1
|
Boekestijn I, van Oosterom MN, Dell'Oglio P, van Velden FHP, Pool M, Maurer T, Rietbergen DDD, Buckle T, van Leeuwen FWB. The current status and future prospects for molecular imaging-guided precision surgery. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:48. [PMID: 36068619 PMCID: PMC9446692 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00482-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging technologies are increasingly used to diagnose, monitor, and guide treatment of i.e., cancer. In this review, the current status and future prospects of the use of molecular imaging as an instrument to help realize precision surgery is addressed with focus on the main components that form the conceptual basis of intraoperative molecular imaging. Paramount for successful interventions is the relevance and accessibility of surgical targets. In addition, selection of the correct combination of imaging agents and modalities is critical to visualize both microscopic and bulk disease sites with high affinity and specificity. In this context developments within engineering/imaging physics continue to drive the growth of image-guided surgery. Particularly important herein is enhancement of sensitivity through improved contrast and spatial resolution, features that are critical if sites of cancer involvement are not to be overlooked during surgery. By facilitating the connection between surgical planning and surgical execution, digital surgery technologies such as computer-aided visualization nicely complement these technologies. The complexity of image guidance, combined with the plurality of technologies that are becoming available, also drives the need for evaluation mechanisms that can objectively score the impact that technologies exert on the performance of healthcare professionals and outcome improvement for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imke Boekestijn
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Floris H P van Velden
- Medical Physics, Department of Radiology , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Pool
- Department of Clinical Farmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa Buckle
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sier VQ, van der Vorst JR, Quax PHA, de Vries MR, Zonoobi E, Vahrmeijer AL, Dekkers IA, de Geus-Oei LF, Smits AM, Cai W, Sier CFM, Goumans MJTH, Hawinkels LJAC. Endoglin/CD105-Based Imaging of Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:4804. [PMID: 33946583 PMCID: PMC8124553 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging of pathologic lesions can improve efficient detection of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. A shared pathophysiological feature is angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels. Endoglin (CD105) is a coreceptor for ligands of the Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) family and is highly expressed on angiogenic endothelial cells. Therefore, endoglin-based imaging has been explored to visualize lesions of the aforementioned diseases. This systematic review highlights the progress in endoglin-based imaging of cancer, atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and aortic aneurysm, focusing on positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, and ultrasound imaging. PubMed was searched combining the following subjects and their respective synonyms or relevant subterms: "Endoglin", "Imaging/Image-guided surgery". In total, 59 papers were found eligible to be included: 58 reporting about preclinical animal or in vitro models and one ex vivo study in human organs. In addition to exact data extraction of imaging modality type, tumor or cardiovascular disease model, and tracer (class), outcomes were described via a narrative synthesis. Collectively, the data identify endoglin as a suitable target for intraoperative and diagnostic imaging of the neovasculature in tumors, whereas for cardiovascular diseases, the evidence remains scarce but promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Q. Sier
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (V.Q.S.); (J.R.v.d.V.); (P.H.A.Q.); (M.R.d.V.); (E.Z.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Joost R. van der Vorst
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (V.Q.S.); (J.R.v.d.V.); (P.H.A.Q.); (M.R.d.V.); (E.Z.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Paul H. A. Quax
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (V.Q.S.); (J.R.v.d.V.); (P.H.A.Q.); (M.R.d.V.); (E.Z.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Margreet R. de Vries
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (V.Q.S.); (J.R.v.d.V.); (P.H.A.Q.); (M.R.d.V.); (E.Z.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Elham Zonoobi
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (V.Q.S.); (J.R.v.d.V.); (P.H.A.Q.); (M.R.d.V.); (E.Z.); (A.L.V.)
- Edinburgh Molecular Imaging Ltd. (EMI), Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Alexander L. Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (V.Q.S.); (J.R.v.d.V.); (P.H.A.Q.); (M.R.d.V.); (E.Z.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Ilona A. Dekkers
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands;
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Anke M. Smits
- Department of Cell & Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (A.M.S.); (M.J.T.H.G.)
| | - Weibo Cai
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA;
| | - Cornelis F. M. Sier
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (V.Q.S.); (J.R.v.d.V.); (P.H.A.Q.); (M.R.d.V.); (E.Z.); (A.L.V.)
