Aspirin resistant patients with recent ischemic stroke

Efficacy and safety of lumbrokinase plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for acute ischemic stroke (LUCENT): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background

Lumbrokinase has been widely used for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in China; however, because rigorously designed studies are lacking, safety and efficacy of lumbrokinase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke remains largely unknown. In this multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial, we aim to compare lumbrokinase plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

A total of 220 eligible participants will be randomized to either the intervention or control group with a 1:1 ratio. These participants must be diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke for the first time, whose symptoms appear within 72 h. Their NIHSS score must be greater than 5 and less than 15, and their age must be between 35 and 85 years old. They must have not received intravenous thrombolysis, arterial thrombolysis, or intravascular intervention. Participants in the intervention group will be treated with lumbrokinase plus aspirin for the first 90 days. Participants in the control group will use placebo plus aspirin for the first 90 days. Then, all participants will be treated with aspirin only and followed up for another 90 days (180-day follow-up). The primary outcome is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The secondary outcomes are National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Scale score, coagulation function, and serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein. The exploratory outcomes are fasting lipid panel, recurrence rate, the occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and the mortality rate. Safety evaluations include liver function and kidney function, serum fibrinogen, adverse events, serious adverse events, and bleeding events. Adherence of participants will also be assessed.

Discussion

This trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of lumbrokinase plus aspirin as compared to aspirin alone in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000032952. Registered on May 16, 2020.

[Prevalence and prognosis of aspirin resistance in critical limb ischemia patients]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence and the association between aspirin resistance in critical limb ischemia patients using the VerifyNow^® bed-side platelet test, and occurrence of cardiovascular morbidity and/or death at one year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

National multicenter prospective observational study related to COPART II centers. From 2010 through 2014, 64 subjects hospitalized for critical limb ischemia and already treated by aspirin before the VerifyNow^® test were included. A VerifyNow^® test>550 ARU was defined as aspirin resistance. Critical limb ischemia was defined according to the TASC I criteria. The primary outcome was a composite including death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke and major amputation during the one-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

In all, 9/64 patients were aspirin resistant, the status was confirmed in one case. The prevalence of aspirin resistance was 14.06%. There was no significant difference between aspirin resistant and aspirin non-resistant groups in terms of cardiovascular history and glycemia status. Neither was there significant difference between the two groups in terms of survival.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin resistance was not predictive of poorer survival in critical limb ischemia patients. However, our population was limited. Considering that a clear definition of aspirin resistance and standardized diagnostic tests are lacking, complementary studies might be useful.