Comparing 36.5°C with 37°C for human embryo culture: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Temperature fluctuations during embryo transfer can be mitigated by optimizing transfer protocol

RESEARCH QUESTION

What impact do variations in embryo transfer catheter loading and movement procedures have on temperature and pH fluctuations during embryo transfer?

DESIGN

Mock embryo transfers were conducted to test the impact of air flow/movement, use of catheter coverings, and the type of workstation used for catheter loading on catheter temperature. A thermocouple probe inserted into the tip of the outer catheter or taped to the exterior of the inner catheter recorded temperature within the catheter every 5 s from time of mock embryo loading (TL) to 60 s (TL + 60 s) or from the start of transit (TT). Fluctuations in culture medium pH in embryo transfer dishes were monitored.

RESULTS

The rate of cooling during transit was faster (all P < 0.05) when catheters were uncovered compared with all covering methods tested. This resulted in a lower catheter temperature at TL + 20 s (28.43 ± 0.30 °C) compared with catheters covered by plastic tubing (31.4 ± 0.30 °C), paper (31.0 ± 0.26 °C) or paper + thumb (31.1 ± 0.78 °C; all P ≤ 0.05). Temperature was maintained more effectively when catheters were loaded in a crib compared with a heated stage, until initiation of transit, when the rate of temperature decrease was similar. Culture medium pH increased more rapidly when embryo transfer dishes remained on a heated stage during the procedure compared with in an open crib.

CONCLUSIONS

Temperature loss during the embryo transfer procedure can be mitigated by reducing the transit time and using catheter coverings. Use of a crib for catheter loading only improved temperature stability while the catheter remained in the crib, not during transit, and reduced pH fluctuations during the procedure.

Effects of Melatonin, GM-CSF, IGF-1, and LIF in Culture Media on Embryonic Development: Potential Benefits of Individualization

The implantation of good-quality embryos to the receptive endometrium is essential for successful live birth through in vitro fertilization (IVF). The higher the quality of embryos, the higher the live birth rate per cycle, and so efforts have been made to obtain as many high-quality embryos as possible after fertilization. In addition to an effective controlled ovarian stimulation process to obtain high-quality embryos, the composition of the embryo culture medium in direct contact with embryos in vitro is also important. During embryonic development, under the control of female sex hormones, the fallopian tubes and endometrium create a microenvironment that supplies the nutrients and substances necessary for embryos at each stage. During this process, the development of the embryo is finely regulated by signaling molecules, such as growth factors and cytokines secreted from the epithelial cells of the fallopian tube and uterine endometrium. The development of embryo culture media has continued since the first successful human birth through IVF in 1978. However, there are still limitations to mimicking a microenvironment similar to the reproductive organs of women suitable for embryo development in vitro. Efforts have been made to overcome the harsh in vitro culture environment and obtain high-quality embryos by adding various supplements, such as antioxidants and growth factors, to the embryo culture medium. Recently, there has been an increase in the number of studies on the effect of supplementation in different clinical situations such as old age, recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and unexplained infertility; in addition, anticipation of the potential benefits from individuation is rising. This article reviews the effects of representative supplements in culture media on embryo development.

The Task Matters: A Comprehensive Review and Proposed Literature Score of the Effects of Chemical and Physical Parameters on Embryo Developmental Competence

To explore the effects of chemical and physical parameters on embryo developmental competence, we conducted a systematic search on PubMed for peer-reviewed original papers using specific keywords and medical subject heading terms. Studies of interest were selected from an initial cohort of 4141 potentially relevant records retrieved. The most relevant publications were critically evaluated to identify the effect of these parameters on embryo development. Moreover, we generated a literature score (LS) using the following procedure: (i) the number of studies favoring a reference group was expressed as a fraction of all analyzed papers; (ii) the obtained fraction was multiplied by 10 and converted into a decimal number. We identified and discussed six parameters (oxygen, temperature, humidity, oil overlay, light, pH). Moreover, we generated a LS according to five different comparisons (37 °C vs. <37 °C; 5% vs. 20% oxygen; 5-2% vs. 5% oxygen; humidity conditions vs. dry conditions; light exposure vs. reduced/protected light exposure). Only two comparisons (37 °C vs. <37 °C and 5% vs. 20% oxygen) yielded a medium-high LS (8.3 and 7, respectively), suggesting a prevalence of studies in favor of the reference group (37 °C and 5% oxygen). In summary, this review and LS methodology offer semi-quantitative information on studies investigating the effects of chemical and physical parameters on embryo developmental competence.

