Postoperative comparison of the results from use of antibiotic prophylaxis for one and five days among patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis

Utilization of neurosurgical perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in a Chinese teaching hospital

Background Audits of antimicrobial prophylaxis is an essential strategy to identify practice gaps in antimicrobial prescribing in healthcare facilities. There is a lack of studies on the costs, quality, and antimicrobial use density of neurosurgical perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in China. Objectives Evaluate the appropriateness of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in neurosurgeries and analyze the costs, quality, and antimicrobial use density of neurosurgical perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Setting Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, a teaching hospital in Beijing. Methods This retrospective study was conducted among 262 neurosurgical patients without infections during 2017. The appropriateness of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis was determined based on relevant international and Chinese perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines. Main outcome measures Discrepancy rates in perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, including indication, choice of antimicrobials, dose, route of administration, time of administration of the first dose, re-dosing, and duration, were analyzed. Results Discrepancies were observed between current practice and relevant guidelines. A total of 51 (32.1%) procedures failed to administer intraoperative re-dosing as needed, and the perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis duration of 217 (82.8%) procedures was inappropriately prolonged. The choice of antimicrobial agents was optimal in 249 (95%) procedures, and the timing of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis was appropriate in all procedures. If perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis was implemented according to guidelines, the defined daily dose per 100 procedures would decrease from 31.97 to 16.99, and the total cost would reduce from $2000 to $490. Conclusions Effective antimicrobial stewardship is urgently needed to promote the appropriateness of neurosurgical perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in China.

Postdischarge antibiotic use for prophylaxis following spinal fusion

OBJECTIVE

Despite recommendations to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics after incision closure or <24 hours after surgery, prophylactic antibiotics are continued after discharge by some clinicians. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use after spinal fusion.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

This study included patients aged ≥18 years undergoing spinal fusion or refusion between July 2011 and June 2015 at 3 sites. Patients with an infection during the surgical admission were excluded.

METHODS

Prophylactic antibiotics were identified at discharge. Factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use were identified using hierarchical generalized linear models.

RESULTS

In total, 8,652 spinal fusion admissions were included. Antibiotics were prescribed at discharge in 289 admissions (3.3%). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (22.1%), cephalexin (18.8%), and ciprofloxacin (17.1%). Adjusted for study site, significant factors associated with prophylactic discharge antibiotics included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥3 (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00-1.70), lymphoma (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.11-5.98), solid tumor (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.62-8.14), morbid obesity (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.09-2.47), paralysis (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.30-4.37), hematoma/seroma (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.17-7.33), thoracic surgery (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.93), longer length of stay, and intraoperative antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics were uncommon after spinal fusion. Patient and perioperative factors were associated with continuation of prophylactic antibiotics after hospital discharge.