GnRH antagonist and letrozole co-treatment in diminished ovarian reserve patients: a proof-of-concept study

Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improves diminished ovarian reserve clinical and in silico studies

The therapeutic role of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation among infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is still unclear. Objective evaluation of different ovarian reserve tests (ORTs) such as serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and antral follicle count (AFC) in women with diminished ovarian reserve is required. This is a cross-sectional study performed in Mosul city, Iraq, with 122 infertile women who had been diagnosed with DOR. The enrolled women's age ranged from 18 to 45 years old (mean age of 29.46 ± 2.64 years). The ages of the enrolled women ranged from 18 to 45 years (mean age of 29.46 ± 2.64 years). To assess the influence of DHEA supplements (25 mg, three times/day for 12 weeks) across different age groups, the women were initially divided into three groups (18 to 27 years old, 28 to 37 years old, and ≥ 38 years old). Significant differences were noticed in AMH, FSH, level and AFC before and after DHEA supplementation. (AMH: 0.64 ± 0.82 vs. 1.98 ± 1.32, AFC: 2.86 ± 0.64 vs. 5.82 ± 2.42, and FSH: 12.44 ± 3.85 vs. 8.12 ± 4.64), statistically obvious significant differences regarding the results of AMH (p < 0.001), AFC (p < 0.001), and FSH (p < 0.001). DHEA supplementations improved the ovarian reserve of the enrolled women, which was more evident in younger women (<38 years old) than older women (≥38 years old). The AMH serum levels and AFC value can be considered the best, most reliable and significant OR parameters. However, large randomized multicenter studies are required to confirm the available results and data.

Use of gonadotropins in ovarian stimulation in Spain: Delphi consensus

Two-round Delphi study carried out in Spain. Three theme-based blocks were set out: 1) Patient profiles: therapeutic goal and parameters to be analysed according to POSEIDON patient profiles; 2) Ovarian stimulation protocols with antagonists: monotherapy (FSH) vs combined therapy (FSH + LH/HMG); 3) Safety and effectiveness of the devices. The antral follicle count and the anti-Müllerian hormone level were considered indicators that can be used to predict ovarian response. More than 80% of the participants agreed that FSH monotherapy is the recommended regimen in normal/hyper-responsive patients of < 35 years of age; that 150-300 IU is the dose to be used in ovarian stimulation in monotherapy depending on clinical parameters; and that FSH monotherapy improves patients' comfort compared to two combined drugs. It was unanimously considered that the type of device used by the patient influences the comfort of the treatment.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? There is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment for controlled ovarian stimulation for patients undergoing IVF which leads to highly variable clinical practices.What the results of this study add? This study's strong point is that, since it is a consensus, it has been possible to include more topics than would normally be dealt with in a systematic review or guidelines, which are generally based on a strict method that restricts the scope of the research. Experts have reached a consensus on most of the statements and based on these they have issued consensus statements that will enable the optimal use of gonadotropins in IVF.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This Delphi consensus provides a real-life clinical perspective on gonadotropin usage in IVF.

Efficacy of the depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol on in vitro fertilization outcomes in young poor ovarian responders from POSEIDON group 3

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol could improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for young poor responders from POSEIDON group 3.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out from June 2017 to June 2020. A total of 451 patients were assigned to three groups depending on the ovarian stimulation protocols. The outcome parameters of IVF were compared in each group.

RESULTS

Patients who received the depot GnRH agonist had significantly higher cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (50.88%, 32.02%, and 31.88%, respectively; P = 0.009 and P = 0.007) and cumulative live birth rate (48.25%, 26.97%, and 28.99%, respectively; P = 0.004 and P = 0.009) compared with mild ovarian stimulation protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol. They also had higher live birth rate per fresh embryo transfer cycle (47.78%, 32.35%, and 36.62%, respectively), but these differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, duration of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropins and endometrial thickness were significantly higher among women who received the depot GnRH agonist (P < 0.001). However, they had lower embryo transfer cancellation rate, and abnormal endometrium rate (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The depot GnRH agonist protocol may improve cumulative clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate for young women with poor ovarian response from POSEIDON group 3.

A large observational data study supporting the PROsPeR score classification in poor ovarian responders according to live birth outcome

STUDY QUESTION

Can the Poor Responder Outcome Prediction (PROsPeR) score identify live birth outcomes in subpopulations of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) defined according to the ESHRE Bologna criteria (female age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), number of oocytes retrieved during the previous cycle (PNO) after treatment with originator recombinant human follitropin alfa?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The PROsPeR score discriminated the probability of live birth in patients with POR using observational data with fair discrimination (AUC ≅ 70%) and calibration, and the AUC losing less than 5% precision compared with a model developed using the observational data.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Although scoring systems for the likelihood of live birth after ART have been developed, their accuracy may be insufficient, as they have generally been developed in the general population with infertility and were not validated for patients with POR. The PROsPeR score was developed using data from the follitropin alfa (GONAL-f; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) arm of the Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ESPART) randomized controlled trial (RCT) and classifies women with POR as mild, moderate or severe, based upon three variables: female age, serum AMH level and number of oocytes retrieved during the previous cycle (PNO).

