Challenges in Implementing Treat-to-Target Strategies in Rheumatology

Barriers and facilitators to application of treat-to-target management in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis in practice: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence on barriers and facilitators to application of treat-to-target (T2T) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in daily practice.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE/Embase up to December 2023, focusing on axSpA/PsA. Any type of quantitative/qualitative original research was eligible for inclusion if barriers or facilitators to application of T2T were explored. In a qualitative synthesis, barriers/facilitators were classified by the level to which they apply (healthcare provider [HCP], patient, organisation).

RESULTS

Of 28 included studies, most focused on PsA (n = 21/28). Studies included patients (n = 23/28), HCP (n = 4/28) or both (n = 1/28). In total, over 25 barriers and 15 facilitators to application of T2T were identified. At the HCP level, most studies focused on the measurement of the target, especially in PsA, highlighting that agreement among instruments was suboptimal. At the patient level, the role of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), while deemed relevant, was shown to act as a barrier to achieve targets that included PRO components. At the organisational level, the increased time and resources needed for T2T were considered a barrier, although it was noted that T2T could also reduce healthcare use and sick leave. Notably, for several components, no facilitators were identified at all.

CONCLUSION

Various barriers and facilitators were identified, acting on several levels. Data in axSpA were scarce, as was evidence on certain components of T2T. Future research should address these knowledge gaps and explore how these barriers and facilitators could be targeted to improve application of T2T in practice.

Distinct oral DNA viral signatures in rheumatoid arthritis: a Pilot study

Background

Despite evidence linking viruses and oral microbiome to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), limited whole genome sequencing research has been conducted on the oral virome (a viral component of the microbiome) of untreated RA patients. This pilot research seeks to address this knowledge gap by comparing the oral virome of untreated rheumatoid arthritis patients (RAs) and healthy individuals (HCs).

Method

Whole genome DNA sequence of saliva samples from 45 participants including 21 RAs and 24 age and gender matched HCs was obtained from the BioProject: PRJEB6997. Metaphlan3 pipeline and LEfSe analysis were used for the viral signature detection. Wilcoxon pairwise test and ROC analysis were used to validate and predict signatures.

Results

RA exhibits higher alpha diversity compared to HCs. Callitrichine gammaherpesvirus 3, Human gammaherpesvirus 4 (EBV), Murid betaherpesvirus 8, and Suid alphaherpesvirus 1 were enriched in RAs, while Aotine betaherpesvirus 1 from the Cytomegalovirus genus was enriched in HCs. In addition, Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer virus M1 (ScV-M1) was found to be enriched in RAs, whereas bacteriophage Hk97virus (Siphoviridae) and Cd119virus (Myoviridae) were enriched in HCs.

Conclusion

This study identifies significant DNA oral viral signatures at species level as potential biomarkers for the early detection and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Assessing disease activity and damage in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been characterized by a variety of vascular and pregnancy manifestations related to an interplay between thrombotic and inflammatory mechanisms, a progressive accrual of irreversible organ damage and increased morbidity and mortality rates, supporting a high need of optimal treatment approach. The lack of standardized outcome measures is a significant barrier in the design of clinical studies in APS. Disease activity (in principle reversible) and its distinction from disease damage (in principle irreversible) needs to be evaluated by validated scores for use in clinical trials but also in daily clinical practice in APS. A disease damage score in APS, the DIAPS score, has been developed and validated in external cohorts. The development of a disease activity score that will provide an accurate and reproducible rating of each disease domain, can help clinicians and researchers to comprehensively assess the activity of disease and the response to treatment, in an attempt to prevent future damage.

Effectiveness of a treat-to-target strategy in patients with moderate to severely active rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept

BACKGROUND

To compare a treat-to-target (T2T) approach and routine care (RC) in adults with active to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating subcutaneous abatacept.

