1
|
Isomatsu D, Sato A, Muto Y, Sato Y, Shimizu T, Misaka T, Kaneshiro T, Oikawa M, Kobayashi A, Yoshihisa A, Yamaki T, Kunii H, Nakazato K, Ishida T, Sekino H, Fukushima K, Ito H, Takeishi Y. Predictive Value of Aortic Valve Calcium Volume Measured by Computed Tomography for Paravalvular Leakage After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Int Heart J 2024; 65:63-70. [PMID: 38296581 DOI: 10.1536/ihj.23-298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Paravalvular leakage (PVL) is a complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis, leading to an adverse prognosis. We investigated whether aortic valve calcium volume (Ca-Vol) measured by preoperative cardiac computed tomography had a predictive value for PVL after TAVI using a third-generation self-expandable valve.We retrospectively analyzed 59 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI using a third-generation self-expandable valve. We measured Ca-Vol in the aortic valve and each cusp (non-coronary cusp [NCC], right-coronary cusp [RCC], and left-coronary cusp [LCC]). We divided the patients into 2 groups: a PVL group (32.2%) and a non-PVL group (67.8%). Total Ca-Vol was significantly higher in the PVL group than in the non-PVL group (P < 0.001). Ca-Vol in each cusp was also significantly higher in the PVL group ([NCC] P < 0.001, [RCC] P = 0.001, [LCC] P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis for PVL indicated that the total and per-cusp Ca-Vols were predictors for PVL (total, odds ratio [OR] 4.0, P < 0.001; NCC, OR 12.5, P = 0.002; RCC, OR 16.0, P = 0.008; LCC, OR 44.5, P < 0.001).Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of Ca-Vol for predicting PVL revealed the optimal cut-off values of Ca-Vol were 2.4 cm3 for the total, 0.74 cm3 for NCC, 0.73 cm3 for RCC, and 0.56 cm3 for LCC (area under the curve, 0.85, 0.79, 0.76, and 0.83, respectively).Preoperative total, NCC, RCC, and LCC calcium volumes were significant predictors for PVL after TAVI using third-generation self-expandable valves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Isomatsu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Akihiko Sato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Yuuki Muto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Yu Sato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Takeshi Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Tomofumi Misaka
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | | | - Masayoshi Oikawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | | | - Akiomi Yoshihisa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Health Sciences
| | - Takayoshi Yamaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Hiroyuki Kunii
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ohara General Hospital
| | | | - Takafumi Ishida
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Hirofumi Sekino
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Kenji Fukushima
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Hiroshi Ito
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moura AR, Rodrigues JA, Braga P, Melica B, Santos L, Pires-Morais G, Sampaio F, Fontes-Carvalho R. Impact of the use of cusp-overlap projection on the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding valves. Rev Port Cardiol 2023; 42:759-769. [PMID: 36948457 DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) range between 3.4% and 25.9%. PPMI is associated with a worse prognosis. A lower valve implantation depth is associated with an increased risk of conduction disturbances. Theoretically, cusp-overlap projection (COP) has the potential to enable higher valve deployment. OBJECTIVE To compare the 30-day PPMI incidence post-TAVI using self-expanding valves according to the fluoroscopic guidance technique. METHODS This retrospective single-center study assessed consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with CoreValve™ valves between April 2019 and November 2021, grouped according to the fluoroscopic guidance technique (COP vs. coplanar implantation technique [CIT]). RESULTS A total of 122 patients were included, predominantly women (52.5%), with a mean age of 81.6±5.5 years. COP was used in 49.2% of the sample. The CIT group had a significantly higher prevalence of previous beta-blocker use (p<0.01), lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.04) and a higher EuroSCORE II (p=0.02). The 30-day PPMI rate was 27.9% (n=34), with no significant difference between the COP and CIT groups (26.7% vs. 29.0%, p=0.77). Complete atrioventricular block was the main cause (38.5%). Likewise, mean fluoroscopy time (p=0.14) and contrast volume (p=0.35) used were similar between the two groups. Radiation dose was lower in the COP group (p=0.02). There was no significant difference between post-TAVI grades III and IV aortic valve regurgitation (p=0.27) and there were no cases of periprocedural acute coronary occlusion. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the COP technique, although safe and not associated with increased complexity, did not significantly reduce the 30-day PPMI rate compared to the traditional CIT view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rita Moura
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Distrital de Santarém, Santarém, Portugal.
