Physiological and perceptual responses to exercise according to locus of symptom limitation in COPD

Physiological Factors Associated with Unsatisfied Inspiration at Peak Exercise in Healthy Adults

INTRODUCTION

Contrary to common belief, a growing body of evidence suggests that unsatisfied inspiration (UI), an inherently uncomfortable quality of dyspnea, is experienced by ostensibly healthy adults during high-intensity exercise. Based on our understanding of the mechanisms of UI among people with chronic respiratory conditions, this analysis tested the hypothesis that the experience of UI at peak exercise in young, healthy adults reflects the combination of high ventilatory demand and critical inspiratory constraints.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis design, data included 321 healthy individuals (129 females) aged 25 ± 5 yr. Data were collected during one visit to the laboratory, which included anthropometrics, spirometry, and an incremental cardiopulmonary cycling test to exhaustion. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory variables were measured at peak exercise, and qualitative descriptors of dyspnea at peak exercise were assessed using a list of 15 descriptor phrases.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of participants ( n = 109) reported sensations of UI at peak exercise. Compared with the non-UI group, the UI group achieved a significantly higher peak work rate (243 ± 77 vs 235 ± 69 W, P = 0.016, d = 0.10), rate of O 2 consumption (3.32 ± 1.02 vs 3.27 ± 0.96 L·min -1 , P = 0.018, d = 0.05), minute ventilation (120 ± 38 vs 116 ± 35 L·min -1 , P = 0.047, d = 0.11), and breathing frequency (50 ± 9 vs 47 ± 9 breaths per minute, P = 0.014, d = 0.33), while having a lower exercise-induced change (peak-baseline) in inspiratory capacity (0.07 ± 0.41 vs 0.20 ± 0.49 L, P = 0.023, d = 0.29). The inspiratory reserve volume to minute ventilation ratio at peak exercise was also lower in the UI versus non-UI group. Dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness ratings were significantly higher in the UI versus non-UI group at peak exercise (both P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthy individuals reporting UI at peak exercise have relatively greater inspiratory constraints compared with those who do not select UI.

Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Understand Dyspnea and Exercise Intolerance in Respiratory Disease

A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is ideally suited to quantify exercise tolerance and evaluate the pathophysiological mechanism(s) of dyspnea and exercise limitation in people with chronic respiratory disease. Although there are several statements on CPET and many outstanding resources detailing the cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to exercise, limited information is available to support the health care provider in conducting a practical CPET evaluation. This article provides the health care provider with practical and timely information on how to use CPET data to understand dyspnea and exercise intolerance in people with chronic respiratory diseases. Information on CPET protocol, as well as how to evaluate maximal patient effort, peak rate of oxygen consumption, ventilatory demand, pulmonary gas exchange, ventilatory reserve, operating lung volumes, and exertional dyspnea, is presented. Two case examples are also described to highlight how these parameters are evaluated to provide a clinical interpretation of CPET data.

Qualitative Components of Dyspnea during Incremental Exercise across the COPD Continuum

INTRODUCTION

Evaluation of the intensity and quality of activity-related dyspnea is potentially useful in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study sought to examine associations between qualitative dyspnea descriptors, dyspnea intensity ratings, dynamic respiratory mechanics, and exercise capacity during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in COPD and healthy controls.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 261 patients with mild-to-very severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 62 ± 25%pred) and 94 age-matched controls (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 114 ± 14%pred) completed an incremental cycle CPET to determine peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak). Throughout exercise, expired gases, operating lung volumes, and dyspnea intensity were assessed. At peak exercise, dyspnea quality was assessed using a modified 15-item questionnaire.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis revealed that among 15 dyspnea descriptors, only those alluding to the cluster "unsatisfied inspiration" were consistently associated with an increased likelihood for both critical inspiratory mechanical constraint (end-inspiratory lung volume/total lung capacity ratio ≥0.9) during exercise and reduced exercise capacity (V˙O2peak < lower limit of normal) in COPD (odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 3.26 (1.40-7.60) and 3.04 (1.24-7.45), respectively; both, P < 0.05). Thus, patients reporting "unsatisfied inspiration" (n = 177 (68%)) had an increased relative frequency of critical inspiratory mechanical constraint and low exercise capacity compared with those who did not select this descriptor, regardless of COPD severity or peak dyspnea intensity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with COPD, regardless of disease severity, reporting descriptors in the unsatisfied inspiration cluster complemented traditional assessments of dyspnea during CPET and helped identify patients with critical mechanical abnormalities germane to exercise intolerance.