Manejo integral de los factores de riesgo en enfermedad arterial periférica. Consenso de expertos

Risk factors for fracture-related infection after ankle fracture surgery

INTRODUCTION

Ankle fracture surgery comes with a risk of fracture-related infection (FRI). Identifying risk factors are important in preoperative planning, in management of patients, and for information to the individual patient about their risk of complications. In addition, modifiable factors can be addressed prior to surgery. The aim of the current paper was to identify risk factors for FRI in patients operated for ankle fractures.

METHODS

A cohort of 1004 patients surgically treated for ankle fractures at Haukeland University Hospital in the period of 2015-2019 was studied retrospectively. Patient charts and radiographs were assessed for the diagnosis of FRI. Binary logistic regression was used in analyses of risk factors. Regression coefficients were used to calculate the probability for FRI based on the patients' age and presence of one or more risk factors.

RESULTS

FRI was confirmed in 87 (9%) of 1004 patients. Higher age at operation (p < .001), congestive heart failure (CHF), p = 0.006), peripheral artery disease (PAD, p = 0.001), and current smoking (p = .006) were identified as risk factors for FRI. PAD and CHF were the risk factors displaying the strongest association with FRI with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.2 (95% CI 1.8-10.1) and 4.7 (95% CI 1.6-14.1) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of FRI was 9% after surgical treatment of ankle fractures. The combination of risk factors found in this study demonstrate the need for a thorough, multidisciplinary, and careful approach when faced with an elderly or frail patient with an ankle fracture. The results of this study help the treating surgeons to inform their patients of the risk of FRI prior to ankle fracture surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective case-control study.

A New Nomogram for Predicting 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality Rate of Acute Cholangitis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Purpose

Acute cholangitis (AC) is a widespread acute inflammatory disease and the main cause of septic shock, which has a high death rate in hospitals. At present, the prediction models for short-term mortality of AC patients are still not ideal. We aimed at developing a new model that could forecast the short-term mortality rate of AC patients.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV version 2.0 (MIMIC-IV v2.0). There were a total of 506 cases of AC patients that were included. Patients were given a 7 : 3 split between the training set and the validation set after being randomly assigned to one of the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to create an AC patient predictive nomogram for 30-day mortality. The overall efficacy of the model is evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the calibration curve, the net reclassification improvement (NRI), the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and a decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Out of 506 patients, 14.0% (71 patients) died. The training cohort had 354 patients, and the validation cohort had 152 patients. GCS, SPO2, albumin, AST/ALT, glucose, potassium, PTT, and peripheral vascular disease were the independent risk factors according to the multivariate analysis results. The newly established nomogram had better prediction performance than other common scoring systems (such as SOFA, OASIS, and SAPS II). For two cohorts, the calibration curve demonstrated coherence between the nomogram and the ideal observation (P  >  0.05). The clinical utility of the nomogram in both sets was revealed by decision curve analysis.

Conclusion

The novel prognostic model was effective in forecasting the 30-day mortality rate for acute cholangitis patients.

Clinical Profile and Management of Patient Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease and/or Peripheral Artery Disease in Clinical Practice: The APALUSA Study

This study was aimed to ascertain the clinical profile and management of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD). In this observational and cross-sectional study developed in 80 hospitals throughout Spain, consecutive adults with stable IHD and/or PAD were included. A total of 1089 patients were analyzed, of whom 65.3% had only IHD, 17.8% PAD and 16.9% both. A total of 80.6% were taking only one antiplatelet agent, and 18.2% were on dual antiplatelet therapy (mainly aspirin/clopidogrel). Almost all patients were taking ≥1 lipid lowering drug, mainly moderate-to-high intensity statins. IHD patients took ezetimibe more commonly than PAD (43.9% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.001). There were more patients with IHD that achieved blood pressure targets compared to PAD (<140/90 mmHg: 67.9% vs. 43.0%; p < 0.001; <130/80 mmHg: 34.1% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001), LDL-cholesterol (<70 mg/dL: 53.1% vs. 41.5%; p = 0.033; <55 mg/dL: 26.5% vs. 16.0%; p = 0.025), and diabetes (HbA1c < 7%, with SGLT2i/GLP1-RA: 21.7% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.032). Modifications of antihypertensive agents and lipid-lowering therapy were performed in 69.0% and 82.3% of patients, respectively, without significant differences between groups. The use of SGLT2i/GLP1-RA was low. In conclusion, cardiovascular risk factors control remains poor among patients with IHD, PAD, or both. A higher use of combined therapy is warranted.