[Utility of the PET/CT in vulvar cancer management]

Clinical and prognostic 18F-FDG PET/CT role in recurrent vulvar cancer: a multicentric experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to investigate the diagnostic performance, the prognostic value and the impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on treatment decision-making in patients with suspected recurrent vulvar cancer (VC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three patients affected by VC performed 18F-FDG-PET/CT for restaging purposes in case of suspected clinical and/or radiological recurrence. Histopatology results if available and/or clinical-imaging follow-up for at least 12 months were considered as reference standard. The diagnostic accuracy and the clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT were investigated. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Fifty-two (82.5%) PET/CT showed the presence of recurrence, while the remaining 11 (17.5%) were negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PET/CT were 100% (95%CI 93-100%), 92% (95%CI 62-100%), 98% (95%CI 89-99%), 100% and 98% (95%CI 92-100%). A relevant impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was registered in 28 cases: in 12 cases moving from local therapy to chemotherapy due to the recognition of disseminate localizations; in 10 showing the site of recurrence in presence of negative conventional imaging, and in 6 cases confirming to be true negative and avoiding unnecessary therapies. Beside advanced age and HPV status, a positive restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was significantly correlated with shorter PFS and OS compared to negative scan (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated to be an accurate tool in the assessing of recurrent VC with high sensitivity and specificity and with a significant impact on clinical decision-making. Restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were associated with survival.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography for inguinal nodes in vulvar cancer

We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the spread of disease to inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer. A retrospective review of vulvar cancer patients who underwent both inguinal nodal sampling and dissection as well as FDG PET-CT was performed, with 21 patients meeting criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the FDG PET-CT imaging was performed using a combination of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Using an SUV_maxcutoff of 4.5 or of two times the average liver uptake, we had a 100% sensitivity and 89% specificity for positive inguinal nodes. MTV and TLG did not add to sensitivity or specificity. We conclude that FDG PET-CT has good sensitivity for inguinal nodal spread in vulvar cancer, and either a quantitative or semiquantitative approach is effective.

18F-FDG PET/CT in preoperative staging of vulvar cancer patients: is it really effective?

The aim of this study was to assess the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in preoperative staging of vulvar cancer patients.29 pts (69 years, range 51-88) with vulvar cancer (clinical apparent stage I-II), underwent preoperative FDG-PET/CT scan followed by radical vulvectomy and bilateral (or monolateral in case of tumor >2 cm from midline) inguinal lymphadenectomy ± sentinel node biopsy. PET/CT images were analyzed in consensus and correlated to histological findings according to a pt-based and a groin-based analyses. SUVmax of the nodal uptake of each inguinal area (if present) was calculated and correlated to histological findings. The presence of distant metastases was also considered and confirmed.PET/CT analysis in consensus resulted negative at the inguinal LN level in 17 pts (10 true negative, 7 false negative) and positive in 12 pts (7 true positive, 5 false positive). Incidence of LN metastases resulted 48%. On pt-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive value of PET/CT in detecting LN metastases were 50%, 67%, 59%, 59%, and 58%, respectively. On a groin-based analysis, considering overall 50 LN-sites, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive value of PET/CT were 53%, 85%, 73%, 67%, and 76%, respectively. The mean value of SUVmax was 6.1 (range 0.7-16.2) for metastatic nodes, whereas 1.6 (range 0.7 - 5.4) for negative lymph-nodes (P = .007). PET/CT detected pelvic (n = 1) and both pelvic/paraortic (n = 1) nodal metastases.In clinical early stage vulvar cancer FDG PET/CT showed low sensitivity and moderate specificity for N-staging; therefore, it is not an accurate tool for the nodal status assessment. PET/CT may not be cost-effective in detecting the rare event of distant metastases, but further studies are needed.

Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced and recurrent vulvar cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to report our experience with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) in locally advanced and recurrent vulvar cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2014, fourteen women with locally advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer were treated using HDR-ISBT in our Centre. High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy was performed as a separate treatment or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (given prior to brachytherapy).

RESULTS

Patients were divided into: group I (n = 6) with locally advanced tumors, stages III-IVA after an incisional biopsy only, and group II (n = 8) with recurrent vulvar cancer after previous radical surgery. In group I, median follow up was 12 months (range 7-18 months); 1-year overall survival (OS) was 83%. Transient arrest of cancer growth or tumor regression was noticed in all patients but 4/6 developed relapse. Median time to failure was 6.3 months (range 3-11 months). The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 33%. In group II, median follow up was 28 months (range 13-90 months). The 1-year and 3-year OS was 100% and 80%, respectively. The arrest of cancer growth or tumor regression was achieved in all patients. In 4/8 patients neither clinical nor histological symptoms of relapse were observed but 4/8 women experienced relapse. Median time to failure was 31 months (range 13-76 months). The 1-year and 3-year PFS was 100% and 62.5%, respectively. Two patients (14.3%) in group II had severe late toxicity (G3).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy is a well-tolerated treatment option in selected patients with advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer. It is a safe and effective treatment modality for advanced and recurrent vulvar cancer, yielding good local control with acceptable late treatment related side effects. In our study, patients with recurrent vulvar cancer had better results in HDR-ISBT treatment, probably because of the smaller tumor volume. This hypothesis should be verified in a larger group of patients.

The impact of FDG-PET/CT in the management of patients with vulvar and vaginal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the changes in prognostic impression and patient management following PET/CT in patients with vulvar and vaginal carcinoma; and to compare PET/CT findings with those of conventional imaging modalities.

METHODS

We summarized prospectively and retrospectively collected data for 50 consecutive patients from our institution that enrolled in the National Oncologic PET Registry and underwent FDG-PET/CT for a suspected or known primary or recurrent vulvar/vaginal cancer.

RESULTS

54/83 (65%) studies included had a diagnosis of vulvar cancer, and the remaining 29/83 (35%), a diagnosis of vaginal cancer. Following FDG-PET/CT, the physician's prognostic impression changed in 51% of cases. A change in patient management, defined as a change to/from a non-interventional strategy (observation or additional imaging), to/from an interventional strategy (biopsy or treatment), was documented in 36% of studies. The electronic records demonstrated that 95% of the management strategies recorded in the physician questionnaires were implemented as planned. MRI and/or CT were performed within one month of the FDG-PET/CT in 20/83 (24%) and 28/83 (34%) cases, respectively. FDG-PET/CT detected nodes suspicious for metastases on 29/83 (35%) studies performed. MRI and CT detected positive nodes on 6 and 11 studies respectively. Distant metastases were identified in 10 cases imaged with FDG-PET and 5 cases that had additional conventional CT imaging. All suspicious lesions seen on CT were positively identified on PET/CT. In 4 cases, an abnormality identified on PET/CT, was not seen on diagnostic CT.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT may play an important role in the management of vulvar and vaginal carcinoma.