[The geometry of the keel determines the behaviour of the tibial tray against torsional forces in total knee replacement]

Tibial implant design in primary TKA: retrospective comparison of two designs for the occurrence of radiolucent lines and aseptic loosening

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this retrospective study was to study the effect of tibial implant design on the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) and aseptic loosening (AL) by comparing two different total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two types of total knee arthroplasty, different for tibial shape, size and keel design were compared, 255 for the first and 774 for the second. The occurrence of RLLs and radiological signs of micro- and macro-mobility and aseptic loosening was analyzed. Demographic data were compared, as well as the type and rate of RLLs, occurrence of aseptic loosening and the presence of potential risk factors.

RESULTS

The first implant design is morphometric and has a squarer keel than the second implant TKA. The overall rate of RLLs was similar (21% vs 23%), despite of a significantly lower rates of radiological signs of macro-mobility of the tibial component with the first implant (2% vs 17%). Survivorship of both designs was overall comparable (99.6% vs 98.8 %) the first implant group had more potential risk factors for poor bone quality than the second group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A morphometric design is more anatomic and offers better bone coverage of the epiphyseal tibial surface. RLLs, as a sign of implant micro-mobility, were equally present in both designs. Radiological signs of macro-mobility at the metaphysis were less frequently observed in squared keel design. The morphometric implant did not show improved survivorship compared with a symmetric implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness

BACKGROUND

With the Persona® knee system a novel anatomic total knee design was developed, which has no pre-coating, whereas the predecessor knee system is pre-coated with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Joint registry data have shown no decrease in risk of aseptic revision of PMMA pre-coated tibial components compared with non-pre-coated implants. The aim of this retrieval study was to compare the amount of cement adhesions, geometry and surface features between the two knee designs and to correlate them with the underlying reason for revision surgery.

METHODS

Retrieval analysis was performed of 15 NexGen® and 8 Persona® fixed-bearing knee implants from the same manufacturer retrieved from two knee revision centres. A photogrammetric method was used to grade the amount of cement attached to the tibial tray backside. The geometry and dimensions of the tibial trays, tray projections and peripheral lips were measured using digital callipers and compared between the two different designs. To measure the surface roughness on the backside of the tibial tray, a contact profilometer was used. To investigate differences between the two designs statistical analyses (t-test) were performed.

RESULTS

All Persona® trays showed evidence of cement adhesion with a % area of 75.4%; half of the NexGen® trays had cement adhesions, with a mean value of 20%. There was a significant difference in the percentage of area covered by cement between the two designs (p < 0.001). Results from the contact profilometer revealed that Persona® and NexGen® tray backsides showed a similar lateral (1.36 μm and 1.10 μm) and medial (1.39 μm and 1.12 μm) mean surface roughness with significant differentiation (p < 0.05) of the lateral and medial roughness values between the two designs. Persona® stems showed a significantly higher mean surface roughness (1.26) compared to NexGen® stems (0.89; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel anatomic knee system showed significantly more cements adhesions and a higher surface roughness which was most likely attributed to the most obvious design and coating alteration of the tibial tray. This study provides first retrieval findings of a novel TKA design recently introduced to the market.

Laser-Induced Microgrooves Improve the Mechanical Responses of Cemented Implant Systems

The impact of a laser-induced microgroove (LIM) architecture on mechanical responses of two cemented implant systems was evaluated. One system consisted of two aluminum alloy rods bonded end-to-end by polymethylmethacrylate cement. The second system consisted of a custom-made, aluminum tibial tray (TT) cemented in an artificial canine tibia. Control specimens for each system were polished smooth at the cement interface. For LIM samples in the rod system, microgrooves were engraved (100 µm depth, 200 µm width, 500 µm spacing) on the apposing surface of one of the two rods. For TT system testing, LIM engraving (100 µm spacing) was confined to the underside and keel of the tray. Morphological analysis of processed implant surfaces revealed success in laser microgrooving procedures. For cemented rods tested under static tension, load to failure was greater for LIM samples (279.0 ± 14.9 N vs. 126.5 ± 4.5 N). Neither non-grooved nor grooved TT samples failed under cyclic compression testing (100,000 cycles at 1 Hz). Compared with control specimens, LIM TT constructs exhibited higher load to failure under static compression and higher strain at the bone interface under cyclic compression. Laser-induced microgrooving has the potential to improve the performance of cemented orthopedic implants.