1
|
Chung HW, Jeon CH, Lee HD, Chung NS. Effectiveness of supplemental screw fixation for the prevention of anterior cage migration in oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1. J Orthop Sci 2022; 27:1172-1176. [PMID: 34364752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The anterior cage at L5-S1 segment is more vulnerable to anterior migration because of the sacral slope, the greater disc angle (DA), the higher shear force, and the weaker pedicle screw fixation at S1. We hypothesized that a supplemental screw (SS) fixation is effective for the prevention of anterior cage migration in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5-S1. METHODS This study involved 61 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF at L5-S1 and had more than 1-year regular follow-up. In the first 35 cases, the anterior cage was fixed with pedicle screws only (non-SS group). In the remaining 26 cases, the anterior cage was fixed with a SS and pedicle screws (SS group). Radiological parameters including anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), DA, cage migration, cage subsidence, and fusion rate at L5-S1 were compared between the two groups. RESULT Of the total 61 patients, fifteen (24.6%) patients had an anterior cage migration of >2 mm and six (9.8%) patients had an anterior cage migration of >5 mm. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mean cage migration was 2.0 ± 3.1 mm in the non-SS group and 0.9 ± 0.9 mm in the SS group (P = 0.038). Thirteen (37.1%) patients had a cage migration of >2 mm in the non-SS group, while only two (7.7%) had a cage migration of >2 mm in the SS group (P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the ADH, PDH, DA, cage subsidence, and fusion rate between the two groups (all P > 0.05). There was no SS-related complication in the SS group. CONCLUSIONS SS fixation in front of the anterior L5-S1 cage is simple, safe, and effective for the prevention of anterior cage migration in OLIF at L5-S1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee-Woong Chung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Chang-Hoon Jeon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Han-Dong Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Nam-Su Chung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilder JH, Ross BJ, McCluskey LC, Cyriac M, Patel AH, Sherman WF. Trends in Surgical Approach for Single-Level Lumbar Fusion Over the Past Decade. Clin Spine Surg 2022:01933606-990000000-00059. [PMID: 35969681 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Comparative Study. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize trends in surgical approach for single-level lumbar fusion over the past decade. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The number of elective lumbar fusion cases performed is increasing annually. Several different surgical approaches exist for lumbar spinal fusion including novel anterior approaches developed in recent years. With ongoing innovation, trends in the utilization of common surgical approaches in recent years are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database (Fort Wayne, IN). Patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion between 2010 and 2019 were identified using Current Procedural Technology codes and divided into 4 mutually exclusive cohorts based on surgical approach: (1) anterior-only, (2) anterior approach with posterior instrumentation, (3) posterolateral, and (4) posterior-only interbody. Trend analyses of surgical approach utilization over the last decade were performed with the Cochran-Armitage test to evaluate the 2-tailed null hypothesis that utilization of each surgical approach for single-level lumbar fusion remained constant. RESULTS A total of 53,234 patients met inclusion criteria and were stratified into 4 cohorts: anterior-only (n=5104), anterior with posterior instrumentation (n=23,515), posterolateral (n=5525), and posterior-only interbody (n=19,090). Trend analysis revealed the utilization of a posterior-only interbody approach significantly decreased from 36.7% to 29.2% (P<0.001), whereas the utilization of a combined anterior and posterior approach significantly increased from 45.8% to 50.4% (P<0.001). The utilization of an anterior-only approach also significantly increased from 7.9% to 10.5% (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Utilization of anterior-only and anterior with posterior instrumentation approaches for single-level lumbar fusion have been significantly increasing over the past decade while use of posterior-only interbody approach trended significantly downward. These data may be particularly useful for trainees and spine surgeons as new techniques and technology become available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III-retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Heath Wilder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mortazavi A, Mualem W, Dowlati E, Alexander H, Rotter J, Withington C, Margolis M, Voyadzis JM. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: single institutional review of complications and associated variables. Spine J 2022; 22:454-462. [PMID: 34600108 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT As more patients undergo anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures and more devices are created for that purpose, it is important to understand the complications that can arise and the variables that mitigate risk for major and minor complications. PURPOSE To assess complication rates after ALIF with or without posterior instrumentation and variables associated with increased likelihood of postoperative complications. We aim to provide this data as benchmarking to improve patient safety and surgical care. STUDY DESIGN A single-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE All adult patients who underwent ALIF between 2017 and 2019 was performed OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative major and minor complications were evaluated. METHODS Complications were recorded and presented as percentages. Patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative data were also collected and analyzed between patients who had no complications and those that had any complication. Subgroup analysis of surgical complications were performed by nonparametric Chi-square tests. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS Ninty-five of three hundred sixty-two (26.2%) of patients experienced a minor or major complication. Among the most common complications found were surgical site infections (5.8%), neurological complications (4.1%), vascular complications (3.6%), and urinary tract infections (3.3%). Patients undergoing ALIF alone with post-operative complications had higher mean age, higher BMI, higher ASA status, and experienced higher estimated blood loss. Patients undergoing ALIF and posterior instrumentation with post-operative complications were more likely to have diabetes and had a higher ASA status. Patients with any complications from both groups had longer length of stay, discharge to a non-home setting and were more likely to be readmitted or return to the operating room. CONCLUSION Our study reveals variables associated with complications at our institution, including age of the patient, BMI, and ASA status leading to higher complications and greater LOS, higher readmission rates, and disposition to skilled facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Mortazavi
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William Mualem
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ehsan Dowlati
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3800 Reservoir Rd, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Hepzibha Alexander
- Division of Neurosurgery, 16001 W Nine Mile Rd, Ascension Providence Hospital, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Southfield, MI, USA
| | - Juliana Rotter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 200 1st St NW, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Charles Withington
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Marc Margolis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, 3800 Reservoir Rd, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jean-Marc Voyadzis
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3800 Reservoir Rd, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Singh S, McCloskey K, Ahmad HS, Turlip R, Ghenbot Y, Sinha S, Yoon JW. Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5–S1 for Multi-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position. World Neurosurg 2022; 162:e416-e426. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
5
|
Szadkowski M, Bahroun S, Aleksic I, Vande Kerckhove M, Ramos-Pascual S, Fière V, d'Astorg H. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2021.101312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
6
|
Dowlati E, Alexander H, Voyadzis JM. Vulnerability of the L5 nerve root during anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: case series and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 49:E7. [PMID: 32871560 DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.focus20315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nerve root injuries associated with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) are uncommonly reported in the literature. This case series and review aims to describe the etiology of L5 nerve root injury following ALIF at L5-S1. METHODS The authors performed a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent surgery between 2017 and 2019 who had postoperative L5 nerve root injuries after stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF. They also reviewed the literature with regard to nerve root injuries after ALIF procedures. RESULTS The authors report on 3 patients with postoperative L5 radiculopathy. All 3 patients had pain that improved. Two of the 3 patients had a neurological deficit, one of which improved. CONCLUSIONS Stretch neuropraxia from overdistraction is an important cause of postoperative L5 radiculopathy after L5-S1 ALIF. Judicious use of implants and careful preoperative planning to determine optimal implant sizes are paramount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Dowlati
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; and
| | | | - Jean-Marc Voyadzis
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; and
