1
|
Albujja MH, Al-Ghedan M, Dakshnamoorthy L, Pla Victori J. Preimplantation genetic testing for embryos predisposed to hereditary cancer: Possibilities and challenges. CANCER PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPY 2024; 2:1-14. [PMID: 38328708 PMCID: PMC10846329 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpt.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), which was developed as an alternative to prenatal genetic testing, allows couples to avoid pregnancies with abnormal chromosomes and the subsequent termination of the affected fetus. Originally used for early onset monogenic conditions, PGT is now used to prevent various types of inherited cancer conditions based on the development of PGT technology, assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs), and in vitro fertilization (IVF). This review provides insights into the potential benefits and challenges associated with the application of PGT for hereditary cancer and provides an overview of the existing literature on this test, with a particular focus on the current challenges related to laws, ethics, counseling, and technology. Additionally, this review predicts the future potential applications of this method. Although PGT may be utilized to predict and prevent hereditary cancer, each case should be comprehensively evaluated. The motives of couples must be assessed to prevent the misuse of this technique for eugenic purposes, and non-pathogenic phenotypes must be carefully evaluated. Pathological cases that require this technology should also be carefully considered based on legal and ethical reasoning. PGT may be the preferred treatment for hereditary cancer cases; however, such cases require careful case-by-case evaluations. Therefore, this study concludes that multidisciplinary counseling and support for patients and their families are essential to ensure that PGT is a viable option that meets all legal and ethical concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed H. Albujja
- Department of Forensic Sciences, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences, Riyadh 11452, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maher Al-Ghedan
- Genetics Laboratory, Thuriah Medical Center, Riyadh 11523, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Josep Pla Victori
- Department of Genetic Counselling, VI-RMA Global, Valencia 46004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wirleitner B, Hrubá M, Schuff M, Hradecký L, Stecher A, Damko A, Stadler J, Spitzer D, Obkircher M, Murtinger M. Embryo drop-out rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a retrospective data analysis from the DoLoRes study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:193-203. [PMID: 37878220 PMCID: PMC10789689 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02976-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the decline in transferable embryos in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles due to (a) non-biopsable blastocyst quality, (b) failure of genetic analysis, (c) diagnosis of uniform numerical or structural chromosomal aberrations, and/or (d) chromosomal aberrations in mosaic constitution. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study comprised outcomes of 1562 blastocysts originating from 363 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, respectively, 226 IVF couples in the period between January 2016 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were PGT-A cycles with trophectoderm biopsy (TB) and next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS Out of 1562 blastocysts, 25.8% were lost due to non-biopsable and/or non-freezable embryo quality. In 10.3% of all biopsied blastocysts, genetic analysis failed. After exclusion of embryos with uniform or chromosomal aberrations in mosaic, only 18.1% of those originally yielded remained as diagnosed euploid embryos suitable for transfer. This translates into 50.4% of patients and 57.6% of stimulated cycles with no euploid embryo left for transfer. The risk that no transfer can take place rose significantly with a lower number of oocytes and with increasing maternal age. The chance for at least one euploid blastocyst/cycle in advanced maternal age (AMA)-patients was 33.3% compared to 52.1% in recurrent miscarriage (RM), 59.8% in recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and 60.0% in severe male factor (SMF). CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates that PGT-A is accompanied by high embryo drop-out rates. IVF-practitioners should be aware that their patients run a high risk of ending up without any embryo suitable for transfer after (several) stimulation cycles, especially in AMA patients. Patients should be informed in detail about the frequency of inconclusive or mosaic results, with the associated risk of not having an euploid embryo available for transfer after PGT-A, as well as the high cost involved in this type of testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina Hrubá
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Next Lab Genetika, Parková 11a, 32600, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Maximilian Schuff
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Libor Hradecký
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Astrid Stecher
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Adriane Damko
