1
|
De Cassai A, Geraldini F, Freo U, Boscolo A, Pettenuzzo T, Zarantonello F, Sella N, Tulgar S, Busetto V, Negro S, Munari M, Navalesi P. Erector Spinae Plane Block and Chronic Pain: An Updated Review and Possible Future Directions. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:1073. [PMID: 37626959 PMCID: PMC10452136 DOI: 10.3390/biology12081073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain is a common, pervasive, and often disabling medical condition that affects millions of people worldwide. According to the Global Burden of Disease survey, painful chronic conditions are causing the largest numbers of years lived with disability worldwide. In America, more than one in five adults experiences chronic pain. Erector spinae plane block is a novel regional anesthesia technique used to provide analgesia with multiple possible uses and a relatively low learning curve and complication rate. Here, we review the erector spinae plane block rationale, mechanism of action and possible complications, and discuss its potential use for chronic pain with possible future directions for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro De Cassai
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Federico Geraldini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Ulderico Freo
- Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Annalisa Boscolo
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Tommaso Pettenuzzo
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | | | - Nicolò Sella
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Serkan Tulgar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Training and Research Hospital of Samsun, Faculty of Medicine, University of Samsun, 55000 Samsun, Turkey
| | - Veronica Busetto
- Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Negro
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Marina Munari
- Sant’Antonio Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Navalesi
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bellantonio D, Bolondi G, Cultrera F, Lofrese G, Mongardi L, Gobbi L, Sica A, Bergamini C, Viola L, Tognù A, Tosatto L, Russo E, Santonastaso DP, Agnoletti V. Erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in neurosurgical lower-thoracic and lumbar spinal fusion: a single-centre prospective randomised controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:187. [PMID: 37254058 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02130-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erector spinae plane block is a locoregional anaesthetic technique widely used in several different surgeries due to its safety and efficacy. The aim of this study is to assess its utility in spinal degenerative and traumatic surgery in western countries and for patients of Caucasian ethnicity. METHODS Patients undergoing elective lower-thoracic and lumbar spinal fusion were randomised into two groups: the case group (n = 15) who received erector spinae plane block (ropivacaine 0.4% + dexamethasone 4 mg, 20 mL per side at the level of surgery) plus postoperative opioid analgesia, and the control group (n = 15) who received opioid-based analgesia. RESULTS The erector spinae plane block group showed significantly lower morphine consumption at 48 h postoperatively, lower need for intraoperative fentanyl (203.3 ± 121.7 micrograms vs. 322.0 ± 148.2 micrograms, p-value = 0.021), lower NRS score at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 h, and higher satisfaction rates of patients (8.4 ± 1.2 vs. 6.0 ± 1.05, p-value < 0.0001). No differences in the duration of the hospitalisation were observed. No erector spinae plane block-related complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS Erector spinae plane block is a safe and efficient opioid-sparing technique for postoperative pain control after spinal fusion surgery. This study recommends its implementation in everyday practice and incorporation as a part of multimodal analgesia protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was approved by the local ethical committee of Romagna (CEROM) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04729049). It also adheres to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the CONSORT 2010 guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Bellantonio
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy
| | - Giuliano Bolondi
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy.
| | - Francesco Cultrera
- Neurosurgery Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, 47521, Italy
| | - Giorgio Lofrese
- Neurosurgery Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, 47521, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Mongardi
- Neurosurgery Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, 47521, Italy
| | - Luca Gobbi
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy
| | - Andrea Sica
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy
| | - Carlo Bergamini
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Viola
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy
| | - Andrea Tognù
- Anesthesia Unit, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Nazionale Ponente 5, Argenta, FE, 44011, Italy
| | - Luigino Tosatto
- Neurosurgery Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, 47521, Italy
| | - Emanuele Russo
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy
| | | | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Anesthesia Unit - Ospedale Bufalini, viale Ghirotti 286, Cesena, FC, 47521, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Breidenbach KA, Wahezi SE, Kim SY, Koushik SS, Gritsenko K, Shaparin N, Kaye AD, Viswanath O, Wu H, Kim JH. Contrast Spread After Erector Spinae Plane Block at the Fourth Lumbar Vertebrae: A Cadaveric Study. Pain Ther 2023; 12:241-249. [PMID: 36370257 PMCID: PMC9845450 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00453-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent years, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has seen widespread use to treat acute and chronic pain in the regions of the thoracic spine. While limited data suggest its increasing utilization for pain management distal to the thoracic, abdomen and trunk, the anesthetic spread and analgesic mechanism of ESPB at the level of the lumbar spine has not been fully described or understood. METHODS This is an observational anatomic cadaveric study to assess the distribution of solution following an ESPB block performed at the fourth lumbar vertebrae (L4) using ultrasound guidance to evaluate the spread of a 20 ml solution consisting of local anesthetic and methylene blue. The study was performed in an anatomy lab in a large academic medical center. Following injection of local anesthetic with contrast dye, cadaveric dissection was performed to better understand the extent of contrast dye and to determine the degree of staining to further predict analgesic potential. We reviewed the findings of other ESPB cadaveric studies currently available for comparison. RESULTS Following cadaveric dissection in an anatomy lab, the contrast dye was observed in the ESP space, and staining was found most cranially at L2 and extending caudally underneath the sacrum. Evaluating the depth of its spread, we found it to be confined to the posterior compartment of the spine sparing the nerve roots bilaterally, which is consistent with the only other cadaveric study of ESPB performed at L4. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate the clinical utility of lumbar ESPB where posterior confinement of local anesthesia is preferred. However, further investigation is needed to determine the efficacy of ESPB in lower extremity analgesia which is predicated on ventral nerve root involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn A. Breidenbach
