[Dual-time point images of the liver with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in suspected recurrence from colorectal cancer]

Metabolic changes in breast cancer on dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging according to primary tumor uptake and background parenchymal enhancement

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed at investigating metabolic changes in breast cancer on dual-time-point ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging (DTPI) according to primary tumor uptake and determining whether this technique is affected by background parenchymal enhancement (BPE).

METHODS

A total of 189 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent DTPI examination were retrospectively evaluated. DTPI was performed using a standard FDG/PET protocol followed by delayed image acquisition at 120 min after injection. Patients were divided into two groups according to primary tumor uptake as breast cancer with low maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) (< 2.5) and high SUVmax (≥ 2.5). The maximal SUV of the primary breast tumor (T-SUVmax), contralateral breast parenchyma uptake (B-SUVmax) according to different BPE grades, tumor to background ratio (T/B-SUVmax), and their percentage changes between early and delayed images (retention index, RI) were calculated.

RESULTS

For primary tumor uptake, tumors with high SUV had a significant increase in mean T-SUVmax between early and delayed images (8.17 vs. 9.16, P < 0.001), and %RI T-SUVmax was 10.52%. Conversely, mean T-SUVmax did not change between early and delayed images for tumors with low SUV (1.96 vs. 1.94, P = 0.610), and %RI T-SUVmax was - 1.41%. The mean %RI B-SUVmax was - 12.43% for minimal BPE, - 14.19% for mild BPE, - 19.49% for moderate BPE, and - 21.25% for marked BPE grade, indicating that higher BPE grades undergo better washouts on delayed imaging (β = - 3.220, P < 0.001 for trend). The %RI T/B-SUVmax of both breast cancer groups with low SUV and high SUV was 18.86% and 32.47%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer with low SUV undergoes no significant change in SUV on DTPI; however, washing of background parenchymal activity was evident over time, resulting in significantly increased tumor contrast in delayed images, which leads to increased sensitivity. Breast parenchymal washout was more significant with increased BPE level. Therefore, DTPI is expected to be more useful for evaluating breast lesions in regions with marked BPE on MRI.

Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?

Prior reports have demonstrated the improved ability of delayed fluorine-18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging (dual-time-point imaging) in detecting more patients with liver metastases. To evaluate whether routine triple-time-point FDG PET/CT imaging improves the detection of liver metastasis not visualized on initial imaging. To our knowledge, no triple-time-point imaging has been reported. This retrospective study included total 310 patients with various malignancies who underwent PET/CT scans. Triple-time-point imaging including the liver was obtained. The comparison between negative and positive liver lesions on delayed imaging for patients with initial negative imaging were analyzed. Of the 310 patients, 286 did not exhibit liver lesions on initial imaging, but six of the 286 patients exhibited lesions on delayed imaging. No additional liver lesions were detected on further delayed imaging in the 286 patients. The other 24 patients with liver lesions identified on initial imaging still showed lesions on delayed and further delayed imaging. The analysis showed a significant difference in the percentage of colorectal cancer (66.7%) and liver lesions before the PET scan (50.0%) compared with unchanged results (22.1% and 3.9%, respectively). Routine triple-time-point imaging did not improve the detection of liver metastases; however, it may be recommended in patients with colorectal cancer and liver lesions before the PET scan.

Relationship Between Dual Time Point FDG PET/CT and Clinical Prognostic Indexes in Patients with High Grade Lymphoma: a Pilot Study

Purpose

This study investigated the correlative relationship between metabolic parameters estimated from dual time point 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F] fluoro-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) and the clinical tools predicting the outcome of a lymphoma. We also measured metabolic and volumetric alterations between early and delayed ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with high grade lymphoma (HGL).

Methods

The samples were 122 lymph nodes and extralymphatic lesions from 26 patients diagnosed with HGL. All patients were applied to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), Ann Arbor stage, and revised IPI as clinical prognostic parameters. ¹⁸F-FDG dual time point PET/CT (DTPFP) consisted of an early scan 1 h after ¹⁸F-FDG injection and a delayed scan 2 h after the early scan. Based on an analysis of DTPFP, we estimated the standardized uptake value (SUV) of tumors from the early and delayed scans, retention index (RI) representing the percentage change between early and delayed SUV, and metabolic volume different index (MVDI) calculated using metabolic tumor volumes (MTV).

