Acidente vascular cerebral isquémico em doentes previamente anticoagulados por fibrilhação auricular não valvular: por que acontece?

Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulation

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) experiencing ischemic stroke despite oral anticoagulation (OAC), i.e., breakthrough strokes, are not uncommon, and represent an important clinical subgroup in view of the consistently high risk of stroke recurrence and mortality. The understanding of the heterogenous potential mechanism underlying OAC failure is essential in order to implement specific therapeutic measures aimed at reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. However, due to the incomplete comprehension of this phenomenon and the limited available data, secondary stroke prevention in such high-risk patients represents a clinical dilemma. There are several available strategies to prevent ischemic stroke recurrence in AF patients with breakthrough stroke in the absence of competing causes unrelated to AF, and these include continuation or change in the type of OAC, addition of antiplatelet therapy, left atrial appendage closure, or any combination of the above options. However, due to the limited available data, the latest guidelines do not provide any specific recommendations about which of the above strategies may be preferred. This review describes the incidence, the clinical impact and the potential mechanisms underlying OAC failure in AF patients. Furthermore, the evidence supporting each of the above therapeutic options for secondary stroke prevention and the potential future directions will be discussed.

Admission Severity of Atrial-Fibrillation-Related Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients under Anticoagulation Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: In non-valvular-associated atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the prevention of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). DOAC are associated with decreased risk and severity of intracranial hemorrhage. It is unknown if different pre-admission anticoagulants impact the prognosis of AF related AIS (AF-AIS). We sought to analyze the literature to assess the association between pre-admission anticoagulation (VKA or DOAC) and admission severity of AF-AIS. Methods: A Systematic literature search (PubMed and ScienceDirect) between January 2011 to April 2021 was undertaken to identify studies describing the outcome of AF-AIS. Results: A total of 128 articles were identified. Of 9493 patients, 1767 were on DOAC, 919 were on therapeutical VKA, 792 were on non-therapeutical VKA and 6015 were not anticoagulated. In comparison to patients without anticoagulation, patients with therapeutical VKA and under DOAC presented with less severe stroke (MD −1.69; 95% CI [−2.71, −0.66], p = 0.001 and MD −2.96; 95% Cl [−3.75, −2.18], p < 0.00001, respectively). Patients with non-therapeutical VKA presented with more severe stroke (MD 1.28; 95% Cl [0.45, 2.12], p = 0.003). Conclusions: In AF-AIS, patients under therapeutical VKA or DOAC have reduced stroke severity on admission in comparison to patients without any anticoagulation, with higher magnitude of protection for DOAC.

Medication adherence to direct anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation - A real world analysis

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) changed the landscape of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but also brought with them new challenges in terms of accessibility and compliance. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to DOACs, and its determinants in a population of AF patients.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study including all patients with non-valvular AF treated with a DOAC from the outpatient general cardiology list at a tertiary center, whose first DOAC prescription was between 1 April 2016 and August 2018. The number of pharmacy refills from the day of first prescription to 31 August 2018 was counted (by means of an electronic prescription platform). Medication refill adherence (MRA) was calculated by dividing the total days' supply by the number of days under therapy. Non-compliance was defined as MRA <90%.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients (120 men, mean age 74 ± 12 years) met the inclusion criteria. The median CHA₂DS₂VAS_C score was 3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-5) and the median HAS-BLED was 1 (IQR 1-2). Rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were prescribed in 45%, 41%, 24% and 13% of patients, respectively. During the study 51 patients (19%) used at least two DOACs .Patients took DOACs for a median period of 439 days (IQR 269-638), during which the included population adhered to therapy 90% of the time (IQR 75-100%). Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant; therapy duration (adjusted odds ratio 1.06 per month, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.08, p<0.001), DOACs twice daily (adjusted OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.08-2.75, p=0.022), and higher out-of-pocket costs (adjusted OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.28-3.45, p=0.003) were independent predictors of non-compliance.

CONCLUSION

Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant (medication refill adherence <90%). Therapy duration, DOACs twice daily and higher out out-of-pocket costs were independent predictors of non-compliance, which could be targets to improve patient adherence.

Self-report instruments for assessing adherence to warfarin therapy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The assessment of adherence to warfarin therapy is useful in clinical practice due to its wide variability in dose-response and risks of complications. The aim of this study was to investigate validated instruments used to assess adherence to warfarin therapy.

METHODS

Information was collected from the MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Search strategies were applied for each database, with no time limit or language restriction. Inclusion criteria consisted of study participants of ≥ 18 years of age, from both sexes, on chronic anticoagulation with warfarin for any indication and the use of validated instruments to assess adherence to warfarin therapy. Exclusion criteria consisted of duplicate articles, narrative or systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, as well as case reports/series and experimental studies involving animals. Two independent reviewers performed the following steps: evaluation of titles/abstracts, selection of studies after full reading, data extraction, and evaluation of potential bias. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 articles were selected for this systematic review, including 17 cross-sectional studies, one cohort study, and one quasi-experimental study, published from 2009 to 2019. The validated instruments identified in this review were Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), Measurement of Treatment Adherence (MTA), and Brief Medication Questionnaire (BMQ). Only MMAS-8 was tested for reliability, using the internal consistency assessment, with Cronbach's α range 0.56-0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlighted a gap in knowledge regarding the scarcity of validated instruments to assess adherence to warfarin therapy. Limitations were found in instruments that comprised the assessment of the isolated use of medication and the lack of analysis of other relevant therapeutic aspects. Future studies are needed to develop and validate more comprehensive instruments in an attempt to assess adherence to warfarin therapy.

PROSPERO

Registration number CRD42019128324.