Saphenous nerve injury during harvesting of one or two hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Outside-in technique versus inside-out semitendinosus graft harvest technique in ACLR: a randomised control trial

Background

Paraesthesia after hamstring graft harvest is a ubiquitous complication in the early post-operative period, and its correlation with vertical versus horizontal skin incision are well documented. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the incidence and extent/area of sensory loss of saphenous nerve branches occurring with the outside-in (OI) versus inside-out technique (IO) of semitendinosus graft harvest from the sartorius fascia and to determine a better method of graft harvest.

Methods

Sixty patients who underwent isolated semitendinosus graft harvest during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between 2016 and 2017. Patients were randomised into two groups depending on the graft harvest technique: 30 in the OI group and 30 in the IO group. The area of sensory loss was mapped on the patients’ skin using tactile feedback from the patients at each follow-up (10 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year). Then, the area of sensory changes for the infrapatellar branch (IPBSN) and sartorial branch (SBSN) of the saphenous nerve, incision length, graft harvest duration, and graft length were analysed statistically between the groups.

Results

In groups 1 and 2, 18/30 (60%) and 19/30 (63%) of patients, respectively, developed sensory changes, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.79). Isolated SBSN and IPBSN paraesthesia occurred in 2/60 (3%) and 19/60 (32%), respectively. Combined SBSN and IPBSN paraesthesia was present in 16/60 (27%) of patients. There was no significant difference in the area of the sensory deficit between OI and IO groups on the 10th post-operative day or at 1-month, 3-month or 1-year follow-up (p = 0.723, p = 0.308, p = 0.478, p = 0.128, respectively). However, at 6-month follow-up, the area of paraesthesia was significantly higher in the IO group (p = 0.009). The length of incision and duration of graft harvest was higher in the OI group than in the IO group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively), and the total length of the graft was greater in the IO group (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Incidence is equally distributed, area of iatrogenic saphenous nerve injury gradually decreases, and recovery is seen in the majority of the patients in both graft harvest techniques. IO graft harvesting technique is better in terms of graft harvest time and cosmetics and yields longer graft; however, area of paraesthesia, though not significant, was two-fold higher than the OI technique at 1-year follow-up.

Clinical relevance

IO graft harvest technique would enable the surgeon to adopt quicker graft harvest, smaller surgical scar and lengthier graft than the OI technique.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic randomised controlled prospective study, Level II.

Autonomic Denervation Dermatitis: A Relatively Undocumented 'ADD'itional Complication of Total Knee Replacements and Other Surgeries Around the Knee

BACKGROUND

Infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve lies subcutaneously and supplies the anterolateral aspect of knee below the patella. It is extremely susceptible to iatrogenic injuries during the surgeries around the knee, mainly total knee replacements (TKRs). Post operatively the patients present with localised area of numbness and in some instances a traumatic eczematous reaction termed autonomous denervation dermatitis (ADD) is witnessed, leading to skin manifestations that range from a simple rash to extensive lesions.

METHODOLOGY

A review of literature was conducted with search of relevant articles from Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus which discussed eczematous skin lesions secondary to total knee replacements. Additionally, we noted studies which described these lesions in other surgeries around the knee like arthroscopies and fracture fixations.

RESULTS

Eight studies including atleast one case after TKR were reviewed. There was only one cohort study while the remaining included case reports and small case series. There were 69 cases of ADD appearing after TKR. The appearance of the skin lesions was lateral to the incision in 30/34 operated knees and on both sides of the incision in four knees after TKRs. Bilateral lesions were seen in only six patients of TKRs. There was no functional limitation caused by these lesions and they resolved either spontaneously or after using topical steroids.

CONCLUSION

ADD is a relatively uncommonly reported complication of TKRs, which can reduce patient satisfaction and increase surgeon apprehension. Although all cases of nerve damage do not manifest as cutaneous lesions, steps to minimise the damage to the nerve intra operatively should be taken. The diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion, and should not be dispelled as a simple allergic reaction without adequate investigations. Patients should be counselled to alleviate unnecessary fear and apprehensions.

Diagnosis and treatment of the most common neuropathies following knee injuries and reconstructive surgery - A narrative review

The main nerves in the knee region are the tibial nerve, the common peroneal nerve, and the saphenous nerve. These three nerves innervate the lower leg and foot, providing sensory and motor function. The large sciatic nerve splits just above the knee to form the tibial and common peroneal nerves. The tibial nerve travels down in the posterior region, while the common peroneal nerve runs around the lateral side of the knee and runs down the front of the leg to the foot. Although all these nerves can be affected by injuries of the knee, the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) and the common peroneal nerve (CPN) are most affected. In this narrative review we focus on neuropathies associated with nerves located in the region of the knee joint in the context of their injuries and possible iatrogenic damage during reconstructive surgery.