| | | | - Pedro Braga
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Bruno Melica
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Lino Santos
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Gustavo Pires-Morais
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Francisco Sampaio
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doldi PM, Stolz L, Escher F, Steffen J, Gmeiner J, Roden D, Linnemann M, Löw K, Deseive S, Stocker TJ, Orban M, Theiss H, Rizas K, Curta A, Sadoni S, Buech J, Joskowiak D, Peterss S, Hagl C, Massberg S, Hausleiter J, Braun D. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expandable Core Valve Evolut Prosthesis Using the Cusp-Overlap vs. Tricusp-View. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061561. [PMID: 35329887 PMCID: PMC8953752 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the rapid increase in experience and technological improvement, the incidence of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the self-expandable CoreValve Evolut valve remains high. Recently, a cusp-overlap view (COP) implantation technique has been proposed for TAVR with self-expandable valves offering an improved visualization during valve expansion compared to the three-cusp view (TCV). This study aims to systematically analyze procedural outcomes of TAVR patients treated with the CoreValve Evolut valve using a COP compared to TCV in a high-volume center. The primary endpoint was technical success according the 2021 VARC-3 criteria. A total of 122 consecutive patients (61 pts. TCV: April 2019 to November 2020; 61 pts. COP: December 2020 to October 2021) that underwent TAVR with the CoreValve Evolut prosthesis were included in this analysis. Although there was no difference in the primary endpoint technical success between TCV and COP patients (93.4% vs. 90.2%, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.16, 2.4, p = 0.51), we observed a significantly lower risk for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) among COP patients (TCV: 27.9% vs. COP: 13.1%, OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.15, 0.97, p = 0.047). Implantation of the CoreValve Evolut prosthesis using the COP might help to reduce the rate of PPI following TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Maximilian Doldi
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Lukas Stolz
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
| | - Felix Escher
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.E.); (A.C.)
| | - Julius Steffen
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Jonas Gmeiner
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
| | - Daniel Roden
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
| | - Marie Linnemann
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
| | - Kornelia Löw
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
| | - Simon Deseive
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
| | - Thomas J. Stocker
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Theiss
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
| | - Konstantinos Rizas
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Adrian Curta
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.E.); (A.C.)
| | - Sebastian Sadoni
- Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (J.B.); (D.J.); (S.P.); (C.H.)
| | - Joscha Buech
- Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (J.B.); (D.J.); (S.P.); (C.H.)
| | - Dominik Joskowiak
- Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (J.B.); (D.J.); (S.P.); (C.H.)
| | - Sven Peterss
- Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (J.B.); (D.J.); (S.P.); (C.H.)
| | - Christian Hagl
- Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (J.B.); (D.J.); (S.P.); (C.H.)
| | - Steffen Massberg
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Hausleiter
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Braun
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.S.); (J.S.); (J.G.); (D.R.); (M.L.); (K.L.); (S.D.); (T.J.S.); (M.O.); (H.T.); (K.R.); (S.M.); (J.H.); (D.B.)
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, 80539 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Permanent Pacemaker Reduction Using Cusp-Overlapping Projection in TAVR: A Propensity Score Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:150-161. [PMID: 35057985 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine if modifying the classical implantation technique for self-expanding (SE) transcatheter aortic valve replacement to a novel cusp-overlapping projection (COP) technique results in a higher implantation depth (ID) and subsequently reduces the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). BACKGROUND The COP technique presents the potential benefit of an optimized ID to reduce the rate of PPMI. However, only a few studies have compared clinical outcomes with those achieved using the standard technique. This is the first study to systematically evaluate this approach for SE transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in different populations METHODS: Beginning in February 2015, 444 patients were consecutively included. Propensity score matching was used to control baseline characteristics because of the observational nature of the study. In total, 161 pairs of patients were analyzed. Three methods were used to measure ID (noncoronary cusp [NCC] to the THV, mean of the NCC and the left coronary cusp [LCC] to the THV, and the deepest edge from the LCC and the NCC to the THV). RESULTS ID was significantly higher in COP cases when measuring from the NCC (4.2 mm vs 5.3 mm; P < 0.001) and the mean from the NCC and the LCC (5.3 mm vs 5.9 mm; P = 0.04), but not from the deepest edge. The PPMI rate was lower in the COP group: 19 (11.8%) vs 35 (21.7%) (P = 0.03; relative risk: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.91). CONCLUSIONS The present study showed that the COP technique significantly reduces PPMI in SE THV implantation compared with the classical implantation technique, with similar rates of complications.
Collapse
|