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Jürgen Stadler
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Innsbrucker Bundesstrasse 35, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Dietmar Spitzer
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Innsbrucker Bundesstrasse 35, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Maximilian Murtinger
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
- Next Fertility St. Gallen, Kürsteinerstrasse 2, 9015, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gleicher N, Barad DH, Patrizio P, Orvieto R. We have reached a dead end for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:2730-2734. [PMID: 35355062 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The hypothesis of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was first proposed 20 years ago, suggesting that during IVF elimination of aneuploid embryos prior to transfer will improve implantation rates of remaining embryos and, therefore, increase pregnancy and live birth rates, while also reducing miscarriages. Subsequently, unvalidated and increasingly unrestricted clinical utilization of PGT-A called for at least one properly randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess cumulative live birth rates following a single oocyte retrieval, utilizing all fresh and frozen embryos of an IVF cycle. Only recently two such RCTs were published, however both, when properly analysed, not only failed to demonstrate significant advantages from utilization of PGT-A, but actually demonstrated outcome deficits in comparison to non-use of PGT-A, when patient selection biases in favour of PGT-A were reversed. Moreover, because of high embryo mosaicism at the blastocyst stage and, therefore, high false-positive rates from trophectoderm biopsies, large numbers of chromosomal-normal embryos with normal pregnancy potential are unnecessarily left unused or discarded, indisputably causing harm to affected couples. We, therefore, strongly call for restricting PGT-A to only research protocols and, as of this point in time, encourage professional societies in the field to follow suit with appropriate practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Gleicher
- Center for Human Reproduction (CHR), New York, NY, USA.,Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Stem Cell and Embryology Laboratory, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.,Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David H Barad
- Center for Human Reproduction (CHR), New York, NY, USA
| | - Pasquale Patrizio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Raoul Orvieto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Infertility and IVF Unit, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Tel Aviv University, Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang L, Wang X, Li M, Liu Y, Ou X, Chen L, Shao X, Quan S, Duan J, He W, Shen H, Sun L, Yu Y, Cram DS, Leigh D, Yao Y. PGT-A: The biology and hidden failures of randomized control trials. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:1211-1221. [PMID: 35765263 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE PGT-A for embryo selection has undergone significant advancements in the last two decades and yet many studies still fail to demonstrate any clinical benefits over traditional embryo morphology selection. To understand this conundrum, we performed a multi-center clinical study of PGT-A patients, where morphology selection (Mo-S) and euploid selection (Eu-S) outcomes were directly compared. METHOD All suitable blastocysts were biopsied and analysed for chromosome copy number. Outcomes (positive beta hCG, implantation, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates) for euploid selection were compared to morphology selection using single embryo transfers RESULTS: Compared to Eu-S embryos, Mo-S embryos resulted in significant reduction of outcomes for positive beta hCG (P=0.0005), implantation (P=0.0008), ongoing pregnancy (P=0.0046), livebirth (P=0.0112), babies per transfer (P=0.0112) and babies per embryo transferred (P=0.0112). Morphology selection resulted in patients of all age groups having non-euploid embryos chosen for transfer. Post-hoc evaluation of individual clinic performances showed variable transfer outcomes that could potentially confound the true benefits of PGT-A. CONCLUSION Embryo chromosome status is central to improved embryo transfer outcomes and sole reliance on current morphology-based selection practices, without euploid selection, will always compromise outcomes. Often overlooked but a major effector of successful PGT-A outcomes are individual clinic performances. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wang
- Genetics and Precision Medicine Center, the First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohong Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yun Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, 900thHospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xianghong Ou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Shao
- Reproductive and Genetic Medicine Center, Dalian Municipal Women and Children's Medical Center, New Sports City, Dalian, China
| | - Song Quan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinliang Duan
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, the 924thHospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Guilin, China
| | - Wei He