METHODS

A 12-month cluster-randomized trial in active RA patients treated with abatacept was conducted. Physicians were randomized to RC or T2T with a primary endpoint of achieving sustained Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at two consecutive assessments approximately 3 months apart. Additional outcomes included Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Disease Activity Score 28-CRP (DAS28-CRP), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Time to achieve therapeutic endpoints was assessed with survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 284 enrolled patients, 130 were in the T2T group and 154 in RC. Primary endpoint was achieved by 36.9% and 40.3% of patients in T2T and RC groups, respectively. No significant between-group differences were observed in the odds of achieving secondary outcomes, except for a higher likelihood of CDAI LDA in the T2T group vs. RC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.33 [1.03-1.71], p = 0.0263). Compared with RC, patients in the T2T group achieved SDAI remission significantly faster (Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean [standard error]: 14.0 [0.6] vs. 19.3 [0.8] months, p = 0.0428) with a trend toward faster achievement of CDAI LDA/remission, DAS28-CRP remission, and HAQ-DI minimum clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients managed per T2T and those under RC experienced significant improvements in RA disease activity at 12 months of abatacept treatment. T2T was associated with higher odds of CDAI LDA and a shorter time to achieving therapeutic endpoints.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

NCT03274141 . Date of registration: September 6, 2017.

Treat to target in Behcet's disease: Should we follow the paradigm of other systemic rheumatic diseases?

During the last decades the efficacy of biologic agents, mainly of anti-TNFs, in controlling the activity of serious manifestations of Behcet's Disease (BD) has been established. On the other hand, the clinical heterogeneity of BD has precluded the validation of a widely-accepted composite index for disease assessment and for target disease-state definitions, such as low disease activity and remission, and the testing of their implementation in clinical practice. Therefore, in contrast to other systemic rheumatic diseases, a treat-to-target strategy has not yet been developed in BD. There are several challenges towards this approach, including standardization of outcome measures for assessing the disease activity in each-affected organ and construction of a composite disease activity index. The challenges for the development of a treat-to-target strategy and possible solutions are discussed in this position paper, which stemmed from a round table discussion that took place in the 19th International Conference on BD.

Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world study of the application and impact of treat-to-target within the wider context of patient management, patient centricity and advanced therapy use in Europe

BACKGROUND

While treat-to-target (T2T) is endorsed for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), data on the degree of implementation in clinical practice are limited. This study investigated the use of T2T for RA in a real-world setting across Europe.

METHODS

The Adelphi RA Disease-Specific Programme was a point-in-time survey of rheumatologists and their consulting patients with RA conducted between January and October 2020 in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Rheumatologists completed an attitudinal survey, and a record form for their next 10-12 consulting patients, who were invited to voluntarily complete a patient-reported questionnaire. Data collected included clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and attitudes towards T2T.

RESULTS

Overall, 316 rheumatologists provided data for 3120 patients, of whom 1108 completed the questionnaire. While 86.1% of rheumatologists estimated using T2T principles in clinical practice, only 66.6% of patients were reported by their physician to be managed using a T2T approach. Achieving disease remission was the most commonly reported treatment goal identified by rheumatologists (79.7%), followed by symptom control (47.8%) and reducing impact on quality of life (44.5%). 40.8% of rheumatologists and their patients were in agreement that a treatment goal had been set. When there was agreement on treatment goals, we observed better patient satisfaction, engagement and treatment success.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations, the T2T approach in RA appears to be suboptimally implemented in clinical practice. This highlights the importance of patient-centricity in the decision-making process to define meaningful targets and select appropriate treatments to improve disease outcomes.

Critical appraisal of serum urate targets in the management of gout

Gout management involves two broad aspects: treatment of gout flares to provide rapid symptomatic relief and long-term urate-lowering therapy to lower serum urate sufficiently to prevent gout flares from occurring. All of the major rheumatology societies recommend a target serum urate of <5 mg/dl (<0.30 mmol/l) or <6 mg/dl (<0.36 mmol/l), both of which are below the point of saturation for urate and therefore lead to monosodium urate crystal dissolution. In this Review, we describe the rationale for treat-to-target urate approach in the long-term management of gout and the current evidence and controversy around the appropriate serum urate targets.

