1
|
Caspersen CK, Ingemann-Molden S, Grove EL, Højen AA, Andreasen J, Klok FA, Rolving N. Performance-based outcome measures for assessing physical capacity in patients with pulmonary embolism: A scoping review. Thromb Res 2024; 235:52-67. [PMID: 38301376 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Up to 50 % of patients surviving a pulmonary embolism (PE) report persisting shortness of breath, reduced physical capacity and psychological distress. As the PE population is heterogeneous compared to other cardiovascular patient groups, outcome measures for assessing physical capacity traditionally used in cardiac populations may not be reliable for the PE population as a whole. This scoping review aims to 1) map performance-based outcome measures (PBOMs) used for assessing physical capacity in PE research, and 2) to report the psychometric properties of the identified PBOMs in a PE population. METHODS The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute framework for scoping reviews and reported according to the PRISMA-Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. RESULTS The systematic search of five databases identified 4585 studies, of which 243 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 185 studies focused on a subgroup of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Ten different PBOMs were identified in the included studies. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were the most commonly used, followed by the (Modified) Bruce protocol and Incremental Shuttle Walk test. No studies reported psychometric properties of any of the identified PBOMs in a PE population. CONCLUSIONS Publication of studies measuring physical capacity within PE populations has increased significantly over the past 5-10 years. Still, not one study was identified, reporting the validity, reliability, or responsiveness for any of the identified PBOMs in a PE population. This should be a priority for future research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stian Ingemann-Molden
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Erik Lerkevang Grove
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anette Arbjerg Højen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jane Andreasen
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark; Aalborg Health and Rehabilitation Centre, Aalborg Municipality, Denmark
| | - Frederikus A Klok
- Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Nanna Rolving
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neder JA, Phillips DB, O'Donnell DE, Dempsey JA. Excess ventilation and exertional dyspnoea in heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2022; 60:13993003.00144-2022. [PMID: 35618273 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00144-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Increased ventilation relative to metabolic demands, indicating alveolar hyperventilation and/or increased physiological dead space (excess ventilation), is a key cause of exertional dyspnoea. Excess ventilation has assumed a prominent role in the functional assessment of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We herein provide the key pieces of information to the caring physician to 1) gain unique insights into the seeds of patients' shortness of breath and 2) develop a rationale for therapeutically lessening excess ventilation to mitigate this distressing symptom. Reduced bulk oxygen transfer induced by cardiac output limitation and/or right ventricle-pulmonary arterial uncoupling increase neurochemical afferent stimulation and (largely chemo-) receptor sensitivity, leading to alveolar hyperventilation in HFrEF, PAH and small-vessel, distal CTEPH. As such, interventions geared to improve central haemodynamics and/or reduce chemosensitivity have been particularly effective in lessening their excess ventilation. In contrast, 1) high filling pressures in HFpEF and 2) impaired lung perfusion leading to ventilation/perfusion mismatch in proximal CTEPH conspire to increase physiological dead space. Accordingly, 1) decreasing pulmonary capillary pressures and 2) mechanically unclogging larger pulmonary vessels (pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty) have been associated with larger decrements in excess ventilation. Exercise training has a strong beneficial effect across diseases. Addressing some major unanswered questions on the link of excess ventilation with exertional dyspnoea under the modulating influence of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions might prove instrumental to alleviate the devastating consequences of these prevalent diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alberto Neder
- Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Devin B Phillips
- Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Denis E O'Donnell
- Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jerome A Dempsey
- John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fu Z, Tao X, Xie W, Yang P, Gao Q, Wang J, Zhai Z. Different response of the oxygen pathway in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with pulmonary endarterectomy versus balloon pulmonary angioplasty. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:990207. [PMID: 36237910 PMCID: PMC9551285 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.990207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOxygen pathway limitation exists in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are two effective interventions for CTEPH, but their effects and comparison of these two interventions on the oxygen pathway are not well demonstrated.MethodsCTEPH patients with available pulmonary function test, hemodynamics, and blood gas analysis before and after the interventions were included for comparison of oxygen pathway in terms of lung ventilation, lung gas exchange, oxygen delivery, and oxygen extraction between these two interventions.ResultsThe change in the percentage of the predicted forced expiratory volume in the 1 s (−3.4 ± 12.7 vs. 3.8 ± 8.7%, P = 0.006) and forced vital capacity (−5.5 ± 13.0 vs. 4.2 ± 9.9%, P = 0.001) among the PEA group (n = 24) and BPA group (n = 46) were significantly different. Patients in the PEA group had a significant increase in their arterial oxygen saturation (from 92.5 ± 3.6 to 94.6 ± 2.4%, P = 0.022), while those in the BPA group had no change, which could be explained by a significant improvement in ventilation/perfusion (−0.48 ± 0.53 vs. −0.17 ± 0.41, P = 0.016). Compared with patients post-BPA, patients post-PEA were characterized by higher oxygen delivery (756.3 ± 229.1 vs. 628.8 ± 188.5 ml/min, P = 0.016) and higher oxygen extraction (203.3 ± 64.8 vs. 151.2 ± 31.9 ml/min, P = 0.001).ConclusionPartial amelioration of the oxygen pathway limitations could be achieved in CTEPH patients treated with PEA and BPA. CTEPH patients post-PEA had better performance in lung gas exchange, oxygen delivery, and extraction, while those post-BPA had better lung ventilation. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation may assist in improving the impairment of the oxygen pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihui Fu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Xincao Tao
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Wanmu Xie
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Peiran Yang
- National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Gao
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Jinzhi Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenguo Zhai
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhenguo Zhai,
| |
Collapse
|