Tratamento cirúrgico das lesões condrais do joelho com o uso da membrana de colágeno – condrogênese autóloga induzida por matriz

AMIC achieves sustained clinical improvement in isolated patellar cartilage defects over 5 years, correlating with MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluate 5-year postoperative clinical outcomes of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for isolated ICRS grade 3-4 patellar cartilage defects and correlate outcomes with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The hypothesis was that AMIC would improve clinical symptoms and induce neocartilage formation, visible on MRI, making it a safe and effective option for repairing focal patellar cartilage defects.

METHODS

The cohort comprised 13 focal patellar lesions in 12 patients. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala score, EuroQol-5D Health Survey questionnaire and MRI data were assessed preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. All MRI scans were evaluated using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue System. Descriptive statistics were calculated on all data. Inferential analysis comparing outcome scores before and after surgery employed the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with the nonparametric Friedman test used to detect differences across multiple test attempts. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (23-52 years old) with patellofemoral chondral full-thickness defects (2-4 cm2) were treated. At a 5-year follow-up, eleven knees showed MRI improvement. Two were asymptomatic and nine showed clear clinical improvement. Only one knee showed no clinical improvement. MRI revealed a defect filling with newly formed cartilage characterized by a less compact and heterogeneous signal. Cartilage degradation or joint damage was observed in two knees, and bone formation within the plate was identified in four. AMIC significantly improved patients' VAS pain, KOOS, EuroQol-5D and Kujala scores compared to preoperative baseline for up to 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory clinical outcomes and new cartilage formation, as observed by MRI, are achieved with AMIC at mid-term follow-up for ICRS grade 3-4 in small-to-medium-sized patellar defects in patients under 52 years of age, with improvements maintained for up to 5 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Arthroscopic and open approaches for autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis repair of the knee have similar results: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cartilage defects are debilitating injuries that can reduce quality of life in patients. However, the poor regenerative properties of cartilage mean that cartilage repair remains challenging, and many methods have arisen to address that. Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) is a popular technique to manage cartilage defects. Recent advances have allowed AMIC® to be done arthroscopically, instead of a mini-open arthrotomy approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate whether the arthroscopic approach to AMIC® provides better clinical outcomes than does the mini-open approach, in hopes of delineating a gold standard in cartilage repair.

METHODS

With reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic search of the following databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) was performed on 26th October 2022 using a combination of the following search terms: "autologous matrix induced", "chondrogenesis", and "knee". A total of 390 studies were identified, of which, 24 studies were included in our final analysis.

RESULTS

The arthroscopic approach achieves lower Visual Analogue Scale for pain scores. The International Knee documentation Committee) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were comparable between arthroscopic and open approaches. The open approach achieves a higher Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score. Incidence of reported postoperative complications of revision surgery and knee stiffness was higher for the open approach than for the arthroscopic approach, whereas deep vein thrombosis was higher in the arthroscopic approach.

CONCLUSION

The AMIC® repair outcomes indicate that the arthroscopic approach does not hold a distinct advantage over the open approach. The choice of approach should consider surgeon expertise, location of lesion, and patient-specific factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level III.

Particulated Costal Allocartilage With Microfracture Versus Microfracture Alone for Knee Cartilage Defects: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Participant- and Rater-Blinded Study

Background

Microfracture is the first-line treatment for cartilage defects; however, the suboptimal quality of the repaired cartilage remains an issue.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The aim of this first in-human study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of a combination of particulated costal allocartilage and microfracture versus microfracture alone in treating knee cartilage defects. We hypothesized that the particulated costal allocartilage with microfracture would result in superior cartilage repair quality and better clinical outcomes at 48 weeks postoperatively.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

Patients with cartilage defects were allocated randomly to the treatment group (particulated costal allocartilage with microfracture) and control group (microfracture alone). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of cartilage repair (the primary outcome measure) were evaluated at the 48-week follow-up using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Patient-reported clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] pain score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and International Knee Documentation Committee score) and adverse events were evaluated at 12, 24, and 48 weeks postoperatively.

Results

Overall, 88 patients were included (44 patients each in the treatment and control groups). The total MOCART score at 48 weeks postoperatively was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P < .001). Among the 9 MOCART variables, 6 were significantly superior in the treatment versus the control group: degree of repair and defect filling (P < .001), integration to the border zone (P < .001), surface (P = .006), structure (P = .011), signal intensity of the repair tissue (P < .001), and subchondral lamina (P = .005). There were significant between-group differences in KOOS-Pain (P = .014), KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (P = .010), KOOS-Sports (P = .029), and KOOS-Symptoms (P = .039) at 12 weeks postoperatively and in VAS pain (P = .012) and KOOS-Pain (P = .005) at 24 weeks postoperatively. At 48 weeks postoperatively, clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

Microfracture augmented with particulated costal allocartilage resulted in superior cartilage repair quality compared with microfracture alone in terms of MRI evaluation of the knee joint cartilage defect at the 48-week follow-up. Functional outcomes were favorable for both treatments at final follow-up.

Registration

KCT0004936 (Clinical Research Information Service [CRiS] of the Republic of Korea).

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Chondral defects of the knee are common and their treatment is challenging.

