Is there a difference in the positioning of sliding screws between stable and unstable extracapsular fractures?

A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screws and Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures

Background Intertrochanteric fractures, which occur in the hip of older individuals due to the weak and brittle structure of the bone caused by osteoporosis, make up over 50% of all hip fractures. There are several treatment options available for these fractures. The major objective of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treating intertrochanteric fractures. Methodology Two hundred instances of intertrochanteric hip fractures were surgically treated between July 2022 and January 2024 at a tertiary care facility. The evaluation of fractures was conducted in two groups, namely, group 1, which consisted of 140 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the DHS method. Group 2 consisted of 60 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the PFN technique. The evaluation of functional results was performed with the Harris hip score. Results In the investigation within these groups, group 1 produced excellent outcomes in 53 patients, which accounts for 37.86% of the total. In group 2, the expected results were achieved in 34 patients (56.67%). Achieved outcomes were favorable in 75 (53.57%) individuals in group 1 and 21 (35%) in group 2. Out of the individuals in group 1, eight (5.71%) saw benefits, whereas four (1.6%) did not gain significantly. In group 2, five (8.33%) individuals benefitted. None of the patients in group 2 had unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion While both PFN and DHS provide comparable outcomes in stable bone, PFN demonstrated superior results in cases of unstable bone. The use of PFN results in reduced surgical duration and a smaller surgical opening. Additionally, PFN exhibited superior specificity compared to DHS, especially in cases with stable intertrochanteric bone.

A Survey of Current Practices and Preferences for Internal Fixation of Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur in Brazil

Objective The primary aim of this study was to survey current practices and preferences behind internal fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures among Brazilian orthopedic surgeons. The secondary aim was to identify the main reason for these preferences. Methods A survey containing 20 images of trochanteric fractures of the femur was presented to a group of 62 orthopedists, all members of the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT). The first part of the questionnaire was created to identify the surgeons' degree of professional experience, type of practice, and areas of greatest interest and performance within the specialty. The second part of the questionnaire contained options for fixating different trochanteric fracture patterns in the femur for participants to choose, along with the main reason for their decision. Statistical analysis was descriptive and profiled the surgeons' major area of interest, treatment option, and the main reason for their therapeutic decision. Results Of the 62 orthopedists who participated in the study, 10 (16.0%) stated that their area of greatest interest was orthopedic trauma and 52 (83.9%) reported greater interest in another area of the specialty; these two groups were classified as the Trauma Group and Orthopedics Group, respectively. To treat AO 31A1 type fractures, the trauma group selected the sliding hip screw (SHS) in 66.7% of cases, while the orthopedics group chose the SHS in 65.8% of cases. For 31A2 type fractures, the trauma group chose the intramedullary (IM) nail in 64.0% of the cases, while the orthopedics group chose the IM nail in 76.7% of the cases. For 31A3 type fractures, the trauma group opted for the IM nail in 70.0% of the cases, while the orthopedics group selected the IM nail in 88.0% of the cases. The two most important factors in implant selection for the three types of fracture were fracture pattern and implant availability. Conclusion The sliding hip screw is preferred by most Brazilian orthopedic surgeons for fixation of 31A1 type trochanteric femoral fractures. For 31A2 and 31A3 type fractures, the IM nail is preferred.

Comparing the Intramedullary Nailing Method Versus Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Dynamic Hip Screw fixation is currently considered as a standard treatment for pre-trochanteric fractures; however, due to the long-term hospitalization and some other complications, some researchers have proposed intramedullary nailing as the alternative surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to compare and examine the consequences of the using intramedullary nailing method versus Dynamic Hip Screw.

METHODS

In this study 114 patients with unstable Intertrochanteric fracture refer to Rasoul Akram hospital during 2011 to 2013 has been selected. After reduction, fixation surgery with PFN nail (60 patients) and Dynamic Hip Screw (54 patients) has been performed. All patients were screen during surgery and six months after surgery and some parameters like, bleeding, union, as well as complications such as collapse, varus and medialization of the distal fragment were record and patients.

RESULTS

About some parameters like cutting length, surgery duration, bleeding there were significant differences between two groups. In six months follow up period 2 patinas from nail and 8 patients from DHS group had non-union. Also from the point of radiologic and clinical parameters, like anterior thigh pain, cut out, medialization of the distal fragment, collapse of the neck, walking recovery and daily activities were significant between two groups.

CONCLUSION

Due to the reduced hospital stay in intramedullary nailing method and the necessity of doing repeated surgery and applying intramedullary nailing when the patients are not treated with external fixation, the researchers recommend intramedullary nailing as the first option in treating such patients.