Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Early Arthritis

Comparative Effectiveness of Etanercept and Adalimumab in Patient Reported Outcomes and Injection-Related Tolerability

OBJECTIVE

To describe patient preferences in selecting specific biologics and compare clinical response using patient reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) started on different anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies.

METHODS

Participants were enrollees in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Patients with RA who had at least two provider visits and started a new anti-TNF therapy from 10/2010-8/2011, were eligible for participation in this longitudinal study. Using a telephone survey, patient preferences in biologic selection and RAPID3, MDHAQ, and SF-12 scores were collected at baseline and at 6 months. Patient scores rating injection/infusion-site burning and stinging (ISBS) were collected at 6 months.

RESULTS

In all, 267 patients with RA responded to the baseline survey, of whom 57% preferred an injectable biologic, 22% preferred an infused biologic, and 21% had no preference. Motivation for injectable biologics was convenience (92%) and for infusion therapy was dislike or lack of self-efficacy for self-injection (16%). After 6 months of treatment with anti-TNF, 70% of the 177 patients who answered the ISBS question reported ISBS with the last dose; on a scale of 1 (none) to 10 (worst), 41% of these reported a score of 2-5; and 29% reported a score of 6-10. Adalimumab users experienced 3.2 times (95% confidence interval 1.2-8.6) the level of ISBS that etanercept users experienced. There were no significant differences in RAPID3, MDHAQ, or SF-12 scores between etanercept or adalimumab initiators.

CONCLUSION

Convenience and fear of self-injection were important considerations to patients selecting a biologic drug. Although more convenient, adalimumab associated with more ISBS than did etanercept, and this rate was higher than reported in clinical trials. At 6 months, PROs did not differ between etanercept and adalimumab users.

Induction of remission in rheumatoid arthritis: criteria and opportunities

The concept of remission in rheumatology is complicated by the lack of a single gold standard measurement, spontaneous remissions and the usage of several sets of remission criteria. Feasibility is reduced by traditional clinical practice, which does not include remission criteria monitoring. The "window of opportunity" to prevent joint damage with DMARD therapy lasts only a few months. The perspective of the physician and patient differ, as the former gives importance to signs of disease activity, whereas the latter to disability and quality of life. All patients with rheumatoid arthritis are candidates for combination DMARD-based therapy, which should be instituted without delay. Remission is important to prevent joint destruction, preserve adequate quality of life and prevent disability. The introduction of biological agents has made this objective feasible, but the failure rate is still high (about 50%), on account of lack of response, contraindications and intolerance.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs

Modern therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based on knowledge of the severity of the natural history of the disease. RA patients are approached with early and aggressive treatment strategies, methotrexate as an anchor drug, biological targeted therapies in those with inadequate response to methotrexate, and “tight control,” aiming for remission and low disease activity according to quantitative monitoring. This chapter presents a rationale for current treatment strategies for RA with antirheumatic drugs, a review of published reports concerning treatments in clinical cohorts outside of clinical trials, and current treatments at 61 sites in 21 countries in the QUEST-RA database.

Polypharmacy among people with rheumatoid arthritis: the role of age, disease duration and comorbidity

BACKGROUND

People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often have comorbidities with associated disability and complex medication regimens. Little published evidence exists about why people with RA require so many medications, although it is logical to hypothesize that this may relate to older age, longer duration of RA, more active RA, worse functional disability and a greater number of comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES

We set out to quantify polypharmacy in RA and identify its predictors in an observational cohort.

METHODS

The case notes of 348 people receiving secondary care for RA were reviewed to record polypharmacy. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was calculated and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ) were completed.

RESULTS

The mean total number of medications was 5.39, with a maximum of 16; of these, a mean of 2.41 medications were directly for RA. A mediational relationship was identified: older age and longer RA duration were significant predictors of a greater total number of medications, but these relationships were explained by the greater number of comorbidities in older participants and those with longer RA duration. Polypharmacy was not related to RA activity or functional disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is common among people with RA and associates with older age and longer RA duration through a greater number of comorbidities. Regular review of the full treatment plan of individuals with RA by pharmacists and other health professionals specializing in rheumatology, to weigh the benefits and risks of each medication and their interactions in light of RA activity and comorbidities, is advocated.

