Inspiratory muscle training improves breathing pattern and sympatho-vagal balance but not spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity in older women

Respiratory training in older women: Unravelling central and peripheral hemodynamic slow oscillatory patterns

We hypothesized that inspiratory muscle training (IMT) increases the respiratory-induced low-frequency oscillations of mean blood pressure (MBP) and middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv), upregulating cerebrovascular function in older women. Firstly, participants were recorded with free-breathing (FB) and then breathed at a slow-paced frequency (0.1 Hz; DB test) supported by sonorous metronome feedback. Blood pressure was recorded using finger photoplethysmography method, ECG, and respiration using a thoracic belt. To obtain the MCAv a transcranial ultrasound Doppler device was used. Spectral analysis of MBP, R-R intervals, and mean MCAv time series was obtained by an autoregressive model. The transfer function analysis (TFA) was employed to calculate the coherence, gain, and phase. After that, older women were enrolled in a randomized controlled protocol, the IMT-group (n = 8; 64 ± 3 years-old) performed IMT at 50 % of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and Sham-group, a placebo training at 5 % MIP (Sham-group; n = 6; 66 ± 3 years-old). Participants breathed against an inspiratory resistance twice a day for 4-weeks. DB test is repeated post IMT and Sham interventions. IMT-group, compared to Sham-group, augmented tidal volume responses to DB (Sham-group 1.03 ± 0.41 vs. IMT-group 1.61 ± 0.56 L; p = 0.04), increased respiratory-induced MBP (Sham-group 26.37 ± 4.46 vs. IMT-group 48.21 ± 3.15 mmHg²; p = 0.04) and MCAv (Sham-group 14.16 ± 31.26 vs. IMT-group 79.90 ± 21.76 cm²s^-2; p = 0.03) slow oscillations, and reduced TFA gain (Sham-group 2.46 ± 1.32 vs. IMT-group 1.78 ± 1.30 cm·s^-1.mmHg^-1; p = 0.01). Our findings suggest that IMT increases the respiratory-induced oscillations in MBP and MCAv signals and reduces TFA gain. It seems compatible with an improved dynamic cerebrovascular regulation following IMT in older women.

Orthostatic intolerance: a handicap of aging or physical deconditioning?

Despite several studies that have been investigated physical inactivity and age-related effects on orthostatic tolerance, impaired hemodynamics and postural balance responses to orthostatic stress are incorrectly attributed to aging or sedentarism alone. The isolated effects from aging and sedentarism should be investigated through comparative studies between senior athletes and age-matched controls, and physical activity assessments on aging follow-up studies. On the other hand, bed rest and space flight studies mimic accelerated physical inactivity or disuse, which is not the same physiological decline provoked by aging alone. Thus, the elementary question is: could orthostatic intolerance be attributed to aging or physical inactivity? The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of possible mechanisms underlying orthostatic tolerance contrasting the paradigm of aging and/or physical inactivity. The key points of this review are the following: (1) to counterpoint all relevant literature on physiological aspects of orthostatic tolerance; (2) to explore the mechanistic aspects underneath the cerebrovascular, cardiorespiratory, and postural determinants of orthostatic tolerance; and (3) examine non-pharmacological interventions with the potential to counterbalance the physical inactivity and aging effects. To date, the orthostatic intolerance cannot be attributed exclusively with aging since physical inactivity plays an important role in postural balance, neurovascular and cardiorespiratory responses to orthostatic stress. These physiological determinates should be interpreted within an integrative approach of orthostatic tolerance, that considers the interdependence between physiological systems in a closed-loop model. Based on this multisystem approach, acute and chronic countermeasures may combat aging and sedentarism effects on orthostatic tolerance.