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Body AM, Plummer ZJ, Krueger BM, Virojanapa J, Nasser R, Cheng JS, Prestigiacomo CJ. Retrograde ejaculation following anterior lumbar surgery: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 35:427-436. [PMID: 34271542 DOI: 10.3171/2020.12.spine201101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present systematic review and pooled analysis aims to assess the incidence and risk factors for the development of retrograde ejaculation (RE) following first-time open anterior lumbar surgery. METHODS A systematic MEDLINE review via PubMed was performed, identifying 130 clinical papers relating to the topic. Eighteen publications were selected according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and were used to determine the incidence of RE. Only the publications that provided data on surgical risk factors present specifically in the men in the study were included in the analysis of risk factors. RESULTS Of the 2503 men included, there were 57 reported events of RE (2.3%). Of the cases for which long-term data were provided, 45.8% had resolved by final follow-up. There was a statistically significant increased risk associated with a transperitoneal as opposed to a retroperitoneal approach (8.6% vs 3.2%), as well as with the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) as opposed to ALIF with bone graft or arthroplasty in controls (5.0% vs 1.8%). However, when excluding from analysis the patients operated on prior to the FDA's 2008 warning that commented on the drug's neuroinflammatory properties, there was no significant difference in rates of RE in patients receiving rhBMP-2 versus the control group (2.4% vs 2.5%). There was no significant difference in risk based on single- versus multilevel procedure or on ALIF versus arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS In a pooled analysis of currently published data on men undergoing first-time open anterior lumbar surgery, this study found an overall incidence of RE of 2.3%. Nearly half of these patients recovered, reporting resolution of symptoms anywhere between 3 months and 48 months. Analysis of risk factors was limited by a paucity of published literature segregating data by sex. However, there was an increased risk associated with rhBMP-2 only when including data collected prior to the FDA warning on its detrimental properties. The authors therefore posit that the risk of RE is probably overestimated in the literature, given that the vast majority of the data available were collected prior to this warning and given the subsequent implementation of precautions when handling rhBMP-2.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pelletier Y, Lareyre F, Cointat C, Raffort J. Management of Vascular Complications during Anterior Lumbar Spinal Surgery Using Mini-Open Retroperitoneal Approach. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 74:475-488. [PMID: 33549783 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior retroperitoneal spine exposure has become increasingly performed for the surgical treatment of various spinal disorders. Despite its advantages, the procedure is not riskless and can expose to potentially life-threatening vascular lesions. The aim of this review is to report the vascular lesions that can happen during anterior lumbar spinal surgery using mini-open retroperitoneal approach and to describe their management. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA to identify studies published in English between January 1980 and December 2019 reporting vascular complications during anterior lumbar spinal surgery with mini-open retroperitoneal approach. Three authors independently conducted the literature search on PubMed/Medline database using a combination of the following terms: "spinal surgery", "anterior lumbar surgery (ALS)", "anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)", "lumbar total disc replacement", "artificial disc replacement", "vascular complications", "vascular injuries". Vascular complications were defined as any peri-operative or post-operative lesions related to an arterial or venous vessel. The management of the vascular injury was extracted. RESULTS Fifteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Venous injuries were observed in 13 studies. Lacerations and deep venous thrombosis ranged from 0.8% to 4.3% of cases. Arterial lesions were observed in 4 studies and ranged from 0.4% to 4.3% of cases. It included arterial thrombosis, lacerations or vasospasms. The estimated blood loss was reported in 10 studies and ranged from 50 mL up to 3000 mL. Vascular complications were identified as a cause of abortion of the procedure in 2 studies, representing respectively 0.3% of patients who underwent ALS and 0.5% of patients who underwent ALIF. CONCLUSION Imaging pre-operative planning is of utmost importance to evaluate risk factors and the presence of anatomic variations in order to prevent and limit vascular complications. Cautions should be taken during the intervention when manipulating major vessels and routine monitoring of the limb oxygen saturation should be systematically performed for an early detection of arterial thrombosis. The training of the surgeon access remains a key-point to prevent and manage vascular complications during anterior lumbar spinal surgery with mini-open retroperitoneal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yann Pelletier
- Orthopedic Department, IULS (Institut Universitaire Locomoteur & du sport), University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Fabien Lareyre
- Université Côte d'Azur, CHU, Inserm, C3M, Nice, France; Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Antibes Juan-les-Pins, Antibes, France.
