Socioeconomic status and in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review

Trends in Incidence and Outcomes of Cardiac Arrest Occurring in Swedish ICUs

OBJECTIVE

To determine temporal trends in the incidence of cardiac arrest occurring in the ICU (ICU-CA) and its associated long-term mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Swedish ICUs, between 2011 and 2017.

PATIENTS

Adult patients (≥18 yr old) recorded in the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

ICU-CA was defined as a first episode of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or defibrillation following an ICU admission, as recorded in SIR or the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry. Annual adjusted ICU-CA incidence trend (all admissions) was estimated using propensity score-weighted analysis. Six-month mortality trends (first admissions) were assessed using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for pre-admission characteristics (sex, age, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, medications, and healthcare utilization), illness severity on ICU admission, and admitting unit. We included 231,427 adult ICU admissions. Crude ICU-CA incidence was 16.1 per 1,000 admissions, with no significant annual trend in the propensity score-weighted analysis. Among 186,530 first admissions, crude 6-month mortality in ICU-CA patients was 74.7% (95% CI, 70.1-78.9) in 2011 and 68.8% (95% CI, 64.4-73.0) in 2017. When controlling for multiple potential confounders, the adjusted 6-month mortality odds of ICU-CA patients decreased by 6% per year (95% CI, 2-10). Patients admitted after out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest had the highest ICU-CA incidence (136.1/1,000) and subsequent 6-month mortality (76.0% [95% CI, 73.6-78.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

In our nationwide Swedish cohort, the adjusted incidence of ICU-CA remained unchanged between 2011 and 2017. More than two-thirds of patients with ICU-CA did not survive to 6 months following admission, but a slight improvement appears to have occurred over time.

A more conservative test of sex differences in the treatment and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Studies investigating sex disparities related to treatment and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have produced divergent findings and have typically been unable to adjust for outstanding confounding variables.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to examine sex differences in treatment and survival following IHCA, using a comprehensive set of control variables including e.g., age, comorbidity, and patient-level socioeconomic status.

METHODS

This retrospective study was based on data from the Swedish Register of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Statistics Sweden. In the primary analyses, logistic regression models and ordinary least square regressions were estimated.

RESULTS

The study included 24,217 patients and the majority (70.4%) were men. In the unadjusted analyses, women had a lower chance of survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempt, at hospital discharge (with good neurological function) and at 30 days (p<0.01). In the adjusted regression models, female sex was associated with a higher chance of survival after the CPR attempt (B = 1.09, p<0.01) and at 30-days (B = 1.09, p<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant association between sex and survival to discharge with good neurological outcome. Except for treatment duration (B=-0.07, p<0.01), no significant associations between sex and treatment were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

No signs of treatment disparities or discrimination related to sex were identified. However, women had a better chance of surviving IHCA compared to men. The finding that women went from having a survival disadvantage (unadjusted analysis) to a survival advantage (adjusted analysis) attests to the importance of including a comprehensive set of control variables, when examining sex differences.

Socioeconomic status and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM

To investigate the association between socioeconomic status and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study based on nationwide registries and prospectively collected data on in-hospital cardiac arrest from 2017 and 2018 in Denmark. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses using regression models were performed to assess the association between socioeconomic status and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to 30 days, survival to one year, and the duration of resuscitation among patients without ROSC.

RESULTS

A total of 3,223 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest were included in the study. In the adjusted analyses, high household assets were associated with 1.20 (95 %CI: 0.96, 1.51) times the odds of ROSC, 1.49 (95 %CI: 1.14, 1.96) times the odds of survival to 30 days, 1.40 (95 %CI: 1.04, 1.90) times the odds of survival to one year, and 2.8 (95 %CI: 0.9, 4.7) minutes longer duration of resuscitation among patients without ROSC compared to low household assets. Similar albeit attenuated associations were observed for education. While high household income was associated with better outcomes in the unadjusted analyses, these associations largely disappeared in the adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, we found that high household assets were associated with a higher odds of survival and a longer duration of resuscitation among patients without ROSC compared to low household assets. However, the effect size may potentially be small. The results varied based on socioeconomic status measure, outcome of interest, and across adjusted analyses.

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in United States Emergency Departments, 2010–2018

Background

Little is known about the in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the US emergency department (ED). This study aimed to describe the incidence and mortality of ED-based IHCA visits and to investigate the factors associated with higher incidence and poor outcomes of IHCA.

