Pituitary suppression with GnRH agonists before ART may be insufficient to treat women with severe adenomyosis

The First Lugano Workshop on the role of adenomyosis in ART

Adenomyosis is an important clinical condition with uncertain prevalence, and clinical focus on adenomyosis in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased during recent years. Recognizing the limited clinical knowledge on the impact of adenomyosis on ART outcomes, the First Lugano Adenomyosis Workshop was a symposium involving experts in the field of adenomyosis, covering basic research, imaging, surgery and infertility to highlight current advances and future research areas over a wide range of topics related to adenomyosis. Adenomyosis is characterized by altered oestrogen and progesterone signalling pathways. Although the criteria of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) Consortium apply to patients with infertility, the presence of direct signs and localization in the different myometrial layers, particularly the inner myometrium, need more focus. In addition to the MUSA criteria, clinical symptoms and the magnitude of uterine enlargement should also be considered. Whilst pre-treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist with or without an aromatase inhibitor in frozen embryo transfer cycles seems promising, many issues related to therapy remain unanswered. During the Workshop, therapeutic progress over the past decades as well as novel insights were presented and discussed. The role of this opinion paper is to stimulate discussion and spark further interest in adenomyosis and the role of adenomyosis in infertility.

Adenomyosis: An Update Concerning Diagnosis, Treatment, and Fertility

This review article aims to summarize current tools used in the diagnosis of adenomyosis with relative pharmacological and surgical treatment and to clarify the relative association between adenomyosis and infertility, considering the importance of an accurate diagnosis of this heterogeneous disease. Among different reported concepts, direction invagination of gland cells from the basalis endometrium deep into the myometrium is the most widely accepted opinion on the development of adenomyosis. Adenomyosis has been increasingly identified in young women with pain, AUB, infertility, or no symptoms by using imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance. Furthermore, adenomyosis often coexists with other gynecological conditions, such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids, increasing the heterogeneity of available data. However, there is no agreement on the definition and classification of adenomyotic lesions from both the histopathology and the imaging points of view, and diagnosis remains difficult and unclear. A standard, universally accepted classification system needs to be implemented to improve our understanding and inform precise diagnosis of the type of adenomyosis. This could be the key to designing RCT studies and evaluating the impact of adenomyosis on quality of life in terms of menstrual symptoms, fertility, and pregnancy outcome, given the high risk of miscarriage and obstetric complications.

The adenomyosis/endometriosis IVF patient - call for clinical focus

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are distinct clinical conditions that carry the same pathophysiological features. In recent years the clinical focus on assisted reproductive technology patients with either condition (E/A) has increased, in the recognition that this subgroup of patients might need special attention to obtain reproductive success. Endometriosis and adenomyosis are characterized by a disruption of progesterone and oestrogen signalling pathways, resulting in local oestrogen dominance and progesterone resistance at the receptor level. Recent scientific evidence suggests that the endometrial progesterone receptor resistance encountered in E/A patients can be overcome by a freeze-all policy, followed by down-regulating circulating oestradiol concentrations prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET), in combination with an increase in exogenous luteal phase progesterone supplementation in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) FET cycles. Specifically, for adenomyosis patients who do not respond to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist down-regulation in terms of a decrease in circulating oestradiol concentrations, a small case series has suggested that the addition of an aromatase inhibitor for 21 days prior to HRT-FET is a valid option. Endometriosis and adenomyosis are hormonally active diseases, which need to be treated by controlling local hyperoestrogenism and progesterone resistance. Based on physiology and recent preliminary clinical data, the authors of this opinion paper wish to stimulate discussion and spark interest in research in E/A patients.

Impact of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization outcomes in women undergoing donor oocyte transfers: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively examine the association between adenomyosis type, location, and severity with reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing single embryo transfer (SET) with embryos derived from donor oocytes.

DESIGN

A prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.

PATIENTS

Patients with infertility with (n = 114) and without (n = 114) adenomyosis who received their first donor oocyte transfer between January 2019 and January 2023 were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Adenomyosis was confirmed with the presence of at least one direct feature visualized by 2- or 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and classified according to type (diffuse or focal), localization (inner or outer myometrium and/or junctional zone [JZ]), and uterine extension (mild, moderate, or severe). After an artificial or natural endometrial preparation cycle, patients underwent SET in the blastocyst stage.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the implantation rate. The secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates after SET.

