APHRODITE criteria: addressing male patients with hypogonadism and/or infertility owing to altered idiopathic testicular function

Clinical factors impacting microdissection testicular sperm extraction success in hypogonadal men with nonobstructive azoospermia

OBJECTIVE

To explore factors influencing microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) success in hypogonadal men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).

DESIGN

A cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated male reproductive health center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 616 consecutive patients with NOA and hypogonadism (total testosterone [T] levels <350 ng/dL) underwent micro-TESE between 2014 and 2021. All patients had no prior sperm retrieval (SR) history.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients aged 23-55 years underwent comprehensive clinical, laboratory, and histopathological diagnostic evaluation for NOA and were further categorized into two cohorts on the basis of pre-SR hormonal stimulation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

A multivariable logistic regression analysis explored the associations between patient variables and micro-TESE success, defined as the presence of viable spermatozoa in extracted specimens. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to assess the relationship between SR success and relevant predictors. Sperm retrieval rates were compared between patients receiving or not hormonal stimulation, and logistic regression analysis evaluated the effect of baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels (i.e., normogonadotropic vs. hypergonadotropic classes) on SR success.

RESULT(S)

The overall micro-TESE success rate was 56.6%. Baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), pre-SR hormonal stimulation (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.64-3.93), presence of clinical varicocele (aOR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.51), history of previous varicocelectomy (aOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.26-5.16), and testicular histopathology were independent predictors of SR success. Among hormone-pretreated patients, pre-micro-TESE T levels and delta T (an absolute increase in T levels from baseline) were associated with SR success. A pre-micro-TESE T level of 418.5 ng/dL (area under the curve value: 0.78) and a delta T of 258 ng/dL (area under the value: 0.76) distinguished patients with positive and negative SR outcomes. Subgroup analysis showed that pre-SR hormonal stimulation yielded a greater benefit for normogonadotropic patients than for those who were hypergonadotropic.

CONCLUSION(S)

This study underscores the association between clinical factors and micro-TESE success in hypogonadal men with NOA. Although causality is not established, our findings suggest that these patients may benefit from pre-SR interventions, particularly hormonal stimulation and varicocele repair.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05110391.

Pre- and Procedural Factors Influencing the Success of In Vitro Fertilization: Evaluating Embryo Quality and Clinical Pregnancy in Cases of Tubal Factor Infertility

Introduction: While tubal occlusion is a prevalent cause of infertility, accounting for 11-35% of infertility cases among women, there remains a limited understanding of the factors influencing clinical pregnancy following in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods: In our retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center, medical records of women aged 19 to 43 years were analyzed. Logistic regression models were employed to identify the prognostic factors associated with clinical pregnancy after IVF in patients with tubal factor infertility, excluding cases with hydrosalpinx. Results: Data from 219 women diagnosed with tubal occlusion were compared to 1140 cases with non-tubal indication, covering a total of 1359 IVF cycles. A lower maternal age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.89, p = 0.001) and a higher embryo quality (AOR: 1.26, p = 0.01) emerged as important factors in clinical pregnancy in the tubal infertility group. Moreover, a lower maternal (AOR:0.91, p < 0.01) and paternal age (p = 0.001), and favorable semen quality (AOR: 1.32, p = 0.03) were critical determinants in the non-tubal infertility group. BMI was generally higher in tubal infertility patients (p = 0.01). Furthermore, FSH level (AOR: 0.93, p = 0.004), AMH level (p < 0.04), number of embryos transferred (AOR: 2.04, p < 0.001), and embryo quality (AOR: 1.26, p < 0.001) came into prominence only in the non-tubal infertility group. The clinical pregnancy rate (34.2%) of women with tubal occlusion did not differ significantly from those in other forms of infertility undergoing IVF (35.4%). Conclusions: Although tubal infertility is typically anticipated to yield the highest clinical pregnancy rates following IVF, it is crucial to acknowledge that both maternal and paternal characteristics can also significantly impact the outcomes.

