The measurement of DLNO and DLCO: A manufacturer's perspective

Single-Breath Simultaneous Measurement of DLNO and DLCO as Predictor of the Emphysema Component in COPD - A Retrospective Observational Study

Background

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a respiratory condition characterized by heterogeneous abnormalities of the airways and lung parenchyma that cause different clinical presentations. The assessment of the prevailing pathogenetic components underlying COPD is not usually pursued in daily practice, also due to technological limitations and cost.

Aim

To assess non-invasively the lung emphysema component of COPD by the simultaneous measurement of DLNO and DLCO via a single-breath (sDLNO and sDLCO).

Methods

COPD patients aged ≥40 years of both genders were recruited consecutively and labelled by computed tomography as "with significant" emphysema (>10% of CT lung volume) or "with negligible" emphysema otherwise. Current lung function tests such as sDLNO, sDLCO and Vc (the lung capillary blood volume) were measured. All possible subsets of independent spirometric and diffusive parameters were tested as predictors of emphysema, and their predicted power compared to each parameter alone by ROC analysis and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Thirty-one patients with "significant emphysema" were compared to thirty-one with "negligible emphysema". FEV1 and FEV1/FVC seemed to be the best spirometric predictors (AUC 0.80 and 0.81, respectively), while sDLCO and Vc had the highest predicted power among diffusive parameters (AUC 0.92 and 0.94, respectively). sDLCO and Vc values were the parameters most correlated to the extent of CT emphysema. Six subsets of independent predictors were identified and included at least one spirometric and one diffusive parameter. According to goodness-to-fit scores (AIC, BIC, log-likelihood and pseudo R2), RV coupled with sDLCO or Vc proved the best predictors of emphysema.

Conclusion

When investigating the parenchymal destructive component due to emphysema occurring in COPD, sDLNO, sDLCO and Vc do enhance the predictive power of current spirometric measures substantially. sDLNO, sDLCO and Vc contribute to phenotype of the main pathogenetic components of COPD easily and with high sensitivity. Organizational problems, radiation exposure, time and costs could be reduced, while personalized and precision medicine could be noticeably implemented.

Two is better than one: the double diffusion technique in classifying heart failure

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump enough blood to meet the body's demands. Diffusing capacity of the lung for nitric oxide (DLNO) and carbon monoxide (DLCO) may be used to classify patients with HF, as DLNO and DLCO are lung function measurements that reflect pulmonary gas exchange. Our objectives were to determine 1) if DLNO added to DLCO testing predicts HF better than DLCO alone and 2) whether the binary classification of HF is better when DLNO z-scores are combined with DLCO z-scores than using DLCO z-scores alone.

Methods

This was a retrospective secondary data analysis in 140 New York Heart Association Class II HF patients (ejection fraction <40%) and 50 patients without HF. z-scores for DLNO, DLCO and DLNO+DLCO were created from reference equations from three articles. The model with the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion was the best predictive model. Binary HF classification was evaluated with the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC).

Results

The top two of 12 models were combined z-score models. The highest MCC (0.51) was from combined z-score models. At most, only 32% of the variance in the odds of having HF was explained by combined z-scores.

Conclusions

Combined z-scores explained 32% of the variation in the likelihood of an individual having HF, which was higher than models using DLNO or DLCO z-scores alone. Combined z-score models had a moderate ability to classify patients with HF. We recommend using the NO-CO double diffusion technique to assess gas exchange impairment in those suspected of HF.

Pulmonary function testing in COPD: looking beyond the curtain of FEV1

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management remains challenging due to the high heterogeneity of clinical symptoms and the complex pathophysiological basis of the disease. Airflow limitation, diagnosed by spirometry, remains the cornerstone of the diagnosis. However, the calculation of the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) alone, has limitations in uncovering the underlying complexity of the disease. Incorporating additional pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in the everyday clinical evaluation of COPD patients, like resting volume, capacity and airway resistance measurements, diffusion capacity measurements, forced oscillation technique, field and cardiopulmonary exercise testing and muscle strength evaluation, may prove essential in tailoring medical management to meet the needs of such a heterogeneous patient population. We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the available PFTs, which can be incorporated into the primary care physician's practice to enhance the efficiency of COPD management.

Lung Diffusing Capacities (DL ) for Nitric Oxide (NO) and Carbon Monoxide (CO): The Evolving Story

Nitric oxide and carbon monoxide diffusing capacities (D_LNO and D_LCO ) obey Fick's First Law of Diffusion and the basic principles of chemical kinetic theory. NO gas transfer is dominated by membrane diffusion (D_M ), whereas CO transfer is limited by diffusion plus chemical reaction within the red cell. Marie Krogh, who pioneered the single-breath measurement of D_LCO in 1915, believed that the combination of CO with red cell hemoglobin (Hb) was instantaneous. Roughton and colleagues subsequently showed, in vitro, that the reaction rate was finite, and prolonged in the presence of high P O 2 . Roughton and Forster (R-F) proposed that the resistance to transfer (1/D_L ) was the sum of the membrane resistance (1/D_M ) and (1/θVc), the red cell resistance (θ being the CO or NO conductance for blood uptake and Vc the capillary volume). From this R-F equation, D_M for CO and Vc can be solved with simultaneous NO and CO inhalation. At near maximum exercise, D_MCO and Vc for normal subjects were 88% and 79%, respectively, of morphometric values. The validity of these calculations depends on the values chosen for θ for CO and NO, and on the diffusivity of NO versus CO. Recent mathematical modeling suggests that θ for NO is "effectively" infinite because NO reacts only with Hb in the outer 0.1 μM of the red cell. An "infinite θ_NO " recalculation reduced D_MCO to 53% and increased Vc to 95% of morphometric values. © 2020 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 10:73-97, 2020.