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Huan Shen
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ling Sun
- Department of Assisted Reproductive Technology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuexin Yu
- Department of Reproduction Medicine, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No.5, Shenyang, China
| | - David S Cram
- Genetics and Precision Medicine Center, the First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
| | - Donald Leigh
- Genetics and Precision Medicine Center, the First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
| | - Yuanqing Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang L, Wang X, Liu Y, Ou X, Li M, Chen L, Shao X, Quan S, Duan J, He W, Shen H, Sun L, Yu Y, Cram DS, Leigh D, Yao Y. IVF embryo choices and pregnancy outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1709-1717. [PMID: 34480803 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate the chromosome status and transfer outcomes of embryos selected using routine "best morphology" IVF practices. METHOD A prospective multi-center, non-selection cohort study involving patients undertaking IVF treatment. Study entry conditions were blastocyst biopsy, >1 embryo with chromosome analysis and frozen transfer of the best morphology embryo. Primary analyses were βhCG positive, implantation, ongoing pregnancy and birth rates and pregnancy-stage progression failures. RESULTS After transfer, embryo chromosome status was assigned and outcomes divided into two primary groups - euploids (n = 135) and aneuploids (n = 53). Compared to euploid embryo transfers, aneuploid embryos had significantly lower primary outcomes (+βhCG: 67% vs. 30%, p < 0.0001; IR: 56% vs. 19%, p < 0.0001; ongoing week 12: 51% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001; and livebirths: 50% vs. 8%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Transfers were further subdivided into smaller groups according to their main chromosomal feature. Stage analysis showed higher failure rates for aneuploids to initiate a pregnancy (p < 0.0001), higher subclinical miscarriage rate (p = 0.0402) and higher clinical miscarriage rate (p = 0.0038). CONCLUSION Routine morphology-based embryo selection resulted in a high euploid selection rate but a significant number of aneuploid embryos were still inadvertently selected for transfer (28%) with the subsequent high failure rates for pregnancy initiation and progression having implications for appropriate patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wang
- Genetics and Precision Medicine Center, The First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohong Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, China
| | - Yun Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xianghong Ou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Shao
- Reproductive and Genetic Medicine Center, Dalian Municipal Women and Children's Medical Center, Dalian, China
| | - Song Quan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinliang Duan
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, The 924th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Guilin, China
| | - Wei He
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Huan Shen
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ling Sun
- Department of Assisted Reproductive Technology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuexin Yu
- Department of Reproduction Medicine, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - David S Cram
- Genetics and Precision Medicine Center, The First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
| | - Donald Leigh
- Genetics and Precision Medicine Center, The First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
| | - Yuanqing Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Popovic M, Dhaenens L, Boel A, Menten B, Heindryckx B. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 26:313-334. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and next generation sequencing (NGS) are currently the preferred techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Although this approach delivered important improvements over previous testing strategies, increased sensitivity has also prompted a rise in diagnoses of uncertain clinical significance. This includes reports of chromosomal mosaicism, suggesting the presence of karyotypically distinct cells within a single TE biopsy. Given that PGT-A relies on the chromosomal constitution of the biopsied cells being representative of the entire embryo, the prevalence and clinical implications of blastocyst mosaicism continue to generate considerable controversy.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
The objective of this review was to evaluate existing scientific evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts. We discuss insights from a biological, technical and clinical perspective to examine the implications of this diagnostic dilemma for PGT-A.
SEARCH METHODS
The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were used to search peer-reviewed publications using the following terms: ‘chromosomal mosaicism’, ‘human’, ‘embryo’, ‘blastocyst’, ‘implantation’, ‘next generation sequencing’ and ‘clinical management’ in combination with other keywords related to the subject area. Relevant articles in the English language, published until October 2019 were critically discussed.