| | - Caroline Cointat
- Orthopedic Department, IULS (Institut Universitaire Locomoteur & du sport), University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Juliette Raffort
- Université Côte d'Azur, CHU, Inserm, C3M, Nice, France; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dias Pereira Filho AR. Technique for Exposing Lumbar Discs in Anterior Approach Using Steinmann Wires: Arthroplasties or Arthrodesis. World Neurosurg 2020; 148:189-195. [PMID: 33385594 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to increasing longevity, the incidence of degenerative lumbar disc diseases has increased, and surgical treatment is often necessary. In this context, the anterior approach becomes an important technique. However, one of the main limitations of this method is the need for dedicated retractors, which requires larger incisions for its positioning and increases the cost of the procedure. The objective of the present study was to describe a technique for retracting abdominal structures by anterior approaches to the lumbar spine using Steinmann wires. METHODS This manuscript consists of a technique description of anterior approach for lumbar spine. RESULTS Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease is often necessary when the patients have symptoms refractory to conservative treatments. Many of them will be candidates for surgical treatment with anterior approach, either for arthrodesis/anterior lumbar interbody fusion or arthroplasty. Small incisions are performed for positioning the modified Langenbeck retractors and the Steinmann wires. These retractors are easily positioned and provide good exposure of the lumbar discs making it possible to implant appropriate cages for restoring the necessary height, lordosis, and sagittal balance. CONCLUSIONS The technique described is safe, inexpensive, and reproducible. Simple and easily accessible instruments are required in most hospital complexes.
Collapse
|
10
|
The lumbar autonomic nerves in males: a few anatomical insights into anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2020; 20:2006-2013. [PMID: 32721586 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lumbar autonomic nerve injury is an underappreciated complication of anterior lumbar spinal surgery. A detailed description of lumbar autonomic nerve anatomy would be helpful for surgeons to minimize the risk of this complication. PURPOSE This study was designed to investigate the anatomical characteristics of lumbar autonomic nerves and provide a better understanding of these nerves for anterior lumbar spinal surgery. STUDY DESIGN A dissection-based study of 10 embalmed male cadavers. METHODS The lumbar autonomic nerves from 10 embalmed male cadavers were dissected in this study. The position of the lumbar sympathetic trunks was recorded. Distance between the initial sites of the lumbar splanchnic nerves (LSNs) and the corresponding lumbar vertebral inferior endplate, distance between the ipsilateral and adjacent LSNs, angles formed by the LSNs and the vertical axis were measured. This study has been supported by grants from Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (CN) (Grant No. 2017B020210010) without potential conflict of interest-associated biases in the text of the paper. RESULTS In this study, a total of 72 LSNs were identified in the 10 human cadavers. On average, the investigation found that the initial sites of the first, second, third, and fourth LSNs were 9 mm distal, 5 mm distal, 9 mm proximal, and 9 mm distal to the inferior endplates of the L1, L2, L3, and L4 vertebrae, respectively, with variations from 6 to 11 mm for each nerve among specimens. There was no significant difference in the angle between each lumbar splanchnic nerve and the vertical axis (H=2.461, p=.482), with an angle of approximately 50°±6°. The distance between the first and the second LSNs, the second and the third LSNs, or the third and the fourth LSNs were 24±6 mm, 22±8 mm, and 55±11 mm, respectively. The bilateral lumbar sympathetic trunks (N=57, 95%) were more likely to be located in the first third of the sagittal plane at the level of the L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 intervertebral discs. CONCLUSIONS The study found the same number and parallel courses of LSNs on each side, and on both the left and right side, the distance between the third and the fourth LSNs was much larger than the distance between the other two adjacent LSNs. The initial sites of 80.6% (n=58) of LSNs were superior to the inferior endplate of the L3 vertebra. Improved knowledge of lumbar autonomic nerve anatomy may be of great significance in reducing complications and improving surgical safety.