Non-Obstructive Azoospermia and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Unveiling the Chances of Success and Possible Consequences for Offspring

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is found in up to 15% of infertile men. While several causes for NOA have been identified, the exact etiology remains unknown in many patients. Advances in assisted reproductive technology, including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and testicular sperm retrieval, have provided hope for these patients. This review summarizes the chances of success with ICSI for NOA patients and examines preoperative factors and laboratory techniques associated with positive outcomes. Furthermore, we reviewed possible consequences for offspring by the use of ICSI with testicular sperm retrieved from NOA patients and the interventions that could potentially mitigate risks. Testicular sperm retrieved from NOA patients may exhibit increased chromosomal abnormalities, and although lower fertilization and pregnancy rates are reported in NOA patients compared to other forms of infertility, the available evidence does not suggest a significant increase in miscarriage rate, congenital malformation, or developmental delay in their offspring compared to the offspring of patients with less severe forms of infertility or the offspring of fertile men. However, due to limited data, NOA patients should receive specialized reproductive care and personalized management. Counseling of NOA patients is essential before initiating any fertility enhancement treatment not only to mitigate health risks associated with NOA but also to enhance the chances of successful outcomes and minimize possible risks to the offspring.

FSH Therapy in Male Factor Infertility: Evidence and Factors Which Might Predict the Response

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) administration is applied in the management of subjects affected by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Whilst this application is widely recognized and established alone or in combination with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a similar strategy is empirically advocated in idiopathic male factor infertility (MFI). In this setting, FSH therapy has been used to increase sperm quantity, quality, and pregnancy rate when FSH plasma concentrations are below 8 IU/L and when the seminal tract is not obstructed. In the literature, several studies suggested that giving FSH to patients with idiopathic MFI increases sperm count and motility, raising the overall pregnancy rate. However, this efficacy seems to be limited, and about 10-18 men should be treated to achieve one pregnancy. Thus, several papers suggest the need to move from a replacement approach to an overstimulating approach in the management of FSH therapy in idiopathic MFI. To this aim, it is imperative to determine some pharmacologic markers of FSH efficacy. Furthermore, it should be useful in clinical practice to distinguish, before starting the treatment, among patients who might respond or not to FSH treatment. Indeed, previous studies suggest that infertile men who have normal levels of gonadotropins in plasma might not respond to FSH treatment and about 50% of patients might be defined as "non-responders". For these reasons, identifying predictive markers of FSH action in spermatogenesis and clinical markers of response to FSH treatment is a fascinating area of study that might lead to new developments with the aim of achieving personalization of the treatment of male infertility. From this perspective, seminal parameters (i.e., spermatid count), testicular cytology, genetic assessment, and miRNA or protein markers in the future might be used to create a tailored FSH therapy plan. The personalization of FSH treatment is mandatory to minimize side effects, to avoid lost time with ineffective treatments, and to improve the efficacy, predicting the most efficient dose and the duration of the treatment. This narrative review's objective is to discuss the role of the different putative factors which have been proposed to predict the response to FSH treatment in idiopathic infertile men.

Are they functional hypogonadal men? Testosterone serum levels unravel male idiopathic infertility subgroups

PURPOSE

To evaluate total testosterone distribution in male idiopathic infertility.

METHODS

A retrospective, real-world case-control clinical study was conducted. Cases consisted of men evaluated for couple infertility, specifically those with alterations in semen parameters and normal gonadotropin levels, and after excluding all known causes of male infertility. Controls were male subjects who underwent semen analysis for screening purposes, without any abnormality detected. The total testosterone distribution was evaluated in cases and controls. Further analyses were performed subgrouping cases according to total testosterone reference threshold suggested by scientific societies (i.e., 3.5 ng/mL).

RESULTS

Cases included 214 idiopathic infertile men (mean age 38.2 ± 6.2 years) and controls 224 subjects with normozoospermia (mean age 33.7 ± 7.5 years). Total testosterone was not-normally distributed in both cases and controls, with positive asymmetric distribution slightly shifted on the left in cases. The rate of subjects with testosterone lower than 3.5 ng/mL was higher in cases (23.8%) than controls (4.5%) (p < 0.001). In cases with testosterone lower than 3.5 ng/mL, a significant direct correlation between testosterone and the percentage of normal morphology sperms was highlighted, also applying multivariate stepwise linear regression analysis (R = 0.430, standard error = 0.3, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Although idiopathic infertile men show by definition altered semen analysis and gonadotropins within reference ranges, testosterone serum levels are widely variable in this population. Approximately a quarter of these patients present some sort of functional hypogonadism. Our data support the need to better classify idiopathic male infertility and total testosterone serum levels could be a supportive parameter in tracing the patient's therapeutic profile.