Seguridad del implante ambulatorio de desfibrilador automático implantable

Outcomes of an expedited same-day discharge protocol following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation

BACKGROUND

With increasing constraints on healthcare resources, greater attention is being focused on improved resource utilization. Prior studies have demonstrated safety of same-day discharge following CIED implantation but are limited by vague protocols with long observation periods. In this study, we evaluate the safety of an expedited 2 hour same-day discharge protocol following CIED implantation.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CIED implantation at three centers between 2015 and 2021 were included. Procedural, demographic, and adverse event data were abstracted from the electronic health record. Patients were divided into same-day discharge (SDD) and delayed discharge (DD) cohorts. The primary outcome was complications including lead malfunction requiring revision, pneumothorax, hemothorax, lead dislodgement, lead perforation with tamponade, and mortality within 30 days of procedure. Outcomes were compared between the two cohorts using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

A total of 4543 CIED implantation procedures were included with 1557 patients (34%) in the SDD cohort. SDD patients were comparatively younger, were more likely to be male, and had fewer comorbidities than DD patients. Among SDD patients, the mean time to post-operative chest X-ray was 2.6 h. SDD had lower rates of complications (1.3% vs 2.1%, p = 0.0487) and acute care utilization post-discharge (9.6% vs 14.0%, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the 90-day infection rate between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

An expedited 2 hour same-day discharge protocol is safe and effective with low rates of complications, infection, and post-operative acute care utilization.

Time to diagnosis of acute complications after cardiovascular implantable electronic device insertion and optimal timing of discharge within the first 24 hours

BACKGROUND

More than 3 million cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are implanted annually. There are minimal data regarding the timing of diagnosis of acute complications after implantation. It remains unclear whether patients can be safely discharged less than 24 hours postimplantation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the precise timing of acute complication diagnosis after CIED implantation and optimal timing for same-day discharge.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of adults 18 years or older who underwent CIED implantation at a large urban quaternary care medical center between June 1, 2015, and March 30, 2020, was performed. Standard of care included overnight observation and chest radiography 6 and 24 hours postprocedure. Medical records were reviewed for the timing of diagnosis of acute complications. Acute complications included pneumothorax, hemothorax, pericardial effusion, lead dislodgment, and implant site hematoma requiring surgical intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 2421 patients underwent implantation. Pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade was diagnosed in 13 patients (0.53%), pneumothorax or hemothorax in 19 patients (0.78%), lead dislodgment in 11 patients (0.45%), and hematomas requiring surgical intervention in 5 patients (0.2%). Of the 48 acute complications, 43 (90%) occurred either within 6 hours or more than 24 hours after the procedure. Only 3 acute complications identified between 6 and 24 hours required intervention during the index hospitalization (0.12% of all cases).

CONCLUSION

Most acute complications are diagnosed either within the first 6 hours or more than 24 hours after implantation. With rare exception, patients can be considered for discharge after 6 hours of appropriate monitoring.

[Structural requirements and prerequisites for outpatient implantation of defibrillators, devices for cardiac resynchronization and event recorders]

Die Möglichkeiten der ambulanten Implantation von Defibrillatoren, Geräten zur kardialen Resynchronisation und Ereignisrekordern („cardiac implantable electronic devices“, CIEDs) gewinnen zunehmend an Bedeutung. In Deutschland existieren aktuell vereinzelte Möglichkeiten zur ambulanten Implantation. Es fehlt allerdings an einheitlichen, anerkannten und verbindlichen Qualitätskriterien sowie an Grundzügen vertraglicher Gestaltungen. Der vorliegende Artikel stellt einen Einblick in die aktuellen Vertragskonstellationen zur ambulanten Operation bereit und definiert ein erstes, holistisches Qualitätskonzept für ambulante Implantationen von CIEDs. Im Zentrum steht das Ziel, einen Diskurs in der Fachgesellschaft anzustoßen, um ein abgestimmtes, verbindliches Qualitätskonzept zu definieren. Dieses sollte als Grundlage für zukünftige Leistungen der ambulanten Implantation dienen, die Leistungen vergleichbar machen und einen Beitrag zum langfristigen Nachweis der Evidenz leisten.

Trends in Hospital Admissions for and Readmissions After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Procedures in the United States: An Analysis From 2010 to 2014 Using the National Readmission Database

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate inpatient trends in de novo complete cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures and subsequent all-cause 30-day readmissions in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We accessed the National Readmission Database to identify CIED implantation-related hospitalizations between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. In-hospital mortality and postprocedure all-cause 30-day readmissions were also analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 800,250 CIED implantation hospitalizations were identified across the United States, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0.9% (7423 of 800,250) and a 29% decrease in CIED-related index hospitalizations (188,086 in 2010 vs 134,276 in 2014). The all-cause 30-day readmission rate for the entire cohort was 13% (106,505 of 800,250), decreasing from 14% (26,134 of 188,085) in 2010 to only 13% (17,154 of 134,276) by 2014. Dual-chamber pacemakers were the most frequently implanted in-hospital CIEDs (473,615 of 800,250 [59%]). The most common cause for readmission was heart failure exacerbation, which remained unchanged over the study period.