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Sayed E. Wahezi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Soo Yeon Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY USA
| | - Sarang S. Koushik
- Department of Anesthesiology, Valleywise Health Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Karina Gritsenko
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Naum Shaparin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Alan D. Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Innovative Pain and Wellness, LSU Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Hall Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Jung H. Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai West and Morningside Hospitals, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ní Eochagáin A, Singleton BN, Moorthy A, Buggy DJ. Regional and neuraxial anaesthesia techniques for spinal surgery: a scoping review. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129:598-611. [PMID: 35817613 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whilst general anaesthesia is commonly used to undertake spine surgery, the use of neuraxial and peripheral regional anaesthesia techniques for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia is an evolving practice. Variations in practice have meant that it is difficult to know which modalities achieve optimal outcomes for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Our objective was to identify available evidence on the use of regional and neuraxial anaesthesia techniques for adult patients undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS This study was conducted using a framework for scoping reviews. This included a search of six databases searching for articles published since January 1980. We included studies that involved adult patients undergoing spinal surgery with regional or neuraxial techniques used as the primary anaesthesia method or as part of an analgesic strategy. RESULTS Seventy-eight articles were selected for final review. All original papers were included, including case reports, case series, clinical trials, or conference publications. We found that general anaesthesia remains the most common anaesthesia technique for this patient cohort. However, regional anaesthesia, especially non-neuraxial techniques such as fascial plane blocks, is an emerging practice and may have a role in terms of improving postoperative pain relief, quality of recovery, and patient satisfaction. In comparison with neuraxial techniques, the popularity of fascial plane blocks for spinal surgery has significantly increased since 2017. CONCLUSIONS Regional and neuraxial anaesthesia techniques have been used both to provide analgesia and anaesthesia for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Outcome metrics for the success of these techniques vary widely and more frequently use physiological outcome metrics more than patient-centred ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisling Ní Eochagáin
- Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Barry N Singleton
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Aneurin Moorthy
- Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Donal J Buggy
- Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA; EuroPeriscope: The ESA-IC Onco-Anaesthesiology Research Group, Rue des Comédiens, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cirenei C, Boussemart P, Leroy HA, Assaker R, Tavernier B. Effectiveness of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Percutaneous Lumbar Osteosynthesis for Spine Trauma: A Retrospective Study. World Neurosurg 2021; 150:e585-e590. [PMID: 33753319 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain in spine surgery is an issue. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) may reduce such postoperative pain, but its usefulness has never been evaluated in the specific context of trauma surgery. We thus studied the effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB on postoperative pain and opioid requirement after percutaneous lumbar arthrodesis for trauma. METHODS All patients who underwent percutaneous lumbar arthrodesis for spine trauma between December 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively studied. Some patients received preoperative bilateral ESPB (30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side; ESPB group), others received the standard of care (i.e., postoperative muscular infiltration with 30 mL of 0.75% of ropivacaine; control group), according to the preference of the anesthesiologist in charge of the patient. The rest of the management was identical in all patients. The primary outcome was the cumulative morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain score at various time points until 24 hours. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were included, of whom 24 received an EPSB and 31 received the standard of care. The cumulative morphine consumption (mean [standard deviation]) at 24 hours was 13 (12) mg in the ESPB group, and 35 (17) mg in the control group (P < 0.001). Pain scores were significantly lower in the ESPB group compared with the control group up to 9 hours after surgery (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, compared with standard analgesia, ESPB reduced opioid requirement and postoperative pain after percutaneous lumbar arthrodesis for trauma. A randomized controlled trial is required to prove this effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Cirenei
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, CHU de Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Lille, France.
| | - Pierre Boussemart
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, CHU de Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Benoit Tavernier
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, CHU de Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth 2021; 68:387-408. [DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
7
|
Qiu Y, Zhang TJ, Hua Z. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res 2020; 13:1611-1619. [PMID: 32669870 PMCID: PMC7335845 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s256205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a new trunk fascia block technique was proposed in 2016. ESPB has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. However, there are few clinical studies on ESPB for lumbar surgery, and its effectiveness and safety are controversial. The goal of this review is to summarize the use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery in order to better understand this technique. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were searched up to July 30, 2019. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in advance, "lumbar spine surgery" and "ESPB" related MesH terms and free-text words were used. Data on pain scores, analgesic consumptions and adverse effects were reported. All processes follow PRISMA statement guidelines. Results A total of 171 participants from 11 publications were identified, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective cohort study, four case reports and four cases series. Block operation planes from T8 to L4. The main anesthetics used in the block are bupivacaine, ropivacaine and lidocaine. There was evidence for reducing postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumptions. Conclusion The effectiveness and safety of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery are still controversial. The current evidence is insufficient to support the widespread use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery. High-quality RCTs are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Qiu
- Anesthesiology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Teng-Jiao Zhang
- Anesthesiology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen Hua
- Anesthesiology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|