Impacto de la circulación colateral en el pronóstico a largo plazo de los pacientes tratados con angioplastia primaria

Early recruitable coronary collaterals preserve miocardial viability in late presentation infarctions

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed conflicting results regarding the contribution of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) to myocardial perfusion and function in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI). In the primary angioplasty era, the role of CCC in these studies may have been influenced by the effect of early reperfusion. The true impact of CCC could be clarified by studying its effect on nonreperfused patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of CCC on myocardial viability of late presentation MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2019, we included 167 patients with a late presentation MI who had a complete angiographic occlusion in a major coronary artery in which myocardial viability of the culprit territory was assessed. Patients were divided according to the presence of angiographic early recruited CCC (ERCC) (Rentrop 2-3) or poor CCC (PCC) (Rentrop 0-1). A lower left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) at discharge (54.2 ± 9 vs. 47.9 ± 12; <0.01) and a more severe left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in the culprit territory were observed in PCC patients. The presence of ERCC was the main independent predictor of myocardial viability in late presentation MI (hazard ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-10.6; P < 0.001). At follow-up, wall motion score increased significantly (2.05 ± 0.16; P = 0.02) in patients with ERCC but not in PCC patients (0.07 ± 0.16; P = 0.4), and LVEF improvement was significantly higher in ERCC than in PCC patients (9.7 ± 2.6 vs. 3.8 ± 4.2; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The presence of ERCC was the main independent predictor of myocardial viability in late presentation MI.

Primary Angioplasty in a Catastrophic Presentation: Acute Left Main Coronary Total Occlusion-The ATOLMA Registry

OBJECTIVES

To determine the outcome predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute total occlusion of the left main coronary artery (ATOLMA) patients referred to emergent angioplasty and to describe the clinical presentation and the long-term outcome of these patients.

BACKGROUND

ATOLMA is an uncommon angiographic finding that usually leads to a catastrophic presentation. Limited and inconsistent data have been previously reported regarding true ATOLMA, yet comprehensive knowledge remains scarce.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort that includes patients presenting with myocardial infarction due to a confirmed ATOLMA who underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

RESULTS

In the period of the study, 7930 emergent PCI were performed in the five participating centers, and 46 of them had a true ATOLMA (0.58%). At admission, cardiogenic shock was present in 89% of patients, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was required in 67.4%. All the patients had right dominance. Angiographic success was achieved in 80.4% of the procedures, 13 patients (28.2%) died during the catheterization, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 58.6% (27/46). At one-year and at the final follow-up, 18 patients (39%) were alive, including four cases successfully transplanted. Multivariate analysis showed that postprocedural TIMI flow was the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.23, (95% CI 0.1-0.36), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that the clinical presentation of ATOLMA is catastrophic, presenting a high in-hospital mortality rate; nevertheless, primary angioplasty in this setting is feasible. Postprocedural TIMI flow resulted as the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. In-hospital survivors presented an encouraging outcome. ATOLMA and left dominance could be incompatible with life.

Spontaneous coronary collateral recruitment in patients with recurrent ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

The spontaneous recruitment of acute coronary collaterals in the setting of an ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is seen frequently in those patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and is associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, it is unknown whether in patients who present with a recurrent STEMI, the degree of collateral recruitment remains the same as in the index procedure. We reviewed all patients presenting to our tertiary centre with a STEMI undergoing primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from July 2010 until December 2018. We identified patients who presented with a recurrent STEMI following their index procedure. We defined patients with poor collateral recruitment as Rentrop grade 0 or 1, whilst patients with robust collateral recruitment as Rentrop grade 2 or 3. Of the 1795 patients who were identified, there were 27 cases in 25 patients who presented with a repeat STEMI following their index procedure. The median time between cases was 12.8 days (IQR 2.3-589.5 days). Compared to the index case, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of collateral recruitment in recurrent presentations (Z = - 0.378, p = 0.70). In those patients presenting more than 6 months following the index procedure, the median time between cases was 654.5 days (IQR 479.5-1151.9). There was no difference in the degree of collateral recruitment in recurrent presentations (Z = 0.000, p = 1.0). Cases which had poorer collateral recruitment in recurrent presentations were less likely to be current smokers (0% vs 50%, p < 0.001) and less likely to have diabetes (0% vs 27.3%, p < 0.05) The recruitment of spontaneous coronary collaterals remains constant in recurrent STEMI presentations suggesting an innate biological process rather than merely a manifestation of alteration of haemodynamic blood flow. Further investigations to identify these processes is required.

Effect of Coronary Collaterals on Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

The impact of coronary collaterals on the prognosis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the era of coronary revascularization remains controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of coronary collateral on clinical outcomes, especially mortality (≥6 months), in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. Eligible observational studies were selected by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to August 9, 2017. Overall, 14 observational studies involving 10 411 patients were included. Coronary collaterals were found to reduce the risk of long-term mortality (≥6 months; risk ratio [RR]: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.76) as well as in-hospital plus 30-day mortality (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.78) in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI. In addition, pooling the risk-adjusted or propensity-matched data showed a significant reduction in long-term mortality (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.95) and in-hospital plus 30-day mortality (RR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.55) in patients with collateral circulation. However, no significant difference was found in the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization between the 2 groups. Therefore, it was found that coronary collaterals have a beneficial effect on long-term survival (≥6 months) as well as in-hospital plus 30-day survival in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI.