Imaging of Acute Low Back Pain

Case Report and Literature Review: Lumbar Disc Extrusion Misdiagnosed as an Epidural Hematoma

Accurate differentiation between epidural hematomas and lumbar disc extrusion is essential due to the potential overlap in clinical presentations. We present a case report highlighting a significant challenge in which a massive lumbar disc extrusion was mistaken for an epidural hematoma. This is a case report of a 38-year-old male patient who developed cauda equina syndrome four days after experiencing an audible cracking in the lower back during weightlifting activity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was inconclusive, unable to distinguish between an extruded nucleus pulposus and a spinal epidural hematoma. Subsequently, an urgent operation revealed a large herniated disc at the L4-L5 level, ruling out any hematoma. The patient's post-operative follow-up showed significant improvement, with almost complete recovery of motor and sensory functions. This case emphasizes the challenges faced when distinguishing between epidural hematomas and lumbar disc herniations, particularly on MRI. The lumbar disc herniation's substantial size, cranial and caudal migration on multiple levels, and signal intensity contributed to the misdiagnosis, underscoring the importance of careful interpretation and awareness of such complexities.

Prevalence of Lumbar Disk Herniation in Adult Patients with Low Back Pain Based in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis

Background: Lumbar disc degenerative disease has now been proven as the most common cause of low back pain throughout the world. Approximately 5–15% of patients with low back pain suffer from lumbar disc herniation. Presenting symptoms of lumbar disc degeneration are lower back pain and sciatica which may be aggravated by walking, sitting, standing, bending, lifting etc. Aim: To evaluate based on MRI images the prevalence of LDH in patients with low back pain and its correlation between various demographic data. Methods: This Cross sectional and observational study was conducted from January 2016 to December 2017 at department of Imagery in the University Hospital Center `Mother Theresa`. During the two years’ period of this study, 342 patients of low back pain were presented to department of imagery suspected for lumbar disc herniation. Diagnostic criteria were based upon abnormal findings in MRI. All MRI scans were obtained with 1.5 tesla MRI machine. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS software for Windows version 20.0. Results: Overall 342 patients with LBP came into Imagery department, the prevalence of lumbar disc herniation resulted 31.9% (109/342). Most of patients 60.5% were presented with continuous LBP with a predominance of deterioration of pain by the walking activity 65.2%. The average age of patients with LDH resulted 51.12 years old with min 32 years and max 74 years old. The ratio M:F of LDH patients resulted 1.4, with predominance of males 59.6%. The active age 40-49 years (28.9%) old and 50-59 years (36.9%) were the most affected by LDH compared to other age groups. Based on MRI images disc herniation was most commonly present at the level of L3/L4 and L4/L5. Commonest types of disc herniation were protrusion 63.3% (69/109) followed by extrusion 21.1% (23/109). In the overall multivariate regression analysis, a significant relation between lumbar disk herniation and some of occupation was found (p˂0.05) Conclusions: Biologically, the lumbar herniation disc is a potential contributor to low back pain. The prevalence of LDH among patients with LBP resulted 31.9%, and men were more prone to suffered from disc herniation than women, due to increased mechanical stress and injury. Results reported the frequent occurrence of lumbar disc degenerative disease in active age. The lumbar discs most often affected and leads to herniation are L3-L4, and L4–L5. Research efforts should endeavor to reduce risk factors and improve the quality of life.

Can routine MRI spine T1 sequences be used for prediction of decreased bone density?

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow signal is ideally evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to its high tissue contrast. While advanced MRI quantitative methods can be used for estimating bone density, there are no readily available parameters on routine clinical MRI sequences of the lumbar spine.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether T1 signal intensity (SI) ratio of lumbar vertebral body (VB)/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may predict decreased bone density.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. After use of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 36 patients who had an MRI scan of the lumbar spine and a DEXA scan performed as a part of annual health visit were selected. T1 SI of the lumbar vertebral bodies and adjacent CSF were recorded. Ratio of T1 SI of L1-L4 (VB)/CSF was calculated. The corresponding bone-density values on DEXA scan measured as g/cm² were obtained. Pearson's r correlation statistic was used to determine the correlation between these variables.

