes in poor ovarian responders with GnRH antagonist protocol. 1283 cycles of 1010 poor responder patients according to Bologna criteria were retrospectively analysed in terms of final oocyte maturation: dual trigger group (250 μg hCG + 0.2 mg triptorelin) or standard group (250 μg hCG). Primary outcome measures were the number of retrieved and mature oocytes. The secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates.The number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, and the top-quality embryos transferred were significantly higher in the dual trigger group (p < .001). Fertilisation rates (73.6% vs 69.6%, p = .009), implantation rates (18.7% vs 14.6, p = .039), clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (27.5% vs. 19.9%, p = .010) and live birth rate per embryo transfer (21.6% vs. 14.9%, p = .011) were also significantly higher in the dual trigger group as compared to the hCG trigger group. The usage of dual trigger with a GnRH agonist and a standard dosage of hCG could improve clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in poor ovarian responders undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Dual trigger with standard dose of hCG has been the subject of trials in normal responders to optimise IVF outcomes. The results of these studies showed significant improvements in implantation and pregnancy rates with an increase in the number of mature oocytes retrieved. As a result, dual trigger has become a popular ovulation trigger option in GnRH antagonist cycles.What do the results of this study add? There is limited data about the use of dual trigger in poor ovarian responders (PORs). According to our study, increasing the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, the number of fertilised oocytes, the number of transferred embryos and top quality embryos transferred by using dual trigger in patients with PORs have a positive impact on pregnancy outcomes.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings implies potential advantages of dual trigger usage for improving IVF outcomes in PORs. With large sample sized prospective randomised trials, dual trigger with combination of GnRHa and a standard dose of hCG might replace the traditional ovulation trigger with hCG in PORs.

Machine-intelligence for developing a potent signature to predict ovarian response to tailor assisted reproduction technology

The prediction of poor ovarian response (POR) for stratified interference is a critical clinical issue that has received an increasing amount of recent concern. Anthropogenic diagnostic modes remain too simple for the handling of actual clinical complexity. Therefore, this study conducted extensive selection using models that were derived from a variety of machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF), decision trees, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN) for the development of two models called the COS pre-launch model (CPLM) and the hCG pre-trigger model (HPTM) to assess POR based on different requirements. The results demonstrated that CPLM constructed using ANN achieved the highest AUC result of all the algorithms in COS pre-launch (AUC=0.859, C-index=0.87, good calibration), and HPTL constructed using random forest was found to be the most effective in hCG pre-trigger (AUC=0.903, C-index=0.90, good calibration). It is notable that CPLM and HPTM exhibited better performance than common clinical characteristics (0.895 [CPLM], and 0.903 [HPTM] in comparison to 0.824 [anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)], and 0.799 [antral follicle count (AFC)]). Furthermore, variable importance figure elucidated the values of AMH, AFC, and E₂ level and follicle number on hCG day, which provides important theoretical guidance and experimental data for further application. Generally, the CPLM and HPTM can offer effective POR prediction for patients who are receiving assisted reproduction technology (ART), and has great potential for guiding the clinical treatment of infertility.

Effect of a dual trigger on oocyte maturation in young women with decreased ovarian reserve for the purpose of elective oocyte cryopreservation

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether co-administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation improved mature oocyte cryopreservation outcomes in young women with decreased ovarian reserve (DOR) compared with hCG alone.

Methods

Between January 2016 and August 2019, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles in women (aged ≤35 years, anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] <1.2 ng/mL) who underwent elective oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 76 COS cycles were triggered with a GnRH agonist and hCG (the dual group) or hCG alone (the hCG group). The mean age and serum AMH levels were comparable between the two groups. The duration of stimulation, total dose of follicle-stimulating hormone used, and total number of oocytes retrieved were similar. However, the number of mature oocytes retrieved and the oocyte maturation rate were significantly higher in the dual group than in the hCG group (p=0.010 and p<0.001). After controlling for confounders, the dual-trigger method remained a significant factor related to the number of mature oocytes retrieved (p=0.016).

Conclusion

We showed improved mature oocyte collection and maturation rate with the dual triggering of oocyte maturation in young women with DOR. A dual trigger appears to be more beneficial than hCG alone in terms of mature oocyte cryopreservation for young women with DOR.

The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders

BACKGROUND

Patients found to be poor ovarian responders (POR) are a challenging patient population for any assisted reproduction technology. Despite attempts at various controlled ovarian stimulation schemes, reproductive outcomes in this patient population have not improved. In recent years, the DuoStim protocol (both follicular and luteal phase stimulation during the same menstrual cycle) has shown a potential for use in patients with POR.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 304 women who were diagnosed as POR and underwent the DuoStim protocol. We compared follicular phase stimulation (FPS) data and luteal phase stimulation (LPS) data of the same patients. We also compared the effects of different trigger drugs including urine human chorionic gonadotropin (uHCG; 10,000 IU), recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rHCG; 250 μg), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; 0.2 mg) at the FPS and LPS stages.

