1
|
Robles A, Gil-Rojas Y, Amaya D, Hernández F, Escobar-Cordoba F, Venegas M, Amado S, Restrepo-Gualteros S, Echeverry J, Marín F, Zabala S, Bazurto-Zapata MA, Deger M. Cost-utility and budget impact analysis of CPAP therapy compared to no treatment in the management of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea in Colombia from a third-party payer perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:399-407. [PMID: 36852713 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2181792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To conduct cost-utility and budget impact analysis of providing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy versus no treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Colombia from a third-party payer perspective. METHODS We used a Markov model to assess the cost-utility and budget impact analysis of CPAP in patients over 40 years old with moderate to severe OSA. Data on effectiveness and utility values were obtained from published literature. A discount rate of 5% was applied for outcomes and costs. ICER was calculated and compared against the threshold estimated for Colombia, which is 86% of the GDP per capita. RESULTS Over a lifetime horizon, the base case analysis showed the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained with CPAP therapy was COP$3,503,804 (USD$1,011 in 2020 prices). The budget impact analysis showed that the adoption of CPAP therapy in the target population would lead to a cumulative net budget impact of COP$411,722 million (USD$118,784,412 in, 2020 prices) over five years of time horizon. CONCLUSIONS CPAP was cost-effective compared to no-treatment in OSA. According to the budget impact analysis, adopting this technology would require a budget allocation that is partially offset by reduced number of strokes and traffic accident events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Devi Amaya
- Real World Insights (RWI), IQVIA, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Franklin Escobar-Cordoba
- Fundación Sueño Vigilia Colombiana, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.,Asociación Colombiana de Medicina del sueño, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Marco Venegas
- Asociación Colombiana de Medicina del sueño, Bogotá, Colombia.,Somnarum, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Steve Amado
- Asociación Colombiana de Medicina del sueño, Bogotá, Colombia.,Maple Respiratory. Universidad del Rosario. Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Sonia Restrepo-Gualteros
- Fundación Sueño Vigilia Colombiana, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.,Asociación Colombiana de Medicina del sueño, Bogotá, Colombia.,Hospital La Misericordia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jorge Echeverry
- Asociación Colombiana de Medicina del sueño, Bogotá, Colombia.,Maple Respiratory. Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia
| | | | - Sandra Zabala
- Asociación Colombiana de Medicina del sueño, Bogotá, Colombia.,Maple Respiratory, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uribe-Arango W, Reyes Sánchez JM, Castaño Gamboa N. Budget Impact Analysis of Anticoagulation Clinics in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation under Chronic Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 12:21501327211000213. [PMID: 33719701 PMCID: PMC7968007 DOI: 10.1177/21501327211000213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess budget impact of the implementation of an anticoagulation clinic (AC) compared to usual care (UC), in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHOD A decision tree was designed to analyze the cost and events rates over a 1-year horizon. The patients were distributed according to treatment, 30% Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) regimens and the rest to warfarin. The thromboembolism and bleeding were derived from observational studies which demonstrated that ACs had important impact in reducing the frequency of these events compared with UC, due to higher adherence with DOACs and proportion of time in therapeutic range (TTR) with warfarin. Costs were derived from the transactional platform of Colombian government, healthcare authority reimbursement and published studies. The values were expressed in American dollars (USD). The exchanged rate used was COP $3.693 per dollar. RESULTS During 1 year of follow-up, in a cohort of 228 patients there were estimated 48 bleedings, 6 thromboembolisms in AC group versus 84 bleedings, and 12 thromboembolisms events in patients receiving UC. Total costs related to AC were $126 522 compared with $141 514 in UC. The AC had an important reduction in the cost of clinical events versus UC ($52 085 vs $110 749) despite a higher cost of care facilities ($74 436 vs $30 765). A sensibility analysis suggested that in the 83% of estimations, the AC produced savings varied between $27 078 and $135 391. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that AC compared with UC, produced an important savings in the oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with NVAF.
Collapse
|