El internista como consultor de ética clínica: un antídoto contra «la barbarie del especialismo» en la práctica hospitalaria

What Ethics Support for Resolving Ethical Conflicts Do Internists Use in Spanish Hospitals?

Background Ethical conflicts generate difficulties in daily clinical activity. Which methods of ethical advice are most frequently used to resolve them among Spanish doctors has not been studied. The objective of this study is to describe what methods hospital internal medicine physicians in Spain use to resolve their ethical doubts and which they consider most useful. Design A cross-sectional observational study was conducted through a voluntary and anonymous survey and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. Measures We measured methods by which to resolve doubts, types of tools sought, frequency of consulting the Clinical Ethics Committees, and satisfaction with resolution of ethical issues. Results Of 261 internists surveyed, 86 per cent resolve their ethical doubts with assistance, the most frequently used method being consultation with colleagues (58.6 per cent), followed by using specific protocols or guides (11.8 per cent) and consultation with experts in bioethics (9.6 per cent). The most preferred tools are the creation of protocols (30.3 per cent) and the establishment of a consultant/expert in bioethics (27.8 per cent). Conclusions Internists in Spain usually seek assistance to resolve their ethical doubts. Consulting colleagues is the most frequently adopted method. The majority regard tools to resolve ethical conflicts as necessary, seeking above all protocols and consultants/experts in bioethics.

Description of the experience of a clinical ethics consultation service from 2019 to 2021

INTRODUCTION

Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) are useful model for ethical counselling, albeit with scarce implementation in European countries. This article shares the experience of one of the first ethics consultation services in Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This work is a retrospective, observational study of all consultations received by the CEC service at La Princesa University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021. The demographic, logistic, and ethical variables of the cases were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 63 cases were analyzed in which a total of 124 ethical conflicts were identified. Forty-one percent of the cases (n = 26) were emergency consultations and 38% (n = 24) were preferential inquiries. An initial evaluation was performed with 24 h in 50 cases (79%). The department that consulted most often was the Intensive Care Unit (9; 14%). The preferred contact methods were via pager (36; 57%), the electronic medical record system (13; 21%), or direct conversations with consulting team (7; 11%). The most common ethical conflicts were those related to the adequacy of treatment measures (24; 19%), refusal of treatment (19; 15%), communication with the patient or his/her family (29; 23%), or the patient's capacity (13; 11%).

CONCLUSION

CEC services provide quick, efficient assistance for resolving ethical problems in daily practice. Their implementation in Spain is feasible.

La relación entre Bioética y Salud Pública

El proceso de toma de decisiones desde la Salud Pública (SP) se basa en el ser y el deber ser. En Colombia los comités de bioética, ética de la investigación y ética clínica han funcionado con sus propios estatutos para garantizar el derecho a la salud, a pesar de las reformas a la seguridad social. Los antecedentes los llevaron a una fragmentación del sistema de salud caracterizada por la axiología neoliberal (economía de mercado según capacidad de pago) y normativa del Estado Social de Derecho. El sistema pretende resolver esta fragmentación, pero existen problemas estructurales del mercado que solo se solucionarían si funcionaran los mecanismos de regulación y el papel del Estado. Es decir, el sistema es insuficiente para lograr satisfacer las necesidades de la salud debido a las interacciones entre actores sociopolíticos. Este proceso conduce a opciones utilitaristas que sustentan la tendencia en temas de investigación. Los valores en SP junto con la ética de la SP son variables. Para la ética de la SP los valores de la práctica son de importancia pública, relacionados con los objetivos de la SP y los profesionales.