Complexité des prises en soins à domicile : développement d’un outil d’évaluation infirmier et résultat d’une étude d’acceptabilité

First Evidence on the Validity of the Complexity Index Derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care in Home Care Patients

OBJECTIVES

Recently, a Complexity Index (CI), based on the multidimensional complexity model and derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (interRAI HC) was proposed as a decision-support tool to help frontline health care professionals in their clinical evaluation to identify and analyze complex situations. This study aims to test the CI: (1) concurrent validity with another measure of complexity (ie, the COMID), (2) convergent validity with related constructs assessed by interRAI HC scales (eg, depression), (3) divergent validity (comparison between CI-COMID and scales-COMID correlations), and (4) predictive validity on coordination meetings.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional observational design was used for a secondary analysis of interRAI HC and COMID data collected in routine home care nursing practice (July-December 2021).

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants were community-dwelling adults receiving home care, with full interRAI HC and COMID assessments (N = 3533).

METHODS

Correlational analyses were conducted to test the concurrent validity of the CI (with the COMID) and the convergent and divergent validity of the CI (with interRAI HCSwitzerland scales, eg, Depression Rating Scale, Method for Assigning Priority Levels, and a Frailty Index). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to test the discriminative ability of CI on specific professional team coordination meetings.

RESULTS

Results showed that the CI correlated positively and strongly with the COMID (ρ = 0.691, P < .001, concurrent validity), positively with all the tested scales (P < .001, convergent validity), whereas the CI-COMID correlation was higher than the interRAI HC scales-COMID correlations (divergent validity). The ROC analysis showed the CI had a high area under the curve (AUC = 0.719, predictive validity).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The CI demonstrates good validity properties with a strong correlation with the COMID and a high predictive value for coordination meeting. It is distinct from the other interRAI HC scales and has its place among them to support the clinical analysis of complex situations.

Assessing multidimensional complexity in home care: congruencies and discrepancies between patients and nurses

Background

Person-centered care allows for the inclusion of the totality of a person’s needs and preferences, beyond just the clinical or medical aspect. This approach requires the development of tools to allow for the integration of the patient in his/her healthcare. Based on a 30-item tool developed for nurses to evaluate the complexity of home care situations (COMID), this study proposed a version for the patients (i.e. COMID-P). Both instruments were used, independently by nurses and patients, to rate the complexity of individual situations, in order to compare ratings.

Methods

The COMID-P and the COMID were completed during the fraXity study at the patients’ homes, independently by patients (aged 65 and over) and nurses. Item-level and scale-level analyses were performed using, Kappa and McNemar tests, and intra-class correlation (ICC).

Results

A total of 159 pairs of COMID and COMID-P ratings were retained for analyses. Results demonstrated a high degree of patient/nurse agreement for 12/30 items, a moderate agreement for 10/30 items, and a low degree of agreement for 7/30 items. The intra-class correlation between the COMID-P and the COMID was high (ICC= .826, 95%CI [.761-.873]).

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that patients and nurses can assess complexity using tools that have comparable structural properties. They also reveal congruencies and discrepancies in scoring the components of complexity, highlighting the need of reaching consensus in designing care plans. Further work is needed to demonstrate the benefits of joint assessment in developing care plans that truly meet patients’ needs.

Trial registration

The fraXity study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03883425, on March 20, 2019.

Transitional shared decision-making processes for patients with complex needs: A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Shared decision-making (SDM) processes, combining patients' and professionals' perspectives, are especially necessary for patients with complex needs (CNs) during their care transitions. In 2016, we started implementing interprofessional and interinstitutional SDM processes (IIPs) for patients admitted to a short-stay unit (SSU) for inpatient care and then followed-up by primary care providers. Two types of IIPs were identified: (a) iterative IIPs, and (b) meeting IIPs. These differed in terms of the timing of SDM processes: whereas the former were multilateral and iterative, meeting IIPs were simultaneous. However, the two processes had similar outcomes and participants had similar characteristics. The intervention included other components, such as CNs assessment and a care coordinator position. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of the intervention's implementation.

METHODS

The intervention's feasibility was assessed using fidelity and coverage indicators. We collected data from the patients' records on (a) patients' and professionals' characteristics, (b) the fidelity (CNs evaluations and occurrences of IIPs), and (c) the intervention's coverage (types of IIPs, participants).

RESULTS

The study included 453 patients between September 2017 and February 2019: mean age of 82.3 years, 65.6% women and 61.1% considered to have CNs. For patients with CNs, iterative IIPs and meeting IIPs occurred in 78.3% and 23.8% of cases, respectively. 35.1% of iterative IIPs and 8.8% of meeting IIPs for patients with CNs involved patients or their informal caregivers, inpatient professionals, primary care physicians and homecare professionals.

DISCUSSION

These results showed that an intervention targeting the implementation of formalized IIPs for SDM in transitional care was feasible. However, to improve the evaluation of such interventions, other methods should be used to measure their appropriateness and acceptability. Additionally, assessing the effects of IIPs would legitimize their funding, supporting their sustainability and generalisability.

Tooling nurses to assess complexity in routine home care practice: Derivation of a complexity index from the interRAI-HC

AIM

Home care nurses often use the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (interRAI-HC) to assess health needs. However, this tool does not assess complexity. This study proposes to derive a complexity index (CI) from the interRAI-HC using the operational definition of the dedicated COMID checklist (COmplexité Multidimensionnelle des prises en soins Infirmières à Domicile).

DESIGN

Data were collected at the baseline assessment of the fraXity study (N = 231, aged ≥ 65), which relied on an observational longitudinal design.

METHODS

Measures were the interRAI-HC, from which the CI binary variables were computed and the COMID, used as a reference.

RESULTS

Twenty-six CI variables were computed from the interRAI-HC, and all but three correlations were significant. The correlation between the CI score and the COMID score was ρ = 0.730 (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that complexity can be assessed directly from the interRAI-HC by deriving a CI.

[Complexity in nursing practice : Toward a new conceptual framework in nursing care]

While complexity theory has gradually influenced the field of health and social sciences, it has also had an impact on nursing care by introducing a wealth of terminology into the field. The terms “complex patient,” “complex case,” “complex care,” “complex practice,” and “complex needs” have been proposed to describe different aspects of complexity in nursing care. As these qualifiers reflect, nurses become actors in multidefined care and must integrate complexity into their reflective practice. By way of a narrative literature review, this article aims to offer a new perspective on nursing by explaining the different terms used in the discipline, using a multi-level approach. At the end of this review, the authors propose a new integrative conceptual framework for complexity in nursing practice.

[Analysis of the reliability of a multidimensional complexity scale instrument (COMID) for home care nurses]

Introduction : The increasingly frequent mention of complexity by different health care actors challenges the measurement of this construct. The COMID, a tool that helps home nurses to identify complex situations, provides a multidimensional and operational definition of complexity.Context : While an acceptability study showed that nurses took a keen interest in the COMID, its psychometric properties have not yet been examined.Objective : This article reports on two studies testing the reliability of the scale.Method : Study 1 focuses on 5,401 COMIDs completed by home care nurses in their usual practice. The internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. Study 2 focuses on 38 COMIDs, completed by home care nurses (rater group 1) and specialized nurses (rater group 2). Inter-rater agreement was examined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Results : The COMID has an acceptable internal consistency α = 0.797 and an excellent inter-rater agreement ICC = 0.839.Discussion : The metrological properties of the COMID will need to be complemented by an analysis of its validity. Conclusion : The COMID has good measurement accuracy and therefore has good potential for identifying complexity in nursing practice.