1
|
Lang M, Kenda M, Scheel M, Martola J, Wheeler M, Owen S, Johnsson M, Annborn M, Dankiewicz J, Deye N, Düring J, Friberg H, Halliday T, Jakobsen JC, Lascarrou JB, Levin H, Lilja G, Lybeck A, McGuigan P, Rylander C, Sem V, Thomas M, Ullén S, Undén J, Wise MP, Cronberg T, Wassélius J, Nielsen N, Leithner C, Moseby-Knappe M. Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:1096-1107. [PMID: 38900283 PMCID: PMC11245448 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07497-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Application of standardised and automated assessments of head computed tomography (CT) for neuroprognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS Prospective, international, multicentre, observational study within the Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TTM2) trial. Routine CTs from adult unconscious patients obtained > 48 h ≤ 7 days post-arrest were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by seven international raters blinded to clinical information using a pre-published protocol. Grey-white-matter ratio (GWR) was calculated from four (GWR-4) and eight (GWR-8) regions of interest manually placed at the basal ganglia level. Additionally, GWR was obtained using an automated atlas-based approach. Prognostic accuracies for prediction of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) for the qualitative assessment and for the pre-defined GWR cutoff < 1.10 were calculated. RESULTS 140 unconscious patients were included; median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-76), 76% were male, and 75% had poor outcome. Standardised qualitative assessment and all GWR models predicted poor outcome with 100% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI] 90-100). Sensitivity in median was 37% for the standardised qualitative assessment, 39% for GWR-8, 30% for GWR-4 and 41% for automated GWR. GWR-8 was superior to GWR-4 regarding prognostic accuracies, intra- and interrater agreement. Overall prognostic accuracy for automated GWR (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91) did not significantly differ from manually obtained GWR. CONCLUSION Standardised qualitative and quantitative assessments of CT are reliable and feasible methods to predict poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest. Automated GWR has the potential to make CT quantification for neuroprognostication accessible to all centres treating cardiac arrest patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margareta Lang
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Martin Kenda
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Scheel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Juha Martola
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matthew Wheeler
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Stephanie Owen
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Mikael Johnsson
- Department of Radiology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Martin Annborn
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Josef Dankiewicz
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nicolas Deye
- Department of Medical and Toxicological Intensive Care Unit, Inserm UMR-S 942, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Joachim Düring
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Hans Friberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Thomas Halliday
- Department of Operation and Intensive Care, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Janus Christian Jakobsen
- Department of Regional Health Research, The Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou
- Medecine Intensive Reanimation, Movement-Interactions-Performance,, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, MIP, UR 4334, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Helena Levin
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Research and Education, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Gisela Lilja
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anna Lybeck
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Peter McGuigan
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Christian Rylander
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Victoria Sem
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Central Hospital of Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden
| | - Matthew Thomas
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston, Bristol, UK
| | - Susann Ullén
- Clinical Studies Sweden‑Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Undén
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Operation and Intensive Care, Hallands Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Matt P Wise
- Adult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Tobias Cronberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Wassélius
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Niklas Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Christoph Leithner
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marion Moseby-Knappe
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
- Department of Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|