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion of L5-S1 using a novel implant with anterior plate fixation. Spine J 2020; 20:1618-1628. [PMID: 32504869 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Compared with other approaches, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is believed to be more effective at restoring segmental lordosis and reducing risks of adjacent-segment disease. It remains controversial, however, whether ALIF improves global lumbar lordosis or influences pelvic parameters, possibly because of the heterogeneity of implants and levels studied. PURPOSE To report clinical outcomes of stand-alone ALIF with anterior plate fixation for L5-S1 and to determine the effect on global lumbar lordosis and pelvic parameters. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients that underwent isolated mini-ALIF with anterior plate fixation for L5-S1. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 12, lower back and legs pain on Visual Analog Scale, as well as spino-pelvic parameters. METHODS The authors reviewed the records of all patients that underwent retroperitoneal mini-ALIF for single-level L5-S1 fusion between August 2012 and December 2016. A total of 129 patients were included, but 9 patients had incomplete preoperative radiographic data, and one patient had schizophrenia and was unable to respond to outcome questionnaires, leaving 119 patients eligible for outcome assessment. At a minimum follow-up of 1 year, seven patients refused to participate in the study or could not be reached, which left a final cohort of 112 patients. RESULTS Nine patients were reoperated without implant removal (four pseudarthrosis, two hematomas, one sepsis, one L4-L5 disc hernia, and one L4-L5 disc degeneration). At a mean of 20±9 months, all scores improved significantly from baseline values, with net improvement in ODI of 23.3±19.9. Multivariable analyses confirmed better postoperative ODI in patients that received 18° cages (β=-9.0, p=.017), but revealed no significant trends for net improvement in ODI. Comparison of preoperative and last follow-up radiographs revealed that global lumbar lordosis increased by 4.2±7.1° (p<.001), L5-S1 segmental lordosis increased by 11.8±6.7° (p<.001), and L4-L5 segmental lordosis decreased by 1.9±3.3° (p<.001). All pelvic parameters changed: pelvic incidence increased by 0.6±2.7° (p=.003), pelvic tilt decreased by 2.5±4.1° (p<.001) and sacral slope increased by 3.3±4.7° (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS Stand-alone mini-ALIF with anterior plate fixation for L5-S1 can change pelvic parameters while improving global and segmental lumbar lordosis. The procedure resulted in a fusion rate of 96% and comparable improvements in ODI to other studies.
Collapse
|
13
|
Safaee MM, Tenorio A, Osorio JA, Choy W, Amara D, Lai L, Molinaro AM, Zhang Y, Hu SS, Tay B, Burch S, Berven SH, Deviren V, Dhall SS, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Eichler CM, Ames CP, Clark AJ. The impact of obesity on perioperative complications in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:332-341. [PMID: 32330881 DOI: 10.3171/2020.2.spine191418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Anterior approaches to the lumbar spine provide wide exposure that facilitates placement of large grafts with high fusion rates. There are limited data on the effects of obesity on perioperative complications. METHODS Data from consecutive patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) from 2007 to 2016 at a single academic center were analyzed. The primary outcome was any perioperative complication. Complications were divided into those occurring intraoperatively and those occurring postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association of obesity and other variables with these complications. An estimation table was used to identify a body mass index (BMI) threshold associated with increased risk of postoperative complication. RESULTS A total of 938 patients were identified, and the mean age was 57 years; 511 were females (54.5%). The mean BMI was 28.7 kg/m2, with 354 (37.7%) patients classified as obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Forty patients (4.3%) underwent a lateral transthoracic approach, while the remaining 898 (95.7%) underwent a transabdominal retroperitoneal approach. Among patients undergoing transabdominal retroperitoneal ALIF, complication rates were higher for obese patients than for nonobese patients (37.0% vs 28.7%, p = 0.010), a difference that was driven primarily by postoperative complications (36.1% vs 26.0%, p = 0.001) rather than intraoperative complications (3.2% vs 4.3%, p = 0.416). Obese patients had higher rates of ileus (11.7% vs 7.2%, p = 0.020), wound complications (11.4% vs 3.4%, p < 0.001), and urinary tract infections (UTI) (5.0% vs 2.5%, p = 0.049). In a multivariate model, age, obesity, and number of ALIF levels fused were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complication. An estimation table including 19 candidate cut-points, odds ratios, and adjusted p values found a BMI ≥ 31 kg/m2 to have the highest association with postoperative complication (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Obesity is associated with increased postoperative complications in ALIF, including ileus, wound complications, and UTI. ALIF is a safe and effective procedure. However, patients with a BMI ≥ 31 kg/m2 should be counseled on their increased risks and warrant careful preoperative medical optimization and close monitoring in the postoperative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Safaee