Culture conditions in the IVF laboratory: state of the ART and possible new directions

In the last four decades, the assisted reproductive technology (ART) field has witnessed advances, resulting in improving pregnancy rates and diminishing complications, in particular reduced incidence of multiple births. These improvements are secondary to advanced knowledge on embryonic physiology and metabolism, resulting in the ability to design new and improved culture conditions. Indeed, the incubator represents only a surrogate of the oviduct and uterus, and the culture conditions are only imitating the physiological environment of the female reproductive tract. In vivo, the embryo travels through a dynamic and changing environment from the oviduct to the uterus, while in vitro, the embryo is cultured in a static fashion. Importantly, while culture media play a critical role in optimising embryo development, a large host of additional factors are equally important. Additional potential variables, including but not limited to pH, temperature, osmolality, gas concentrations and light exposure need to be carefully controlled to prevent stress and permit optimal implantation potential. This manuscript will provide an overview of how different current culture conditions may affect oocyte and embryo viability with particular focus on human literature.

An all-37 °C thawing method improves the clinical outcomes of vitrified frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective study using a case-control matching analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of different temperatures and incubation times on the clinical outcomes of FET cycles during the thawing procedure and to select a better thawing method to improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1734 FET cycles from January 1, 2020, to January 30, 2022. Embryos vitrified using a KITAZATO Vitrification Kit were thawed at 37 °C in all steps (the case group, denoted the "all-37 °C" group) or at 37 °C and then at room temperature (RT; the control group, denoted the "37 °C-RT" group), according to the kit instructions. The groups were matched 1:1 to avoid confounding.

RESULTS

After case-control matching, 366 all-37 °C cycles and 366 37 °C-RT cycles were included. The baseline characteristics were similar (all P > 0.05) between the two groups after matching. FET of the all-37 °C group yielded a higher clinical pregnancy rate (CPR; P = 0.009) and implantation rate (IR; P = 0.019) than FET of the 37 °C-RT group. For blastocyst transfers, the CPR (P = 0.019) and IR (P = 0.025) were significantly higher in the all-37 °C group than in the 37 °C-RT group. For D3-embryo transfers, the CPR and IR were non-significantly higher in the all-37 °C group than in the 37 °C-RT group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Thawing vitrified embryos at 37 °C in all steps with shortening wash time can enhance CPR and IR in FET cycles. Well-designed prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the all-37 °C thawing method.

The effects of temperature variation treatments on embryonic development: a mouse study

Since the development of ART, embryos have been cultured at 37 °C in an attempt to mimic the in vivo conditions and the average body temperature of an adult. However, a gradient of temperatures within the reproductive tract has been demonstrated in humans and several other mammalian species. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of temperature variation treatments on mouse embryo quality through morphokinetic events, blastocyst morphology, the relative gene expression of Igf2, Bax, Bcl2 and Apaf1 and the metabolomics of individual culture media. Study groups consisted of 2 circadian treatments, T1 with embryos being cultured at 37 °C during the day and 35.5 °C during the night, T2 with 38.5 °C during the day and 37 °C during the night and a control group with constant 37 °C. Our main findings are that the lower-temperature group (T1) showed a consistent negative effect on mouse embryo development with “slow” cleaving embryos, poor-quality blastocysts, a higher expression of the apoptotic gene Apaf1, and a significantly different set of amino acids representing a more stressed metabolism. On the other hand, our higher-temperature group (T2) showed similar results to the control group, with no adverse effects on blastocyst viability.

Endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant for subfertile women in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial improvements in the success of assisted reproduction techniques (ART), live birth rates may remain consistently low, and practitioners may look for innovative treatments to improve the outcomes. The injection of embryo culture supernatant in the endometrial cavity can be undertaken at various time intervals before embryo transfer. It provides an altered endometrial environment through the secretion of factors considered to facilitate implantation. It is proposed that injection of the supernatant into the endometrial cavity prior to embryo transfer will stimulate the endometrium and provide better conditions for implantation to take place. An increased implantation rate would subsequently increase rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth, but current robust evidence on the efficacy of injected embryo culture supernatant is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer in women undergoing ART.

