2
|
Loonis AST, Yu H, Glazer DI, Bay CP, Sodickson AD. Dual Energy-Derived Metrics for Differentiating Adrenal Adenomas From Nonadenomas on Single-Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:693-704. [PMID: 36416399 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Adrenal masses are often indeterminate on single-phase postcontrast CT. Dual-energy CT (DECT) with three-material decomposition algorithms may aid characterization. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of metrics derived from portal venous phase DECT, including virtual noncontrast (VNC) attenuation, fat fraction, iodine density, and relative enhancement ratio, for characterizing adrenal masses. METHODS. This retrospective study included 128 patients (82 women, 46 men; mean age, 64.6 ± 12.7 [SD] years) who between January 2016 and December 2019 underwent portal venous phase abdominopelvic DECT that showed a total of 139 adrenal lesions with an available reference standard based on all imaging, clinical, and pathologic records (87 adenomas, 52 nonadenomas [48 metastases, two adrenal cortical carcinomas, one ganglioneuroma, one hematoma]). Two radiologists placed ROIs to determine the following characteristics of the masses: VNC attenuation, fat fraction, iodine density normalized to portal vein, and for masses with VNC greater than 10 HU, relative enhancement ratio (ratio of portal venous phase attenuation to VNC attenuation). Readers' mean measurements were used for ROC analyses, and clinically optimal thresholds were derived as thresholds yielding the highest sensitivity at 100% specificity. RESULTS. Adenomas and nonadenomas were significantly different (all p < .001) in VNC attenuation (mean ± SD, 18.5 ± 12.9 vs 34.1 ± 8.9 HU), fat fraction (mean ± SD, 24.3% ± 8.2% vs 14.2% ± 5.6%), normalized iodine density (mean ± SD, 0.34 ± 0.15 vs 0.17 ± 0.17), and relative enhancement ratio (mean ± SD, 186% ± 96% vs 58% ± 59%). AUCs for all metrics ranged from 0.81 through 0.91. The metric with highest sensitivity for adenoma at the clinically optimal threshold (i.e., 100% specificity) was fat fraction (threshold, ≥ 23.8%; sensitivity, 59% [95% CI, 48-69%]) followed by VNC attenuation (≤ 15.2 HU; sensitivity, 39% [95% CI, 29-50%]), relative enhancement ratio (≥ 214%; sensitivity, 37% [95% CI, 25-50%]), and normalized iodine density (≥ 0.90; sensitivity, 1% (95% CI, 0-60%]). VNC attenuation at the traditional true noncontrast attenuation threshold of 10 HU or lower had sensitivity of 28% (95% CI, 19-38%) and 100% specificity. Presence of fat fraction 23.8% or greater or relative enhancement ratio 214% or greater yielded sensitivity of 68% (95% CI, 57-77%) with 100% specificity. CONCLUSION. For adrenal lesions evaluated with single-phase DECT, fat fraction had higher sensitivity than VNC attenuation at both the clinically optimal threshold and the traditional threshold of 10 HU or lower. CLINICAL IMPACT. By helping to definitively diagnose adenomas, DECT-derived metrics can help avoid downstream imaging for incidental adrenal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie T Loonis
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - HeiShun Yu
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Daniel I Glazer
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Camden P Bay
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Aaron D Sodickson
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Robinson-Weiss C, Patel J, Bizzo BC, Glazer DI, Bridge CP, Andriole KP, Dabiri B, Chin JK, Dreyer K, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Mayo-Smith WW. Machine Learning for Adrenal Gland Segmentation and Classification of Normal and Adrenal Masses at CT. Radiology 2023; 306:e220101. [PMID: 36125375 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Background Adrenal masses are common, but radiology reporting and recommendations for management can be variable. Purpose To create a machine learning algorithm to segment adrenal glands on contrast-enhanced CT images and classify glands as normal or mass-containing and to assess algorithm performance. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included two groups of contrast-enhanced abdominal CT examinations (development data set and secondary test set). Adrenal glands in the development data set were manually segmented by radiologists. Images in both the development data set and the secondary test set were manually classified as normal or mass-containing. Deep learning segmentation and classification models were trained on the development data set and evaluated on both data sets. Segmentation performance was evaluated with use of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and classification performance with use of sensitivity and specificity. Results The development data set contained 274 CT examinations (251 patients; median age, 61 years; 133 women), and the secondary test set contained 991 CT examinations (991 patients; median age, 62 years; 578 women). The median model DSC on the development test set was 0.80 (IQR, 0.78-0.89) for normal glands and 0.84 (IQR, 0.79-0.90) for adrenal masses. On the development reader set, the median interreader DSC was 0.89 (IQR, 0.78-0.93) for normal glands and 0.89 (IQR, 0.85-0.97) for adrenal masses. Interreader DSC for radiologist manual segmentation did not differ from automated machine segmentation (P = .35). On the development test set, the model had a classification sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 55, 95) and specificity of 89% (95% CI: 75, 96). On the secondary test set, the model had a classification sensitivity of 69% (95% CI: 58, 79) and specificity of 91% (95% CI: 90, 92). Conclusion A two-stage machine learning pipeline was able to segment the adrenal glands and differentiate normal adrenal glands from those containing masses. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cory Robinson-Weiss