OUTCOMES
Chromosomal mosaicism predominately results from errors in mitosis following fertilization. Although it appears to be less pervasive at later developmental stages, establishing the true prevalence of mosaicism in human blastocysts remains exceedingly challenging. In a clinical context, blastocyst mosaicism can only be reported based on a single TE biopsy and has been ascribed to 2–13% of embryos tested using NGS. Conversely, data from NGS studies disaggregating whole embryos suggests that mosaicism may be present in up to ~50% of blastocysts. However, differences in testing and reporting strategies, analysis platforms and the number of cells sampled inherently overshadow current data, while added uncertainties emanate from technical artefacts. Moreover, laboratory factors and aspects of in vitro culture generate further variability. Outcome data following the transfer of blastocysts diagnosed as mosaic remain limited. Current studies suggest that the transfer of putative mosaic embryos may lead to healthy live births, but also results in significantly reduced ongoing pregnancy rates compared to the transfer of euploid blastocysts. Observations that a subset of mosaic blastocysts has the capacity to develop normally have sparked discussions regarding the ability of embryos to self-correct. However, there is currently no direct evidence to support this assumption. Nevertheless, the exclusion of mosaic blastocysts results in fewer embryos available for transfer, which may inevitably compromise treatment outcomes.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts remains a perpetual diagnostic and clinical dilemma in the context of PGT-A. This review offers an important scientific resource, informing about the challenges, risks and value of diagnosing mosaicism. Elucidating these uncertainties will ultimately pave the way towards improved clinical and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Popovic
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FAST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lien Dhaenens
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FAST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annekatrien Boel
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FAST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Björn Menten
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Björn Heindryckx
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FAST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- P R Braude
- Division of Women's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M H Johnson
- Anatomy School, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Homer HA. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): The biology, the technology and the clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 59:317-324. [PMID: 30811595 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) seeks to identify preimplantation embryos with a normal chromosome complement (euploid) during in vitro fertilisation (IVF). By sifting out embryos with abnormal chromosome numbers (aneuploid), PGT-A should theoretically improve pregnancy success. However, earlier versions of PGT-A were ineffective, and in some cases, detrimental, due to biopsy-induced trauma and because the technology at the time could analyse only a fraction of all chromosomes. More recently, the emergence of technologies enabling all chromosomes to be analysed and a switch to less traumatic blastocyst-stage biopsy have seen widespread uptake of PGT-A. Assessing the full impact of blastocyst biopsy PGT-A requires consideration of multiple factors, including embryonic mosaicism, sensitivity of the technological platform used, embryo loss during long-term in vitro culture, embryo cryopreservation and inter-clinic variability in expertise. Significantly, there hasnt yet been an appropriately designed randomised controlled trial (RCT) of blastocyst biopsy PGT-A analysed by intention-to-treat that accounts for all these parameters on a per-cycle basis. The three RCTs reporting benefits studied outcomes on a per-embryo transfer basis were small and underpowered and demonstrated benefits for a very select sub-group of good prognosis patients. The liberal use of this very expensive IVF add-on for other patient populations has not yet been shown to be effective, or indeed, without harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayden Anthony Homer
- Christopher Chen Oocyte Biology Research Laboratory, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Clinic, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Queensland Fertility Group, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhou S, Cheng D, Ouyang Q, Xie P, Lu C, Gong F, Hu L, Tan Y, Lu G, Lin G. Prevalence and authenticity of de-novo segmental aneuploidy (>16 Mb) in human blastocysts as detected by next-generation sequencing. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 37:511-520. [PMID: 30228073 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What is the prevalence and authenticity of de-novo segmental aneuploidies (>16 Mb) detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in human preimplantation blastocysts? DESIGN Between April 2013 and June 2016, 5735 blastocysts from 1854 couples (average age 33.11 ± 5.65 years) underwent preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) or for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using NGS on trophectoderm (TE) biopsy samples. The prevalence of de-novo segmental aneuploidy was calculated from these results. Forty blastocysts with de-novo segmental aneuploidy detected by NGS, which had been donated for research, were warmed for further fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) analysis to confirm their authenticity. RESULTS The frequency of de-novo segmental aneuploidies in blastocysts was 10.13% (581/5735); the phenomenon was not related to maternal age and occurred on all chromosomes. Of the 40 donated blastocysts, 39 were successfully warmed and fixed for FISH analysis at the single-cell level. The de-novo segmental aneuploidies identified by NGS were confirmed by FISH in all 39 blastocysts. However, the de-novo segmental aneuploidies in these blastocysts were not all pure patterns, with 66.67% (26/39) of blastocysts exhibiting mosaic patterns varying from 8.30% to 92.86% of cells with de-novo segmental aneuploidy. The concordance rate between NGS and FISH in TE and inner cell mass (ICM) samples was 47.69% (31/65). CONCLUSIONS De-novo segmental aneuploidy above 16 Mb occurred in blastocysts and could be detected by NGS, while some aneuploidies existed as mosaics in both TE and ICM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Zhou
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Dehua Cheng
- Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qi Ouyang
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Pingyuan Xie
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Changfu Lu
- Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Fei Gong
- Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liang Hu
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yueqiu Tan
- Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Guangxiu Lu
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China
| | - Ge Lin
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Medicine College, Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|