SEARCH METHODS

Our search strategies were designed with the help of the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Information Specialist. We sought to identify all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) meeting inclusion criteria. Searches were performed on 2 December 2019. We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, trials registries and grey literature. We made further searches in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) fertility assessment and treatment guidelines. We handsearched reference lists of relevant systematic reviews and RCTs, together with searches of PubMed and Google for any recent trials that have not yet been indexed in the major databases. We had no language or location restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs testing the use of endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer during an ART cycle, compared with the non-use of this intervention, the use of placebo or the use of any other similar drug.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias, extracted data from studies and attempted to contact the authors where data were missing. We pooled studies using a fixed-effect model. Our primary outcomes were live birth/ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage. We performed statistical analysis using Review Manager 5. We assessed evidence quality using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We found five RCTs suitable for inclusion in the review (526 women analysed). We made two comparisons: embryo culture supernatant use versus standard care or no intervention; and embryo culture supernatant use versus culture medium. All studies were published as full-text articles. Data derived from the reports or through direct communication with investigators were available for the final meta-analysis performed. The GRADE evidence quality of studies ranged from very low-quality to moderate-quality. Factors reducing evidence quality included high risk of bias due to lack of blinding, unclear risk of publication bias and selective outcome reporting, serious inconsistency among study outcomes, and serious imprecision due to wide confidence intervals (CIs) and low numbers of events. Comparison 1. Endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer versus standard care or no intervention: One study reported live birth only and two reported the composite outcome live birth and ongoing pregnancy. We are uncertain whether endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer during an ART cycle improves live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates compared to no intervention (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.70; 3 RCTs; n = 340, I² = 84%; very low-quality evidence). Results suggest that if the chance of live birth/ongoing pregnancy following placebo or no treatment is assumed to be 42%, the chance following the endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer would vary between 22% and 81%. We are also uncertain whether the endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant could decrease miscarriage rates, compared to no intervention (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.78, 4 RCTs, n = 430, I² = 58%, very low-quality evidence). Results suggest that if the chance of miscarriage following placebo or no treatment is assumed to be 9%, the chance following injection of embryo culture supernatant would vary between 3% and 30%. Concerning the secondary outcomes, we are uncertain whether the injection of embryo culture supernatant prior to embryo transfer could increase clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.61; 5 RCTs; n = 526, I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence), decrease ectopic pregnancy rates (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.24; n = 250; 2 RCTs; I² = 41%; very low-quality evidence), decrease multiple pregnancy rates (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.83; 2 RCTs; n = 150; I² = 63%; very low-quality evidence), or decrease preterm delivery rates (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.42; 1 RCT; n = 90; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence), compared to no intervention. Finally, there may have been little or no difference in foetal abnormality rates between the two groups (OR 3.10, 95% CI 0.12 to 79.23; 1 RCT; n = 60; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence). Comparison 2. Endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant versus endometrial injection of culture medium before embryo transfer We are uncertain whether the use of embryo culture supernatant improves clinical pregnancy rates, compared to the use of culture medium (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.46; n = 96; 1 RCT; very low-quality evidence). No study reported live birth/ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic or multiple pregnancy, preterm delivery or foetal abnormalities.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain whether the addition of endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer as a routine method for the treatment of women undergoing ART can improve pregnancy outcomes. This conclusion is based on current available data from five RCTs, with evidence quality ranging from very low to moderate across studies. Further large well-designed RCTs reporting on live births and adverse clinical outcomes are still required to clarify the exact role of endometrial injection of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer.

Temperature of embryo culture for assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

'Infertility' is defined as the failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. One in six couples experience a delay in becoming pregnant. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is one of the assisted reproductive techniques used to enable couples to achieve a live birth. One of the processes involved in IVF is embryo culture in an incubator, where a stable environment is created and maintained. The incubators are set at approximately 37°C, which is based on the human core body temperature, although several studies have shown that this temperature may in fact be lower in the female reproductive tract and that this could be beneficial. In this review we have included randomised controlled trials which compared different temperatures of embryo culture.

