Importance of cardiac implantable eletronic devices in the diagnosis of Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Implantable cardiac devices in sleep apnoea diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A particularly high burden of sleep apnoea is reported in patients treated with cardiac implants such as pacemakers and defibrillators. Sleep apnoea diagnosis remains a complex procedure mainly based on sleep and respiratory indices captured by polysomnography (PSG) or respiratory polygraphy (PG).

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the performance of implantable cardiac devices for sleep apnoea diagnosis compared to reference methods.

METHOD

Systematic structured literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and. Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant studies. Quantitative characteristics of the studies were summarized and a qualitative synthesis was performed by a randomized bivariate meta-analysis and completed by pre-specified sensitivity analyses for different implant types and brands.

RESULTS

16 studies involving 999 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The majority of patients were men, of mean age of 64 ± 4.6 years. Sensitivity of cardiac implants for sleep apnoea diagnosis ranged from 60 to 100%, specificity from 50 to 100% with a prevalence of sleep apnoea varying from 22 to 91%. For an apnoea-hypopnoea index threshold ≥30 events/h during polysomnography (corresponding to severe sleep apnoea), the overall performance of the implants was relevant with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 79%. Subgroup analyses on implant type and brand provided no additional information owing to the small number of studies.

CONCLUSION

The respiratory disturbance index provided by cardiac implants is clinically relevant and might improve access to sleep apnoea diagnosis in at-risk cardiovascular populations. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42020181656.

Microsleep assessment enhances interpretation of the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) is used to objectively evaluate an individual's ability to remain awake; however, microsleeps are not included in the assessment. We aimed to determine if microsleep data prior to sleep onset assisted in interpretation of ability to maintain wakefulness across a range of typical patient groups.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients referred for overnight polysomnography and subsequent MWT were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups (treated obstructive sleep apnea [OSA], untreated OSA, or treated idiopathic hypersomnia or narcolepsy) based on prior medical diagnosis. Demographics, clinical characteristics, polysomnography, and MWT variables, including frequency, distribution, duration, and latency of microsleeps were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Microsleeps were observed in MWT trials significantly more frequently in patients with treated idiopathic hypersomnia/narcolepsy over the course of the day (0.34 ± 0.06 vs 0.07 ± 0.02 microsleeps/min; P < .001) and in patients with untreated OSA toward the end of the day (0.31 ± 0.06 vs 0.05 ± 0.02 microsleeps/min; P < .001) compared to the group with treated OSA. Microsleeps were often observed in series and earlier in patients with treated idiopathic hypersomnia/narcolepsy (10.9 ± 1.6 minutes) and those with untreated OSA (16.2 ± 2.7 minutes) compared to the group with treated OSA (24.9 ± 3.0 minutes; P < .05), and, if taken into consideration, would increase the proportion of patients demonstrating inability to maintain wakefulness by 33% and 22%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MWT performance varies significantly across patient groups. Microsleep analysis prior to sleep onset may be a more sensitive measure of patient daytime wakefulness than sleep latency alone and should be considered in MWT assessment.

CITATION

Anniss AM, Young A, O'Driscoll DM. Microsleep assessment enhances interpretation of the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(8):1571-1578.