Trascendencia clínica del embarazo en el síndrome de Brugada

Brugada Syndrome: 30 Years of Scientific Ventures

Thirty years ago, a distinctly new clinical-electrocardiographic syndrome was described, today known as Brugada Syndrome (BrS). Typical treatment for this type of syndrome is electrocardiography with ST-segment elevation in the direct precordial derivations. The clinical presentation of the disease is highly variable: the patients can remain completely asymptomatic, but they can also develop episodes of syncope, atrial fibrillation (AF), sinus node dysfunction (SNF), conduction disorders, asystole, and ventricular fibrillation (VF). This disease is caused by mutations in the genes responsible for the potential action of cardiac cells. The most commonly involved gene is SCN5A, which controls the structure and function of the heart's sodium channel. The description of this new syndrome has shown highly positive implications in all fields of medicine.

Management of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators during Pregnancy-A Systematic Review

Background: With the advent of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) technology in recent decades, patients with inherited or congenital cardiomyopathy have a greater chance of survival into adulthood. Women with ICDs in this group are now more likely to reach reproductive age. However, pregnancy represents a challenge for clinicians, as no guidelines for the treatment of pregnant women with an ICD are currently available. Methods: To analyze this issue, we performed a systematic screening of the literature using the keywords: pregnancy with ICD, lead fracture in pregnancy, lead thrombi in pregnancy, ventricular tachycardia in pregnancy, inappropriate shocks in pregnancy, ICD discharge in pregnancy and ICD shock in pregnancy. Of 1101 publications found, 27 publications were eligible for further analysis (four retrospective trials and 23 case reports). Results: According to physiological changes in pregnancy, resulting in an increase in heart rate and cardiac output, a vulnerability for malignant arrhythmias and device-related complications in ICD carriers might be suspected. While the literature is limited on this issue, maternal complications including arrhythmia burden with following ICD therapies, thromboembolic events and lead complications as well as inappropriate shock therapy have been reported. According to the limited available studies, associated risk seems not to be more frequent than in the general population and depends on the underlying cardiac pathology. Furthermore, worsening of heart failure and related cardiovascular disease have been reported with associated risk of preterm delivery. These observations are exaggerated by restricted applications of diagnostics and treatment due to the risk of fetal harm in this population. Conclusions: Due to limited data on management of ICDs during pregnancy, further scientific investigations are required. Consequently, careful risk assessment with individual risk evaluation and close follow ups with interdisciplinary treatment are recommended in pregnant ICD carriers.

Long-term prognosis of women with Brugada syndrome and electrophysiological study

BACKGROUND

A male predominance in Brugada syndrome (BrS) has been widely reported, but scarce information on female patients with BrS is available.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of women with BrS.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study of patients diagnosed with BrS and previous electrophysiological study (EPS) was performed.

RESULTS

Among 770 patients, 177 (23%) were female. At presentation, 150 (84.7%) were asymptomatic. Females presented less frequently with a type 1 electrocardiographic pattern (30.5% vs 55.0%; P <.001), had a higher rate of family history of sudden cardiac death (49.7% vs 29.8%; P <.001), and had less sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) on EPS (8.5% vs 15.1%; P = .009). Genetic testing was performed in 79 females (45% of the sample) and was positive in 34 (19%). An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was inserted in 48 females (27.1%). During mean (± SD) follow-up of 122.17 ± 57.28 months, 5 females (2.8%) experienced a cardiovascular event compared to 42 males (7.1%; P = .04). On multivariable analysis, a positive genetic test (18.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-192.53; P = .01) and atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 21.12; 95% CI 1.27-350.85; P = .03) were predictive of arrhythmic events, whereas VAs on EPS (neither with 1 or 2 extrastimuli nor 3 extrastimuli) were not.

CONCLUSION

Women with BrS represent a minor fraction among patients with BrS, and although their rate of events is low, they do not constitute a risk-free group. Neither clinical risk factors nor EPS predicts future arrhythmic events. Only atrial fibrillation and positive genetic test were identified as risk factors for future arrhythmic events.

Inherited cardiac arrhythmias

The main inherited cardiac arrhythmias are long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and Brugada syndrome. These rare diseases are often the underlying cause of sudden cardiac death in young individuals and result from mutations in several genes encoding ion channels or proteins involved in their regulation. The genetic defects lead to alterations in the ionic currents that determine the morphology and duration of the cardiac action potential, and individuals with these disorders often present with syncope or a life-threatening arrhythmic episode. The diagnosis is based on clinical presentation and history, the characteristics of the electrocardiographic recording at rest and during exercise and genetic analyses. Management relies on pharmacological therapy, mostly β-adrenergic receptor blockers (specifically, propranolol and nadolol) and sodium and transient outward current blockers (such as quinidine), or surgical interventions, including left cardiac sympathetic denervation and implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. All these arrhythmias are potentially life-threatening and have substantial negative effects on the quality of life of patients. Future research should focus on the identification of genes associated with the diseases and other risk factors, improved risk stratification and, in particular for Brugada syndrome, effective therapies.

Síndrome de Brugada. Aspectos fisiopatológicos, clínicos y su asociación con enfermedades infecciosas

El síndrome de Brugada (SBr) es una enfermedad cardiaca no estructural que afecta los canales iónicos cardiacos, caracterizado por manifestaciones clínicas como arritmias, taquicardia, síncope y muerte súbita, entre otras. Su diagnóstico es netamente electrocardiográfico, con un patrón altamente sugestivo pero no patognomónico, por lo que existen diagnósticos diferenciales desde el punto de vista electrocardiográfico.Existen tres patrones electrocardiográficos en los pacientes con SBr, de los cuales el tipo I es el patrón más característico. Actualmente, múltiples genes se han relacionado con la presentación de este síndrome, entre los cuales se destaca el gen SCN5A, el más descrito en la literatura. Se conoce que este síndrome es más frecuente en el género masculino; sin embargo, no existen estudios epidemiológicos en Latinoamérica que lo confirmen. Pese a que la investigación alrededor de los mecanismos causales del síndrome ha avanzado, existen varias cuestiones sin resolver, como su desenmascaramiento por los signos que producen algunas enfermedades infecciosas causadas principalmente por virus. Por lo tanto, dada la relevancia clínica del tema para el médico general y para el especialista, el objetivo de esta revisión es describir no solo aspectos fisiopatológicos y clínicos de la enfermedad, sino también resaltar casos de pacientes con enfermedades infecciosas quienes posteriormente han sido diagnosticados con el síndrome de Brugada.

Brugada syndrome: clinical and genetic findings

Brugada syndrome is a rare, inherited cardiac disease leading to ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death in structurally normal hearts. Clinical diagnosis requires a Brugada type I electrocardiographic pattern in combination with other clinical features. The most effective approach to unmasking this diagnostic pattern is the use of ajmaline and flecainide tests, and the most effective intervention to reducing the risk of death is the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator. To date, 18 genes have been associated with the disease, with the voltage-gated sodium channel α type V gene (SCN5A) being the most common one to date. However, only 30-35% of diagnosed cases are attributable to pathogenic variants in known genes, emphasizing the need for further genetic studies. Despite recent advances in clinical diagnoses and genetic testing, risk stratification and clinical management of patients with Brugada syndrome remain challenging.Genet Med 18 1, 3-12.