Post-shock myocardial stunning: A prospective randomised double-blind comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveforms

[Adult advanced life support]

These European Resuscitation Council Advanced Life Support guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the prevention of and ALS treatments for both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support

These European Resuscitation Council Advanced Life Support guidelines, are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the prevention of and ALS treatments for both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation

The purpose of this review article is to summarize our current understanding of the efficacy and safety of cardiac defibrillation with nanosecond shocks. Experiments in isolated hearts, using optical mapping of the electrical activity, have demonstrated that nanosecond shocks can defibrillate with lower energies than conventional millisecond shocks. Single defibrillation strength nanosecond shocks do not cause obvious damage, but repeated stimulation leads to deterioration of the hearts. In isolated myocytes, nanosecond pulses can also stimulate at lower energies than at longer pulses and cause less electroporation (propidium uptake). The mechanism is likely electroporation of the plasma membrane. Repeated stimulation leads to distorted calcium gradients.

Low-energy defibrillation with nanosecond electric shocks

Aims

Reliable defibrillation with reduced energy deposition has long been the focus of defibrillation research. We studied the efficacy of single shocks of 300 ns duration in defibrillating rabbit hearts as well as the tissue damage they may cause.

Methods and results

New Zealand white rabbit hearts were Langendorff-perfused and two planar electrodes were placed on either side of the heart. Shocks of 300 ns duration and 0.3-3 kV amplitude were generated with a transmission line generator. Single nanosecond shocks consistently induced waves of electrical activation, with a stimulation threshold of 0.9 kV (over 3 cm) and consistent activation for shock amplitudes of 1.2 kV or higher (9/9 successful attempts). We induced fibrillation (35 episodes in 12 hearts) and found that single shock nanosecond-defibrillation could consistently be achieved, with a defibrillation threshold of 2.3-2.4 kV (over 3 cm), and consistent success at 3 kV (11/11 successful attempts). Shocks uniformly depolarized the tissue, and the threshold energy needed for nanosecond defibrillation was almost an order of magnitude lower than the energy needed for defibrillation with a monophasic 10 ms shock delivered with the same electrode configuration. For the parameters studied here, nanosecond defibrillation caused no baseline shift of the transmembrane potential (that could be indicative of electroporative damage), no changes in action potential duration, and only a brief change of diastolic interval, for one beat after the shock was delivered. Histological staining with tetrazolium chloride and propidium iodide showed that effective defibrillation was not associated with tissue death or with detectable electroporation anywhere in the heart (six hearts).

Conclusion

Nanosecond-defibrillation is a promising technology that may allow clinical defibrillation with profoundly reduced energies.

Defibrillation for Ventricular Fibrillation: A Shocking Update

Cardiac arrest is defined as the termination of cardiac activity associated with loss of consciousness, of spontaneous breathing, and of circulation. Sudden cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are terms often used interchangeably. Most patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have shown coronary artery disease or symptoms during the hour before the event. Cardiac arrest is potentially reversible by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, cardioversion, cardiac pacing, or treatments targeted at the underlying disease (e.g., acute coronary occlusion). We restrict SCD hereafter to cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation, including rhythms shockable by an automatic external defibrillator (AED), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), or wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD). We summarize the state of the art related to defibrillation in treating SCD, including a brief history of the evolution of defibrillation, technical characteristics of modern AEDs, strategies to improve AED access and increase survival, ancillary treatments, and use of ICDs or WCDs.

Does the choice of definition for defibrillation and CPR success impact the predictability of ventricular fibrillation waveform analysis?

BACKGROUND

Quantitative analysis of ventricular fibrillation (VF), such as amplitude spectral area (AMSA), predicts shock outcomes. However, there is no uniform definition of shock/cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The objective of this study is to investigate post-shock rhythm variations and the impact of shock/CPR success definition on the predictability of AMSA.

METHODS

A total of 554 shocks from 257 OHCA patients with VF as initial rhythm were analyzed. Post-shock rhythms were analyzed every 5s up to 120s and annotated as VF, asystole (AS) and organized rhythm (OR) at serial time intervals. Three shock/CPR success definitions were used to evaluate the predictability of AMSA: (1) termination of VF (ToVF); (2) return of organized electrical activity (ROEA); (3) return of potentially perfusing rhythm (RPPR).