The Effect of Graft Harvest and Skin Incision Angle on Sensory Disturbance in ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus-Gracilis Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Cadaveric Study

Background:

Injury to the inferior branch of the saphenous nerve (IBSN) and the subsequent loss of skin sensation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are common. The literature suggests that the incision angle may affect the incidence and area of loss of skin sensation.

Purpose:

To determine whether there is a difference in the incidence and area of altered sensory loss on the tibia between vertical (VI) and oblique (OI) incisions for semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft harvest during ACL reconstruction. The cadaveric component was designed to determine whether there is a “safe zone” for incision by identifying the location and number of branches of the IBSN.

Study Design:

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

Patients (n = 37) were randomized to receive either VI or OI. Incidence and area of altered skin sensation were documented during at least 1 postoperative visit. In addition, 18 cadaveric knees were dissected.

Results:

The presence or absence of hypoesthesia did not differ between groups postoperatively. Although no statistical differences between groups were seen in the total area of perceived altered skin sensation at 3 (P = .57), 6 (P = .08), 12 (P = .65), and 24 months (P = .27), data demonstrated a trend toward VI participants having a larger area of hypoesthesia at every time point. Among the 18 cadaveric specimens, 4 variations in the distribution of IBSN were noted: 18 (100%) had 1 branch, 14 (78%) had 2 branches, 6 (33%) had 3 branches, and 1 (6%) had 4 branches. No safe zone for incision could be identified.

Conclusion:

No difference was found between a vertical and an oblique incision with respect to incidence or area of sensory loss. Furthermore, it was not possible to identify a safe zone that would prevent transection of all nerves branches of the IBSN based on the cadaveric component of this study.

A Comparison between Oblique and Vertical Incisions on the Hamstring Tendon Harvesting in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Infrapatellar Branch Injury of the Saphenous Nerve

Objective  The present study aimed to compare the oblique and vertical incisions in hamstring tendon harvesting in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and in infrapatellar branch injury of the saphenous nerve. Methods  The present study was conducted at a tertiary referral center for 12 months. Patients with an indication of reconstruction of ACL tear were included in the study, who were then randomized into two groups (vertical [VG] and oblique [OG] groups). After excluding a few cases, 92 patients were eligible for further analysis (VG: n= 44; OG: n =  48). They were followed-up for 9 months after the surgery, and loss of sensation over the knee and over the proximal aspect of the operated leg was recorded. Results  The mean lengths of the incisions were 27 mm and 38 mm for the OG and VG groups, respectively. The total rate of hypoesthesia was 40% (27 patients). A total of 12 (25%) and 25 patients (56.8%) on the OG and VG groups, respectively, reported hypoesthesia symptoms. The presence of hypoesthesia in patients in the VG group was two times higher than in the OG group. No statistical correlation was observed between the nerve injury and age, gender, education, and delay from injury to reconstruction. Conclusion  Oblique incision, which showed lower risk of nerve damage, might be more recommended for graft harvesting. Patients who underwent reconstruction of the ACL in the OG group had a lower incidence of peri-incisional hypoesthesia when compared to those in the VG group.

Relationship between peri-incisional dysesthesia and the vertical and oblique incisions on the hamstrings harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of peri-incisional dysesthesia according to the skin incision technique for hamstring tendon graft harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with ACL rupture were separated in two groups: group 1, with 19 patients submitted to the oblique skin incision to access the hamstrings and group 2-14 patients operated by vertical skin incision technique. The selected patients were assessed after surgery. Demographic data and prevalence of dysesthesia was measured by digital pressure around the skin incision and classified according to the Highet scale.

RESULTS

The total rate of dysesthesia was 42% (14 patients). Five patients (26%) on the oblique incision group reported dysesthesia symptoms. On the group submitted to the vertical incision technique, the involvement was 64% (nine patients). On the 33 knees evaluated, the superior lateral area was the most affected skin region, while the superior medial and inferior medial regions were affected in only one patient (7.1%). No statistical differences between both groups were observed regarding patients' weight, age, and height¸ as well as skin incision length.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the oblique access technique had five times lower incidence of peri-incisional dysesthesia when compared with those in whom the vertical access technique was used.