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The external validation of the PROsPeR score was completed using data derived from eight different centres in France. In addition, the follitropin alfa data from the ESPART RCT, originally used to develop the PROsPeR score, were used as reference cohort. The external validation of the PROsPeR score l was assessed using AUC. A predetermined non-inferiority limit of 0.10 compared with a reference sample and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) were the two conditions required for evaluation.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The observational cohort included data from 8085 ART treatment cycles performed with follitropin alfa in patients with POR defined according to the ESHRE Bologna criteria (17.6% of the initial data set). The ESPART cohort included 477 ART treatment cycles with ovarian stimulation performed with follitropin alfa in patients with POR.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The external validation of the PROsPeR score to identify subpopulations of women with POR with different live birth outcomes was shown in the observational cohort (AUC = 0.688; 95% CI: 0.662, 0.714) compared with the ESPART cohort (AUC = 0.695; 95% CI: 0.623, 0.767). The AUC difference was -0.0074 (95% CI: -0.083, 0.0689). This provided evidence, with 97.5% one-sided confidence, that there was a maximum estimated loss of 8.4% in discrimination between the observational cohort and the ESPART cohort, which was below the predetermined margin of 10%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test did not reject the calibration when comparing observed and predicted data (Hosmer-Lemeshow test = 1.266688; P = 0.260).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study was based on secondary use of data that had not been collected specifically for the analysis reported here and the number of characteristics used to classify women with POR was limited to the available data. The data were from a limited number of ART centres in a single country, which may present a bias risk; however, baseline patient data were similar to other POR studies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This evaluation of the PROsPeR score using observational data supports the notion that the likelihood of live birth may be calculated with reasonable precision using three readily available pieces of data (female age, serum AMH and PNO). The PROsPeR score has potential to be used to discriminate expected probability of live birth according to the degree of POR (mild, moderate, severe) after treatment with follitropin alfa, enabling comparison of performance at one centre over time and the comparison between centres.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This analysis was funded by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. P.L. received grants from Merck KGaA, outside of the submitted work. N.M. reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck KGaA outside the submitted work. T.D.H. is Vice President and Head of Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development at Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. P.A. has received personal fees from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, outside the submitted work. C.R. has received grants and personal fees from Gedeon Richter and Merck Serono S.A.S., France, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, outside the submitted work. P.S. reports congress support from Merck Serono S.A.S., France (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Gedeon Richter, TEVA and MDS outside the submitted work. C.A., J.P., G.P. and R.W. declare no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

The POSEIDON stratification - moving from poor ovarian response to low prognosis

Poor ovarian response remains one of the most challenging tasks for an IVF clinician. In this review, we aim to highlight the ongoing research for optimizing the prognosis in poor ovarian response patients. The newly introduced POSEIDON criteria argue that the first step is to move from a poor response to a poor prognosis concept, while improving identification and stratification of the different sub-types of poor prognosis patients prior to ovarian stimulation. The immediate marker of success is the ability of the ovarian stimulation to retrieve the number of oocytes needed to obtain at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer in each patient. This surrogate marker of success should not replace live birth as the most important outcome, but it should be approached as a useful tool for clinicians to evaluate their strategy for achieving live birth in the shortest timespan possible in the individual patient/ couple.

Treatment potential of bone marrow-derived stem cells in women with diminished ovarian reserves and premature ovarian failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the techniques recently tested in both animal models and humans to provide a state-of-the-art on adult stem cell ovarian transplant to achieve ovarian rejuvenation in patients with diminished ovarian reserves.

RECENT FINDINGS

As the firsts reports of spontaneous pregnancies achieved after bone marrow transplantation in oncologic women with primary ovarian insufficiency, increasing evidence supports the regenerative effects of stem cell-based therapies in the ovarian niche. Adult stem cells from several origins promote follicular development, increase ovarian local vascularization, increase follicle and stromal cell proliferation and reduce cell apoptosis and follicular atresia, although they do not modify embryo quality. Therefore, residual quiescent follicles of aged or damaged ovaries might produce competent oocytes in an adequate ovarian environment. Nevertheless, further research is needed to properly evaluate underlying mechanisms, identify best cell sources and design less invasive infusion techniques.

SUMMARY

Stem cells may be a relevant therapeutic alternative for ovary regeneration and follicular development in patients with impaired ovaries, such as poor ovarian responders or women diagnosed with primary ovarian insufficiency.