[Toward a non-empirical treatment for rheumatoid arthritis based on its molecular pathology]

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, disabbling disease that affects individuals during the productive years of their lives. Modern treatment for RA includes the so called "biologic" therapy, which is based on recombinant proteins that modify the biologic processes. These agents have potent therapeutic effects and different mechanisms of action. Nevertheless, therapeutic failure still prevails. Treatment that prevents disability in RA must be started in an early manner, before the development of complications and, ideally, with a minimum possibility of therapeutic failure. As yet, there are no clinical or laboratory criteria to identify those patients with a higher probability of responding to particular types of therapy, delaying control of RA ad affecting the prevention of incapacity. Research into gene diversity through single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by means of microarray systems, allows the detailed analysis of gene factors associated to a given disease. SNPs have been recently applied to the study of RA, where the major polymorphisms associated to RA occur primarily in genes that code for proteins related to the initiation of an immune response and/or the control of cellular activity in the immune system, in addition to genes related to tissue repair. The specific meaning of these findings is in its initial stages of research. On the other hand, proteomics relate to the analysis of protein expression profiles at multiple levels. Both types of studies will contribute to the knowledge of patterns of gene expression in RA compared to the general population, and will allow an understanding of the pathogenesis of RA. Moreover, proteomic and genomic profiles can be employed to designs probes that identify individuals with the risk of developing RA, individually predict the response to different therapeutic modalities (pharmacogenomics) and for the follow-up of the biologic response to therapy.

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis in developing countries. Biologics or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs?

Biologics are highly effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but they are very expensive. The costs of biologics should limit their usage in patients with RA, especially in the developing countries. Therefore, it is necessary to develop suitable strategies for treating RA patients in these countries. In this article, the efficacy, toxicity, and cost-effectiveness of conventional DMARDs and biologics will be investigated. The therapeutic strategies for treating early RA will also be proposed.

Stable occurrence of knee and hip total joint replacement in Central Finland between 1986 and 2003: an indication of improved long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Total joint replacement (TJR) surgery is an important severe long-term outcome of rheumatoid arthritis, but relatively little is known about changes of its incidence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over the past two decades.

METHODS

A population-based, retrospective, incidence case review was conducted to analyse the frequency of primary TJR surgery of the knee and hip in all patients, and specifically in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Central Finland between 1986 and 2003. Patients with TJR surgery of the knee and hip were identified in hospital databases over the 18-year period. Age-standardised incidence rate ratios for the primary TJR of the knee and hip were calculated, stratified to sex and diagnosis, with 1986 as the reference value.

RESULTS

In patients without rheumatoid arthritis the age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (with 95% CI) for TJR of the knee increased 9.8-fold from 1986 to 2003 in women and men, and for TJR of the hip 1.8-fold in women and 2-fold in men. By contrast, no meaningful change was seen over this period, in age-adjusted incidence rate ratios for TJR of the knee or hip in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 in 2003 compared with 1986.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of TJR surgery has increased 2-10-fold in patients without rheumatoid arthritis patients, associated with an ageing population, but has not increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between 1986 and 2003. These data are consistent with emerging evidence that long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis have improved substantially, even before the availability of biological agents.

Early rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides novel and updated information on pathogenesis, referral, and clinical characteristics as well as therapeutic approaches in early rheumatoid arthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early referral is important, but new classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis need to be elaborated. Predictive markers for rheumatoid arthritis are still confined to autoantibodies; respective algorithms have been presented. Other biomarkers will still have to prove their usefulness. Magnetic resonance imaging and sonography do not appear to sufficiently distinguish between early rheumatoid and nonrheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis has become milder at presentation in recent years. In its very early stages, the cytokine profile reflects T-cell activation and switches to abundant proinflammatory cytokines thereafter. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs plus glucocorticoids are highly effective, as is early use of tumor necrosis factor blockers plus methotrexate. Tight control of disease activity and subsequent therapeutic adjustments are highly effective. Disease activity indices that are simple to calculate have been presented and validated. Early intensive therapy may lead to decrease in disability and cost reduction in rheumatoid arthritis.

SUMMARY

Understanding of early arthritis is increasing, especially in prognostic and therapeutic respects, and new treatment strategies appear to improve the outcome in patients with early arthritis. Nevertheless, much remains to be studied to better address the issue of early rheumatoid arthritis.

Pharmacogenomics in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: clinical implication and perspective

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease. The inflammatory process of the joint destroys articular architecture and causes a significant disability. The efficacy of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine and biological response modifiers, is widely accepted. However, the outcome of the treatment with these agents is known to vary among patients. The application of the pharmacogenomics is expected to reduce toxicities and enhance the desirable effects of therapeutic agents for RA. Recently, pharmacogenomic studies on methotrexate, sulfasalazine and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors have been reported. These investigations suggest that the pharmacogenomic approach is useful for the treatment of RA, although there are points to be considered before the translation of the pharmacogenomic data into clinical practice. This review focuses on the latest information on the pharmacogenomics of antirheumatic drugs and its clinical implication in the treatment of RA.