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Jay Patel
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Bernardo C Bizzo
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Daniel I Glazer
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Christopher P Bridge
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Katherine P Andriole
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Borna Dabiri
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - John K Chin
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Keith Dreyer
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| | - William W Mayo-Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (C.R.W., D.I.G., K.P.A., B.D., W.W.M-S.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Mass (J.P., C.P.B., J. Kalpathy-Cramer); Health Sciences and Technology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (J.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., K.D.); and MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Mass (B.C.B., C.P.B., K.P.A., J. K. Chin, K.D., J. Kalpathy-Cramer)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Corwin MT, Badawy M, Caoili EM, Carney BW, Colak C, Elsayes KM, Gerson R, Klimkowski SP, McPhedran R, Pandya A, Pouw ME, Schieda N, Song JH, Remer EM. Incidental Adrenal Nodules in Patients Without Known Malignancy: Prevalence of Malignancy and Utility of Washout CT for Characterization-A Multiinstitutional Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:804-812. [PMID: 35731098 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Washout CT is commonly used to evaluate indeterminate adrenal nodules, although its diagnostic performance is poorly established in true adrenal incidentalomas. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare, in patients without a known malignancy history, the prevalence of malignancy for incidental adrenal nodules with unenhanced attenuation more than 10 HU that do and do not show absolute washout of 60% or more, thereby determining the diagnostic performance of washout CT for differentiating benign from malignant incidental adrenal nodules. METHODS. This retrospective six-institution study included 299 patients (mean age, 57.3 years; 180 women, 119 men) without known malignancy or suspicion for functioning adrenal tumor who underwent washout CT, which showed a total of 336 adrenal nodules with a short-axis diameter of 1 cm or more, homogeneity, and unenhanced attenuation over 10 HU. The date of the first CT ranged across institutions from November 1, 2003, to January 1, 2017. Washout was determined for all nodules. Reference standard was pathology (n = 54), imaging follow-up (≥ 1 year) (n = 269), or clinical follow-up (≥ 5 years) (n = 13). RESULTS. Prevalence of malignancy among all nodules, nodules less than 4 cm, and nodules 4 cm or more was 1.5% (5/336; 95% CI, 0.5-3.4%), 0.3% (1/317; 95% CI, 0.0-1.7%), and 21.1% (4/19; 95% CI, 6.1-45.6%), respectively. Prevalence of malignancy was not significantly different for nodules smaller than 4 cm with (0% [0/241]; 95% CI, 0.0-1.2%) and without (1.3% [1/76]; 95% CI, 0.0-7.1%) washout of 60% or more (p = .08) or for nodules 4 cm or larger with (16.7% [1/6]; 95% CI, 0.4-64.1%) and without (23.1% [3/13]; 95% CI, 5.0-53.8%) washout of 60% or more (p = .75). Washout of 60% or more was observed in 75.5% (243/322; 95% CI, 70.4-80.1%) of benign nodules (excluding pheochromocytomas), 20.0% (1/5; 95% CI, 0.5-71.6%) of malignant nodules, and 33.3% (3/9; 95% CI, 7.5-70.1%) of pheochromocytomas. For differentiating benign nodules from malignant nodules and pheochromocytomas, washout of 60% or more had 77.5% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, 98.8% PPV, and 9.2% NPV among nodules smaller than 4 cm. CONCLUSION. Prevalence of malignancy is low among incidental homogeneous adrenal nodules smaller than 4 cm with unenhanced attenuation more than 10 HU and does not significantly differ between those with and without washout of 60% or more; wash-out of 60% or more has suboptimal performance for characterizing nodules as benign. CLINICAL IMPACT. Washout CT has limited utility in evaluating incidental adrenal nodules in patients without known malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Corwin
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y St, Ste 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817
| | - Mohamed Badawy
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Benjamin W Carney
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y St, Ste 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817
| | - Ceylan Colak
- Cleveland Clinic Imaging Institute, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rosalind Gerson
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sergio P Klimkowski
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rachel McPhedran
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Amit Pandya
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Matthew E Pouw
- Department of Radiology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Nicola Schieda
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Julie H Song
- Department of Radiology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Erick M Remer
- Cleveland Clinic Imaging Institute, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|