Imaging of Traumatic Shoulder Girdle Injuries

The current standard of the shoulder trauma series in Ireland - A national audit

OBJECTIVES/AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to assess the current standard of shoulder radiographs in Ireland. The secondary aim of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons in Ireland are of the opinion that a national protocol is required, and what this protocol should consist of.

METHODS

A national audit of shoulder trauma series x-rays performed in emergency departments was conducted. The number and type of views performed was recorded. The anteroposterior (AP) and axillary or Velpeau views were assessed to determine if they met pre-defined audit criteria. Consultant orthopaedic surgeons working in public trauma hospitals were invited to participate in an online survey by email.

RESULTS

The number of shoulder trauma series included in this audit was 789. The majority of patients had two views performed (75.92%, n ​= ​599) and 21.17% (n ​= ​167) had an axillary or Velpeau view. The AP view met the audit criteria in 23.09% (n ​= ​181) of cases. The survey response rate was 70.8% (n ​= ​17). 88.2% (n ​= ​15) of surgeons agreed that three views should be performed for a shoulder trauma series and 94.12% (n ​= ​16) agreed that an axillary or Velpeau view should be included. The majority of surgeons surveyed (94%, n ​= ​16) are in favour of establishing a national protocol.

CONCLUSION

The current standard shoulder trauma series in Irish hospitals consists of two views, most frequently a thoracic AP and a scapular Y view. We propose the introduction of a national protocol consisting of three views: Grashey AP, Scapular Y, and an axillary or Velpeau view.

Imaging of traumatic shoulder injuries – Understanding the surgeon’s perspective

Imaging plays a key role in the assessment and management of traumatic shoulder injuries, and it is important to understand how the imaging details help guide orthopedic surgeons in determining the role for surgical treatment. Imaging is also crucial in preoperative planning, the longitudinal assessment after surgery and the identification of complications after treatment. This review discusses the mechanisms of injury, key imaging findings, therapeutic options and associated complications for the most common shoulder injuries, tailored to the orthopedic surgeon’s perspective.

Isolated Fracture of the Acromion Process: A Case Report

Fracture of the acromion process is an uncommon injury which is often diagnosed late. Though, usually managed conservatively, the indications for surgery in these fractures are very specific. A 52-year-old active man attended the out-patient department of our hospital following an injury to the right shoulder. An X-ray revealed a Type II, minimally displaced fracture of the base of the acromion process. Conservative management was attempted initially, which was converted to surgical stabilization after six weeks when it was noticed that the fracture had failed to unite and had progressed to become a displaced Type III fracture. Post-operative period was uneventful with a gradual return to the pre-injury level of function of the right shoulder, which was assessed by the Constant Score as well as the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. The satisfaction with the final functional outcome was assessed by the UCLA shoulder score. Clinicians must look actively for acromion process fractures in all shoulder injuries. Minimally displaced fractures should be regularly followed up for displacement and sub-acromial space compromise. Although acromion fractures are usually treated conservatively, albeit a higher non-union rate, they should be treated surgically in the event of displacement or sub-acromial space reduction, in order to achieve good functional recovery.

Young men in sports are at highest risk of acromioclavicular joint injuries: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To study the incidence of acromioclavicular joint injuries in a general population.

METHODS

All acute shoulder injuries admitted to an orthopaedic emergency department were registered prospectively, using electronic patient records and a patient-reported questionnaire. The regional area was the city of Oslo with 632,990 inhabitants. Patients with symptoms from the acromioclavicular joint without fracture were registered as a dislocation (type II-VI) if the radiologist described widening of the joint space or coracoclavicular distance on standard anteroposterior radiographs. Patients without such findings were diagnosed as sprains (type I).

RESULTS

Acromioclavicular joint injuries constituted 11% of all shoulder injuries (287 of 2650). The incidence was 45 per 10⁵ person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 40-51). 196 (68%) were diagnosed as sprains and 91 (32%) as dislocations. Median age of all acromioclavicular joint injuries was 32 years (interquartile range 24-44), and 82% were men. Thirty percent of all acromioclavicular joint injuries were registered in men in their twenties. Sports injuries accounted for 53%, compared to 27% in other shoulder injuries [OR 3.1 (95% CI 2.4-4.0; p < 0.001)]. The most common sports associated with acromioclavicular joint injuries were football (24%), cycling (16%), martial arts (11%), alpine skiing and snowboarding (both 9%), and ice hockey (6%).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that in the general population, one in ten shoulder injuries involves the acromioclavicular joint and young men in sports are at highest risk. A prognostic level II cohort study.

Imaging of Acute Shoulder Trauma

Acute injuries to the shoulder girdle are common and frequently encountered by the practicing radiologist. The type of injury is highly dependent on the age of the patient and mechanism of trauma with injuries occurring at the site of greatest mechanical weakness. In this review, we discuss the main clinical features and key imaging findings for the most common shoulder injuries. For each injury, we also provide a section on the important features that the orthopedic surgeon needs to know in order to guide surgical versus nonsurgical management.