Tendoscopia de los peroneos: nuestra experiencia

Importance of Space-Occupying Anatomical Variations in Peroneal Tendoscopy

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that peroneal tendons disorders are more commonly associated with anatomical variations, which could overcrowd the retrofibular groove.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective case study covered 84 consecutive cases that had undergone peroneal tendoscopy. Peroneal tendoscopy was performed on 82 patients, predominantly female (3:1) with a median age of 46 years. The preoperative evaluation and all the procedures were performed by a single surgeon using a standardized technique.

RESULTS

Two patients required revision surgery 8 and 52 months after the index procedure due to persistent posterolateral ankle pain. Peroneal tendoscopy was performed as a solitary procedure in 45.1% (37/82) of cases, while the remaining cases involved peroneal tendoscopy as a supplementary procedure. Low-lying peroneus brevis muscle belly (LLMB) was the most common finding in this series in 53.7% (44/82) of cases. In 41.5% (34/82) of cases, longitudinal tears of the peroneus brevis tendon were noted. Some patients presented with more than 1 concomitant peroneal tendon pathology. The LLMB was observed in 23.5% (8/34) of cases with a longitudinal tear of the peroneus brevis tendon.

CONCLUSION

Peroneal tendon anatomical variations, especially LLMB, were associated with the presence of peroneus brevis tendon ruptures and intrasheath peroneal tendon subluxations as well as posttraumatic posterolateral ankle pain. Due to high rates of undiagnosed and misdiagnosed cases of LLMB preoperatively, we believe special care should be taken to recognize it during tendoscopy. Peroneal tendoscopy is a high-efficiency, low-complication method to treat some peroneal tendon conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve at the posterior tip of the fibula decreases from proximal to distal

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve in different points proximally and distally to the tip of the fibula.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen lower extremities were dissected to expose the nerves and tendons. Having the posterior tip of the fibula as a reference, the distance between the tendons sheath and the sural nerve was measured in each point with a tachometer with three independent different observers. Two measures were taken distally at 1.5 and 2 cm from fibula tip and 3 measures were performed proximally at 2, 3, and 5 cm from fibula tip. Data were described using means, standard deviations, medians, and minimum and maximum values.

RESULTS

The average distance between distance between the fibula tip and sural nerve is 16.6 ± 4.4 mm. The average distance between peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 5 cm, 3 cm, and 2 cm from the proximal fibular tip was 29.6 ± 3.2 mm, 24.2 ± 3.6 mm, and 19.7 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The average distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 2 cm and 1.5 cm distal to fibular tip was 9.1 ± 3.5 mm and 7.8 ± 3.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal. As the distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal, performing the tendoscopy portal more distally would increase the risk of nerve iatrogenic injury.

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve at the posterior tip of the fibula decreases from proximal to distal

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve in different points proximally and distally to the tip of the fibula.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen lower extremities were dissected to expose the nerves and tendons. Having the posterior tip of the fibula as a reference, the distance between the tendons sheath and the sural nerve was measured in each point with a tachometer with three independent different observers. Two measures were taken distally at 1.5 and 2 cm from fibula tip and 3 measures were performed proximally at 2, 3, and 5 cm from fibula tip. Data were described using means, standard deviations, medians, and minimum and maximum values.

RESULTS

The average distance between distance between the fibula tip and sural nerve is 16.6 ± 4.4 mm. The average distance between peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 5 cm, 3 cm, and 2 cm from the proximal fibular tip was 29.6 ± 3.2 mm, 24.2 ± 3.6 mm, and 19.7 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The average distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 2 cm and 1.5 cm distal to fibular tip was 9.1 ± 3.5 mm and 7.8 ± 3.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal. As the distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal, performing the tendoscopy portal more distally would increase the risk of nerve iatrogenic injury.

Results of Peroneal Tendoscopy With a Technical Modification

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of tendoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of peroneal tendon (PT) pathologies, and to evaluate the results of our technical modification.

METHODS:

Twenty ankles of 18 patients with retrofibular pain, operated on between 2006 and 2012, were included in this study. Peroneal tendoscopy was performed diagnostically for the patients who were diagnosed as having "peroneal tendinopathy" with physical examination, x-ray, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After being diagnosed by peroneal tendoscopy, patients were definitively treated with either tendoscopy or open surgery.

RESULTS:

Thirteen of 20 ankles had accompanying ankle pathology with PT pathology, and the other 7 ankles had no concomitant pathology. We detected peroneal tenosynovitis (PTS) in 13 patients, PT tear in 7 patients, and vincula thickening in 1 patient. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 76 preoperatively, and after 2 years' follow-up the AOFAS score was 96.

CONCLUSION:

Tendoscopy is a useful method for the diagnosis and treatment of PT pathologies. The patients with clinical suspicion of PT pathology were treated or diagnosed by peroneal tendoscopy with our technical modification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, retrospective case series.