OBJECTIVES

To assess different temperatures of embryo culture for human assisted reproduction, which may lead to higher live birth rates.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases and trial registers: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov, The World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform search portal, DARE, Web of Knowledge, OpenGrey, LILACS database, PubMed and Google Scholar. Furthermore, we manually searched the references of relevant articles and contacted experts in the field to obtain additional data. We did not restrict the search by language or publication status. We performed the last search on 6 March 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of articles retrieved by the search. Full texts of potentially eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained and screened. We included all RCTs which compared different temperatures of embryo culture in IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with a minimum difference in temperature between the two incubators of ≥ 0.5°C. The search process is shown in the PRISMA flow chart.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data from the included studies; the third review author resolved any disagreements. We contacted trial authors to provide additional data. The primary review outcomes were live birth and miscarriage. Clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, multiple pregnancy and adverse events were secondary outcomes. All extracted data were dichotomous outcomes, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on an intention-to-treat basis. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for the main comparisons using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs, with a total of 563 women, that compared incubation of embryos at 37.0°C or 37.1°C with a lower incubator temperature (37.0°C versus 36.6°C, 37.1°C versus 36.0°C, 37.0° versus 36.5°C). Live birth, miscarriage, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and multiple pregnancy were reported. After additional information from the authors, we confirmed one study as having no adverse events; the other two studies did not report adverse events. We did not perform a meta-analysis as there were not enough studies included per outcome. Live birth was not graded since there were no data of interest available. The evidence for the primary outcome, miscarriage, was of very low quality. The evidence for the secondary outcomes, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and multiple pregnancy was also of very low quality. We downgraded the evidence because of high risk of bias (for performance bias) and imprecision due to limited included studies and wide CIs.Only one study reported the primary outcome, live birth (n = 52). They performed randomisation at the level of oocytes and not per woman, and used a paired design whereby two embryos, one from 36.0°C and one from 37.0°C, were transferred. The data from this study were not interpretable in a meaningful way and therefore not presented. Only one study reported miscarriage. We are uncertain whether incubation at a lower temperature decreases the miscarriage (odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.55; 1 study, N = 412; very low-quality evidence).Of the two studies that reported clinical pregnancy, only one of them performed randomisation per woman. We are uncertain whether a lower temperature improves clinical pregnancy compared to 37°C for embryo incubation (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.60; 1 study, N = 412; very low-quality evidence). For the outcome, ongoing pregnancy, we are uncertain if a lower temperature is better than 37°C (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.62; 1 study, N = 412; very low quality-evidence). Multiple pregnancy was reported by two studies, one of which used a paired design, which made it impossible to report the data per temperature. We are uncertain if a temperature lower than 37°C reduces multiple pregnancy (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.07; 1 study, N = 412; very low-quality evidence). There was insufficient evidence to make a conclusion regarding adverse events, as no studies reported data suitable for analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review evaluated different temperatures for embryo culture during IVF. There is a lack of evidence for the majority of outcomes in this review. Based on very low-quality evidence, we are uncertain if incubating at a lower temperature than 37°C improves pregnancy outcomes. More RCTs are needed for comparing different temperatures of embryo culture which require reporting of clinical outcomes as live birth, miscarriage, clinical pregnancy and adverse events.

Tracking quality: can embryology key performance indicators be used to identify clinically relevant shifts in pregnancy rate?

STUDY QUESTION

Can embryology key performance indicators (KPIs) detect shifts in laboratory performance that precede changes in clinical outcomes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Day 5 usable blastocyst rate (D5BUR) is an important embryology KPI that complements total usable blastocyst rate (TBUR) in its ability to rapidly identify adverse embryology outcomes, prior to changes in clinical outcomes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The hypothesis that monitoring performance of an IVF laboratory using statistical process controls (SPCs) can act as an early warning signal of shifts in laboratory conditions is a hypothesis that requires validation. The Vienna consensus report recently defined KPIs for monitoring fresh IVF and ICSI cycles, but the effectiveness of using these KPIs for detecting clinically relevant shifts following changes in laboratory processes is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective, multicentre, analysis of KPIs for 1971 fresh IVF and ICSI cycles during three consecutive 5-month periods (P1, P2 and P3) during which the culture medium was changed in the middle period.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

ICSI fertilisation rate, IVF fertilisation rate, D5BUR, TBUR and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were tracked monthly and analysed for SPC using Shewhart control charts. Out-of-control KPIs were identified by warning (2-sigma) and control (3-sigma) limits. The effect of the laboratory culture medium change on embryology KPIs and cumulative CPR was investigated using a one-way ANOVA or Pearson Chi-squared test and logistic regression.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

