1
|
Rager JE, Koval LE, Hickman E, Ring C, Teitelbaum T, Cohen T, Fragola G, Zylka MJ, Engel LS, Lu K, Engel SM. The environmental neuroactive chemicals list of prioritized substances for human biomonitoring and neurotoxicity testing: A database and high-throughput toxicokinetics approach. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2024; 266:120537. [PMID: 39638029 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
There is a diversity of chemicals to which humans are potentially exposed. Few of these chemicals have linked human biomonitoring data, and most have very limited neurotoxicity testing. Of particular concern are environmental exposures impacting children, who constitute a population of heightened susceptibility due to rapid neural growth and plasticity, yet lack biomonitoring data compared to other age/population subgroups. This study set out to develop a prioritized list of neuroactive substances, titled the Environmental NeuRoactIve CHemicals (ENRICH) list, to be used as a defined screening library in the evaluation of human biological samples, with emphasis on early childhood-relevant environmental exposures. In silico database mining approaches were used to prioritize chemicals based upon likelihood of neuroactivity, human exposure, and feasible detection in biological samples. Evidence of neuroactivity was compiled across in vitro high-throughput screening, animal testing, and/or human epidemiological findings. Chemicals were considered for their likelihood of human exposure and detection presence in biological samples (including metabolites), with additional evidence indicating presence within child-relevant products. The resulting list of 1827 chemicals were ranked using a Chemical Prioritization Index. Manual inclusion/exclusion criteria were employed for the top-ranking chemical candidates to ensure that chemicals were within the study's scope (i.e., environmentally relevant) and, for the purposes of biomonitoring, had properties amenable to mass spectrometry methods. These elements were combined to produce the ENRICH list of 250 top-ranking chemicals, spanning pesticides and those used in home maintenance, personal care, cleaning products, vehicles, arts and crafts, and consumer electronics, among other sources. Chemicals were additionally evaluated for high-throughput toxicokinetics to predict how much of a chemical and/or its metabolite(s) may reach urine, as an example biological matrix for practical use in biomonitoring efforts. This novel study couples databases and in silico-based predictions to prioritize chemicals in the environment with potential neurological impacts for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E Rager
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Center for Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Lauren E Koval
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Elise Hickman
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Center for Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Caroline Ring
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Drop D143-02, PO Box 12055, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Taylor Teitelbaum
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Todd Cohen
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115 Mason Farm Road, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, CB #7545, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; UNC Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Giulia Fragola
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115 Mason Farm Road, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark J Zylka
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, CB #7545, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; UNC Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence S Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Kun Lu
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Stephanie M Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kreutz A, Chang X, Hogberg HT, Wetmore BA. Advancing understanding of human variability through toxicokinetic modeling, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, and new approach methodologies. Hum Genomics 2024; 18:129. [PMID: 39574200 PMCID: PMC11580331 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-024-00691-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The merging of physiology and toxicokinetics, or pharmacokinetics, with computational modeling to characterize dosimetry has led to major advances for both the chemical and pharmaceutical research arenas. Driven by the mutual need to estimate internal exposures where in vivo data generation was simply not possible, the application of toxicokinetic modeling has grown exponentially in the past 30 years. In toxicology the need has been the derivation of quantitative estimates of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic variability to evaluate the suitability of the tenfold uncertainty factor employed in risk assessment decision-making. Consideration of a host of physiologic, ontogenetic, genetic, and exposure factors are all required for comprehensive characterization. Fortunately, the underlying framework of physiologically based toxicokinetic models can accommodate these inputs, in addition to being amenable to capturing time-varying dynamics. Meanwhile, international interest in advancing new approach methodologies has fueled the generation of in vitro toxicity and toxicokinetic data that can be applied in in vitro-in vivo extrapolation approaches to provide human-specific risk-based information for historically data-poor chemicals. This review will provide a brief introduction to the structure and evolution of toxicokinetic and physiologically based toxicokinetic models as they advanced to incorporate variability and a wide range of complex exposure scenarios. This will be followed by a state of the science update describing current and emerging experimental and modeling strategies for population and life-stage variability, including the increasing application of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation with physiologically based toxicokinetic models in pharmaceutical and chemical safety research. The review will conclude with case study examples demonstrating novel applications of physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling and an update on its applications for regulatory decision-making. Physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling provides a sound framework for variability evaluation in chemical risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kreutz
- Inotiv, 601 Keystone Park Drive, Suite 200, Morrisville, NC, 27560, USA.
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA.
| | - Xiaoqing Chang
- Inotiv, 601 Keystone Park Drive, Suite 200, Morrisville, NC, 27560, USA
| | | | - Barbara A Wetmore
- Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sapounidou M, Andersson PL, Leemans M, Fini JB, Demeneix B, Rüegg J, Bornehag CG, Gennings C. From Cohort to Cohort: A Similar Mixture Approach (SMACH) to Evaluate Exposures to a Mixture Leading to Thyroid-Mediated Neurodevelopmental Effects Using NHANES Data. TOXICS 2023; 11:331. [PMID: 37112558 PMCID: PMC10142960 DOI: 10.3390/toxics11040331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Prenatal exposure to a mixture (MIX N) of eight endocrine-disrupting chemicals has been associated with language delay in children in a Swedish pregnancy cohort. A novel approach was proposed linking this epidemiological association with experimental evidence, where the effect of MIX N on thyroid hormone signaling was assessed using the Xenopus eleuthero-embryonic thyroid assay (XETA OECD TG248). From this experimental data, a point of departure (PoD) was derived based on OECD guidance. Our aim in the current study was to use updated toxicokinetic models to compare exposures of women of reproductive age in the US population to MIX N using a Similar Mixture Approach (SMACH). Based on our findings, 66% of women of reproductive age in the US (roughly 38 million women) had exposures sufficiently similar to MIX N. For this subset, a Similar Mixture Risk Index (SMRIHI) was calculated comparing their exposures to the PoD. Women with SMRIHI > 1 represent 1.1 million women of reproductive age. Older women, Mexican American and other/multi race women were less likely to have high SMRIHI values compared to Non-Hispanic White women. These findings indicate that a reference mixture of chemicals identified in a Swedish cohort-and tested in an experimental model for establishment of (PoDs)-is also of health relevance in a US population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Sapounidou
- Department of Chemistry, Umea University, SE-901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | | | - Michelle Leemans
- UMR 7221, Phyma, CNRS–Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Fini
- UMR 7221, Phyma, CNRS–Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Barbara Demeneix
- UMR 7221, Phyma, CNRS–Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Joëlle Rüegg
- Department of Organismal Biology, Environmental Toxicology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carl-Gustaf Bornehag
- Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden
- Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Chris Gennings
- Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|