Femur lengthening with monoplanar external fixator associated with locked intramedullary nail

An engineering review of external fixators

•

Mechanical stability plays a key role in the effectiveness of external fixators.

•

Strength and stiffness are the main factors which contributes towards stability.

•

Modified configurations of linear, circular and hybrid fixators are investigated.

•

Light weight composite materials are gradually replacing traditional metallic alloys.

•

Existing research gaps in further optimizing external fixators are identified.

External Fixators are a common technique used to treat a variety of issues related to bones, predominantly due to its non-intrusive nature and versatility in terms of form and materials. While it is mainly used to treat open fractures, its other uses include limb lengthening, deformity correction, bone grafting, compression of non-unions and stabilization of dislocations. Its earliest use dates as far back as 400 BCE and has undergone significant improvements, focusing on both customization and optimization. These two aspects highlight the significance of complementing the orthopaedic requirements with engineering knowledge and its applications. Hence, this review paper aims to conduct an examination of recent developments of external fixators with a special focus on its structure, the usage of materials and biomechanical investigations using experimental and numerical techniques. The paper presents the existing level of engineering knowledge with regards to these aspects and identifies research gaps, which can improve the quality of the commonly used external fixators.

Limb Length Discrepancy on an 11-Month-Old Boy with Osteoid Osteoma

Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone tumor that frequently occurs between the ages of 10 and 25 years old; in about 80% of the patients, it is associated with intense pain. The present article describes the case of an 11-month-old infant with claudication, right lower limb shortening, and painless right leg volume increase. Image studies demonstrated an osteolytic lesion with small ossifications within, involved by cortical thickening of the right tibial diaphysis. The diagnostic hypotheses were osteoid osteoma, chronic osteomyelitis (Brodie abscess), Ewing sarcoma, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Microorganism cultures were negative and the histopathological exam demonstrated osteoid osteoma. The present report expands the knowledge on osteoid osteoma as a cause of painless limping and lower limb shortening in infancy. The early differential diagnosis is important, as surgical excision is curative and prevents further complications.

[Precise orthormorphia of tibial angulation deformity and shortening deformity by using digital technology combined with circular external fixator]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of precise orthormorphia of tibial angulation deformity and shortening deformity by using digital technology combined with external fixator.

Methods

Twenty-six cases of tibial angulation deformity combined with shortening deformity were treated between June 2012 and August 2016, including 12 males and 14 females aged from 1 to 19 years with an average age of 16.5 years. There were 6 cases of congenital patella pseudoarthrosis, 1 case of fibrous dysplasia of femur and tibia, 3 cases of limb shortening deformity caused by infantile paralysis, 16 cases of fracture malunion. Limb shortening was 1.5-9.5 cm (mean, 6.2 cm) before operation. The deformity from three-dimensional perspective was analysed by digital technology, the surgical procedures of lengthening and osteotomy was simulated, the navigation templates were completed with computer aided design (CAD) and three-dimensional printing, and the external fixator was used to assist the lengthening of the tibia. X-ray films were regularly reviewed after operation to observe the new bone remolding, limb lengthening, load bearing line of lower limb, and recurrences of angulation.

Results

All the patients were followed up 14-48 months (mean, 18.8 months). There was only 1 case of superficial pin site infection which was cured with oral antibiotics and pin site care with mild disinfectants, and no complication such as bone nonunion, equines deformity, or vascular nerve injury occurred. The deformity of tibia and load bearing line of lower limb had been completely recovered according to postoperative X-ray films at 1 week. All the cases achieved perfect limb length as with preoperative design. The bone mineralization time was 12-20 weeks (mean, 11.6 weeks), the external fixator removal time was 18-26 weeks (mean, 14.9 weeks), and the healing index was 21-78 d/cm (mean, 63.4 d/cm). The postoperative flexion range of the injured limb was 15° less than the unaffected extremity in 1 case, and the situation was improved significantly after some physical manipulation and exercise, who completed the limb lengthening and achieved the expected effectiveness finally.

Conclusion

Precise orthormorphia of tibial deformity by using digital technology, and limb lengthening with the aid of external fixator can achieve good effectiveness with good reliability, invasiveness, and precision.

A Comparison of Femoral Lengthening Methods Favors the Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail When Compared with Lengthening Over a Nail

BACKGROUND

Bone lengthening with an internal lengthening nail (ILN) avoids the need for external fixation and requires one less surgical procedure than lengthening over a nail (LON). However, LON has been shown to be superior to femoral internal lengthening using a mechanical nail. The magnetic ILN, a remote-controlled and magnet-driven device, may have overcome the weaknesses of earlier internal lengthening technology and may be superior to LON.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the magnetic ILN more accurate than LON for femoral lengthening? (2) Does the magnetic ILN demonstrate more precise distraction rate control than LON? (3) Does the magnetic ILN result in faster regenerate site healing, with more robust callus, than LON? (4) Does the magnetic ILN result in fewer complications, including impediments to knee motion, than LON?

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective comparison of the records and radiographs of 21 consecutive patients with 22 femoral lengthenings using LONs and 35 consecutive patients with 40 femoral lengthenings using remote-controlled magnetic ILNs. Primary outcomes measured included accuracy, distraction rate precision, time to bony union, final knee range of motion, regenerate quality, and complications. The minimum follow-up times for the LON and ILN cohorts were 13 and 21 months, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ILN had a lower post-treatment residual limb-length discrepancy (0.3 mm) than those treated with LON (3.6 mm). The rate of distraction was closer to the goal of 1 mm/day and more tightly controlled for the ILN cohort (1 mm/day) than that for the LON group (0.8 mm/day; SD, 0.2). Regenerate quality was not significantly different between the cohorts. Bone healing index for ILN was not statistically significant. Time to union was shorter in the ILN group (3.3 months) than that in the LON group (4.5 months). A lower percentage of patients experienced a complication in the ILN group (18%) than in the LON group (45%). Knee flexion at the end of distraction was greater for ILN patients (105°) than that for LON patients (88.8°), but this difference was no longer observed after 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral lengthening with magnetic ILN was more accurate than with LON. The magnetic ILN comports the additional advantage of greater precision with distraction rate control and fewer complications. Both techniques afford reliable healing and do not significantly affect knee motion at the final follow-up. The magnetic ILN method showed no superiority in regenerate quality and healing rate.