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Alexander Tenorio
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Joseph A Osorio
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Winward Choy
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Dominic Amara
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Lillian Lai
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Yalan Zhang
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Serena S Hu
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto; and
| | - Bobby Tay
- Departments of3Orthopedic Surgery and
| | | | | | | | - Sanjay S Dhall
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Dean Chou
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Charles M Eichler
- 4Vascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Aaron J Clark
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fidalgo DS, Areias B, Sousa LC, Parente M, Jorge RN, Sousa H, Gonçalves JM. Minimally invasive transforaminal and anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery at level L5-S1. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2020; 23:384-395. [PMID: 32096422 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1731482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
This paper presents a finite element analysis to investigate the biomechanical changes caused by transforaminal (TLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at the L5-S1 level, applying two different implants: T_PAL (TLIF) and SynFix (ALIF). The main objective is to determine which one is more stable for patients. Numerical simulations of segmental motion show that, in the early postoperative phase, displacements and rotation angles obtained in ALIF are greater than the corresponding ones obtained in TLIF, as well as the principal stress values on the ligaments. So, TLIF performed with T_PAL is more stable than ALIF, especially during the recovery phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Fidalgo
- INEGI/DEMec, FEUP, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - B Areias
- INEGI/DEMec, FEUP, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - L C Sousa
- INEGI/DEMec, FEUP, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - M Parente
- INEGI/DEMec, FEUP, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - R N Jorge
- INEGI/DEMec, FEUP, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - H Sousa
- Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cheaney B, Krause KL, Jung E, Than KD. Treatment of L5-S1 spondyloptosis with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion in a patient with neurofibromatosis. Br J Neurosurg 2019:1-6. [DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2019.1572868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Barry Cheaney
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Katie L. Krause
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Enjae Jung
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery,Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Khoi D. Than
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
MARCHI LUIS, NOGUEIRA-NETO JOES, AMARAL RODRIGO, FAULHABER NICHOLAI, COUTINHO ETEVALDO, OLIVEIRA LEONARDO, POKORNY GABRIEL, JENSEN RUBENS, PIMENTA LUIZ. ALIF WITH AUTO-LOCKING CAGE WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTATION - TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF INTERBODY BONE FUSION. COLUNA/COLUMNA 2018. [DOI: 10.1590/s1808-185120181701182868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this work is to study the fusion rate and complications of the mini-ALIF with an auto-locking device at the L5-S1 level. Methods: Retrospective and radiological study. The inclusion criteria were mini-ALIF in L5-S1 with auto-locking cage, DDD and/or low grade spondylolisthesis. The exclusion criteria were posterior/anterior supplementation; lack of 12-month follow-up images, and previous surgery at L5-S1 level. The primary endpoint was fusion assessed in CT images and/or lateral lumbar flexion/extension radiographs. The secondary endpoint was the revision surgery due to device movement/migration or pseudoarthrosis. Lumbar TCs and radiographs were analyzed during 12 months of follow-up. Fusion was defined according to Bridwell/Lenke classification. Results: Sixty-one cases were included in this study. Complete or ongoing fusion was found in 57 cases (93%). Forty-two of the 61 levels (65%) were completely fused after 12 months. Fifteen levels (28%) had evident bone growth, two levels (3%) showed lysis lines around the implant, and two levels (3%) presented lysis lines and depression. Reoperation for pedicular screw supplementation was necessary in two cases (3%), one with vertebral sliding progression (12 months), and one with symptomatic micro-movement (six months). No implant has undergone migration or expulsion of the disc space. Conclusions: Mini-ALIF in L5-S1 level using an auto-blocking interbody implant construction in cases of low segmental instability results in good interbody fusion index and low failure rate, even without the need for further supplementation, but should not be applied indiscriminately. Evidence Level: IV. Type of study: Case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - LUIZ PIMENTA
- Instituto de Patologia da Coluna, Brazil; University of California, USA
| |
Collapse
|