- Percuros B.V., 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marie José T. H. Goumans
- Department of Cell & Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (A.M.S.); (M.J.T.H.G.)
| | - Lukas J. A. C. Hawinkels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Collamati F, van Oosterom MN, De Simoni M, Faccini R, Fischetti M, Mancini Terracciano C, Mirabelli R, Moretti R, Heuvel JO, Solfaroli Camillocci E, van Beurden F, van der Poel HG, Valdes Olmos RA, van Leeuwen PJ, van Leeuwen FWB, Morganti S. A DROP-IN beta probe for robot-assisted 68Ga-PSMA radioguided surgery: first ex vivo technology evaluation using prostate cancer specimens. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:92. [PMID: 32761408 PMCID: PMC7410888 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00682-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, a flexible DROP-IN gamma-probe was introduced for robot-assisted radioguided surgery, using traditional low-energy SPECT-isotopes. In parallel, a novel approach to achieve sensitive radioguidance using beta-emitting PET isotopes has been proposed. Integration of these two concepts would allow to exploit the use of PET tracers during robot-assisted tumor-receptor-targeted. In this study, we have engineered and validated the performance of a novel DROP-IN beta particle (DROP-INβ) detector. METHODS Seven prostate cancer patients with PSMA-PET positive tumors received an additional intraoperative injection of ~ 70 MBq 68Ga-PSMA-11, followed by robot-assisted prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The surgical specimens from these procedures were used to validate the performance of our DROP-INβ probe prototype, which merged a scintillating detector with a housing optimized for a 12-mm trocar and prograsp instruments. RESULTS After optimization of the detector and probe housing via Monte Carlo simulations, the resulting DROP-INβ probe prototype was tested in a robotic setting. In the ex vivo setting, the probe-positioned by the robot-was able to identify 68Ga-PSMA-11 containing hot-spots in the surgical specimens: signal-to-background (S/B) was > 5 when pathology confirmed that the tumor was located < 1 mm below the specimen surface. 68Ga-PSMA-11 containing (and PET positive) lymph nodes, as found in two patients, were also confirmed with the DROP-INβ probe (S/B > 3). The rotational freedom of the DROP-IN design and the ability to manipulate the probe with the prograsp tool allowed the surgeon to perform autonomous beta-tracing. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of beta-radioguided surgery in a robotic context by means of a DROP-INβ detector. When translated to an in vivo setting in the future, this technique could provide a valuable tool in detecting tumor remnants on the prostate surface and in confirmation of PSMA-PET positive lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Collamati
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Matthias N. van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Micol De Simoni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Faccini
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Fischetti
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Di Scienze di Base Applicate per l’Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Mancini Terracciano
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mirabelli
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Moretti
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Scuola di specializzazione in Fisica Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Judith olde Heuvel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Solfaroli Camillocci
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Scuola di specializzazione in Fisica Medica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Florian van Beurden
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Renato A. Valdes Olmos
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Section Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W. B. van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Silvio Morganti
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bowles H, Ambrosioni J, Mestres G, Hernández-Meneses M, Sánchez N, Llopis J, Yugueros X, Almela M, Moreno A, Riambau V, Fuster D, Miró JM. Diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspected diagnosis of vascular graft infection: A prospective cohort study. J Nucl Cardiol 2020; 27:294-302. [PMID: 29907934 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-1337-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) is a severe complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. Clinical diagnosis is complex, requiring image testing such as CT angiography or leukocyte scintigraphy, which has considerable limitations. The aim of this study was to know the diagnostic yield of PET/CT with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in patients with suspected PVGI. METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study including 49 patients with suspected PVGI, median age of 62 ± 14 years. Three uptake patterns were defined following published recommendations: (i) focal, (ii) patched (PVGI criteria), and (iii) diffuse (no PVGI criterion). RESULTS Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for 18F-FDG-PET/CT were 88%, 79%, 67%, and 93%, respectively. 18F-FDG-PET/CT identified 14/16 cases of PVGI showing a focal (n = 10) or patched pattern (n = 4), being true negative in 26/33 cases with either a diffuse pattern (n = 16) or without uptake (n = 10). Five of the seven false-positive cases (71%) showed a patched pattern and all coincided with the application of adhesives for PVG placement. CONCLUSIONS 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a useful technique for the diagnosis of PVGI. A patched pattern on PET/CT in patients in whom adhesives were applied for prosthetic vascular graft placement does not indicate infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Bowles
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Ambrosioni
- Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gaspar Mestres
- Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Nuria Sánchez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaime Llopis
- Statistics Department, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Yugueros
- Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Almela
- Clinical Microbiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Asunción Moreno
- Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vicenç Riambau
- Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Fuster
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jose M Miró
- Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|