Sigma-1 receptor is involved in diminished ovarian reserve possibly by influencing endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated granulosa cells apoptosis

Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 (sigma-1 receptor), a non-opioid transmembrane protein, is located on cellular mitochondrial membranes and endoplasmic reticulum. Current research has demonstrated that sigma-1 receptor is related to human degenerative diseases. This study is focused on the effects of sigma-1 receptor on the pathophysiological process of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and granulosa cells (GCs) apoptosis. Sigma-1 receptor concentration in follicular fluid (FF) and serum were negatively correlated with basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and positively correlated with anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC). Sigma-1 receptor reduction in GCs was accompanied by endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-mediated apoptosis in women with DOR. Plasmid transfection was used to establish SIGMAR1-overexpressed and SIGMAR1-knockdown human granulosa-like tumor (KGN) cell and thapsigargin (TG) was used to induce ERS KGN cells. We found that KGN cells treated with endogenous sigma-1 receptor ligand dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and sigma-1 receptor agonist PRE-084 showed similar biological effects to SIGMAR1-overexpressed KGN cells and opposite effects to SIGMAR1-knockdown KGN cells. DHEA may improve DOR patients' pregnancy outcomes by upregulating sigma-1 receptor and downregulating ERS-mediated apoptotic genes in GCs. Thus, sigma-1 receptor may be a potential ovarian reserve biomarker, and ligand-mediated sigma-1 receptor activation could be a future approach for DOR therapy.

Does freeze-all policy affect IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the freeze-all strategy affects in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome in poor ovarian responders (POR) defined according to the Bologna criteria.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing IVF treatment between January 2012 and December 2016 at a single center. A total of 433 POR (as defined by the Bologna criteria) fulfilled criteria and were included in the study; of these, 277 patients underwent fresh embryo transfer (ET) and 156 followed the freeze-all policy. All patients underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) following a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol, and cleavage-stage ET. Main outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. The freeze-all strategy was implemented when the progesterone serum level was > 1.5 ng/mL or the endometrium was < 7 mm on the trigger day, or as per patient preference. Patients with previous failed fresh ET also underwent fresh ET or freeze-all strategy considering the indications mentioned above.

RESULTS

Mean maternal age in the freeze-all group was 39.5 ± 3.6 years and in the fresh ET group was 39.7 ± 3.8 years (P = 0.54). Mean number of embryos transferred (nET) was 1.53 ± 0.6 and 1.60 ± 0.6 (P = 0.12) in the freeze-all and fresh ET groups, respectively. Ongoing pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the freeze-all and fresh ET groups (9.6% vs 10.1%, respectively; relative risk (RR), 0.95; 95% CI, 0.52-1.73), nor did the clinical pregnancy rate (14.1% vs 13.7%, respectively; RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.63-1.67). Implantation rate was 9.6% and 9.8% (P = 0.82) in the freeze-all and fresh ET groups, respectively. Logistic regression analysis (including maternal age, antral follicle count, number of retrieved and mature oocytes, nET, and fresh ET vs freeze-all strategy) indicated that maternal age (P < 0.001) and nET (P = 0.039) were the only independent variables associated with ongoing pregnancy rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The freeze-all strategy, compared with fresh ET, had no impact on IVF outcomes in POR patients as defined according to the Bologna criteria. Multicenter studies including large numbers of patients should be carried out to confirm the results of this study and reach conclusions about the potential benefits of the freeze-all policy for poor responders. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Comparison of modified agonist, mild-stimulation and antagonist protocols for in vitro fertilization in patients with diminished ovarian reserve

Objective To compare the efficacy of three protocols for ovarian stimulation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Methods This prospective randomized study enrolled patients with diminished ovarian reserve who underwent cycles of IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: a modified gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol (group A); (ii) a mild stimulation protocol (group B); or (iii) an antagonist protocol (group C). Demographic characteristics, clinical variables and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups. Results A total of 116 patients were enrolled in the study: 54 in group A, 52 in group B and 60 in group C. Group B (32.69%) had a significantly higher cycle cancellation rate compared with groups A (11.11%) and C (16.67%). The early abortion rate of group C (44.44%) was significantly higher than group A (12.50%), but not significantly different from group B (16.67%). There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates among the three groups. Conclusion A modified GnRH agonist protocol achieved a comparable pregnancy rate to those of the mild stimulation protocol and antagonist protocol, whilst having lower cycle cancellation and early abortion rates.

Utilization of the Bologna criteria: a promise unfulfilled? A review of published and unpublished/ongoing trials

OBJECTIVE

To study the use of the Bologna criteria (BC) for the definition of poor ovarian responders (POR) in clinical practice and research.

DESIGN

Systematic review of published and unpublished/ongoing trials between January 2012 and August 2017 on POR.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Not applicable.

INTERVENTION(S)

The databases were searched using the relevant medical subject headings including all subheadings. The search was limited to humans and English language. The references of the included studies were cross-searched for possibly missed articles. Only clinical trials providing an evidence level ≥ III were included. Case reports, review, letters, and hypothetical articles were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Extracted studies were divided into two groups: studies in which the BC were used or not.

RESULT(S)

One hundred nine published clinical studies analyzing a total of 30,540 women and 112 unpublished/ongoing trials were identified. The BC were used to define POR in 56 (51%) of the published and 44 (39%) of the unpublished trials. The use of the BC gradually increased from 29% to 53% from 2012 to 2017. Asian researchers were more likely to use the BC compared with European and North American researchers (65%, 49%, and 23%, respectively). Neither the design of the study nor the impact factor of the publishing journal was correlated with the use of the BC.

CONCLUSION(S)

There is still reluctance to use the BC for the definition of POR, which makes it difficult to combine data from small studies and reach a meaningful conclusion.