Rheumatologist and Patient Mental Models for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Help Explain Low Treat-to-Target Rates

OBJECTIVE

Despite proven benefits, less than half of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are treated using a treat-to-target (TTT) strategy. Our objective was to identify critical discrepancies between rheumatologist and patient mental models related to the treatment of RA to inform interventions designed to increase implementation of TTT.

METHODS

We developed rheumatologist and patient mental models using the Mental Models Approach to Risk Communication. We conducted semistructured interviews to elicit views related to RA treatment decisions with 14 rheumatologists and 30 patients with RA. We also included responses (n = 284) to an open-ended question on a survey fielded to augment qualitative descriptions from the interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded independently by two members of the research team.

RESULTS

Rheumatologist and patient mental models for RA treatment are significantly more complex than the TTT model. Both consider domains (system factors and patient readiness) outside of disease activity measurement, target setting, and risk versus benefit assessment in their decision-making. Furthermore, specific factors were found to be unique to each model. For example, the physician model stresses the importance of evaluating disease activity over time and patient adherence. In contrast, patients discussed the impact of chronic disease weariness, medication-related fatigue, the importance of feeling adequately informed, and stress associated with changing medications.

CONCLUSION

We found several discrepancies primarily related to information gaps and differences in how patients and physicians value trade-offs that can serve as specific targets to improve patient-physician communication and ultimately inform interventions to improve uptake of TTT.

A Review on Rheumatoid Arthritis Interventions and Current Developments

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammation, swelling, and joint destruction primarily affecting the peripheral joints. In recent years, RA has become an alarming concern affecting more than 1.5% of the population worldwide. The majority of the drugs in clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis are immunomodulatory. The development of novel drugs for RA is impending and scientists are exploring new strategies through various innovative approaches for RA drug development. Treat-to-target and window of opportunity hypothesis are the new approaches that are used to treat, improve outcomes, and prevent long-term use of ineffective therapy, respectively. Novel therapeutic agents (e.g. GM-CSF inhibitors, Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors) and delivery systems (e.g., Liposomes, Superparamagnetic iron oxide nano particles (SPIONs)) are under investigation for more target based therapy with reduced side effects and toxicity. The new drug discovery and repositioning of previously FDA-approved drugs are also being considered for chronic inflammatory disorder. The review encompasses a vast array of information, including genetics, etiology, clinical symptoms, current treatment, and newer therapeutics approaches, focused on the development of RA interventions. The introduction of the bioinformatics-based approach in RA has also been significantly discussed in the review. This review provides a general understanding of the challenges and uncertainties in the treatment of RA and summarizes the evolving scenario as well as innovative approaches taken into consideration for drug development in rheumatoid arthritis.

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug prescription patterns in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients in routine clinical practice in Spain

OBJECTIVE

To describe disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) patterns in routine clinical practice in adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to ascertain the reasons for methotrexate (MTX) discontinuation.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted from March to October 2014 at the Rheumatology Units of seven hospitals in Spain. In a single visit, the treating rheumatologist completed an online case report form. This report contained sociodemographic and RA variables. This study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and local and national research legislations.

RESULTS

A total of 301 patients (71% women) with a mean age of 56.7±14.0 years and disease duration of 3.6±1.5 years were examined. The patients had RA with moderate disease activity, at least one poor prognostic factor, and comorbidities. The mean time between RA diagnosis and prescription of the first conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) was 2.4±6.0 months. A total of 295 patients (98%) started the first csDMARD on monotherapy. MTX was the most-prescribed first-line drug (n=233, 79%). The mean treatment time of the first-line csDMARD was 27.0±19.4 months. Of these patients, 98% progressed to a second-line csDMARD; 118 patients were changed to another DMARD, mainly due to inefficacy (51, 37%), adverse events (AEs, 37, 27%), or intolerance (18, 13%). The use of MTX as second-line therapy reduced from 79% to 51%. At the time of the study, 200 patients (66%) received a csDMARD as monotherapy and 45 (15%) a combination of ≥2 csDMARDs. Fifty-five (18%) patients were being treated with a biological drug in monotherapy (16, 29%) or in a combination with a csDMARD (39, 71%), mainly MTX, 147 patients (57%) received steroids. Biological DMARD were prescribed as the second line for 42% of patients and 51% of patients received the third-line therapy or beyond. The rate of AEs that motivated a change in the csDMARD was 34%.

