Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block in patients with chronic knee pain

Comparative evaluation of functional outcome and pain relief after pulsed radiofrequency of the saphenous nerve within and distal to the adductor canal in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind trial

Background and Aims

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the saphenous nerve (SN) has shown effective pain relief in knee pain because of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The adductor canal (AC) contains other sensory nerves innervating the medial part of the knee joint apart from SN. We compared the PRF of SN within and outside the AC for their quality and duration of pain relief in knee osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (KOA-MC).

Material and Methods

We conducted a randomized prospective study in 60 patients with anteromedial knee pain because of KOA-MC. Patients in group A received PRF-SN, and those in group B received PRF-AC. The primary objectives were comparison of pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and changes in quality of daily living by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and OXFORD knee scores. The secondary objectives were comparison of analgesic requirements using Medicine Quantification Scale (MQS) scores and block-related complications. Intra-group comparison was performed by analysis of variance. Inter-group normally distributed data were assessed by Student's t-test, non-normally distributed and ordinal data were assessed by Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical data were assessed by Chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

VAS scores were significantly lower in Gr-B at 12 weeks. The WOMAC scores and OXFORD scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks were significantly lower in Gr-B compared to Gr-A.

Conclusion

The PRF-AC provides better pain relief and functional outcome than PRF-SN; however, duration of pain relief was not significantly different.

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Canal Adductor Blockade for Chronic Pain and Functioning in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study

Methods

Seventy-seven patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain received ultrasound-guided ACB with 14 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine and 100 mcg clonidine. At baseline and 1 month after the blockade, we assessed maximal and minimal pain intensity in the knee using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The range of motion in extension and flexion (ROMext and ROMflex) and quadriceps muscle strength of both knees (QS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30CST) results were determined at baseline, 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month after the blockade.

Results

ACB with levobupivacaine and clonidine appeared to decrease pain severity (NRS_max 8.13 to 4.2, p < 0.001 and NRS_min 3.32 to 1.40, p < 0.001). Similarly, knee ROMext decreased from 3.90 preintervention to 2.89 postintervention at 1 month, p < 0.001; ROMflex decreased from 5.70 to 3.29, p < 0.001; TUG time decreased from 3.22 to 2.93, <0.001; QS increased from 18.43 to 22.77, p < 0.001; CST increased from 8.23 to 10.74, p < 0.001. The KOOS for pain (36.40 to 58.34), symptoms (52.55 to 64.32), activities of daily living functions (ADLs, 36.36 to 60.77), and quality of life (QoL, 17.87 to 30.97) also increased, all p < 0.001.

Conclusion

ACB appeared to decrease pain and increase ambulation. If our preliminary results are reproducible in a planned randomized controlled trial, ACB could be a useful adjunctive pain therapy in patients with disabling pain due to knee OA.

Saphenous nerve block as a diagnosis tool for chronic postsurgical pain of the left medial calf

Ultrasound‐guided saphenous nerve block above the knee may be a valuable diagnosis tool in patient presenting chronic pain of the calf.