Polyhandicap, profound intellectual multiple disabilities : Concept and definition of a highly specific public health issue

Impact of caring for patients with polyhandicap on institutional health care workers' quality of life: a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation

Background

Profound intellectual multiple disabilities or polyhandicap (PLH) is defined as a combination of profound mental retardation and serious motor deficits resulting in extreme dependence. Support for these patients is multidisciplinary, complex, and time-consuming. Thus, institutional health care workers (HCWs) face specific working conditions: frequent physical tasks, distressed families, and restricted feedback.

Objectives

We aimed to identify determinants of quality of life (QoL) of HCWs and to study longitudinal evolution.

Methods

The study used data from the French cohort EVAL-PLH. The participants were institutional HCWs of persons with PLH (age ≥ 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion <3 years old). Two populations were used: (1) cross sectional study: the sample 1 includes the HCWs assessed at T2 (2020-2021); (2) longitudinal study: the sample 2 includes the HCWs assessed at both T1 (2015-2016) and T2 (2020-2021). The data collected included: sociodemographics, health status, professional variables, and psycho-comportemental aspects. QoL was assessed using WHOQOL-BREF which provides 4 scores.

Results

In comparison with French norms, the physical and social scores of QoL were significantly lower while the psychological score was significantly higher for (i) the 223 HCWs (participation rate 62%) assessed at T2 and (ii) the 61 HCWs assessed at T1 and T2. The main factors modulating QoL were age, marital status, self-perceived financial difficulties, personal chronic disease, anxiety-mood disorders, nature of coping strategies, and burnout.

Conclusion

This study confirms the mixed (negative and positive) impact of caring persons with PLH on the institutional HCWs' QOL. Main determinants of the HCW's QOL were: older age, single status, perceived financial difficulties, altered health status, burn out and coping strategies.Clinical trial registration number: NCT02400528.

Health status of individuals with polyhandicap across a 5-year follow-up period

The present longitudinal study examined a large sample of individuals with PIMD/Polyhandicap to: (i) describe the evolution over time of the health status in terms of severity, (ii) identify the potential predictors of health status change. This study used the data of the French national EVAL-PLH cohort. Inclusion criteria were: individuals with PIMD/Polyhandicap; age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old. The definition of the change in health status over the 5-year period was derived from the Polyhandicap Severity Scale. Among the 875 individuals included in 2015-2016, 492 (56.2%) individuals were assessed in 2020-2021. According to the definition, 68.8% (n = 309), 64.7% (n = 310), and 80.2% (n = 368) of the individuals presented with a worsened or stable severity status based on the global score, the abilities score, and the comorbidities score, respectively. Compared with the individuals with a non-worsened health status (global score), the individuals with a stable or worsened health status were more likely to receive care in specialized rehabilitation centres, more likely to have an antenatal or progressive aetiology, and more likely to have a higher dependency level. The current study provides a robust perspective of the worsened health among persons with PIMD/Polyhandicap over time.

Impact of spinal fusion on severity health status in scoliotic adolescents with polyhandicap

BACKGROUND

Scoliosis constitutes a prevalent comorbidity in adolescents with polyhandicap and frequently leads to other severe impairments, impacting abilities and requiring complex caregiving strategies. Therefore, spinal fusion surgeries are commonly performed to alleviate pain and provide more comfort. However, spine stabilization has not previously been proven to improve the severity health status of adolescents with polyhandicap according to specific clinical scales.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes and compares the severity health status of adolescents with polyhandicap before and after they underwent spinal fusion.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective observational study was conducted in the university hospital centre of Saint-Etienne, France. We included between 2009 to 2020, 30 scoliotic adolescents with polyhandicap who underwent spinal fusion performed with the same surgical technique and the same surgeon. The main outcome was the variation in the Polyhandicap Severity Scale (PSS) score after surgery. Secondary outcomes were variations in PSS subscores, quality of life scores, fronto-sagittal X-ray parameters, and measures of surgical complication rates and lengths of stay.

RESULTS

Among 30 adolescents, 27 PSS analyses were performed. We found a significant improvement between pre- and postoperative PSS scores, mainly for pain and respiratory, digestive, and skin disabilities. These improvements were accompanied by significant reductions in pelvic obliquity, in frontal and sagittal curves. The mean hospital length of stay was 45 days. During postoperative period, patients received a personalized postoperative rehabilitation procedure with spasticity and pain treatments, physiotherapy, and verticalization (wheelchair sitting and positioning devices such as contoured seat intended to increase postural stability). The mortality rate was estimated at 7%. At least 1 complication per patient occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that spinal fusion surgeries confer a significant improvement in the severity health status in scoliotic adolescents with polyhandicap.

Health care management adequacy among French persons with severe profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The care organization of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) varies by country according to the health care system. This study used a large sample of French individuals with severe PIMD/polyhandicap to assess: 1) the adequacy of care setting over a 5-year period and 2) health care consumption.

METHODS

The longitudinal study used data from the French EVALuation PoLyHandicap (EVAL-PLH) cohort of persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap who were receiving managed in specialized care centres and residential facilities. Two assessments were performed: wave 1 (T1) in 2015-2016 and wave 2 (T2) in 2020-2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old; and severe PIMD. The adequacy of the care setting was based on the following: i) objective indicators, i.e., adequacy for age and adequacy for health status severity; ii) subjective indicators, i.e., self-perception of the referring physician about medical care adequacy and educational care adequacy. Health care consumption was assessed based on medical and paramedical care.

RESULTS

Among the 492 persons assessed at the 2 times, 50% of individuals at T1 and 46% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting based on age and severity. Regarding global subjective inadequacy, the combination of medical adequacy and educational adequacy, 7% of individuals at T1 and 13% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting. At T2, a majority of individuals were undermonitored by medical care providers (general practitioners, physical medicine rehabilitation physicians, neurologists, orthopaedists, etc.). Important gaps were found between performed and prescribed sessions of various paramedical care (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychomotor therapy, etc.).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed key elements of inadequate care management for persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap in France. Based on these important findings, healthcare workers, familial caregivers, patients experts, and health decision-makers should develop appropriate care organizations to optimize the global care management of these individuals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02400528, registered 27/03/2015.