RESULTS

The presence of adenomyosis did not significantly affect the implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates. However, women with adenomyosis had a significantly higher miscarriage rate than those without adenomyosis (35.4% vs. 18.1%, respectively). The multivariate analysis assessed possible risk factors for each clinical outcome considered in the study and showed that adenomyosis affected the risk of miscarriage. Specifically, transvaginal sonography detection of adenomyosis in the JZ was associated with over threefold higher relative risk of miscarriage (relative risk [RR], 3.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-7.78). Conversely, adenomyosis features detected exclusively in the outer myometrium were associated with a higher ongoing pregnancy rate (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.72). Diffuse adenomyosis in the JZ and severe adenomyosis increased the relative risk of miscarriage two-fold (RR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.22-4.30 and RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.19-4.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that although adenomyosis did not significantly reduce the odds of implantation, the direct signs of adenomyosis in the JZ and disease severity are significant risk factors for miscarriage in patients receiving donor oocyte transfers. This study highlights the importance of thorough ultrasound examination and detailed adenomyosis classification in the assessment and management of patients with infertility.

Current Medical Therapy for Adenomyosis: From Bench to Bedside

Adenomyosis, characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue within the uterine wall, poses significant challenges in treatment. The literature primarily focuses on managing abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and dysmenorrhea, the main symptoms of adenomyosis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and tranexamic acid provide limited support for mild symptoms or symptom re-exacerbation during hormone therapy. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is commonly employed in adenomyosis management, showing promise in symptom improvement and reducing uterine size, despite the lack of standardized guidelines. Dienogest (DNG) also exhibits potential benefits, but limited evidence hinders treatment recommendations. Danazol, while effective, is limited by androgenic side effects. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may be less effective than progestins but can be considered for contraception in young patients. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists effectively manage symptoms but induce menopausal symptoms with prolonged use. GnRH antagonists are a recent option requiring further investigation. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) show promise in alleviating AUB and pelvic pain, but their safety necessitates exploration and limited use within trials for refractory patients. This review highlights the complexity of diagnosing adenomyosis, its coexistence with endometriosis and uterine leiomyomas, and its impact on fertility and quality of life, complicating treatment decisions. It emphasizes the need for research on guidelines for medical management, fertility outcomes, long-term effects of therapies, and exploration of new investigational targets. Future research should optimize therapeutic strategies, expand our understanding of adenomyosis and its management, and establish evidence-based guidelines to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Presence of Adenomyosis Impairs Clinical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: The presence of adenomyosis among pregnant patients has been associated with a higher incidence of miscarriage and pregnancy complications. Although the role of adenomyosis in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) was investigated in several studies and demonstrated a potentially detrimental effect on live birth rates following IVF, most of them were small studies in which the adenomyosis diagnosis was not confirmed based on solid ultrasonographic criteria. (2) Methods: 3503 patients undergoing their first blastocyst frozen transfer through a hormonal replacement (HRT) FET cycle. Among them, 140 women had a confirmed diagnosis of adenomyosis based on the MUSA criteria. (3) Results: Adenomyosis patients were more likely to proceed with deferred FET compared with no-adenomyosis women (p = 0.002) and were significantly more likely to be treated with GnRH agonist pre-treatment (2 months) (p < 0.001). The presence of adenomyosis significantly decreased the clinical pregnancy rates (aOR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-0.98, p = 0.040) and live birth rates (aOR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27-0.75, p = 0.003) and significantly increased the miscarriage rates (aOR 2.13, 95% CI: 0.98-4.37, p = 0.045). Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, autologous or donor oocytes, PGT-A, deferred FET, serum progesterone levels the day before FET, GnRH agonist pre-treatment, number of embryos transferred, and adenomyosis demonstrated that the use of the GnRH agonist protocol did not decrease or increase the miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate, or live birth rate. (4) Conclusions: The presence of adenomyosis had a significant negative impact on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing FET and was associated with higher miscarriage, lower clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. GnRH agonist pre-treatment does not appear to improve clinical outcomes.