CONCLUSION

MTX was the most-used csDMARD as first and second-line therapy together with corticosteroids. The combination of two or more csDMARDs as first-line treatment was very infrequent. MTX toxicity and intolerance were higher and more significant than inefficacy but progressively decreased with use.

New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for 'Old' Patients: Results of a Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

In the last 20 years, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become available for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and a treat-to-target strategy has been introduced. We hypothesise that these advances should have resulted in changes to the characteristics of patients with RA participating in clinical trials of the newest therapies. This study determined whether the baseline characteristics of patients with RA enrolled in clinical trials have changed in the past decade versus patients participating in earlier RA studies.

METHODS

This secondary analysis was based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified in a systematic literature review. Baseline characteristics of patients with RA with inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs were compared between RCTs published in 1999-2009 and those published in 2010-2017 using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Forty RCTs were analysed: 22 from 1999-2009 and 18 from 2010-2017. No significant difference between the two timeframes and no obvious trend over time were observed for age, gender, disease duration, rheumatoid factor status, tender and swollen joint counts, physician and patient global assessments of disease activity, and pain scores. Variability between RCTs was high. Similar results were observed for Disease Activity Scores and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores, but with low variability between RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The baseline characteristics of patients with RA participating in RCTs do not appear to have changed in the last decade despite the availability of new treatments and a different treatment approach. Further research should determine the impact of baseline patient characteristics on patients' response to RA treatments.

Patient and clinician views on an app for rheumatoid arthritis disease monitoring: Function, implementation and implications

AIM

Best practice management for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involves regular clinical assessment of RA disease activity. This is not achievable with current rheumatology systems of care. We aimed to use opinions from people with RA and their specialist rheumatology healthcare professionals to inform development of a mobile app for people with RA for recording their disease activity data for potential integration into clinical service, and assess usability of the app.

METHOD

In phase 1 we interviewed nine people with RA and seven healthcare professionals. In phase 2 we developed an app with professional software developers. In phase 3 we evaluated app usability for people with RA using the System Usability Scale (SUS).

RESULTS

Interview data showed four themes regarding functionality and implementation of a patient-held app in RA care: (a) variable app acceptance and readiness; (b) app use to reduce barriers; (c) pros and cons of patient-reported outcomes; and (d) allocation of clinics by need. The app developed has high usability in people with RA using the app on their own device for a month (SUS 79.5, n = 16) or using the app on a study device for 10 minutes (SUS 83, n = 100).

CONCLUSION

People with RA and healthcare professionals have clearly identified features, benefits and risks of an app for self-assessment of RA and incorporation into clinical care. An app developed informed by these opinions has high usability. Next steps are development and validation of a method of patient-performed joint counts, and implementation, with evaluation, in the clinical setting.

Treat-to-target strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Audit of adherence from real world clinical data

INTRODUCTION

The current paradigm of the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommends achieving a state of remission or low disease activity through the treat-to-target strategy. Our study assesses adherence to this strategy.

METHOD

Patients with RA (ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria) were included. From each centre, 19 patients were randomly selected. Clinical histories (CH) were assessed by independent auditors, checking compliance with predefined quality criteria. The study was approved by ethics committees.

RESULTS

We included 856 patients (mean age 54 years; 71% women). The use of a combined index (CI) was recorded in 61% of cases. Visits were recorded every 4 weeks using a CI in 4% of CH while attempts were made to achieve remission. Monitoring of disease activity every 6-8 months after reaching the target was recorded in 73% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the treat-to-target strategy is barely recorded in patients with RA in routine clinical practice.