CONCLUSION

Our data reveal a steady decline in overall in-hospital CIED implantations and only a modest decline in readmission rates. The cause for this decline may be an impact of medical and regulatory changes guiding CIED implantations, but it deserves further investigation.

Day-case device implantation-A prospective single-center experience including patient satisfaction data

PURPOSE

Many centers perform day-case cardiac rhythm management (CRM) device implantation. However, there is a paucity of prospective data concerning this approach. We performed a prospective single-center study of day-case device implantation, including data on patient satisfaction.

METHODS

All patients scheduled for a new elective device were considered for a day-case procedure. Exclusion criteria were living alone or without a suitable carer, advancing age/frailty, a metallic valve, and persistent complete heart block. Following discharge, patients were reviewed in device clinic at 6 weeks with an anonymized questionnaire.

RESULTS

During the study period (May 2014-August 2016), 797 new CRM devices were implanted. Of these, 232 were elective and included in the analysis; 101 were planned to be day-case and 131 scheduled for overnight stay. Of the 101 day-case patients, 52 had a pacemaker, 28 an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), 16 a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker/defibrillator, and five a subcutaneous-ICD. Complications were similar in the day-case (n  =  12, 12%) and overnight stay (n  =  15, 11%) groups (P  =  0.92). In the day-case group, 93 (92%) patients went home the same day. An estimated 111 overnight bed days were saved, translating to a cost saving of £61,912 (euro 70,767, $79,211). Note that 99% (n  =  100) of patients returned the questionnaire. Patient satisfaction was universally high. The majority (n  =  98, 98%) felt ready to go home on discharge; only a minority (n  =  5, 5%) would have preferred an overnight stay.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of elective new CRM device implants can be performed as day-case procedures. With appropriate selection patient acceptability of same-day discharge is high.

Start-up of a Cardiology Day Hospital: Activity, Quality Care and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the First Year of Operation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The cardiology day hospital (CDH) is an alternative to hospitalization for scheduled cardiological procedures. The aims of this study were to analyze the activity, quality of care and the cost-effectiveness of a CDH.

METHODS

An observational descriptive study was conducted of the health care activity during the first year of operation of DHHA. The quality of care was analyzed through the substitution rate (outpatient procedures), cancellation rates, complications, and a satisfaction survey. For cost-effectiveness, we calculated the economic savings of avoided hospital stays.

RESULTS

A total of 1646 patients were attended (mean age 69 ± 15 years, 60% men); 2550 procedures were scheduled with a cancellation rate of 4%. The most frequently cancelled procedure was electrical cardioversion. The substitution rate for scheduled invasive procedures was 66%. Only 1 patient required readmission after discharge from the CDH due to heart failure. Most surveyed patients (95%) considered the care received in the CDH to be good or very good. The saving due to outpatient-converted procedures made possible by the CDH was € 219 199.55, higher than the cost of the first year of operation.

CONCLUSIONS

In our center, the CDH allowed more than two thirds of the invasive procedures to be performed on an outpatient basis, while maintaining the quality of care. In the first year of operation, the expenses due to its implementation were offset by a significant reduction in hospital admissions.

Spanish Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Registry. 13th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias Section (2016)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To report the findings of the Spanish Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Registry for 2016 compiled by the Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias Section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology.

METHODS

Prospective data were voluntarily recorded on a data collection form and send to the Spanish Society of Cardiology by each implantation team.

RESULTS

Overall, 5673 device implantations were reported, representing 85% of the estimated total number of implantations. The reported implantation rate was 122 per million population and the estimated total implantation rate was 143 per million. The proportion of first implantations was 66.8%. Data were received from 177 hospitals (8 more than in 2015). Most implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients were men (81.9%). The mean age was 62.7 ± 13.4 years. Most patients had severe or moderate-to-severe ventricular dysfunction and were in New York Heart Association functional class II. The most frequent underlying cardiac condition was ischemic heart disease, followed by dilated cardiomyopathy. Indications for primary prevention accounted for 62% of first implantations. Overall, 81.2% of devices were implanted by cardiac electrophysiologists.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2016 Spanish Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Registry includes information on 85% of the devices implanted in Spain. The total number of device implantations increased in comparison with the last few years. The percentage of implantations for primary prevention also increased in comparison with the previous year.