D5BUR decreased from 32 to 25% after the culture medium was changed, and the decrease was detected within 1 week after the change (P < 0.0001). D5BUR subsequently increased after a change back to the original medium. A decrease in CPR (51-36%) after the medium change was also observed but was not detected until 3 months after the shift in D5BUR (P = 0.0005). Overall, the change in culture medium independently influenced D5BUR, CPR and cumulative CPR. Importantly, TBUR (41%) was not affected by the change in culture medium, remaining within control limits for all three culture periods, indicating that the overall blastocyst rate alone may not sufficiently monitor embryology laboratory performance.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The statistical KPI monitoring system demonstrated by the current study may be less effective at identifying KPI shifts in smaller clinics with lower cycle volumes. Live-birth rate per cycle started was not included as a clinical KPI.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study demonstrates that statistical KPI monitoring systems have the potential to provide systematic, early detection of adverse outcomes in ART laboratories after planned or unexpected shifts in conditions.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funds were used for the study. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Pre-ovulatory follicular cooling correlates positively with the potential for pregnancy in dairy cows: Implications for human IVF

INTRODUCTION

In rabbits, pigs, cows and humans, pre-ovulatory Graafian follicles may be more than 1.0 °C cooler than ovarian stroma and both these ovarian compartments are cooler than deep rectal temperatures. This study examines the effect of follicular cooling on the incidence of pregnancy in dairy cows.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Follicular measurements were compiled for cows with one ovulatory follicle (monovular) and cows with one ovulatory follicle per ovary (bi-ovular) and their corresponding uterine horn contents. The study sample consisted of 80 pre-ovulatory follicles in which antral temperatures were measured using a fine thermistor probe.

RESULTS

Mean (± S.D.) follicular fluid temperature of the ovulating follicles was 1.12 ± 0.86 °C significantly cooler (P < 0.0001) than rectal temperatures. No significant differences in temperatures were found for non-ovulating follicles. In follicles undergoing cooling (n = 58), a one-tenth of a degree drop in temperature with reference to control rectal temperature gave rise to a 3.6-fold increase (odds ratio) in the pregnancy rate (P = 0.003). The follicle-rectum temperature differential giving rise to pregnancy (n = 18; 1.51 ± 1.15 °C) was significantly greater (P = 0.004) than the differential recorded in cooling follicles at that did not result in a subsequent pregnancy (n = 40; 0.83 ± 0.57 °C).

CONCLUSION

Follicular cooling is needed to trigger ovulation and correlates positively with the potential for pregnancy in cows. This finding has interesting implications for human reproductive medicine.

The effect of different temperature conditions on human embryosin vitro: two sibling studies

RESEARCH QUESTION

What temperature is optimal for human embryo development up to day 5 or 6?

DESIGN

Two prospective sibling oocyte studies on culture temperature were conducted in a university-based tertiary referral centre. Eligibility critera for both studies: Study 1: 50 cycles between August and October 2015, with culture at a stable temperature (37.0°C ± 0.3°C) or culture using a circadian temperature rhythm (CTR) (1 am to 6 am: 36.6°C, gradual increase to 37.5°C; 11 am to 9 pm: 37.5°C; gradual decrease to 36.6°C); study 2: 99 cycles between April and November 2016, with stable culture at 36.6°C or 37.1°C.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

fertilization and embryo development (top and good quality) up to day 5 or 6, and utilization rate (number of embryos transferred and cryopreserved per zygote). Secondary outcome measure: clinical pregnancy (number of pregnancies with at least one gestational sac).

RESULTS

An incubator with CTR was used for culture. An effect was found on embryo development (utilization rate: 42.1% versus 32.6%; P = 0.014), but not on clinical pregnancy rate (60.0% versus 45.5%; P = 0.670). Stable culture at 36.6°C or 37.1°C did not affect embryo development (utilization rate: 40.0% versus 40.4%; P = 0.905); clinical pregnancy rate was improved by culture at 37.1°C (46.4% versus 74.2%; P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Culture in an incubator with CTR does not improve fertilization rate or embryo quality. Embryo culture at 36.6°C or 37.1°C showed similar embryo development.