Discovery and validation of peritoneal endometriosis biomarkers in peritoneal fluid and serum

Omics-based novel strategies in the diagnosis of endometriosis

Endometriosis, an enigmatic and chronic disorder, is considered a debilitating condition despite being benign. Globally, this gynecologic disorder affects up to 10% of females of reproductive age, impacting almost 190 million individuals. A variety of genetic and environmental factors are involved in endometriosis development, hence the pathophysiology and etiology of endometriosis remain unclear. The uncertainty of the etiology of the disease and its complexity along with nonspecific symptoms have led to misdiagnosis or lack of diagnosis of affected people. Biopsy and laparoscopy are referred to as the gold standard for endometriosis diagnosis. However, the invasiveness of the procedure, the unnecessary operation in disease-free women, and the dependence of the reliability of diagnosis on experience in this area are considered the most significant limitations. Therefore, continuous studies have attempted to offer a noninvasive and reliable approach. The recent advances in modern technologies have led to the generation of large-scale biological data sets, known as -omics data, resulting in the proceeding of the -omics century in biomedical sciences. Thereby, the present study critically reviews novel and noninvasive biomarkers that are based on -omics approaches from 2020 onward. The findings reveal that biomarkers identified based on genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics are potentially able to diagnose endometriosis, predict prognosis, and stage patients, and potentially, in the near future, a multi-panel of these biomarkers will generate clinical benefits.

Metabolic profile of follicular fluid in patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF: a pilot study

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the metabolic characteristics of follicular fluid in patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF?

DESIGN

This was an exploratory cohort study on endometriosis. In total, 19 infertile patients with ovarian endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy, and 23 controls matched in terms of age and body mass index (women with infertility due to male or tubal factors) were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent IVF treatment with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol, and follicular fluid was collected at oocyte retrieval. The metabolomics of follicular fluid samples was analysed using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography Orbitrap Exploris mass spectrometer (UHPLC-OE-MS). The best combination of biomarkers was selected by performing stepwise logistic regression analysis with backward elimination.

RESULTS

Fifteen metabolites were identified as biomarkers associated with endometriosis. A final model containing 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, biotin, n-acetyl-L-methionine and n-methylnicotinamide was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed the value of these parameters in diagnosing endometriosis, with sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 95.7%. Enrichment analysis via the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome showed that 15 metabolites were enriched in eight metabolic pathways.

CONCLUSION

Metabolomics based on UHPLC-OE-MS effectively characterized the metabolomics analysis of follicular fluid in patients with ovarian endometriosis. These findings may provide a new basis for better understanding of how diseases progress, and for the discovery of new biomarkers.

Autoantibody screening of plasma and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

Are there specific autoantibody profiles in patients with endometriosis that are different from those in controls?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This study did not reveal a significantly higher prevalence of autoantibodies in the studied groups of patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Various inflammatory factors are postulated to be involved in the pathomechanisms of endometriosis, and a potential link exists with autoimmune diseases, which may also play an important role. As the diagnosis of endometriosis remains invasive, it can only be confirmed using laparoscopy with histopathological examination of tissues. Numerous studies have focused on identifying useful biomarkers to confirm the disease, but without unequivocal effects. Autoantibodies are promising molecules that serve as potential prognostic factors.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A multicentre, cross-sectional study was conducted over 18 months (between 2018 and 2019), at eight Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in several cities across Poland on 137 patients undergoing laparoscopic examination for the diagnosis of endometriosis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS

During laparoscopy, we obtained plasma samples from 137 patients and peritoneal fluid (PF) samples from 98 patients. Patients with autoimmune diseases were excluded from the study. Autoantibody profiling was performed using HuProt v3.1 human proteome microarrays.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We observed no significant differences in the expression of autoantibodies in the plasma or PF between the endometriosis and control groups. The study revealed that in the PF of women with Stage II endometriosis, compared with other stages, there were significantly higher reactivity signals for ANAPC15 and GABPB1 (adj. P < 0.016 and adj. P < 0.026, respectively; logFC > 1 in both cases). Comparison of the luteal and follicular phases in endometriosis patients revealed that levels of NEIL1 (adj. P < 0.029), MAGEB4 (adj. P < 0.029), and TNIP2 (adj. P < 0.042) autoantibody signals were significantly higher in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase in PF samples of patients with endometriosis. No differences were observed between the two phases of the cycle in plasma or between women with endometriosis and controls. Clustering of PF and plasma samples did not reveal unique autoantibody profiles for endometriosis; however, comparison of PF and plasma in the same patient showed a high degree of concordance.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Although this study was performed using the highest-throughput protein array available, it does not cover the entire human proteome and cannot be used to study potentially promising post-translational modifications. Autoantibody levels depend on numerous factors, such as infections; therefore the autoantibody tests should be repeated for more objective results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Although endometriosis has been linked to different autoimmune diseases, it is unlikely that autoimmune responses mediated by specific autoantibodies play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of this inflammatory disease. Our study shows that in searching for biomarkers of endometriosis, it may be more efficient to use higher-throughput proteomic microarrays, which may allow the detection of potentially new biomarkers. Only research on such a scale, and possibly with different technologies, can help discover biomarkers that will change the method of endometriosis diagnosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by a grant from the Polish Ministry of Health (grant no. 6/6/4/1/NPZ/2017/1210/1352). It was also funded by the Estonian Research Council (grant PRG1076) and the Horizon 2020 Innovation Grant (ERIN; grant no. EU952516), Enterprise Estonia (grant no. EU48695), and MSCA-RISE-2020 project TRENDO (grant no. 101008193). The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Metabolites Analysis in Endometriosis Patients: A Prospective Observational Translational Study