Results

RI_max showed a multiple positive correlative relationship with stage and IPI in lesion-by-lesion analysis (p < 0.01). In the case of IPI, the high risk group exhibited higher RI_max than the low risk group (p = 0.004). In the case of revised IPI, the RI_max of the low risk group were significantly lower than the intermediate and high risk groups, respectively (p < 0.01). The MVDIs of the best outcome group were decreased in comparison to the moderate outcome group (p = 0.029). There was a significant negative correlative relationship between RI_max and MVDI, and the inclinations for decreased MVDIs were slightly associated with increased RIs.

Conclusions

RI_max extracted from DTPFP had a significant relationship to extranodal involvement, staging, IPI, and revised IPI. MVDI showed significant negative correlation with RI_max. Further large scale studies are warranted to support and extend these preliminary results.

18F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals derived from a single-institution 18F-FDG-directed surgery experience: feasibility and quantification of 18F-FDG accumulation within 18F-FDG-avid lesions and background tissues

Background

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established imaging modality for a wide variety of solid malignancies. Currently, only limited data exists regarding the utility of PET/CT imaging at very extended injection-to-scan acquisition times. The current retrospective data analysis assessed the feasibility and quantification of diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals.

Methods

¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesions (not surgically manipulated or altered during ¹⁸F-FDG-directed surgery, and visualized both on preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging) and corresponding background tissues were assessed for ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation on same-day preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Multiple patient variables and ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion variables were examined.

Results

For the 32 ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesions making up the final ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion data set (from among 7 patients), the mean injection-to-scan times of the preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were 73 (±3, 70-78) and 530 (±79, 413-739) minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion SUV_max values were 7.7 (±4.0, 3.6-19.5) and 11.3 (±6.0, 4.1-29.2), respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean background SUV_max values were 2.3 (±0.6, 1.0-3.2) and 2.1 (±0.6, 1.0-3.3), respectively (P = 0.017). The preoperative and postoperative mean lesion-to-background SUV_max ratios were 3.7 (±2.3, 1.5-9.8) and 5.8 (±3.6, 1.6-16.2), respectively, (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging can be successfully performed at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals of up to approximately 5 half-lives for ¹⁸F-FDG while maintaining good/adequate diagnostic image quality. The resultant increase in the ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion SUV_max values, decreased background SUV_max values, and increased lesion-to-background SUV_max ratios seen from preoperative to postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging have great potential for allowing for the integrated, real-time use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging in conjunction with ¹⁸F-FDG-directed interventional radiology biopsy and ablation procedures and ¹⁸F-FDG-directed surgical procedures, as well as have far-reaching impact on potentially re-shaping future thinking regarding the “most optimal” injection-to-scan acquisition time interval for all routine diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging.

When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET?

FDG PET and PET/CT are now widely used in oncological imaging for tumor characterization, staging, restaging, and response evaluation. However, numerous benign etiologies may cause increased FDG uptake indistinguishable from that of malignancy. Multiple studies have shown that dual time-point imaging (DTPI) of FDG PET may be helpful in differentiating malignancy from benign processes. However, exceptions exist, and some studies have demonstrated significant overlap of FDG uptake patterns between benign and malignant lesions on delayed time-point images. In this review, we summarize our experience and opinions on the value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging in oncology, with a review of the relevant literature. We believe that the major value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging is the increased sensitivity due to continued clearance of background activity and continued FDG accumulation in malignant lesions, if the same diagnostic criteria (as in the initial standard single time-point imaging) are used. The specificity of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging depends on multiple factors, including the prevalence of malignancies, the patient population, and the cut-off values (either SUV or retention index) used to define a malignancy. Thus, DTPI and delayed time-point imaging would be more useful if performed for evaluation of lesions in regions with significant background activity clearance over time (such as the liver, the spleen, the mediastinum), and if used in the evaluation of the extent of tumor involvement rather than in the characterization of the nature of any specific lesion. Acute infectious and non-infectious inflammatory lesions remain as the major culprit for diminished diagnostic performance of these approaches (especially in tuberculosis-endemic regions). Tumor heterogeneity may also contribute to inconsistent performance of DTPI. The authors believe that selective use of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging will improve diagnostic accuracy and interpretation confidence in FDG PET imaging.