1
|
Revollo SO, Echevarria GC, Fullerton D, Ramirez I, Farias J, Lagos R, Lacassie HJ. Intraoperative Fascial Plane Blocks Facilitate Earlier Tracheal Extubation and Intensive Care Unit Discharge After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:437-444. [PMID: 36566128 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Novel fascial plane blocks may allow early tracheal extubation and discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). The present study primarily aimed to determine whether fascial plane blocks, in comparison with intravenous analgesia alone, significantly shortened tracheal extubation times in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The secondary objectives were to compare each block's performance with that of intravenous analgesia alone in terms of the individual tracheal extubation time and length of ICU stay. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING Single-center study. PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2018 and 2019 were identified from a prospective clinical registry. After obtaining ethics approval, the clinical and electronic records of patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2018 were analyzed. Data of patients receiving fascial plane blocks (erector spinae plane [ESP], pectoral plane I and II [PECs], and serratus anterior plane [SAP] blocks) with intravenous analgesia were compared with those of patients receiving only intravenous analgesia. A propensity score (PS) model was used to control for differences in the baseline characteristics. Adjusted p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of the 589 patients screened, 532 met the inclusion criteria; 404 received a fascial plane block. After PS matching, weighted linear regression revealed that by receiving a block, the predicted extubation time difference was 9.29 hours (b coefficient; 95% CI: -11.98, -6.60; p = 0.022). Similar results were obtained using PS weighting, with a reduction of 7.82 hours (b coefficient; 95% CI: -11.89, -3.75; p < 0.001) in favor of the block. In the fascial-plane-block group, ESP block achieved the best performance. The length of ICU stay decreased by 1.1 days (b coefficient; 95% CI: -1.43, -0.79; p = 0.0001) in the block group. No complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS Fascial plane block is associated with reduced extubation times and lengths of ICU stay. ESP block achieved the best performance, followed by PECs and SAP blocks. After PS matching, only ESP block reduced the extubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley O Revollo
- División de Anestesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ghislaine C Echevarria
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai West, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Ignacio Ramirez
- Unidad Coronaria, Kinesiología Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jorge Farias
- Unidad Coronaria, Kinesiología Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rodrigo Lagos
- Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y Clínica, Departamento de Investigación del Cáncer, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hector J Lacassie
- División de Anestesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie cardiaque adulte sous CEC ou à cœur battant 2021. ANESTHÉSIE & RÉANIMATION 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anrea.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
3
|
Zhong H, Garvin S, Poeran J, Liu J, Kirksey M, Wilson LA, DeMeo D, Yang E, Hong G, Jules-Elysee KM, Nejim J, Memtsoudis SG. The Use of Critical Care Services After Orthopedic Surgery at a High-Volume Orthopedic Medical Center: A Retrospective Study. HSS J 2022; 18:344-350. [PMID: 35846258 PMCID: PMC9247588 DOI: 10.1177/15563316211055166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: With an aging population, orthopedics has become one of the largest and fastest growing surgical fields. However, data on the use of critical care services (CCS) in patients undergoing orthopedic procedures remain sparse. Purpose: We sought to elucidate the prevalence and characteristics of patients requiring CCS and intermediate levels of care after orthopedic surgeries at a high-volume orthopedic medical center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed inpatient electronic medical record data (2016-2020) at a high-volume orthopedic hospital. Patients who required CCS and intermediate levels of care, including step-down unit (SDU) and telemetry services, were identified. We described characteristics related to patients, procedures, and outcomes, including type of advanced services required and surgery type. Results: Of the 50,387 patients who underwent orthopedic inpatient surgery, 1.6% required CCS and 21.6% were admitted to an SDU. Additionally, 482 (1.0%) patients required postoperative mechanical ventilation and 3602 (7.1%) patients required continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Spine surgery patients were the most likely to require any form of advanced care (45.7%). Conclusions: This retrospective review found that approximately one-fourth of orthopedic surgery patients were admitted to units that provided critical and intermediate levels of care. These results may prove useful to hospitals in estimating needs and allocating resources for advanced and critical care services after orthopedic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoyan Zhong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean Garvin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jashvant Poeran
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery
Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy/Orthopedics, Icahn
School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jiabin Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meghan Kirksey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren A. Wilson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danya DeMeo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elaine Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Genewoo Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kethy M. Jules-Elysee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jemiel Nejim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stavros G. Memtsoudis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical
Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA,Department of Anesthesiology,
Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University,
Salzburg, Austria,Department of Health Policy and
Research, Weill Cornell Medicine College, New York, NY, USA,Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD, MBA, FCCP,
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for
Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mertes PM, Kindo M, Amour J, Baufreton C, Camilleri L, Caus T, Chatel D, Cholley B, Curtil A, Grimaud JP, Houel R, Kattou F, Fellahi JL, Guidon C, Guinot PG, Lebreton G, Marguerite S, Ouattara A, Provenchère Fruithiot S, Rozec B, Verhoye JP, Vincentelli A, Charbonneau H. Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2022; 41:101059. [PMID: 35504126 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay. DESIGN A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence. METHODS Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. RESULTS The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions. CONCLUSIONS Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul-Michel Mertes
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, FMTS de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michel Kindo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, FMTS de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Julien Amour
- Institut de Perfusion, de Réanimation, d'Anesthésie de Chirurgie Cardiaque Paris Sud, IPRA, Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier, Massy, France
| | - Christophe Baufreton
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Angers, France; MITOVASC Institute CNRS UMR 6214, INSERM U1083, University, Angers, France
| | - Lionel Camilleri
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, T.G.I, I.P., CNRS, SIGMA, UCA, UMR 6602, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Thierry Caus
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, UPJV, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens Picardy University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Didier Chatel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery (D.C.), Institut du Coeur Saint-Gatien, Nouvelle Clinique Tours Plus, Tours, France
| | - Bernard Cholley
- Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Université de Paris, INSERM, IThEM, Paris, France
| | - Alain Curtil
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France
| | | | - Rémi Houel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Saint Joseph Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Fehmi Kattou
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Fellahi
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Universitaire Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Catherine Guidon
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Timone, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Pierre-Grégoire Guinot
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France; University of Bourgogne and Franche-Comté, LNC UMR1231, Dijon, France; INSERM, LNC UMR1231, Dijon, France; FCS Bourgogne-Franche Comté, LipSTIC LabEx, Dijon, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité mixte de recherche CardioMetabolisme et Nutrition, ICAN, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine Marguerite
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, FMTS de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alexandre Ouattara
- CHU Bordeaux, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Magellan Medico-Surgical Centre, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, UMR 1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Sophie Provenchère Fruithiot
- Department of Anaesthesia, Université de Paris, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Rozec
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Laennec, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France; Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, CNRS, INSERM, Institut duDu Thorax, Nantes, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Verhoye
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - André Vincentelli
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Breen TJ, Bennett CE, Van Diepen S, Katz J, Anavekar NS, Murphy JG, Bell MR, Barsness GW, Jentzer JC. The Mayo Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Admission Risk Score is Associated with Medical Resource Utilization During Hospitalization. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2021; 5:839-850. [PMID: 34514335 PMCID: PMC8424127 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine whether the Mayo Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) Admission Risk Score (M-CARS) is associated with CICU resource utilization. Patients and Methods Adult patients admitted to our CICU from 2007 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed, and M-CARS was calculated from admission data. Groups were compared using Wilcoxon test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. Results We included 12,428 patients with a mean age of 67±15 years (37% female patients). The mean M-CARS was 2.1±2.1, including 5890 (47.4%) patients with M-CARS less than 2 and 644 (5.2%) patients with M-CARS greater than 6. Critical care restricted therapies were frequently used, including mechanical ventilation in 28.0%, vasoactive medications in 25.5%, and dialysis in 4.8%. A higher M-CARS was associated with greater use of critical-care therapies and longer CICU and hospital length of stay. The low-risk cohort with M-CARS less than 2 was less likely to require critical-care–restricted therapies, including invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (8.0% vs 46.1%), vasoactive medications (10.1% vs 38.8%), or dialysis (1.0% vs 8.2%), compared with patients with M-CARS greater than or equal to 2 (all P<.001). Conclusion Patients with M-CARS less than 2 infrequently require critical-care resources and have extremely low mortality, suggesting that the M-CARS could be used to facilitate the triage of critically ill cardiac patients.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACS, acute coronary syndrome
- APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation
- BUN, blood urea nitrogen
- CA, cardiac arrest
- CCCTN, Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network
- CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index
- CICU, cardiac intensive care unit
- CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy
- CS, cardiogenic shock
- CVC, central venous catheter
- ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- HF, heart failure
- IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump
- ICU, intensive care unit
- IMCU, intermediate care unit
- LOS, length of stay
- M-CARS, Mayo Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Admission Risk Score
- PAC, pulmonary arterial catheter
- PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
- RBC, red blood cell
- RDW, red blood cell distribution width
- SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
- VF, ventricular fibrillation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Breen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Courtney E Bennett
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sean Van Diepen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jason Katz
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Joseph G Murphy
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Malcolm R Bell
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|