Is ultrasound a feasible tool to verify endotracheal tube position in neonates?

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound compared to standard-of-care methods for endotracheal tube placement in neonates

INTRODUCTION

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool to determine endotracheal tube (ETT) placement; however, few studies have compared it with standard confirmation methods. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and time-to-interpretation for correct identification of tracheal versus esophageal intubations compared to a composite of standard-of-care methods in neonates.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan. All required intubations were performed as per NICU guidelines. The clinical team simultaneously determined the ETT placement using standard-of-care methods (auscultation, colorimetric capnography, and chest X-ray) by POCUS. In addition, the clinical team was blinded to the POCUS images. Timings were recorded for each method by independent study staff.

RESULTS

A total of 348 neonates were enrolled in the study. More than half (58%) of intubations were in an emergency scenario. POCUS user interpretation showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity using an expert as the reference standard. We found a 99.4% agreement (Kappa: 0.96; p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of POCUS compared with at least two standard-of-care methods demonstrated 99.7% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and 98.9% agreement (Kappa:0.93; p < 0.001). The median time required for POCUS interpretation was 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-4.0) seconds for tracheal intubation. The time recorded for auscultation and capnography was 6.0 (IQR 5.0-7.0) and 3.0 (IQR 3.0-4.0), respectively.

CONCLUSION

POCUS is a rapid and reliable method of identifying ETT placement in neonates. Early and correct identification of airway management is critical to save lives and prevent mortality and morbidity.

Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Endotracheal intubation in neonates is challenging and requires a high level of precision, due to narrow and short airways, especially in preterm newborns. The current gold standard for endotracheal tube (ETT) verification is chest X-ray (CXR); however, this method presents some limitations, such as ionizing radiation exposure and delayed in obtaining the radiographic images, that point of care ultrasound (POCUS) could overcome.

Primary Objective

To evaluate ultrasound efficacy in determining ETT placement adequacy in preterm and term newborns.

Secondary Objective

To compare the time required for ultrasound confirmation vs. time needed for other standard of care methods.

Search Methods

A search in Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed. Our most recent search was conducted in September 2021 including the following keywords: "newborn", "infant", "neonate", "endotracheal intubation", "endotracheal tube", "ultrasonography", "ultrasound".

Selection Criteria

We considered randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies published after 2012, involving neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients needing intubation/intubated infants and evaluating POCUS efficacy and/or accuracy in detecting ETT position vs. a defined gold-standard method. Three review authors independently assessed the studies' quality and extracted data.

Main Results

We identified 14 eligible studies including a total of 602 ETT evaluations in NICU or in the delivery room. In about 80% of cases the gold standard for ETT position verification was CXR. Ultrasound was able to identify the presence of ETT in 96.8% of the evaluations, with a pooled POCUS sensitivity of 93.44% (95% CI: 90.4-95.75%) in detecting an appropriately positioned ETT as assessed by CXR. Bedside ultrasound confirmation was also found to be significantly faster compared to obtaining a CXR.

Conclusion

POCUS appears to be a fast and effective technique to identify correct endotracheal intubation in newborns. This review could add value and importance to the use of this promising technique.

[Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube by Ultrasound in Neonates]

The reliable evaluation of a correctly placed endotracheal tube is an essential challenge in neonatology. Point-of-care ultrasound is an emerging method to address this concern with the following advantages: less time-consuming, no exposure to radiation, less staff-intensive, and high tolerability by the patients. This article focuses on the evaluation of the clinical application of point-of-care ultrasound to examine the position of the endotracheal tube with regard to visualization, consistency compared to the chest X-ray, and the level of training to obtain sufficient results. We identified nine studies relevant to these questions. The visualization of the endotracheal tube by using point-of-care ultrasound is highly effective. The assessment of a correctly placed endotracheal tube is comparable to the results of a chest X-ray. The technique is suitable for any examiner with previous ultrasound experience. Future applications such as emergency intubations, implementation in the standard care of extremely low birth weight preterm babies, and use in low-resource settings could be promising. This article offers a practical guideline to promote the level of awareness and the clinical application.

Point-of-care ultrasound in the neonatal ICU

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an emerging clinical tool in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Recent literature describing the use of POCUS for various applications in the NICU has garnered increased interest among neonatologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnostic applications for POCUS in the NICU include the evaluation and serial monitoring of common pulmonary diseases, hemodynamic instability, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), among others. Procedural applications include vascular access, endotracheal intubation, lumbar puncture, and fluid drainage.

SUMMARY

Experience with POCUS in the NICU is growing. Current evidence supports the use of POCUS for a number of diagnostic and procedural applications. As use of this tool increases, there is an urgent need to develop formal training requirements specific to neonatology, as well as evidence-based guidelines to standardize use across centers.

Ultrasonographic confirmation of endotracheal intubation in extremely low birthweigh infants - secondary publication

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of ultrasonography (US) for confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) placement during resuscitation in extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of ELBW infants in whom ETT position was verified using US between June 2016 and September 2017. We investigated the backgrounds of the patients and US investigators, and the time required for the detection of exhaled carbon dioxide using the colorimetric method and US.

RESULTS

Eleven ELBW infants were evaluated using US by four neonatologists. The median duration required to determine the ETT position by the colorimetric method and US were 11 s and 3 s, respectively. In six ELBW infants, we were able to verify the ETT position more rapidly using US than using the colorimetric method, and were able to perform prompt resuscitation. Unnecessary reintubations were avoided in three ELBW infants.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography allowed the swift confirmation of the tracheal intubations. The colorimetric method yielded false negative results; in such cases, unnecessary reintubation could have been avoided if US was used. We assessed the mechanism of false negative results and performed appropriate resuscitation.

A novel training simulator for portable ultrasound identification of incorrect newborn endotracheal tube placement - observational diagnostic accuracy study protocol

Background

Endotracheal tube (ETT) placement is a critical procedure for newborns that are unable to breathe. Inadvertent esophageal intubation can lead to oxygen deprivation and consequent permanent neurological impairment. Current standard-of-care methods to confirm ETT placement in neonates (auscultation, colorimetric capnography, and chest x-ray) are time consuming or unreliable, especially in the stressful resuscitation environment. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the neck has recently emerged as a powerful tool for detecting esophageal ETTs. It is accurate and fast, and is also easy to learn and perform, especially on children.

Methods

This will be an observational diagnostic accuracy study consisting of two phases and conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. In phase 1, neonatal health care providers that currently perform standard-of-care methods for ETT localization, regardless of experience in portable ultrasound, will undergo a two-hour training session. During this session, providers will learn to detect tracheal vs. esophageal ETTs using POCUS. The session will consist of a didactic component, hands-on training with a novel intubation ultrasound simulator, and practice with stable, ventilated newborns. At the end of the session, the providers will undergo an objective structured assessment of technical skills, as well as an evaluation of their ability to differentiate between tracheal and esophageal endotracheal tubes. In phase 2, newborns requiring intubation will be assessed for ETT location via POCUS, at the same time as standard-of-care methods. The initial 2 months of phase 2 will include a quality assurance component to ensure the POCUS accuracy of trained providers. The primary outcome of the study is to determine the accuracy of neck POCUS for ETT location when performed by neonatal providers with focused POCUS training, and the secondary outcome is to determine whether neck POCUS is faster than standard-of-care methods.

Discussion

This study represents the first large investigation of the benefits of POCUS for ETT confirmation in the sickest newborns undergoing intubations for respiratory support.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03533218. Registered May 2018.

Role of ultrasound in confirmation of endotracheal tube in neonates: a review

Tracheal intubation (TI) is a commonly done procedure in neonatal intensive care unit and delivery room during resuscitation. The confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) position should be done quickly as tube malposition is associated with various serious adverse outcomes like hypoxemia, right upper lobe collapse, atelectasis, air leak syndromes and esophageal intubation. ETT position can be confirmed by various methods like clinical sign, chest radiography, capnography, external digital tracheal palpation, ultrasonography (USG), respiratory function monitor, video-laryngoscope and fiberoptic devices. The current gold standard test to confirm ETT position is a chest radiograph, but it has many fallacies thus presently there is the need for a modality that helps in detection of endotracheal intubation and tube position with minimal complications. USG has been used in adult and pediatric population for detecting ETT position but there are very less studies in neonates. In this review, we analyze all the published studies, case reports and personal experiences that have sought the use of USG in neonatal population for detection of ETT position.

Measuring Endotracheal Tube Depth by Bedside Ultrasound in Adult Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study

The aim of the study described here was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of measuring endotracheal tube (ETT) depth with ultrasound in adult patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). The distance between the upper margin of the cuff and the upper margin of the aortic arch (Duc-ua) of 67 ICU patients was measured by ultrasound, and the time of measurement was recorded. The level of agreement between the distance between the tip of the ETT and the carina (Dtt-c) measured by ultrasound (U-Dtt-c) and Dtt-c measured by bronchoscopy (B-Dtt-c) was assessed using linear regression and a Bland-Altman plot. There was a significant correlation between B-Dtt-c and U-Dtt-c (r = 0.844, p < 0.001). Also, the Bland-Altman plot revealed strong agreement between B-Dtt-c and U-Dtt-c. The time it took to measure ETT depth by ultrasound was 33.91 ± 5.43 s. In conclusion, bedside ultrasound provides a novel and convenient method for measuring the depth of ETT in ICU patients.

Bedside Ultrasound for Tracheal Tube Verification in Pediatric Emergency Department and ICU Patients: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Improper placement of the tracheal tube during intubation can lead to dangerous complications, and bedside ultrasound has been proposed as a method of quickly and accurately identifying tube placement. Recent studies in adults have found it to be accurate, but its applicability in pediatric patients is unclear. This systematic review aims to describe the current available data on the accuracy and feasibility of bedside ultrasound for tracheal tube placement in children.

DATA SOURCES

OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE.

STUDY SELECTION

Available articles on bedside neck or lung/diaphragm ultrasound for confirmation of tracheal tube placement in children through December 2015.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers screened studies for eligibility and abstracted data independently. The quality of selected articles was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies statement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of nine articles were identified: one study using neck ultrasound, two using lung/diaphragmatic ultrasound, one with both, and five studies looking at direct visualization of the tracheal tube tip met our inclusion criteria. There were 81 intubations evaluated using neck ultrasound, 214 intubations evaluated using diaphragmatic or pleural sliding, and 165 intubations evaluated for feasibility of bedside ultrasound in visualizing tracheal tube tip placement. The sensitivities of transtracheal ultrasound for intubation were overall high ranging from 0.92 to 1.00 with excellent specificities at 1.00. For lung ultrasound, the sensitivities for tracheal placement versus esophageal placement were high at 1.00, but only one study reported esophageal intubations and had a specificity of 1.00. When assessing the appropriate tracheal tube depth for tracheal intubations using lung ultrasound, the sensitivities ranged from 0.91 to 1.00 with specificities ranging from 0.5 to 1.0. Regarding feasibility of direct visualization of tracheal tube tip, visualization ranged from 83% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Bedside ultrasound has been described to be feasible in determining tracheal tube placement in several small single center studies and could be a useful adjunct tool in confirming tracheal tube placement in critically ill pediatric patients, but further studies are needed to assess its accuracy in a randomized multicenter setting.

The concordance of ultrasound technique versus X-ray to confirm endotracheal tube position in neonates

OBJECTIVE

Given the distressingly high incidence of ETT malposition in the neonatal population, patients are exposed to ionizing radiation to confirm endotracheal tube (ETT) position. Our objective is to determine if ultrasound technique is concordant with X-ray in determining whether an ETT is deeply positioned or not.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational clinical trial. After obtaining informed consent, patients with an ETT who required X-ray for clinical reasons underwent sonographic evaluation of the ETT by an ultrasound technologist or pediatric radiologist, usually within the hour.

RESULTS

A total of 56 image pairs were obtained from 29 patients. Ninety-eight percent of the ultrasound/X-ray image pairs were suitable for analysis. The concordance of ultrasound with X-ray to identify deeply and not deeply positioned ETTs was 95% (53/56). The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect deeply positioned ETTs on X-ray was 86% (6/7). The specificity of ultrasound to detect ETTs that were not deeply positioned on X-ray was 96% (47/49).

CONCLUSIONS

As the largest clinical trial of its kind to date, with the greatest number of ultrasound operators, we have further established US as a feasible imaging modality to determine whether an ETT is deeply positioned or not.