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis affects women of reproductive age, and its pathogenesis is still unclear. Typically, it overlaps other similar medical and surgical conditions, determining a delay in early diagnosis. Metabolomics allows studying metabolic changes in different physiological or pathological states to discover new potential biomarkers. We used the gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) to explore metabolic alterations in endometriosis to better understand its pathophysiology and find new biomarkers.

METHODS

Twenty-two serum samples of patients with symptomatic endometriosis and ten without it were collected and subjected to GC-MS analysis. Multivariate and univariate statistical analyses were performed, followed by pathway analysis.

RESULTS

Partial least squares discriminant analysis was performed to determine the differences between the two groups (p = 0.003). Threonic acid, 3-hydroxybutyric acid, and proline increased significantly in endometriosis patients, while alanine and valine decreased. ROC curves were built to test the diagnostic power of metabolites. The pathway analysis identified the synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies and the biosynthesis of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan as the most altered pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolomic approach identifies metabolic alterations in women with endometriosis. These findings may improve our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of disease and the discovery of new biomarkers.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis

Endometriosis affects approximately 190 million women and people assigned female at birth worldwide. It is a chronic, inflammatory, gynecologic disease marked by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, which in many patients is associated with debilitating painful symptoms. Patients with endometriosis are also at greater risk of infertility, emergence of fatigue, multisite pain, and other comorbidities. Thus, endometriosis is best understood as a condition with variable presentation and effects at multiple life stages. A long diagnostic delay after symptom onset is common, and persistence and recurrence of symptoms despite treatment is common. This review discusses the potential genetic, hormonal, and immunologic factors that lead to endometriosis, with a focus on current diagnostic and management strategies for gynecologists, general practitioners, and clinicians specializing in conditions for which patients with endometriosis are at higher risk. It examines evidence supporting the different surgical, pharmacologic, and non-pharmacologic approaches to treating patients with endometriosis and presents an easy to adopt step-by-step management strategy. As endometriosis is a multisystem disease, patients with the condition should ideally be offered a personalized, multimodal, interdisciplinary treatment approach. A priority for future discovery is determining clinically informative sub-classifications of endometriosis that predict prognosis and enhance treatment prioritization.

Presurgical blood metabolites and risk of postsurgical pelvic pain in young patients with endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To identify metabolites in presurgical blood associated with risk of persistent postsurgical pelvic pain 1 year after endometriosis surgery in adolescent and young adult patients.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study within the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood, a US-based longitudinal cohort of adolescents and women enrolled from 2012-2018.

SETTING

Two tertiary care hospitals.

PATIENT(S)

Laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis patients (n = 180) with blood collected before their endometriosis surgery. Of these, 77 patients additionally provided blood samples 5 weeks to 6 months after their surgery. We measured plasma metabolites using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and a total of 390 known metabolites were included in our analysis.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Persistent postsurgical pelvic pain, defined as severe, life-impacting pelvic pain 1 year after endometriosis surgery.

RESULT(S)

Most patients (>95%) were at stage I/II of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification. Their average age at diagnosis was 18.7 years, with 36% reporting persistent postsurgical pelvic pain. Of the 21 metabolites in presurgical blood that were associated with risk of persistent postsurgical pelvic pain, 19 metabolites, which were mainly lipid metabolites, were associated with increased risk. Only 2 metabolites-pregnenolone sulfate (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.44-0.92) and fucose (odds ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval = 0.47-0.97)-were associated with decreased risk. Metabolite set enrichment analysis revealed that higher levels of lysophosphatidylethanolamines (false discovery rate = 0.01) and lysophosphatidylcholines (false discovery rate = 0.01) in presurgical blood were associated with increased risk of persistent postsurgical pelvic pain.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our results suggest that dysregulation of multiple groups of lipid metabolites may play a role in the persistence of pelvic pain postsurgery among young endometriosis patients.