SOURCE OF DATA

PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus databases.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Both autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and membrane-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) have been used to manage chondral defects of the knee.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

It is debated whether AMIC and mACI provide equivalent outcomes for the management of chondral defects in the knee at midterm follow-up. Despite the large number of clinical studies, the optimal treatment is still controversial.

GROWING POINTS

To investigate whether AMIC provide superior outcomes than mACI at midterm follow-up.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

AMIC may provide better outcomes than mACI for chondral defects of the knee. Further studies are required to verify these results in a clinical setting.

Reliability of the MOCART score: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The present systematic review analysed the available literature to assess reliability of the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score in the evaluation of knee and ankle osteochondral lesions.

METHODS

All the studies using the MOCART score for knee and/or talus chondral defects were accessed in March 2021. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess associations between the MOCART score at last follow-up and data of patients at baseline, clinical scores and complications. A multiple linear model regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

The MOCART score evidenced no association with patient age (P = 0.6), sex (P = 0.1), body mass index (P = 0.06), defect size (P = 0.9), prior length of symptoms (P = 0.9) or visual analogue scale (P = 0.07). For chondral defects of the knee, no statistically significant association was found between the MOCART score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (P = 0.9) and with the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scales (P = 0.2), Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.2), visual analogue scale P = 0.07), rate of failure (P = 0.2) and revision (P = 0.9). For chondral defect of the talus, no statistically significant associations were found between the MOCART score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (P = 0.3), Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.4), visual analogue scale (P = 0.1), rate of failure (P = 0.1) and revision (P = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

The MOCART score demonstrated no association with patient characteristics and with the surgical outcome in patients who underwent surgical management for knee and talus chondral defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Particulated Autologous Chondral-Platelet-Rich Plasma Matrix Implantation (PACI) for Treatment of Full-Thickness Cartilage Osteochondral Defects

Articular hyaline cartilage injuries can occur as a result of either traumatic of progressive degeneration. When the articular cartilage in a joint is damaged, it can cause joint pain and dysfunction, predisposing patients for the development of early-onset osteoarthritis. There are many restoration procedures available to treat these injuries, such as bone marrow-stimulation techniques, osteoarticular auto/allograft transplants, and autologous chondrocyte implantation. Each of these techniques has its own limitations, which led researchers to explore new regenerative and repair techniques to produce normal hyaline cartilage. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe in detail the particulated autologous chondral-platelet-rich plasma matrix implantation (PACI) technique that could be used as a single-stage cartilage restoration procedure for treatment of full-thickness cartilage and osteochondral defects.

A novel autologous-made matrix using hyaline cartilage chips and platelet-rich growth factors for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects: Preliminary results

PURPOSE

To report the clinical, functional, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based outcomes of a novel autologous-made matrix consisting of hyaline cartilage chips combined with mixed plasma poor rich in platelets clot and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) for the treatment of knee full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects.

METHODS

Between July 2015 and January 2018, all patients with full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects undergoing this novel cartilage restoration surgical technique were approached for eligibility. Indications for this procedure included traumatic or atraumatic full-thickness knee cartilage defects or osteochondritis dissecans. Patients were included if they had no concomitant use of stem cells, previous ipsilateral cartilage repair procedure, or follow-up was less than 10 months. The outcomes included data on current symptoms, physical exam, patient-reported, and functional outcomes (visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Lequesne index, and short form-12 (SF-12)) and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. These outcomes were compared to preoperative values, except for the MOCART score.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included in this preliminary study: mean (standard deviation (SD), range) follow-up 15.9 months (7.2, 10-32), age 26.8 years (12.1, 16-58), and body mass index 23.2 (2.1, 19.3-26.9). There were 14 men (93%) and 1 woman (7%). There was a statistically significant improvement between pre- and postoperative periods for VAS for pain (p = 0.003), Lysholm score (p = 0.002), IKDC subjective form (p = 0.003), WOMAC for pain (p = 0.005), WOMAC for stiffness (p = 0.01), WOMAC for function (p = 0.002), Lequesne Index (p = 0.002), and SF-12 physical component summary (p = 0.007). The postoperative mean (SD; range) MOCART score was 70 (12.4; 40-85).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of this novel cartilage restoration surgical technique provides excellent clinical, functional, and MRI-based outcomes in young, active individuals with full-thickness cartilage or osteochondral defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Therapeutic case series.

AMIC-Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis Technique in Patellar Cartilage Defects Treatment: A Retrospective Study with a Mid-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Knee cartilage defects can be retrieved in 60% of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, especially in the patellofemoral joint. Different techniques have been proposed to treat patellar defects, although most of them are associated with short-term results. In this study Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC), combining subchondral microfractures with a collagen membrane (type I and III collagen), was used in the treatment of isolated patellar cartilage defects.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Subjective-International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS), and Kujala score were collected at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, whereas the Tegner Activity Level Scale was determined preoperatively and at final follow-up (final-FU). The same postoperative management and rehabilitation protocol was adopted for all the patients.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients met the inclusion-exclusion criteria and were evaluated at a mean final-FU of 68.2 months (range 25.4-111.2). At 12 months, Kujala, IKDC, and VAS scores significantly increased in comparison to the preoperative assessment, whereas no statistically significant differences were reported between 12 months and final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated very good results throughout the follow-up, also in sports patients. The AMIC technique, together with an adequate rehabilitation protocol, can be considered as a reliable one-step alternative for the treatment of large isolated patellar cartilage defects.