RESULTS

POR undergoing the DuoStim protocol resulted in a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved, normal fertilised oocytes, cleaved embryos, cryopreserved embryos, and good quality embryos at the LPS stage than at the FPS stage. Trigger drugs at the FPS stage did not affect the FPS stage data. Regardless of the stage, rHCG and GnRH-a yielded significantly more cryopreserved embryos and good quality embryos than uHCG.

CONCLUSION

The use of GnRH-a or rHCG as the trigger drug may be better than uHCG in both the FPS and LPS stages for POR undergoing the DuoStim protocol. This will increase the number of good quality embryos at the LPS stage. We found that the LPS stage results in more oocytes (and therefore more embryos) than the FPS stage.

Dual-trigger improves the outcomes of in vitro fertilization cycles in older patients with diminished ovarian reserve: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation has been applied on the women with poor ovarian response or diminished ovarian reserve. However, the results were controversial. The Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) stratification is a set of newly established criteria for low prognosis patients. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation on the in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of patients who fulfill the POSEIDON group 4 criteria.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study investigated 384 cycles fulfilling the POSEIDON group 4 criteria. The patients underwent IVF treatment using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The study group contained 194 cycles that received dual-trigger (human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG] plus GnRH-agonist) for final oocyte maturation. The control group included 114 cycles where final oocyte maturation was performed with only hCG. Baseline characteristics and cycle parameters, as well as IVF outcomes of both groups were compared.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar between the dual trigger group and the control group. In terms of IVF outcomes, the dual trigger group demonstrated significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, day-3 embryos, and top-quality day-3 embryos. A statistically significant improvement in clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate was also observed in the dual trigger group.

Conclusions

Our data suggests that dual trigger for final oocyte maturation might improve clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates of IVF cycles in patients fulfilling the POSEIDON group 4 criteria.

Dual trigger with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves live birth rate for women with diminished ovarian reserve

BACKGROUND

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) remains one of the greatest obstacles affecting the chance of a successful live birth after fertility treatment. The present study was set to investigate whether using a "dual trigger" consisted of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) plus gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) for final oocyte maturation could improve the IVF cycle outcomes for patients with diminished ovarian reserve.

METHODS

A total of 427 completed GnRH-antagonist downregulated IVF cycles with fresh embryo transfer (ET) were included in this retrospective analysis. DOR was defined as antral follicle count ≤5 and serum anti-Müllerian hormone level ≤ 1.1 ng/mL. The control group (n = 130) used a 6500 IU of recombinant hCG for trigger, and the study group (n = 297) used 0.2 mg of triptorelin plus 6500 IU of recombinant hCG for trigger.

RESULTS

The dual-trigger group had significantly higher oocyte fertilization rate (73.1% vs. 58.6%), clinical pregnancy rate (33.0% vs. 20.7%) and live birth rate (26.9% vs. 14.5%) when compared to the hCG trigger group. In addition, the abortion rate (17.4% vs. 37.0%) and embryo transfer cancellation rate (6.1% vs. 15.4%) were both significantly lower in the dual trigger group. The primary outcome measure was the live birth rate per oocyte retrieval cycle. Secondary outcome measures were embryo transfer cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, chemical pregnancy rate and abortion rate per oocyte retrieval cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual triggering the final oocyte maturation with GnRH-a and standard dose of hCG can significantly improve the live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and fertilization rate in women with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing GnRH antagonist down-regulated IVF-ICSI cycles.

Ovarian Reserve Markers to Identify Poor Responders in the Context of Poseidon Classification

It is well-known that poor ovarian reserve is a cause of infertility, poor response to gonadotrophin stimulation and poor success rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Some years ago a consensus was elaborated on precise criteria which can lead to a correct identification of poor responders (the Bologna criteria). More recently, the POSEIDON group has proposed a new stratified classification of patients with low prognosis, also with the aim of providing clinical indications for the management of these patients. A literature search was carried out for studies that investigated the ability of ovarian reserve markers, in particular AMH and AFC, to predict poor ovarian response in IVF cycles; secondly, studies regarding the Bologna criteria and their prognostic value were analyzed and available literature on POSEIDON classification was reported. The most recent markers of ovarian reserve (serum AMH and ultrasound AFC) have shown to provide a direct and accurate measurement of ovarian follicle pool. These markers have generally shown comparable predictive power for ovarian response and a number of retrieved oocytes in IVF cycles. "Abnormal ovarian reserve test" is a very important parameter both in the Bologna criteria and in the POSEIDON classification. Several studies have already been published about the reproductive outcome of patients defined as poor responders according to the ESHRE Bologna criteria: all of them agree on the poor IVF outcome and low pregnancy rate of these patients. Instead, being the POSEIDON classification of very recent publication, the efficacy of the POSEIDON approach in improving management and outcomes of POR patients has yet to be tested and validated with future prospective clinical trials. Prediction of poor response may help clinicians choose the stimulation protocol with the aim of gaining patient compliance and cost reduction, and many efforts have been made by researchers in this sense, including the formulation of the Bologna criteria and of the POSEIDON classification, in which the ovarian reserve markers (AMH and AFC) play a fundamental role.