Materials and Methods

Data were obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) between 2010 and 2018. Adult ED visits with IHCA were identified using the cardiopulmonary resuscitation code, excluding those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We used descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression accounting for NHAMCS’s complex survey design. The primary outcome measures were ED-based IHCA incidence rates and ED-based IHCA mortality.

Results

Over the 9-year study period, there were approximately 1,114,000 ED visits with IHCA. The proportion of IHCA visits in the entire ED population (incidence rate, 1.2 per 1,000 ED visits) appeared stable. The mean age of patients who visited the ED with IHCA was 60 years, and 65% were men. Older age, male, arrival by ambulance, and being uninsured independently predicted a higher incidence of ED-based IHCA. Approximately 51% of IHCA died in the ED, and the trend remained stable. Arrival by ambulance, nighttime, or weekend arrival, and being in the non-Northeast were independently associated with a higher mortality rate after IHCA.

Conclusion

The high burden of ED visits with IHCA persisted through 2010–2018. Additionally, ED-based IHCA survival to hospital admission remained poor. Some patients were disproportionately affected, and certain contextual factors were associated with a poorer outcome.

Trends in In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation from 2010 through 2019: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea

We aimed to examine recent trends in in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in South Korea from 2010 to 2019. A population-based sample of all adult patients who experienced in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019, was included. In all, 298,676 patients who received in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation were included in the survival analysis. In 2010, 60.7 per 100,000 adults experienced in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A similar rate was observed until 2015. The rate increased to 83.5 per 100,000 adults in 2016 and gradually increased to 92.1 per 100,000 adults in 2019. Among all patients, 78,783 (26.2%) were discharged alive after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 9.8% and 8.7%, respectively. In 2010, the mean total cost of hospitalization was USD 5822.80 (United States Dollar) (standard deviation; SD: USD 7493.4), which increased to USD 7886.20 (SD: USD 13,071.6) in 2019. The rate of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cost of care have significantly increased since 2010, while the 6-month and 1-year rates of survival post in-hospital resuscitation remain low.

Treatment and survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest: does patient ethnicity matter?

AIMS 

Previous research on racial/ethnic disparities in relation to cardiac arrest has mainly focused on black vs. white disparities in the USA. The great majority of these studies concerns out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The current nationwide registry study aims to explore whether there are ethnic differences in treatment and survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), examining possible disparities towards Middle Eastern and African minorities in a European context.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective registry study, 24 217 patients from the IHCA part of the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation were included. Data on patient ethnicity were obtained from Statistics Sweden. Regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of ethnicity on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) delay, CPR duration, survival immediately after CPR, and the medical team's reported satisfaction with the treatment. Middle Eastern and African patients were not treated significantly different compared to Nordic patients when controlling for hospital, year, age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidity, aetiology, and initial heart rhythm. Interestingly, we find that Middle Eastern patients were more likely to survive than Nordic patients (odds ratio = 1.52).

CONCLUSION

Overall, hospital staff do not appear to treat IHCA patients differently based on their ethnicity. Nevertheless, Middle Eastern patients are more likely to survive IHCA.

Discriminatory cardiac arrest care? Patients with low socioeconomic status receive delayed cardiopulmonary resuscitation and are less likely to survive an in-hospital cardiac arrest

AIMS

Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) face widespread prejudice in society. Whether SES disparities exist in treatment and survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is unclear. The aim of the current retrospective registry study was to examine SES disparities in IHCA treatment and survival, assessing SES at the patient level, and adjusting for major demographic, clinical, and contextual factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 24 217 IHCAs from the Swedish Register of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation were analysed. Education and income constituted SES proxies. Controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidity, heart rhythm, aetiology, hospital, and year, primary analyses showed that high (vs. low) SES patients were significantly less likely to receive delayed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (highly educated: OR = 0.89, and high income: OR = 0.98). Furthermore, patients with high SES were significantly more likely to survive CPR (high income: OR = 1.02), to survive to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome (highly educated: OR = 1.27; high income: OR = 1.06), and to survive to 30 days (highly educated: OR = 1.21; and high income: OR = 1.05). Secondary analyses showed that patients with high SES were also significantly more likely to receive prophylactic heart rhythm monitoring (highly educated: OR = 1.16; high income: OR = 1.02), and this seems to partially explain the observed SES differences in CPR delay.

CONCLUSION

There are clear SES differences in IHCA treatment and survival, even when controlling for major sociodemographic, clinical, and contextual factors. This suggests that patients with low SES could be subject to discrimination when suffering IHCA.