RESULTS

Rhythm changes occurred after 54.5% (N=302) of shocks and 85.8% (N=259) of them occurred within 60s after shock delivery. The observed post-shock rhythm changes were (1) from AS to VF (24.9%), (2) from OR to VF (16.1%), and (3) from AS to OR (12.1%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for AMSA as a predictor of shock/CPR success reached its maximum 60s post-shock. The AUC was 0.646 for ToVF, 0.782 for ROEA, and 0.835 for RPPR (p<0.001) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-shock rhythm is unstable in the first minute after the shock. The predictability of AMSA varies depending on the definition of shock/CPR success and performs best with the return of potentially perfusing rhythm endpoint for OHCA.

Cardiac stunning in the clinic: the full picture

Cardiac stunning refers to different dysfunctional levels occurring after an episode of acute ischemia, despite blood flow is near normal or normal. The phenomenon was initially identified in animal models, where it has been very well characterized. After being established in the experimental setting, it remained unclear, whether a similar syndrome occurs in humans. In addition, it remained controversial, whether stunning was of any clinical relevance as it is spontaneously reversible. Hence, many studies continue to focus on the properties and mechanisms of stunning, although therapies seem more relevant for attenuating and treating myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, i.e. to bridge until recovery. This article reviews the different facets of cardiac stunning, i.e. myocardial, vascular/microvascular/endothelial, metabolic, neural/neuronal, and electrical stunning. This review also displays where these facets exist and which clinical relevance they might have. Particular attention is directed to the different therapeutic interventions that the various facets of this I/R-induced cardiac injury might require. A final outlook considers possible alternatives to further reduce the detrimental consequences of brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion.

Alteration in transthoracic impedance following cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

Haemodynamically significant ventricular tachyarrhythmias are a frequent complication in the immediate post-operative period after cardiac surgery. Successful cardioversion depends on delivery of sufficient current, which in turn is dependent on transthoracic impedance (TTI). However, it is uncertain if there is a change in TTI immediately following cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

TTI was measured on 40 patients undergoing first time isolated cardiac surgery using CPB. TTI was recorded at 30 kHz using Bodystat Multiscan 5000 equipment before operation (with and without a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm of H(2)O) and then at 1, 4 and 24 h after the operation. Data was analyzed to determine the relationship between pre- and post-operative variables and TTI values.

RESULTS

Mean pre-operative TTI was 54.5+/-10.55 ohms without PEEP and 61.8+/-15.4 ohms on a PEEP of 5 cm of H(2)O. TTI dropped significantly (p<0.001) after the operation to 47.2+/-10.6 ohms at 1 h, 42.6+/-10.2 ohms at 4 h and 41.8+/-10.4 ohms at 24 h. A positive correlation was noted between duration of operation and TTI change at 1 h (r=0.38; p=0.016). There was no significant correlation between the duration of bypass and change in TTI.

CONCLUSION

TTI decreases by more than 30% in the immediate post-operative period following cardiac surgery. This state may favour defibrillation at lower energy levels.

Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure

BACKGROUND

Defibrillation shock is known to induce atrial stunning, which is electrical and mechanical dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that atrial stunning is caused by higher atrial susceptibility to electroporation vs ventricles. We also hypothesize that electroporation may be responsible for early recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We investigated electroporation induced by 10-ms epicardial high-intensity shocks applied locally in atria and ventricles of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 12) using optical mapping.

RESULTS

Electroporation was centered at the electrode and was evident from transient diastolic depolarization and reduction of action potential amplitude and maximum upstroke derivative. Electroporation was voltage-dependent and polarity-dependent and was significantly more pronounced in the atria vs ventricles (P <.01), with a summary 50% of Effective Dose (ED50) for main measured parameters of 9.2 +/- 3.6 V/cm and 13.6 +/- 3.2 V/cm in the atria vs 37.4 +/- 1.5 V/cm and 48.4 +/- 2.8 V/cm in the ventricles, for anodal and cathodal stimuli, respectively. In atria (n = 5), shocks of both polarities (27.2 +/- 1.1 V/cm) transiently induced conduction block and reentry around the inexcitable area. Electroporation-induced ectopic activity was a possible trigger for reentry. However, in the thicker ventricles, electroporation and resulting conduction slowing and block were restricted to the surface only, preventing complete block and arrhythmia. The upstroke morphology revealed that the wave front dived below the electroporated region and resurfaced into unaffected epicardial tissue.

CONCLUSION

We showed that the atria are more vulnerable to electroporation and resulting block and arrhythmia than the ventricles.