RESULTS

T1 VB/T1 CSF SI ratio was between 1.308 and 2.927 (mean = 2.028). Mean T1 SI value of vertebral bodies (L1-L4) was 264.9 and mean CSF SI value was 131.9. Bone density in g/cm² was between 0.851 and 1.398 (mean = 1.081). Pearson correlation coefficient was r = -0.619 (P=0.0001), which shows a negative moderate correlation between the T1 VB/T1 CSF SI ratio and bone density.

CONCLUSION

A high T1 VB/T1 CSF SI ratio on routine MRI sequences may indicate decreased bone density. This ratio may be of substantial benefit in unsuspected osteoporosis/osteopenia on routine MRI lumbar spine imaging.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Low Back Pain: 2021 Update

In the United States, acute low back pain, with or without radiculopathy, is the leading cause of years lived with disability and the third ranking cause of disability-adjusted life-years. Uncomplicated acute low back pain and/or radiculopathy is a benign, self-limited condition that does not warrant any imaging studies. Imaging is considered in those patients who have had up to 6 weeks of medical management and physical therapy that resulted in little or no improvement in their back pain. It is also considered for those patients presenting with red flags, raising suspicion for a serious underlying condition, such as cauda equina syndrome, malignancy, fracture, or infection. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Are Emergency Medicine Provider Characteristics Associated With Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain?

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department (ED). LBP is most commonly non-specific or mechanical in nature yet can be debilitating. Diagnostic imaging (DI) is commonly ordered contrary to guideline recommendations for patients with LBP. This study seeks to determine if physician characteristics are associated with ordering of DI for patients with non-specific or mechanical LBP in the ED. These characteristics include physician sex, age, experience level, location of residency training, and full-time status.

Methodology

We included all patients presenting to the ED of a Canadian tertiary care center with a diagnosis of non-specific or mechanical LBP between January 2015 and June 2018. We tracked the use of DI for physicians caring for patients presenting to the ED over this period. Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, controlling for patient characteristics, to identify provider characteristics that were independently associated with DI use.

Results

Internationally trained physicians were less likely to order diagnostic radiographs than Canadian trained physicians (odds ratio [OR], 0.625; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.95), while middle-aged physicians ordered more computed tomography scans (OR, 6.34; 95% CI, 1.52-26.52) compared to younger physicians; there was no significant difference between younger and older physicians.

Conclusions

Few physician characteristics were associated with any DI ordering for non-specific or mechanical LBP. The likelihood of receiving DI for non-specific or mechanical LBP may be more strongly related to unmeasured patient characteristics, settings, or logistical factors.

Managing Low Back Pain in Primary Care

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common pathologies for which patients present for consultation in primary medical practice. The objective of the study was to determine the number of patients with LBP who presented to the general practitioner 's (GP) office between October 2019 and March 2020, to determine risk factors, favoring factors and their correlation with clinical data obtained after performing the clinical examination, with paraclinical data obtained by imaging investigation. 347 patients, aged between 17 and 82 years, were included in the study, presenting a sex ratio of men: women of approximately 2: 1. The main pain symptoms of the patients were: localized pain in the lumbar spine, radicular pain, referred to the lower limbs, subjective sensitivity disorders felt in the lower limbs, distal motor deficit in the lower limbs, paravertebral muscle contractions and the feeling of instability in the low back. The main risk factors were smoking, the existence of a trauma to the lumbar spine, sedentary lifestyle, maintaining a prolonged fixed position and intense physical exercise, either occasionally or daily. Among the patients included in the study, a number of 93 patients required the granting of medical leave both by the attending GP and by other specialists. Regardless of the etiology and pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the occurrence of LBP, therapeutic management should aim to stop pain symptoms and prevent recurrences.

Nontraumatic Head and Neck Emergencies

Head and neck imaging is an intimidating subject for many radiologists because of the complex anatomy and potentially serious consequences of delayed or improper diagnosis of the diverse abnormalities involving this region. The purpose of this article is to help radiologists to understand the intricate anatomy of the head and neck and to review the imaging appearances of a variety of nontraumatic head and neck conditions that bring patients to the emergency department, including acute infectious and inflammatory diseases and acute complications of head and neck neoplasms. These conditions are presented in five sections on the basis of their primary location of involvement: the oral cavity and pharynx, neck, sinonasal tract, orbits, and ears. Important anatomic landmarks are reviewed briefly in each related section.Online supplemental material is available for this article.^©RSNA, 2019.