Patient education after amputation: Systematic review and experts’ opinions

Care Priorities for Individuals with Lower Extremity Amputations: A Patient Delphi Study

OBJECTIVE

To gather preliminary evidence on short- and long-term care priorities for people with lower extremity amputations.

DESIGN

A three-round modified Delphi study using semi-structured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 20 adult participants who had undergone lower extremity amputations at a tertiary public hospital.

MAIN MEASURE

Consensus on each care priority was defined a priori as an agreement of more than 50%. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the rationales for endorsing the care priorities.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 24 short-term care priorities and 12 long-term care priorities in the biomedical, practical and psychological and spiritual domains. The rationales for endorsing each of the care priorities generated three themes: preparedness; mental health, psychological and spiritual well-being; and participating in life, with respect and dignity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the substantial need to improve patient access to education and planning support prior to undergoing limb amputation, and optimising post-amputation rehabilitation programmes, enabling people with amputations to participate in meaningful life roles that provide them with purpose, dignity, and self-respect. The knowledge of care priorities revealed in this study may promote effective patient-centred care and improve clinical outcomes.

The experience of self-managing from the perspective of persons with lower limb loss, prosthetists, and physical therapists

PURPOSE

Persons with lower limb loss (PwLLL) must self-manage their residual limb and their prosthesis to prevent self-management related complications (SMRC). However, the experience of PwLLL as it relates to self-management has not been reported. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore the experience of self-management from the perspective of PwLLL, prosthetists, and physical therapists.

METHODS

This study had a qualitative design. Twenty-three participants were interviewed (PwLLL = 10, prosthetists = 7, physical therapists = 6). Interviews were transcribed and then coded using constant comparison.

RESULTS

Four prominent themes were developed from the transcripts: (1) embodying the duty of self-management, (2) being a vigilant self-advocate, (3) setting goals collaboratively, and (4) making informed decisions. Each of the four themes were influenced by the health beliefs of the PwLLL, specifically motivation and presence of an internal locus of control.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should emphasize the therapeutic relationship, including open communication, collaborative goal setting, and promoting an internal locus of control in interactions with PwLLL, as it may play a role in decreasing SMRC and improving clinical outcomes.Implications for rehabilitationSelf-management is a crucial aspect of preventing secondary complications associated with limb loss and prosthesis use.Self-management requires an internal locus of control, problem-solving abilities, and foundational knowledgeClinicians can promote self-management through collaborative goal setting and systematic education.

Development and validation of the Self-Management Assessment for the Residuum and prosThesis system designed for persons with limb loss (SMART)

OBJECTIVE

To develop a system of reliable and valid knowledge assessments of self-management in persons with lower limb loss, along with the accompanying targeted educational interventions (TEIs), known as the Self-Management Assessment for the Residuum and prosThesis (SMART) system.

DESIGN

This 2-phase study used mixed methodology. Phase 1 was development, face validation, and content validation of the 60-item knowledge assessment measure (SMART 60) and the TEI. Phase 2 assessed internal consistency reliability using Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 and the creation of the SMART system, consisting of modules developed from the SMART 60. Validity of the measures using known groups' comparison was analyzed by comparing clinicians (prosthetists and physical therapists) with persons with lower limb loss. Participants were recruited from the Amputee Coalition National Conference in 2018 and 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 140 participants completed this study. Four modules from the SMART 60 were created and designed to integrate as a system. Face validity survey average scores found that 9/10 participants either agreed or strongly agreed that the SMART system has high readability, perceived usefulness, and value for both new and experienced prosthetic users. Measure length ranged from 10 to 45 items with a reliability ranging from Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 = 0.70-0.82. The SMART system demonstrated known-groups validity ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The SMART system is an integrated series of self-management knowledge assessments with reasonable to good internal consistency reliability and known-groups validity. The TEIs provide directed solutions to identified knowledge gaps on the assessments.

Socioecological model-based design and implementation principles of lower limb preservation programs as partners for limb-loss rehabilitation programs- A mini-review

People with lower limb loss, especially of dysvascular etiology, are at substantial risk for both ipsilateral and contralateral reamputation. Additionally, while not as well documented for reamputation, there is recognition that amputation incidence is influenced by not only sociodemographic factors such as sex, race, socioeconomic status, but also by system factors such as service access. A systems strategy to address this disparity within the field of limb-loss rehabilitation is for Limb-loss Rehabilitation Programs (LRP) to partner with medical specialists, mental health professionals, and Limb Preservation Programs (LPP) to provide comprehensive limb care. While LPPs exist around the nation, design principles for such programs and their partnership role with LRPs are not well established. Using a socioecological model to incorporate hierarchical stakeholder perspectives inherent in the multidisciplinary field of limb care, this review synthesizes the latest evidence to focus on LPP design and implementation principles that can help policymakers, healthcare organizations and limb-loss rehabilitation and limb-preservation professionals to develop, implement, and sustain robust LPP programs in partnership with LRPs.

Gülhane lower extremity amputee rehabilitation protocol: A nationwide, 123-year experience

Amputation, one of the oldest known surgical procedures, causes many physical, mental and sociological problems. With its 123 years of experience, Gülhane has a special knowledge and experience, particularly in amputation. The main purpose of this protocol is to reveal the steps to be followed in individuals with lower extremity amputation. In this way, it is aimed to create a resource which can be used by our colleagues who have difficulties in using an appropriate approach due to the lack of experience.

Development of shared decision-making resources to help inform difficult healthcare decisions: An example focused on dysvascular partial foot and transtibial amputations

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making is a consultative process designed to encourage patient participation in decision making by providing accurate information about the treatment options and supporting deliberation with the clinicians about treatment options. The process can be supported by resources such as decision aids and discussion guides designed to inform and facilitate often difficult conversations. As this process increases in use, there is opportunity to raise awareness of shared decision making and the international standards used to guide the development of quality resources for use in areas of prosthetic/orthotic care.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the process used to develop shared decision-making resources, using an illustrative example focused on decisions about the level of dysvascular partial foot amputation or transtibial amputation. Development process: The International Patient Decision Aid Standards were used to guide the development of the decision aid and discussion guide focused on decisions about the level of dysvascular partial foot amputation or transtibial amputation. Examples from these shared decision-making resources help illuminate the stages of development including scoping and design, research synthesis, iterative development of a prototype, and preliminary testing with patients and clinicians not involved in the development process.

CONCLUSION

Lessons learnt through the process, such as using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards checklist and development guidelines, may help inform others wanting to develop similar shared decision-making resources given the applicability of shared decision making to many areas of prosthetic-/orthotic-related practice. Clinical relevance Shared decision making is a process designed to guide conversations that help patients make an informed decision about their healthcare. Raising awareness of shared decision making and the international standards for development of high-quality decision aids and discussion guides is important as the approach is introduced in prosthetic-/orthotic-related practice.